Nose job, boob job, married to jared. She has shitty judgement, so why care about her input? Even the way she made this particular judgement is shitty: she didn’t go over the evidence herself, she just accepted what Barr said. Worthless
tons of make up if it is her. Reminds me of that AI program where you take the target person(in this case Ivanka) and scan it over the person who is talking and end up with something that, looks mostly like the target person but, has a slight accent of the actual person talking. I am going with that it is Ivanka though with tons of make up or something. heh.
If it isn't Ivanka, where is she to dispute it? If she doesn't dispute it, does that mean she's in on it? If so, why not just appear?
Seems like a lot of work, if that's the case.
She could also be setting herself up as a "skeptic", so that when further evidence surfaces she can become a "believer" and help others change their mind. That's a big guess on my part, but it seems plausible. Time will tell.
Either way, it's political theater. Show trial, indeed.
Right of the bat I recognize a deepfake's tendency to make certain areas more diffuse...
You mainly see it in the lower quality ones but if this was a real-time equivalent of a deepfake the amount of processing power required could explain it.
This either means that the DS are so stretched for resources that the MUCH better technology that used to be available to them simply isn't anymore and they have to resort to what basically ammounts to a hopped-up real-time deepfake where in the past they had next-level AI systems capable of much better results...
Or that this is a part of the show and done deliberately and just poorly enough to cause just the kind of reaction that motivated this post...
"The Guardian". Nuff said?
If you watch the video rather than a screenshot, it's clearly her. Individual screenshots can look off or manipulated.
Nose job, boob job, married to jared. She has shitty judgement, so why care about her input? Even the way she made this particular judgement is shitty: she didn’t go over the evidence herself, she just accepted what Barr said. Worthless
It's not Ivanka though.
#notIvanka #where’sIvanka #whatmakesagreatmovie?
tons of make up if it is her. Reminds me of that AI program where you take the target person(in this case Ivanka) and scan it over the person who is talking and end up with something that, looks mostly like the target person but, has a slight accent of the actual person talking. I am going with that it is Ivanka though with tons of make up or something. heh.
I agree. Her features are too large to be the real Ivanka, and the real Ivanka doesn't have that voice.
If it isn't Ivanka, where is she to dispute it? If she doesn't dispute it, does that mean she's in on it? If so, why not just appear?
Seems like a lot of work, if that's the case.
She could also be setting herself up as a "skeptic", so that when further evidence surfaces she can become a "believer" and help others change their mind. That's a big guess on my part, but it seems plausible. Time will tell.
Either way, it's political theater. Show trial, indeed.
She’s looking Kardashian-ish….
My first thought too. Kim Kardashian now looks entirely different like she has been replaced.
Kanye woke up the real Kim so they had to replace her.
Kim Kardashian looks totally different these days too. Wonder if she was “removed”.
ANSWER: AI processing to blend Ivanka and Maria???
Why is she going against her dad this is really fucking wierd.
Weird! If I saw that photo I wouldn’t recognize her as Ivanka. Is Ivanka being held prisoner somewhere?
Right of the bat I recognize a deepfake's tendency to make certain areas more diffuse...
You mainly see it in the lower quality ones but if this was a real-time equivalent of a deepfake the amount of processing power required could explain it.
This either means that the DS are so stretched for resources that the MUCH better technology that used to be available to them simply isn't anymore and they have to resort to what basically ammounts to a hopped-up real-time deepfake where in the past they had next-level AI systems capable of much better results...
Or that this is a part of the show and done deliberately and just poorly enough to cause just the kind of reaction that motivated this post...
I think the latter.
Don't think that hard about it. I'm sure you guys are aware of deepfakes. But also, yes, that doesn't look like her.
This is a woman who rejected Jesus Christ as her Lord and Savior just to get married. It should be no surprise that she turned on her father.
That is not her. Is the Guardian putting up fake photos? Or has she been replaced?
I don't think that's even a woman.
Is this the same fake person who we saw playing Cher the other day?
Cherbromvovic
Not her.
I would like to see this. Got a name or a site with a video of that? Cheers.
Hey thanks. That was interesting to see. Brief, but interesting. I wonder if side o beef is actually gone and RRN is serious :p.
Remember when democrat cried about deepfakes being a threat to mih democracy? Pepe does...
Another bullshit fucking rabbit hole to nowhereland
She's a lib, always been a lib.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivanka_Trump#Career This is not the same person.