Lawsuits likely incoming from many companies and individuals who dealt with Twatter based on # of viewers/followers. Some say those suits might bankrupt the platform. So, it's also likely that they want a sucker to come in and hold the bag.
Lawsuits likely incoming from many companies and individuals who dealt with Twatter based on # of viewers/followers. Some say those suits might bankrupt the platform. So, it's also likely that they want a sucker to come in and hold the bag.
They have to sue, their investors lost money so their fiduciary duty in this case would be to sue for completion of contract, or face whatever consequences breaking fiduciary duty would entail.
Though I'm sure you're right, and I trust Musk when he said as such, that evidence, which will be found and published in this lawsuit's discovery, is not yet public (to my knowledge). Fiduciary duty was absolutely broken, but without the evidence, and unaware of it even, they couldn't take any real action, nor did they have the reason to. After Musk's they will have published evidence to use as a cudgel. Twitter is double-fucked no matter what they do, and I'm going to need a bigger popcorn budget.
Who wants to own a failed bot farm?
^ this
Lawsuits likely incoming from many companies and individuals who dealt with Twatter based on # of viewers/followers. Some say those suits might bankrupt the platform. So, it's also likely that they want a sucker to come in and hold the bag.
how do u introduce evidence ...brilliant
“You’ll NEVER buy Twitter!!!”
“You BETTER buy Twitter!!1!”
*soon
“WHAT happened to Twitter!!1”
Ha! They didn't want to sell to him but were drooling for his money!
Sounds like he'll settle, buying it at an even steeper discount.
It'll be about tree fiddy.
art of the deal!
Force the board to accept his offer. Invedtigate them for fraud. Stock price drops off a cliff. Buy at a fraction of the original offer.
DISCOVERY
Lawsuits likely incoming from many companies and individuals who dealt with Twatter based on # of viewers/followers. Some say those suits might bankrupt the platform. So, it's also likely that they want a sucker to come in and hold the bag.
They are fffffffooooooookkkkkkkkeeeeeedddd
Good riddance, to the dustbin of history with it.
👋🏻👋🏻👋🏻
NPC and Bots should not be that expensive.
10k foot view, when you print the money, nothing is expensive.
Try playing poker without real cash and watch how bold people get.
True, or monopoly
Well they just fell into a trap. If they are suing him, then I'm pretty sure that forced discovery or something similar.
Winning.
Everything is so transparent, really. Predictable even
This is the comedy part of the movie!
Twitter wants it both ways, not to have to expose the bots and have a sugar daddy.
They have to sue, their investors lost money so their fiduciary duty in this case would be to sue for completion of contract, or face whatever consequences breaking fiduciary duty would entail.
Though I'm sure you're right, and I trust Musk when he said as such, that evidence, which will be found and published in this lawsuit's discovery, is not yet public (to my knowledge). Fiduciary duty was absolutely broken, but without the evidence, and unaware of it even, they couldn't take any real action, nor did they have the reason to. After Musk's they will have published evidence to use as a cudgel. Twitter is double-fucked no matter what they do, and I'm going to need a bigger popcorn budget.
They refused to comply with his request. It’s simple. How many of your “customers” are real people?
Try again. There is no argument here that has anything to do with what I said.
You can't force anyone to sign a contract. That's just how contracts work.
Offer one dollar of consideration Nd let them k kw the minute you own it, you will dismantle it to the ground.