One year to the day after the publication of the revelatory book "Moon Man: The True Story of a Filmmaker on the CIA Hit List", which divulges the deathbed confession of the former Chief of Security at Cannon Air Force Base in Clovis New Mexico, who confessed thereon to his participation in the falsification of the first "moon landing", his identity is finally revealed. This predetermined waiting period was previously negotiated with his sole surviving son, who himself passed away this year. Cyrus Eugene Akers detailed the information in the book, including not only the location of the filming of the first fake moon landing at his military base, the dates it was filmed, and the CIA codename for the operation, he also gave the names of fifteen government scientists and officials who were allowed exclusive observation of this historic government fraud, some of whom are still alive today. The list was given to Akers by President Lyndon Johnson, who was there at the first day of filming. Threatened with execution if he ever revealed this information, Security Chief Akers kept all of this to himself until his deathbed, the guilt from which prompted his tearful confession to his son, who was also threatened with assassination after sharing this information with the author of Moon Man, Bart Sibrel. This sad and outrageous, and really unnecessary deception, was done for pride and embezzlement. It demonstrates the complete arrogance of leaders over their people, who in fact are financing their own deception. Unlike government frauds about war, assassination, or terrorism, the moon landing deception cruelly gave the over-trusting public the pleasing candy that they cried out for. Trying to take it away from them, after they believed with tears and cheers, by exposing their heroes as the criminals they really are, faces fierce resistance. Even a professor at a major university has so famously said, "Even if I heard a moon astronaut confess that he never really went, I would still believe that he walked on the moon."
Fortunately a new generation is here, ones who were not emotionally branded by the deception, who are objective to the unfolding reality of the moon landings falsification. Simply put, what the corrupt government is claiming, is that in 1969 they went from never being in space, to walking on the moon, with only 8 years of research and development, and that with one-millionth the computing of a cell phone, and on the first attempt, when even the South Pole on Earth was not reached on the first attempt.
Today, with 50 years of more advanced rocket and computer technology, the current Artemis moon rocket took 18 years to develop, had three launch failures, is not safe enough yet to carry astronauts, and will only orbit the moon, because a moon lander for it has not yet been developed that works. The farthest that the government can send astronauts today, 50 years later, is to the space station, which is only one-thousandth the distance to the moon.
For the first time in the entire history of the world, technology was greater in the past than in the future. As this is actually impossible, it only means one thing, that the 1969 moon landing was a forgery. It is not the first time scientific boasts were falsified or governments have lied, as covid vaccine maker Prizer has been fined billions of dollars, on multiple occasions, for making fraudulent claims about their scientific products.
Former high-ranking government employee Robert McNamara, who was Defense Secretary during the Vietnam War, admitted before he died that the "Gulf of Tonkin Incident", which was the reason why the war began, was completely fabricated by the CIA. If the corrupt government is willing to falsify something that led to the death of a million people, including 58,220 of their own citizens, then I think they are capable of faking an image on a television.
14m:14s
Watching various documentaries on the fake landing and how 911 was all planned is what woke me up over a decade ago.
It really is irrefutable (both events) that they didn't happen like they say. If anyone even spends like 8 hours watching a few different docos, they will come to the same conclusion.
I really do wonder what the hell is happening in Antarctica still.
That’s top of my wish list too! The biggest unknown IMO
Ice wall separating the "inner space" from "outer space".
Check in with Linda Paris, aka Deplorable McAllister about Antarctica.
I've said this idk how many times but finally there is a relevant place to say this.
My Grandpa worked at Boeing for about 4 years, working on guided missiles and such, and he had top secret clearance to do that.
(as a side story, he worked with a person that had Q clearance who was also working on precision guided active radar ICBMs that could go over Mach 7. Make of that what you will.)
Anyway, Grandpa eventually got an assignment to work on lighting (he had extensive electrical engineering knowledge) on a "set." That's all he was briefed about it. When he got in there, however, it as plain to see that it was a moon landing set. He was totally stunned because he knew that NASA was going to the moon, so why would they be making a movie set? While he never met any of the people who played as astronauts, he was able to watch from the shadows. He said that there were basically invisible filaments helping the astronauts look like they were on the Moon, bouncing around and such. The moon lander was precisely what was seen when we "went" to the Moon. He complete the job about about 4 months, but they continued rehearsals until a week before the Moon landing.
And within a month after the landing supposedly happened, the entire warehouse that the movie set was in completely disappeared. As if it was literally never there. Not even the concrete foundation. Right from then and there he was convinced that it was a total hoax. And nobody could convince him otherwise.
The moon landing that was broadcast was totally faked. The real landing encountered extraterrestrials and (totally) accidentally landed at the site of an ancient lunar temple of sorts.
Gosh I love discovering real history.
I like your story thank you for sharing. Is your grandfather still around? Can you expand on the last part? First time I am hearing that. Thanks
Extremely valuable statement here.
Now take this and wrap your mind around the energy technology fraud, which hasn't really advanced for more than a hundred years. Why has only communication and data harvesting technology advanced so much?
Idiocracy was a documentary!
Except we didnt know it!
One theory says we did go to the moon, but the TV footage we saw was indeed faked. Q seemed to hint at this with "moon landings are real."
I sure hope the moon landing program was not a total lie.
i have spent years researching, and debating, etc the moon landings.
AMA
https://i.redd.it/r7huai97dx311.png
Didja see this one fren? NASA Mission Control Console close-up view displays 1970 (PHILCO-Ford; Apollo MOCR Computer Houston)
From the first comment, "Notably, computers at the time did not have monitors to display characters, let alone diagrams like you see in some of those screens."
I showed my kids “mars” by photoshopping Devon island and NASA will never be the same in their eyes
Woah
the moon landing hoax is the best red pill.
it exposes the deep state conspirators, without too much emotional resistance.
To people of a certain age...my parents and some of their generation are still all in that it happened
took me hearing it THREE times, before i actually took a closer look at it.
its one of those things, that once you see it, you can't un-see it.
but, its also fascinating watching people argue about it, and go thru all sorts of mental gymnastics to defend their belief.
and i think thats what it boils down to.
what you believe.
and if you "believe" men walked on the moon, because authority figures told you so, well then by golly, your beliefs are the truth.
Q post 2225. Who ya gonna believe?
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.".
~ George Orwell, 1984.
https://i.redd.it/wxh0mt3gwg4z.jpg
Lunar Lander Launch
:37s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9HQfauGJaTs
Q,
Did NASA fake the moon landings? Have we been to the moon since then? Are there secret space programs? Is this why the Space Force was created?
False, moon landings are real.
Programs exist that are outside of public domain.
Q
It's kinda ambigious honestly. If the message there is that what was televised was real, then why add that 2nd part?
Could be that there's both real and fakes.
It's impossible to go the moon. The Earth is flat my frens
Park your '69 Cadillac out in the Mohave Dessert and turn on the heater at night. Then turn on the AC during the day. How long does everything run? Same tech.......
firefighters can only get 20 minutes out of a tank of breathing air,
but somehow astronauts could breathe longer, on the moon,
oh, and the reason you can't hear any air valves open and close, it because it was more of a continuous flow air supply,
because that would be practical
on the moon.
We left trash and reflectors on the moon, son.
The latter you can test yourself.
u/#q2225
This is a Q research site.
Now do you understand why mirrors and disinformation is NECESSARY? - Q
Disinformation is NECESSARY. - Q
Disinformation is real. | Disinformation is NECESSARY. - Q
Disinformation exists and is NECESSARY. - Q
Think logically… now where have I heard that?
"Nothing can stop what is coming."
"Disinformation is necessary."
"These people are sick."
"Disinformation is necessary."
"Where we go one, we go all."
"Disinformation is necessary."
"great awakening"
2 minutes - NASA admits we can't go to the moon
52 seconds - NASA Astronaut Don Pettit admits we can't go to the moon
I vote the moon landing happened. I think the hoax is the hoax.
it takes longer to un-learn some bs, than it takes to learn it in the first place.
its easier for them to lie to you, than it is for you to prove they are lying.
Only issue I've ever had with moon landing conspiracies is the 800+ lbs of moon rock returned from the landings that 10k+ scientists worldwide over 5 decades that've been studied. They can't all be in on the hoax.
http://google.com/search?q=moon+rocks+fake
You place a google link with 3 search words as proof? I love conspiracies and many are real but that's just stupid. There is no viable argument to explain 800+ lbs of moon rocks from the landings that 10k+ scientists worldwide over 5 decades have studied. None other than to say they all all in on it. You may as well start with the flat Earth thing now.
https://phys.org/news/2009-09-moon-fake.amp
Amazing
The earth is a sphere, and we landed on moon and came home.
Now live your life. It's OK.
I don’t see anyone arguing that the earth isn’t (approximately) spherical. There’s a difference between disputing a fact verifiable by one’s own observations of the sky, and arguing about the legitimacy of a “historical” event.
Putting your head in the dirt and repeating the official story when presented with evidence to the contrary… Is that really someone you want to be?
If you are new to the Apollo Moon Landing Hoax, start here ...
https://www.reddit.com/r/ApolloMoonLandingHoax/
Q Post 2225: Question) Did NASA fake the moon landings?... Are there secret space programs? Q's answer) Moon landings are real. Programs exist that are outside of the public domain.
My take: people have made many trips to the moon. Whether their moon trips were part of NASA, or part of a secret space program, or both, is not clear from Q's answer.
That was my take on the information also when the post came out from Q.
We may have landed something on the moon. But man could not survive the Van Allen radiation belt. So men haven't been there. Unless there are other forms of travel.
So from what I gather, I think there is enough evidence to show we actually landed on the moon. However there are some faked footage mixed in woth the real thing in order for broadcasters to visualize what was going on to the audience. This hybrid theory would perfectly explain why ppl think the landings were faked because they shot propaganda footage to go along with it.
welllllll.... its not that easy.
you see, the very concept of "evidence" is disputable.
what constitutes evidence to one person, does not constitute evidence to another person.
examples:
moon walk believer: i saw photos of the landing site! they even showed astronaut footprints in the dust.
me: yeah, those are fake photos.
moon walk believer: scientists regularly bounce a laser beam off of a retroreflector on the moon.
me: no they don't.
moon walk believer: tens of thousands of people watched the lift-off!
me: no they didn't
moon walk believer: and then the rocket achieved escape velocity, and escaped earths gravity!
me: no it didn't
thats the thing about anonymous sources... all you have to do to debunk them, is say, 'they are lying'
50 years after traveling 238,000 miles one way through all sorts of unknowns using primitive technology, several times, going 50 miles up is still the domain of a few dozen a year on average, nearly all military. Fraud.
Because it's not financially viable. What's the point?
These ‘fake moon landing’ stories are the opposite of a red pill for me. That, and believing in a ‘flat earth’ . A few more, but those two are the ones that turn me away.
Then go away.
You know who else tells you the moon landings and flat earth aren’t real? YouTube with their warning labels on videos discussing the topic. Know what other topic gets a warning too? Qanon. I wonder why that is…