"Commander and Chief" was a movie that came out in in 2012. In the movie a famous former president travels to the U.N. American Presidential Museum to do research for a biography on his time in office. More info here: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1205474/plotsummary?ref_=tt_ov_pl
Thank you for this evocative contribution around Qs reference to Commander and Chief.
Q was always adamant that what appeared to be "mistakes" were intentional and had meaning that hopefully anons would eventually discover and use.
Q definitely uses movies to give clue crumbs. When remembered, Qs past movie links have really helped me navigate events that are my present but at the time of Qs drop were my future.
A famous Q "manta", future proves past ie helps make sense of past drops, has definitely been true for me.
I noticed a few data points in the plot summary of the movie, "Commander and Chief":: The main character is a former President. President who is digging for archival documents around his time in office. Bad guys are trying to thwart him. A "lowly" janitor is helping him. The movie is set in 2022.
"Besides the pilots, was there anyone else on board?"
To salute, or not to salute, that was the question:
Whether t'was proper at the time to render
The honors due an officer superior in rank,
Or to break form in a time of troubles
And by opposing foul them.
Tis NFD's favorite question and rabbit hole I don't think we've ever truly figured out...
Was there somebody else in the chopper besides the pilots? Yes. Video indicated as much, albeit without ever gettinf a clear shot of the man's face.
Is there any military officer who ranks higher than the Commander in Chief? No.
Who is the Commander in Chief? POTUS.
So how can Donald Trump both be POTUS and thus Commander in Chief, and also be saluting a superior officer? He cannot.
Therefore, a reasonable conclusion, the only reasonable conclusion, is that when Donald Trump was saluting whoever was in the chopper, he was NOT actually POTUS and whoever he was saluting, was.
How was that made to be? 25th Amendment.
Who then, was POTUS? VP, Speaker, President Pro Tempore. Etc etc? That's the line of succession... although, neither Speaker nor PPT can actually be POTUS because neither is an OFFICER of the USA. So constitutionally speaking, after VP then next eligible down the list of the statute is actually.... Sec of State... who was... Mike Pompeo... a former military (and CIA) man... who better to lead the Military during the "most complex military operations' ever?
Added food for thought, per the 25th, the VP doesn't HAVE to accept becoming POTUS, and declining to do so, would not render them no longer VP. So technically, had Trump 25th'd himself, Pence could have declined, remained VP, and Pompeo have become acting POTUS.
Another interesting historical tidbit about the Constitution and presidential succession. Originally, the Framers intended for there to be special elections to replace POTUS should he die or be removed from office. Whoever was elevated during the vacancy was only ACTING POTUS "until a new president be elected." The Presidential Succession Act of 1792 set up the process for such special elections. One would think if in case of double vacancy, there would be ACTING POTUS, the same would apply in case of single vacancy. VP was only to be ACTING POTUS, temporarily, until a new POTUS was elected. And thus John Tyler, his Ascendancy, illegally made himself POTUS...
Wonder why it says "Commander AND Chief"?
I always notice that too. i thought i read once that it had something to do with Devolution
Interesting. I wonder what it would be
Q said that multiple meanings exist.
"Commander and Chief" was a movie that came out in in 2012. In the movie a famous former president travels to the U.N. American Presidential Museum to do research for a biography on his time in office. More info here: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1205474/plotsummary?ref_=tt_ov_pl
Thank you for this evocative contribution around Qs reference to Commander and Chief.
Q was always adamant that what appeared to be "mistakes" were intentional and had meaning that hopefully anons would eventually discover and use.
Q definitely uses movies to give clue crumbs. When remembered, Qs past movie links have really helped me navigate events that are my present but at the time of Qs drop were my future.
A famous Q "manta", future proves past ie helps make sense of past drops, has definitely been true for me.
I noticed a few data points in the plot summary of the movie, "Commander and Chief":: The main character is a former President. President who is digging for archival documents around his time in office. Bad guys are trying to thwart him. A "lowly" janitor is helping him. The movie is set in 2022.
Pure coincidence...
Thanks! Good tip.
Kinda like the one in DC that still says "2016 - " for Trump?
Interesting....great find!!
So....what's in that movie that is relevant / interdasting?
Has anyone seen it?
I might have to track it down.....
If I’m to hypothesize,
Commander- Ezra
Chief- DJT
Let’s see how this plays out!
Also
"What conditions must present itself?"
Q might make the occasional grammatical error but this one was pretty blatant. That makes it seem as though it was intentional.
Extra s?
No doubt
No one at his level would not know the true title of the head of the military forces
I believe it would have to be a nat sec issue… Infiltration Espionage Defense secrets….
Q might make an occasional grammatical error".
Unless corrected by Q, ALL spelling and grammar "errors", were, according to Q, NOT errors.
Didn't write helicopter pilot.
Wrote helicopter.
Should have asked...
"Besides the pilots, was there anyone else on board?"
To salute, or not to salute, that was the question:
Whether t'was proper at the time to render
The honors due an officer superior in rank,
Or to break form in a time of troubles
And by opposing foul them.
Should have asked.
Tis NFD's favorite question and rabbit hole I don't think we've ever truly figured out...
Was there somebody else in the chopper besides the pilots? Yes. Video indicated as much, albeit without ever gettinf a clear shot of the man's face.
Is there any military officer who ranks higher than the Commander in Chief? No.
Who is the Commander in Chief? POTUS.
So how can Donald Trump both be POTUS and thus Commander in Chief, and also be saluting a superior officer? He cannot.
Therefore, a reasonable conclusion, the only reasonable conclusion, is that when Donald Trump was saluting whoever was in the chopper, he was NOT actually POTUS and whoever he was saluting, was.
How was that made to be? 25th Amendment.
Who then, was POTUS? VP, Speaker, President Pro Tempore. Etc etc? That's the line of succession... although, neither Speaker nor PPT can actually be POTUS because neither is an OFFICER of the USA. So constitutionally speaking, after VP then next eligible down the list of the statute is actually.... Sec of State... who was... Mike Pompeo... a former military (and CIA) man... who better to lead the Military during the "most complex military operations' ever?
Added food for thought, per the 25th, the VP doesn't HAVE to accept becoming POTUS, and declining to do so, would not render them no longer VP. So technically, had Trump 25th'd himself, Pence could have declined, remained VP, and Pompeo have become acting POTUS.
Another interesting historical tidbit about the Constitution and presidential succession. Originally, the Framers intended for there to be special elections to replace POTUS should he die or be removed from office. Whoever was elevated during the vacancy was only ACTING POTUS "until a new president be elected." The Presidential Succession Act of 1792 set up the process for such special elections. One would think if in case of double vacancy, there would be ACTING POTUS, the same would apply in case of single vacancy. VP was only to be ACTING POTUS, temporarily, until a new POTUS was elected. And thus John Tyler, his Ascendancy, illegally made himself POTUS...
OK, we'll continue the little dance
So then who, in your mind, is the superior officer to President Trump [who is not the pilot] who is on the helicopter?
--[Did I say he was ON the helicopter? He's IN the helicopter!]
OK then who, in your mind, is the "superior officer" to President Trump who is supposedly IN the helicopter? LOL
2016 BQ
1 + 1 = 2
2 + 2 = 4
4 + 4 = 8
8 + 8 =16
2017 AQ
8 + 8 + x = ?
x = https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/164 + https://patelpatriot.substack.com/
8 + 8 + x = https://cdn.winknews.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Trump-4.jpg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=345uegSj-zQ (8 sec)