Think Big By Thinking Small - Solves Everything
(media.gab.com)
Comments (42)
sorted by:
Da fuk those idiots babbling about?
Even for them,connecting racism to tiny houses, is crack head thinking. Someone must be writing this to make them look stupid.
Well if they are drugged out, they are easily swayed.
Not until those who are preaching this nonsense proceed to downsize from their mega mansions
Ding ding ding ding, We have a winner!!!!that’s the ticket!!😁😁😁😁
And shut down
Finally, an advertisement with WHITE people!! Oh shit, we are racist again...
Own shit and be happy.
Notice the symbolism of the kid behind the netting?
Missing his mask.
Can't see anything, what did I miss?
It looks like a cage.
It is. And what's more, you will own nothing and rent everything, according to Klaus.
They plan to counter that by having us eat the frogs and the locusts.
we ARE the frogs ...
retards. I have a huge house and try and take it from me. diversity is a cancer.
NOT gonna happen here, I MUST have space
Go fuck yourself Klaus, I have worked hard for what I have…let’s see you lead by example, you fucking freak.
Tiny houses will make nice summer lake or river getaways.
Ooo just think of what one stinky diaper would do in that place
🤣😂🥹🥹
Remember guys: we all have to downsize our homes. And by "our" they mean us, not them.
Let them try, (keep your arms handy folks)
Eff that. I will live in no less than 1400 sq ft with my own personal bathroom because MY LABOR helps pay for the kind of home I WANT. I bet that’s mega raycis kek
Tiny house on a large plot of land sounds best. Big barn, tiny house.
Just like the Fauxbamas' new tiny home on Martha's Vineyard?
Dear God I can’t believe this is real
"Friends" was a show meant to promote the idea of several people living together because Hollywood agendas.
now thats a stretch that stretch armstrong would be proud of.
You mean Friends didn't promote and play upon the idea of 'friends' being defined as roommates, rather than individuals with individual homes?
It wasn't normalizing group living?
How could that be a stretch when that's the obvious theme, were you watching a different show?
It was set in NYC, where most people live in apartments. If you want to make this argument, Full House would be more apt.
In NYC, where most people need the normalization and serves as the example to be normalized.
Exactly.
Full house is about adoption of large numbers of children into foster homes.
Who's the Boss is about emasculation of men in the home.
To be even more 'apt' about the 'argument'.
Every movie/show has cross agendas. Name one.
Full House was about a widower with three daughters who had one friend living in his basement and another friend with a wife and a set of twins living in the attic. What show are you thinking of?
Try the True story of Yours Mine and Ours (original version)
From the old joke: A Hollywood couple was overhead saying, "My kids and your kids are beating up on our kids."
I was referring to the true story about a widower Whidbey Island Naval Captain with ten kids who married a widow who had eight kids (or vise versa) and had two more kids. Henry Fonda and Lucille Ball were the actors
it was about a bunch of people living in a very expensive to live in shithole where they were put in weird situtations because they didnt have a home and could never afford one in that shithole. It was about making the best of living in an overcrowded shithole of a city and making their way through their pathetic lives as best as they could.....at least thats how I took it and Jen was hot in that nippy studio.
Note, not even an operable window.
Looks like a family sized cage to me.
don't they mean 'nothing but the bare essentials'?
trying not to use the word nothing? You will own all but the essentials and you will be happy lol what
Lol WEF don't even logic
🙄🙄🙄🙄🥸🥸🥸🥸🧐🧐🧐