thats the thing, you dont, you can have a wedding and exchange rings and be monogamous without the government. but the gays wanted the tax benefits and property rights that come along with legal union
a legal union instrument would have been a much better solution for gays civil rights relating to medical decisions, assets and such...but then the rabid "gay marriage cult" made a circus out of a basic civil rights issue, in my opinion...
It's a money-making racket for local governments, and that's true of most licensing and permits. I also read that the reason for some licensing -- hair stylists, for example - is that the states were lobbied by people who wanted to run beautician schools, so as to ensure their financial success as a result of the states more or less mandating attendance.
It's a deception to create yet another "trust" between you, your spouse, your children, and of course... the government is the "Executor". Thus then, they can attach to all of your PROPERTY (including your children) via this trust.
With no trust, you stand outside the LEGAL system, and perhaps more importantly, CPS. The government cannot ACCESS the PROPERTY of a MAN/WOMAN without the creation of the marriage license "trust", which is an instrument of the LEGAL world - aka - the realm of the dead "Corp-Oration" (talking dead).
The government can access the PROPERTY of a husband/wife/guardian/tenant/owner - as these are LEGAL words - all of which usurp your LAWFUL STATUS as a MAN/WOMAN. They are "Titles of Slavery". Like; person, resident, citizen, etc.
You must be a MAN/WOMAN that accepts no other TITLES.
Because from what I somewhat understand it has to do with maritime law. Basically looking at it like a corporate or "ship" merger. This goes all the way back to the East India trading company and the way they hijacked America and put us under maritime law. I am sure more apt scholars than me could elaborate. We are literally "chattel" to them. The license is like a merger document.
I am not agreeing any of this is right or acceptable, I am just putting it out there I think this is the basis for it. Please correct me if I am wrong.
Can't remember the name of the series re maritime etc, it was in several parts, and covered all about contracts including marraige, and birth certificates and how u.s. corporation is connected.
Well let's see. The county requires strong ID from both parties. A record is kept on file. Can't marry someone else. Maybe mostly to give legitimacy to children. You know who (legally) is the father and the mother. The kids would also know who the grandparents are. Helps in divorce cases. Personally, I don't like chaos and that's what we would have. I do believe it gives kids a sense of stability and security, which is of major importance to kids. I wouldn't mind 2 husbands but..... in my dreams!
All these good questions now that we are awake!
Why do people with mortgages get a property tax mortgage deduction, but if you pay off your mortgage you no longer get the deduction but pay more in property taxes?
To keep us slaves to debt and fees....
But you'll still read things about so-and-so, and his common law wife. Of course that may only come into play when family court is extracting money from the man...
I know that it's still a thing in Canada, because on our tax forms, my ladyfriend and I were considered to be married after I think, only two years. We've since have had a common law annulment and gone our separate ways back to our respective home countries.
What other people are missing here is what marriage actually is, the joining of man and women who will then start a family. Marriage is firstly a religious thing, and a tax/government thing second.
To make sure you and your spouse is not married to someone else
Because you are becoming a government agent, a guardian, of any children you give birth to, and the government needs to know that the child already has a father
I admit without adultery laws, it makes little sense. Just know that if you decide to live with your girlfriend you are likely already married under common law marriage.
thats the thing, you dont, you can have a wedding and exchange rings and be monogamous without the government. but the gays wanted the tax benefits and property rights that come along with legal union
a legal union instrument would have been a much better solution for gays civil rights relating to medical decisions, assets and such...but then the rabid "gay marriage cult" made a circus out of a basic civil rights issue, in my opinion...
Government becomes a party to the marriage contract and obtains certain rights over the output of the contract (children) if any.
"That's a BINGO!"
It’s both a promise and a legal contract binding your finances and assets.
It's a money-making racket for local governments, and that's true of most licensing and permits. I also read that the reason for some licensing -- hair stylists, for example - is that the states were lobbied by people who wanted to run beautician schools, so as to ensure their financial success as a result of the states more or less mandating attendance.
It's a deception to create yet another "trust" between you, your spouse, your children, and of course... the government is the "Executor". Thus then, they can attach to all of your PROPERTY (including your children) via this trust.
With no trust, you stand outside the LEGAL system, and perhaps more importantly, CPS. The government cannot ACCESS the PROPERTY of a MAN/WOMAN without the creation of the marriage license "trust", which is an instrument of the LEGAL world - aka - the realm of the dead "Corp-Oration" (talking dead).
The government can access the PROPERTY of a husband/wife/guardian/tenant/owner - as these are LEGAL words - all of which usurp your LAWFUL STATUS as a MAN/WOMAN. They are "Titles of Slavery". Like; person, resident, citizen, etc.
You must be a MAN/WOMAN that accepts no other TITLES.
Because from what I somewhat understand it has to do with maritime law. Basically looking at it like a corporate or "ship" merger. This goes all the way back to the East India trading company and the way they hijacked America and put us under maritime law. I am sure more apt scholars than me could elaborate. We are literally "chattel" to them. The license is like a merger document. I am not agreeing any of this is right or acceptable, I am just putting it out there I think this is the basis for it. Please correct me if I am wrong.
Wondering why the down vote.. Maritime language is something everyone should be studying...
Can't remember the name of the series re maritime etc, it was in several parts, and covered all about contracts including marraige, and birth certificates and how u.s. corporation is connected.
Whether you get permission or not, just remember, man is not complete until he is married...and then he's finished 😉
Top kek. Remember lads, a successful marriage ends in death.
Well let's see. The county requires strong ID from both parties. A record is kept on file. Can't marry someone else. Maybe mostly to give legitimacy to children. You know who (legally) is the father and the mother. The kids would also know who the grandparents are. Helps in divorce cases. Personally, I don't like chaos and that's what we would have. I do believe it gives kids a sense of stability and security, which is of major importance to kids. I wouldn't mind 2 husbands but..... in my dreams!
Why does the government exist for most things?
The disgusting pharma co's made "obscene profits" and were told that the vaccines were free. NOT!
Gov did it all.
All these good questions now that we are awake! Why do people with mortgages get a property tax mortgage deduction, but if you pay off your mortgage you no longer get the deduction but pay more in property taxes?
To keep us slaves to debt and fees....
Common law marriage is a thing in most states.
Was.. Mostly done away with in the 50s. Texas is the only state I am aware of where it is recognized.
But you'll still read things about so-and-so, and his common law wife. Of course that may only come into play when family court is extracting money from the man...
I know that it's still a thing in Canada, because on our tax forms, my ladyfriend and I were considered to be married after I think, only two years. We've since have had a common law annulment and gone our separate ways back to our respective home countries.
What other people are missing here is what marriage actually is, the joining of man and women who will then start a family. Marriage is firstly a religious thing, and a tax/government thing second.
Because taxes and court rulings on what is given to whom and how much is split etc.
To make sure we aren't marrying cousins?
Well that used to be a reason. When I went for the marriage license in town hall they checked our lineage for that. No joke.
But all points above in comments are so right.
I admit without adultery laws, it makes little sense. Just know that if you decide to live with your girlfriend you are likely already married under common law marriage.
They made it so that it encourages certain people to take advantage of it for their own financial gains.
Tax code status and property ownership.
Not exactly permission, more like informing thw state what you are up to so they can keep track of you