Remember, Azovstol in Mariupol did not surrender. They just ended their "combat mission" 🤡
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (135)
sorted by:
pruning the off-topic items
Well if it’s over, do we get our $40 billion back?
No backsies
They haven't got it yet and I don't think they will.
Already offshored to 150 different accounts in 17 countries all owned by trusts.
Azov are not retreating, they are just advancing in another direction.
That reminds me of our cadet sergeant major at school who went through WW2 as a Grenadier Guardsman. He always used to tell us that the British Army never retreated rather it would retire to previously prerpared positions!
the wounded are a ruse to get past the Russians.
They are advancing in a̶n̶o̶t̶h̶e̶r̶ reverse direction
Kek
Next thing you know, wikipedia will be changing the definition of "lost"
"Lost" is a very triggering word. It's also relative. Is it really losing if someone simply chooses not to play anymore?
The Ukraine didn't lose. They just chose not to play the game with Russia anymore 5 seconds before the timer ran out and they were down 30 points. Since they broke the timer, grabbed the ball, and ran off the field they didn't "lose". They just stopped playing. Therefore, Russia didn't win.
It's like if you put me in "checkmate" but before you can say it I flip the board and say "this game is stupid". You didn't win because I overturned the board.
See how this works? I didn't lose. I just chose not to play anymore.
Hey, thats not what happened. They actually begged and begged and begged to be allowed to run away, and finally they surrendered.
Media makes you think Russia's objective was to take over the whole of Ukraine. And hence you think they didnt win.
Always remember what the stated objectives by the Russian MoD
De-nazification - succeeded spectacularly in this
De-militarisation - succeeded to the point they need 40 billion more to replenish
To make it neutral - we have to wait and see what happens in the end. My bet - they will (if they exists as a country) be neutral after this.
"Hey, thats not what happened. They actually begged and begged and begged to be allowed to run away, and finally they surrendered."
Yes, I know. I meant the MSM is portraying it like it they didn't lose. My sarcasm may not have been clear.
I meant how the MSM is trying to portray it is completely opposite of reality. It was a complete loss, but they don't want to admit that.
Haha, yeah .... I forgot the full context for the thread, makes sense.
Evacuated like a shit from my bowels.
And ... mission accomplished
Weird they pick 5/17 as the day to end their "combat mission".
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/live-blog/russia-ukraine-war-live-updates-fighters-evacuate-azovstal-mariupol-rcna29151
I am feeling a decode is in the air ...
Or another reused photo from what appears to be a funeral. Why all the fighting age men behind them if this was al all-out battle? Why are they all staring in same direction?
Yeah, there is tragedy everywhere. No doubt many good Ukrainians lost their life for their unseen overlords.
Lol where the fuck have you been shill? Probably living under a rock. Well if you were as smart as you think you are, you would clearly see that we on this board want the corrupt NWO trial government in Ukraine gone. The citizens are like us, victims to the system. A system that seems like it's being removed slowly every day. But anyway! That's probably too many big words for your smooth brain to comprehend, so I'll just stop there so you can absorb this information. Clown.
What kind of absurdity is this, lol.
Ran away. They ran away.
Bravely ran away.
Did not!
Sauce: https://nitter.net/nytimes/status/1526336507430182912
I had to take this and run with it. Kek.
https://greatawakening.win/p/15HvGMKFEG/how-to-say-surrender-in-french/c/
😂Good try fake news faggots! They had their asses handed to them! GTFOH
How is this picture relevant to Nazis being overrun and defeated? LOL
that's a funny way of the NYT wording the Nazis got their ass kicked, again.
wow
They're advancing to the rear.
I did nazi that coming…
No it didn't demon!
Remdesivir is used IN CONJUNCTION with the Respirators to kill people. It weakens the lungs and the respirators damage them. Just because it MAY help in stopping the virus from replicating DOES NOT mean its the best thing to use or that its harmful effects aren't more dangerous than getting Covid was.
" The most common side effects in Remdesivir studies for COVID-19 include respiratory failure and organ dysfunction, including low albumin, low potassium, low red blood cell count, low platelet count, which helps clots, and yellow skin discoloration." https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33060041/
Ok tinfoil hat nutter. Where are you getting that quote because its not in the study that you linked.
Rem is not used to stop the virus. Its used to clear the lungs and fight pneumonia. In which its very effective against. I just posted 3 links showing how effective it is.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7326458/
"As described in previous case reports (Grein et al., 2020, Kujawski et al., 2020), four of the five patients experienced major side effects while on remdesivir treatment: two suffered acute renal injury and two had a maculopapular rash with cytolytic hepatitis.
Both kidney failure events could have been related either to remdesivir or to the SARS-CoV-2 infection. None of these patients received immunomodulatory drugs. Grein et al. (2020) described 53 COVID-19 patients treated with remdesivir, among whom 30 were on mechanical ventilation. After a median follow-up of 18 days after remdesivir initiation, a total of 25 (47%) were discharged; seven (13%) died and 10 were still on invasive mechanical ventilation. No virological data were available in that report."
Here's another.
Im trying to find the study that showed everyone who had kidney or liver issues were on heavy drugs like fentanyl.
Because last time it sent people on a tirade claiming that hospitals are dosing people with fentanyl lol.
13% of patients on vent died while using rem. Thats probably accurate.
We had 7 die in 7 months. All over 65 with copd.
Covid and pneumonia is very dangerous for the elderly, 100% fatal if untreated. So id like to see a comparison to those on vent not given rem and see how they faired.
Imagine arguing with yourself and then declaring yourself the winner when no one has responded within your arbitrary timeline.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31022-9/fulltext
"Remdesivir use was not associated with a difference in time to clinical improvement (hazard ratio 1·23 [95% CI 0·87–1·75]). Although not statistically significant, patients receiving remdesivir had a numerically faster time to clinical improvement than those receiving placebo among patients with symptom duration of 10 days or less (hazard ratio 1·52 [0·95–2·43]). Adverse events were reported in 102 (66%) of 155 remdesivir recipients versus 50 (64%) of 78 placebo recipients. Remdesivir was stopped early because of adverse events in 18 (12%) patients versus four (5%) patients who stopped placebo early."
Here's one for you buddy boy.
Yeah it showed those who received rem had longer stays. Well no shit sherlock, rem was used a last resort tool. If youre getting rem its because youre in very bad shape.
Most patients with covid were treated with a vitamin pack.
And youre still not proving that rem is murdering people. Back pedal all you want, but you people are still spouting ignorance and unsupported claims.
Not one person can prove rem is killing people. Specially not to the scale that you people claim. You literally think its a death sentence and that hospitals are getting paid to murder with rem/vent, but cant even begin to prove it.
Hospitals getting paid to kill with rem is on the level of shape shifting reptilians kind of crazy. You are that level of nuts.
Hey fren ... you're wasting your time. The Anti-Remdesivir crowd on here are worse than the pink hats out in front of Alito's house right now. You are right with all of your assertions. They refuse to read. Lay this one down. I got into this fray with these crazies several months ago on this very subject, and the downvotes and vile comments and vitriol were mind-bending.
Yep, they roll out their spam brigade and just ruin any possibility of discussion. It was nice hearing of your positive experience, thank you for that.
But im not sure why this site pushing that narrative so hard. Its a bit unsettling.
Agreed 100%. It's like the mask Nazis - only opposite.
Exactly lol, and its nice to see some common sense on this page. They've created such an echo chamber its almost like the right wing version of twitter.
A) you're lumping each individual who disagrees with you on any level in the same group that thinks it was a 100% death sentence
B) you seem to have a preconceived bias and self interest in defending hospital protocols and treatment. I wouldn't be surprised if you worked in health-care yourself.
These Rockefeller controlled medical institutions are not stupid. On the contrary in fact. They are well aware that they cannot simply throw caution to the wind and greenlight such recklessly dangerous treatment protocols with flagrant scientific documentation demonstrating it does more harm than good.
However, this is exactly why these government institutions (that direct the protocols set by hospital boards) follow the same modus operandi that the various mainstream media channels and news publications use to push their false narratives.
They utilize framing devices to misdirect readers as well as "lying by omission", in which they purposefully leave out important facts and context in order to redirect people to reach false conclusions of safety
And the ultimate end goal of all this clever manipulation is to achieve their ulterior evil objectives and to maintain one thing. Plausible deniability.
Flash back to the interview Tucker had with Tony Bobulinski regarding the corrupt overseas business dealings he was witnessing the Biden family get into. When Bobulinski asked Joe Biden, "how do you intend to get away with all of this?" What was the response Joe gave?
Two words. Plausible Deniability.