In my opinion, the video is very clear. Nearby sodium lighting experienced a surge of power at nearly the same time as the Guidestones exploded into pieces, indicating a powerful electric field in the area.
There was no orange flash indicating high explosives and no saboteurs were caught on camera.
A lightning strike can be ruled out because there was none in the area at the time of the strike. Even if it was lightning, the time of the strike, 4:03.33, is a message only capable of being delivered by a DEW, which travel at 186,000 miles per second.
If it is known that this was a DEW strike, that would mean the US Military is responsible. They are the only ones with the available technology and control of Theater.
I had strong suspicions about the strike on the George Floyd mural for similar reasons.
I believe the fruits of POTUS45's formation of Space Force are now being realized.
Lovely piece of work though - God Bless whomever did this
Did you notice how quickly they managed to finish them off?
I predict that the site will, one day in the future, will host a statue of DJ Trump. First President of the Neo Republic of America.
To my way of thinking, that rapid demolition leans away from any DEW strike. If you were trying to cover up the use of conventional explosives, and hide any residues, traces of accelerants etc, then you would send in a team to remove anything incriminating as fast as you could.
What are presumed energy weapons probably wouldn't leave a trace if you figure all that was imparted was thermal energy - at the very least nothing that any lab could plausibly extract and analyze.
Just had a text from Fr. Ockham who thinks it's a NATO shoulder mounted bazooka thingy, sold on the black market by a Ukrainian deserter.
”thermal energy”Electromagnetic energy.The EM spectrum is all different types of electromagnetic energy (light) that can be reflective or emissive, visible to the human eye or invisible, high energy or low energy, short wavelength or long wavelength, in particle and/or wave form. Thermal radiation is emissive EM light radiation generated specifically from the motion of atoms referred to as “thermal energy.” There are areas of the EM spectrum (typically IR) that are characterized by thermal effects where some heat energy is converted into EM energy (Also note that, conversely, some EM energy can be converted in thermal energy), but there are also areas of the spectrum that generally are not.
In short, radiated EM energy can be thermal radiation from thermal energy, but not necessarily. So don’t confuse the two as interchangeable.
…
Now, that that’s clearer, I’d like to emphasize that, theoretically, directed energy can be from any part of the EM spectrum. Therefore, there can be varying effects, such as reflections or reemission in the same or different parts of the spectrum (dependent on the transmitting material), which are not entirely limited to thermal.
So your last statement is false—Depending on what area of the spectrum used & how much power through what material, a directed energy weapon would still leave traces (thermal effects being one of the more lasting ones, but not necessarily the only one) that can be detected by various types of EM sensors, be it immediately transferred/dissipated or lasting within the leftover medium. You still would want to get rid of or minimize those traces, especially if it might reveal that they were caused by some sort of Top Secret technology that needs to remain TS…
Conveniently, tearing up, moving, & mixing matter is one of the most effective ways to dissipate residual thermal energy or even transformative chemical effects within the material structure that might have been deposited or caused by a high energy EM beam.
I appreciate you took the time to write that, but you really didn't understand the point I was making perhaps. Thermal energy is probably the most expected and common outcome from whatever beam was used here, right? Sit in the sun, you are gonna feel it. Ditto on why food heats up in the microwave. Anything that kicks electrons up an energy state is going to inevitably heat up the material, and thats gonna happen by photon absorption from whatever EM is on it.
You are certainly right about signs of burning, melting etc being a trace though. I dont know how the material degrades under heat, but I figure there is gonna be some scorching evident.
Yeah, I wasn’t sure if you were just summarizing causation or legitimately confused the concepts, so I just clarified to be on the safe side. Sorry if I got a little Sperg-ish there—I have tendency to get too focused on the technical when I’m in that “mode,” heh.
But even if you are aware, I still hope it can clarify for anyone else reading who may not know the difference.
———————
Scorching might be one sign, but I’m talking beyond that & even internally—Like changing of the chemical structure due to the energy breaking chemical bonds & catalyzing other reactions with those reagents. You might find tiny pockets or traces of reformed granite or other igneous/metamorphic rock of different yet derivative chemical structure that ordinarily is not consistent with that rock. (You would want to get rid of the leftover rock, so a demo & disposal removes that particular kind of evidence.)
Someone also mentioned trapped water, or possibly catalyzed reactions creating water that was not there previously, heating up & causing enough pressure to explode. That makes sense to me because that rock exploded like a boiled egg I stuck in my microwave once.
Heating/energizing rock also weakens it structurally on a chemical & physical level, and causes the material to expand. If that happens too quickly (like with concentrated high power), the pressure from catalyzing reactions creating other chemical forms and/or expansion could cause it to explode with force.
It is possible to cut granite with lasers, for the record. So if the force & energy of a laser cutter is enough to mechanically crumble it, then on a physical force level, enough power can cause it to explode with greater force.
It all makes sense because the same energy that could leave sensor-detectable radiation and heat can also leave traces of rock chemical structure inconsistencies and can also cause an explosion.
——————-
There was another poster here somewhere that said they have more experience with DEWs and target effects, though that was specifically in the IR & they didn’t go too deep into specifics (I still need to respond and ask more about that)—Just that this was “not it.” I am wondering what “is it.” And after thinking about it a bit more & looking up some atuff, I think IR might not be the type of weapon used. So they may be right about that part.
Ironically, I also study IR, but I am not as experienced as other experts who have lived longer than I have, so I could be wrong & it might be wise to defer to that poster. Still, the circle of more experienced experts I have been able to work with study IR atmospheric effects & IR materials, specifically with the goal of getting around degraded environment limitations. It also helps the DEW argument that the weather seemed to be clearer/less degraded on the day the guidestones exploded. So I’m still skeptical & leaning on the side of plausibility. I’m also aware that the military compartmentalizes everything, especially technology that is highly TS, so the other more experienced poster may not be aware of some work being done outside but still related to his specific area. Especially if we’re going to consider very, very specific IR bands or other bands outside IR…
…Like microwave lasers, which have been studied since the 50s. That type of energy beam would give you that microwaved boiled egg explosion effect. And while the waves have a tendency to be be absorbed by water in the atmosphere, they could still penetrate given enough power, & a close enough distance to the target—So maybe the laser isn’t coming from the sky strapped to a high flying plane or satellite, but somewhere nearby under cover from a land vehicle or a low-flying plane. It was dark when the explosion happened (4 am), so that’s good cover for a stealth plane or drone. I’m curious to see what the planefags noticed around the area at that time… This type of beam would work ideally in a place that is already hot, less humid/high pressure, & without cloud cover, which is exactly what the weather conditions were the morning the guidestones were destroyed according to an archived weather map (showing conditions around 7 am). The heating of the atmosphere caused by such a high-powered beam would also cause unusual stormy weather, which I have been noticing in various places lately. And it just so happens that the same afternoon at 2:15pm, there was suddenly a tornado warning for all of Northeast GA, including Eberton County, which is exactly where the guidestones were. You don’t have a tornado system suddenly show up in a dry weather system with no wet systems coming in and clashing with it. Though the wind at the time was blowing a pocket of a low pressure/wet system south, I’m not sure the pressure difference would be enough to cause such strong disturbances & enough rotation to cause a tornado without some help... I think this was a residual effect of the atmosphere being disturbed/irradiated with concentrated (possibly microwave) energy in that particular spot.
While a lot has been studied, when it comes to EM radiation, I’d say far from everything has been studied, at least not in specifics, nor all applications, nor with public disclosure… Or maybe I’m just an optimist.
——————-
Anyway, I’m just rambling about my theories out loud now. I will take no offense if you ignore me, lol.
The NRA…
I just happened to pause the video it at the moment of explosion. The orange ball of flame appears to the left and back of the structure, not coming from it! It's as if a cannon was sitting there in the dark and it was fired.
Anyway, as you watch the vid, keep your eye just below the light, not on the stones. I think it is a muzzle flash, and you can see a separate dustup below the light in a symmetrical pattern. Some form of artillery was rolled up there. I wonder if aerial footage would show light tracks in the grass?
Edit: I was turned around in my mind. Based on this aerial footage (https://greatawakening.win/p/15IY89wSV2/georgia-3-more-to-go/c/) I believe something was in the stone parking lot beneath the light (and thus camouflaged) and fired from there. The artillery round caused the rubble to blow away from the other slabs.
Neither a muzzle blast nor an explosive would have caused the security light to flare brighter like it did. If you watch the vid you will see the light flash much brighter for a millisecond. Only a surge of high energy could cause that light to flare.
I am pretty sure that's a light on the vehicle that is launching the round. But I don't know why the light would surge like that, unless it's not the light and instead something to do with the ignition of the projectile.
No it's a security light mounted on a pole. It's there all the time.
Okay. Well, I dont know what caused the surge, or if it even was a surge. It could have been the recording camera's adjustment as someone pointed out. But the explosion originates absolutely for sure under that light. And the direction of the rubble suggests impact from that direction, too.
If there is a flash of vapor, it would reflect light for an instant.
It could be the camera exposure levels adjusting down and back up.
They have video of a car driving past it on the grass about 10 seconds after the blast. I lean towards that.
Dude was prolly just there banging his girl and left in a hurry when shit started blowing up
She probably said, 'wow, you are amazing! I felt the earth shake!'
Maybe that was an FO (forward observer) putting a sparkle on the stones with a MKVII LTL for the weapons system or DEW.
Good possibility.
Really? Did you ever consider that the car could have been there randomly?. Did you also know that because that was a different camera angle footage could be easily spliced in? I'm not really sure how you connect a car to an explosion, anyways. By the way, where is the APB on the vehicle? There should be a nationwide manhunt.
I am not upset they were destroyed. I'm glad. I don't think they would have a nationwide manhunt. Or at least, I hope not. Most people saw it for what it was: a NWO wet dream. Good riddance. I hope they are not pursued or caught to be honest.
I don't think anybody's going to be pursuing the US Military. That is my point. If it's a DEW, it's US military. The US military just took out a Cabal monument with a bolt of lightning. The significance is absolutely Yuuuuuuuuge.
A DEW is most logical if you've studied them. An operation by some employing the capabilities of the US military is also most logical. People seem to think that the whole of the US armed forces is just one guy who carries out every operation and has the same thought about each event... It's like, oh, you live in Texas? Do you know the Bush's??? A DEW doesn't get fired by Private Ryan... whoever pulled the trigger on that is going to be hard to retaliate against. You're right, this is huge.
I have designed them and analyzed target effects. This was not a laser weapon (and there are no others). Just a simple demolition charge.
Reflection off dust or vapor. Who knows? You are trying to extract too much information from a data source that is inadequate.
yeah. Because I'm sure the military has nothing better to do at the moment until someone says, I got it, lets go partially blow up the GA Guidestones with a weapon unknown to the public!
Props though for originality amongst a flood of Guidestone posts
Boilerplate concern trolling, right there.
This is a message to the Cabal that any one of them could be struck at any moment. Don't tell me there is no purpose to this.
Remember, Lucifer descended to Earth within a bolt of lightning. I would call that perfect irony.
I agree with your above assessment. I believe that the entire incident will be memoryholed. Nor will we get any statement by the FBI regarding forensics. Reason being that they are not going to find any explosive residue because it was directed energy. The flare of the light is very interesting - they only surge due to energy fields.
Study DEW strikes. This is exactly what they look like. Them cleaning it up so fast is to hide their shame and move on asap. They wanted this monument to stand as a witness of defiance and "We warned you" in silence. The last thing they want right now is for the public to go Netherlands farmer/ Marvin Heemeyer on them.
Since there are no "DEW strikes" you have no idea what they "look like." I have designed laser weapons and analyzed target effects. This is not it.
Optics/photonics systems engineer with some materials knowledge, here.
Curious to know: What aspects did you design & in what area of the spectrum? And were the systems primarily ground, ship, air, or space-based? (Asking only if you can disclose, of course.)
I ask because I disagree with you & think DEW is possible, but my reasons are primarily based in theory as opposed to direct application.
If your expertise is primarily in one focus area or part of the spectrum, then there’s likely a lot more options to be explored & I’d say the jury is still out, haha.
Look up YAL-1A for the biggest one I worked on. All laser weapons are in shortwave infrared, 1-10 microns, for reasons of efficiency and effectiveness. Ground and ship weapons at 100 kW levels are in trials. Megawatt-class weapons have come and gone, thanks to President Obama. (I also did optical engineering before I moved to weapons.)
It's not possible for operational reasons. Nobody is going to take a mobile laser weapon for a joyride to try and conduct lethality experiments against slabs of stone. There is no reason to think that the observed effects would be possible (part of my job was target effects analysis).
Lasers are impeded by clouds, smoke, dust, and shrubbery. They are also clear-weather systems generally designed to seek and engage heat signatures. I've worked DEWs since the late 1970s. There are no other options within that category.
Thanks for this.
Coincidentally, I’m also studying IR, but I’m still new and haven’t been able to do as much background research as I would like. I’m also interested in several other areas (some totally unrelated), so my knowledge base is more spread & less concentrated. Thus, my experience (and the fact that a lot of this sort of research is under some sort of clearance to which I don’t currently have access) limits me with respect to what has or hasn’t already been done. I could learn & benefit a lot from asking you about your experience if you don’t mind me asking. Can I DM you to ask more specific questions?
——————
So far, I’m aware of degraded environment limits & the ship laser experiments, as I was able to study that much background at least. I know a couple people who are actively exploring getting around atmospheric degradation & deeper penetration of atmosphere, water, and earth. This was a while ago, so I don’t think it’s impossible, but I haven’t had the chance to keep up with specifics. I thought about a low-flying plane or drone with a DEW: I think that could be more plausible since the distance could be greatly decreased resulting in less beam spread. And I checked the weather—The conditions were ideal in that area that day, so there’s that. While there can be issues coordinating with a moving plane & target, an immobile target seems to ease things greatly. Some of my study has been in target identification, and there have been several advances in AI to make this significantly easier, too. But if not air/space, I also considered a land-based vehicle under cover of night with a clear view—The stones are in an open field with lots of farmland surrounding & few trees, so I would suspect shrubbery is less of an issue.
I don’t see why it’s not operationally possible for a military that has so many resources (albeit, not unlimited), and I don’t see, based on my knowledge of chemistry, rocks/minerals, and simple granite laser lithography research papers, why the effects we saw wouldn’t be possible… Can’t be too hard to buy a granite rock, ship it to base, and zap it with your in-house experimental weapon a bunch of times to see what happens, then follow it up with field tests if it shows promise. You might not even need a large scale experiment to create something that is effective.
I apologize if I seem to be harping on about this and am annoying you with it. I am naturally a thorough person who likes to explore every possibility down to the last detail, and I happen to be stubborn enough to see it through… (Especially if it something doesn’t seem to match my intuition based on my perspective of the bigger picture.) I suppose my thinking out loud like this is my version of creative thought experiments. Maybe it’s just my lack of experience, or maybe I’m just a stubborn, nit-picky optimist, but it still seems like there’s possibility there to me.
Regardless, I really appreciate your feedback.
Yoicks! Well, thank you for the kind respect. Somewhat rare in this environment.
Let me see if I can be helpful in this environment. I don't know of any DM feature in this page and I have scruples about dropping my pseudonym.
Just to set the stage, it seems pretty clear that the stones were damaged by an explosive charge placed by a person unknown but caught on video. That is the obvious and expectable explanation, completely consistent with the video of the blast. No need to pursue any other.
But you have to realize that laser weapons (DEW entails other categories, but only lasers have been brought to a point of utility) are expensive, not commonly available, and exist at the test and trial level today. They are classified and under tight access control. You can see where I am going. There is no way that such technology will be allowed to participate in a stupid and illegal fraternity prank. It is out of the question. Anyone who imagines otherwise has no idea of how classified programs are pursued, how the military operates, or why illegal acts are beyond the pale.
But to get back to laser weapons. Early it was determined there were two basic categories: pulsed weapons and continuous-wave (CW) weapons. The pulsed weapon stores up all its lethal energy to be released in a single pulse of electromagnetic radiation that lasts maybe milliseconds or microseconds. The target surface ablation can result in kinetic effects, like pressure, as well as heat deposition. But the research rather quickly determined that there was a lot of effort to make the pulses, and the target effects were not easily predictable or impressive. So, research bent toward the CW laser, whose effect is like a blowtorch (heat deposition) spread over several seconds of dwelling on a target aimpoint. Easy enough to attain the melting temperature of most common aerospace metals. This is what current weapons are.
Hypothetically, the stones could have been a good target...if the air was clear, there were no density ripples (convection), and the target effects were well understood and predicted, and the beam sightline did not have to move out of alignment with the target aimpoint. I'm not so sure the actual event (explosion from behind) would have been consistent with the only available sightline (from the front). But there is no point in elaborating that hypothesis, since it has been found to be otherwise.
As for target effects, you have to approach it scientifically. Given what you know, what effects would ensue? You can't wave your arms and say "why wouldn't it be possible?" You have to establish that it would be possible. I have seen a benchtop CO2 laser raise a hot spot on a piece of firebrick that went white-hot, probably for a beam intensity of 10 watts/cm2. The equilibrium intensity of molten aluminum is about 1.4 W/m2. Titanium is a bit higher. But the brick was not affected. When the beam was turned off, the glow dimmed and the brick went back to its previous condition. Why would I think that a dressed stone would be any different? A hot spot might provoke cracks if the stone had a high coefficient of thermal expansion, but did it? And how high is high enough, given that firebrick was immune?
There are other aspects to a laser engagement. One of them is the likelihood of stray scorch marks on other parts of the target or surroundings. The beam does not go into a single spot. Diffraction effects will cause some of the beam to be distributed in "rings" around the main beam. At high centerline intensity, these rings can also cause significant damage. (I think I once squelched an ambitious project by pointing this fact out.)
Why do we build laser weapons? To engage high-speed targets, mainly, because nothing is faster than the speed of light. And if something is coming at you, you want to deal with it as soon as possible. Or maneuvering targets, for much the same reason (thus, boosting missiles). Engaging static blocks of stone is not even on the list. Setting things on fire is maybe on the list, but it is usually a frivolous addition. Like burning down a forest with artillery firing incendiary shells. A waste of an asset that has more important uses.
I hope that is helpful. It is probably not a complete answer, but I wanted to give you the Big Picture first.
Is it just me who finds it odd that people who design direct energy weapons spend their spare time posting here? I mean, that's cool and everything but I would picture you guys solving complex equations on a whiteboard in your living rooms in your off time. Maybe I've seen too many movies.
I've done that at work for 40 years. Time off for good behavior. Long ago, I established the principle that work stays at work and have seldom budged from it. That's just by way of keeping my sanity. My colleagues also had families and lives. But I do perform the occasional mathematical derivation for personal amusement. (Bee in bonnet syndrome.)
https://greatawakening.win/p/15IY8B4aIw/interesting/c/
Sounds plausible and likely to me.
Just posting my original thought. The brightness of the explosive flash made the camera briefly adjust its exposure level, leading to the light appear to flicker. It would be interesting to see the footage before the blast to see if anyone was visible planting an explosive.
Do HAARP next or whatever is causing this drought and floods please.
Need rain bad.
If it was, this means the rules of the game have changed. White Hats are moving out in the open now. We are getting VERY close.
If you slow the video down right as the sodium light start to glow a faint cloud forms by the stone. As the sodium light gets brighter the cloud gets larger with a blueish light forming. When the sodium light returns to normal then the stone explodes.
I’m an optics/photonics engineer. DE (W) is one of several direct application areas in my field.
This is exactly what I thought it was when I heard about the GGs (& also the Floyd mural). I also think this is why we have been getting weird weather patterns & lightning storms in areas lately (EM energy is basically the same as the Sun’s & can energize atmospheric molecules, causing meteorologic effects). I think it has a hand in spotty wildfires & several other happenings, too.
DEWs have (publicly) existed on navy ships since at least 2015 or 2017 (Google/search it—Easy to find.), so it’s not outside the realm of possibility. Not too hard to just take it and slap it on a TS aircraft/spacecraft or satellite with some tweaks.
My memory is fuzzy, but I may or may not have been setup to collab with AFRL at one point, maybe about 1 year pre-Space Force (?), on tech that might have had something like a 75+ yr timeline. I’m not sure of anything involved, but overall, it seemed like a cool job generally related to this kinda stuff. (Fun-fact: I was once asked by somebody related to said cool job if I believed extra-terrestrial life existed. I have formed my own conclusions about what that implies, but make of that what you will.) Anyway, it all fell through for personal reasons on my end, so I never got involved nor was privy to any sort of disclosure. I’m literally just a dumb basement-dwelling ape that got a short glimpse of the circus overhead. Keep in mind, I’m an anon who knows next to nothing, and I am speculating as much as the rest of you are. That said, this monkey brain still has a couple wrinkles capable of putting some dots together.
In my very humble opinion, I could see SF or US Mil whitehats using something pretty much exactly like this. (Pretty jelly I’m not part of any of the front lines work if they are!)
There enough ex-military, “good ol boys” in Georgia that could have got a bug up their ass to make this happen. Sometimes the simplest answer is the best one. Good on them if that’s what happened. Still very interested in knowing what really happened.
Remember the mysterious “missile strike” on the moon? Was that a test?
I see alot of people mentioning why would they clean up the guidestones so fast? Imho, good riddance. It’s symbolic to me that the good guys are in charge and crushed their symbolism. If the bad guys are winning I don’t see why they would destroy that guidestone. Unless there’s incriminating evidence but I think they would have used other ways to destroy it. They could have just blown the whole thing up. And we all know they’re sloppy as hell.
This whole operation was clean. Laser beam flex to show black hats we’ve got the weapons. Then take down the whole thing showing you we had planned this the whole time. Makes total sense that it’s a white hat flex.
But who would call to level the stones? Who owns the stones?
Did they say who went in to remove it? Is it on private land? Edit: apparently it’s managed by the Elbert county board of commissioners in Georgia so it’s public
Does anybody know if this has even been mentioned by any MSM sources?
Nothing on Brietbart until today.
shaped charge. Seen enough demo's to know
Tesla ray gun!
what's the significance of the time?
What you said!!!