I saw it multiple times, I believe you guys too. The term “shapeshifters” or “reptilians” or “flat earth” that we saw in various posts here and on other sites.
I will show you how it’s used by the bad guys to strengthen the “conspiracy theorist” label and slow down awakening.
Example:
”Billy Corgan: ‘Shapeshifting Reptilians’ Run The ‘Satanic’ Music Industry”
https://newspunch.com/billy-corgan-shapeshifting-reptilians/
My reaction to it is:
Add “flat earth” to it and you can easily label all inconvenient truth as “conspiracy theory”.
As simple as that.
They could have done it better this way: ‘Shapeshifting Reptilians’ who live on the opposite side of the Flat Earth Run The ‘Satanic’ Music Industry”.
Recall Pelosi saying on video:
We smear somebody with falsehood and all the rest, then you (journalists) print it and we say: The Press has published that (…) - it legitimises what we said, .. etc.
Talking about “shapeshifters” and “reptilians” is a similar tactic but it’s used to strengthen “conspiracy theorist” label.
When do they need to strengthen the “conspiracy theorist” label?
-
when the label stops working,
-
when people discover that all previous conspiracy theories came out to be a reality,
-
when we’re winning awakening the masses.
The deep state has to stick some bullshit they can call later so that people won’t believe it, otherwise the “conspiracy theorist” label will stop working at all.
Think about it as a slider that reflects the % of the truth within the “conspiracy theory” space.
-
We prove something was real, we move the slider closer to 100%
-
We say that the difference between the conspiracy theory and the reality was 2 years, 6 months and now it’s 2 months.
-
We’re destroying the term (a weapon) the C_A has created to prevent awakening.
-
They want to move the slider back where it was, closer to 0% so the term (a weapon) can be used again.
It’s NOT about the flat earth or reptilians.
It’s about Awakening.
Everyone who pushes these theories is either unaware or is a shill working for the deep state for money. People who try to justify “we use it to label (them)” are also either unaware or are paid shills who word Kadr to prevent awakening.
When we hear someone like this article and person “witnessing” it (especially famous person) - we have to note it as he isn’t on our side and will betray us. These celebrities are bought to make a contrast between:
- their lies and fake reality they want us to live and believe in,
versus:
- the truth about their pedo perversions, rapes, blackmail and satanic sacrifice.
Once they add something crazy and unreal to the second group - people are more likely to sit in the first box. Be aware of that!
Even if you’re crazy enough to believe that reptilians are real - it’s your choice. But if you really support the Great Awakening - you need to be aware that normies won’t move from the box 1 to box 2 if you add too much for them to accept. Knowing that: avoid flat earth and reptilians terminology here, leave it for yourself for later, if you enjoy it and focus on Great Awakening.
It’s a social engineering, consciously used by the Deep State.
At this stage anyone pushing flat earth and reptilians theories slows down the awakening process, no matter if consciously and intentionally or not.
I’ve made this post quite long and intentionally used the keywords in the title. Some shills will jump in and start calling me names without even reading the whole post. Once you’ve read the whole thing up until here - you understand who can sponsor to push these theories. Let them to reveal themselves, check their posts and their other comments, give your vote to the article and comments. Digital battlefield.
Agreed with flat earth, there are too many ways where ground level observations can prove it's not flat, and ultimately reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of science.
As for the reptilian / shapeshifters; IMO, whether just figurative because there's a group of high functioning psychopaths running the show is valid imagery to represent a morality that is so evil that it's easier to conceive as not being human. It doesn't matter if it's literally true at that point.
Not flat but is earth way bigger than what we are told? What tf is going on in Antarctica? What is the moon? Are there DUMBS all over the world? Is the earth hollow? Let’s not act like there aren’t legitimate questions here. Flat earth could be used to distract from the real questions
More in the sense of treating the earth as a perfect sphere when that's not accurate.
The Antarctica question doesn't impact a flat earth or not.
I'm reasonably certain that the moon is not a ball of plasma resulting from a reflection of energy interacting with the firmament.
The dumbs question has no bearing.
A hollow earth is more plausible than a flat earth, which would make planetary bodies as more like a toroidal shape rather than a sphere.
Your last point is where I agree, there are legitimate questions and I have little doubt that the DS has ensured that we are living in as much of a fiction as they can maintain.
Antarctica is crucial in FE. I know we aren’t supposed to talk about this though so I will stop. It’s just frustrating that people are allowed to slander and strawman and the actual arguments aren’t allowed. Seems like a cheap shot to me, and so similar to the globalist cabal slander, strawmanning, and censorship. At least you guys are still against pedophiles, but never forget how many of you were strawmanning and slandering the “anti-vaxxers” three years ago and the “climate deniers” five years ago.
So many of you also used to go raging hate on us when we brought up the Lolita Express and Epstein. That was dismissed as “batshit crazy paranoia”. So plenty of people here used to run defense for pedophiles and didn’t realize it. Don’t forget that and be aware of who you might be running defense for now. Like all the “truthers” who won’t go near Sandy Hook. You are running cover for evil when you do that, don’t you think?
The topic was stickied for a time, can only assume that mods intend on looking the other way as that goes. (Ive not done any reports or raised avoiding the topic in thread, even though I agree because of how that will appear to newly redpilled)
Anyway, my understanding was that FE reorients the map such that the south pole is the barrier. If there's more, please elaborate. Otherwise, there's wayy too much fuckery surrounding Antarctica, who knows what to believe.
I share your thinking
Not everything that’s true is worth worrying about right now. I like what that other poster said. There are things that are true that we can prove by and are vital to people understanding right now and then there’s stuff that’s interesting and might be true but isn’t vital and detracts from the more vital things.
There are? There's $60K out there waiting to be claimed if you can come up JUST ONE... you don't need any of the other "too many ways".
Those aren't legitimate offers, the capacity of flat earthers to shift goal posts is on par with leftists.
I've gone through those debates with flat earthers, there's a reason why I call it a fundamental misunderstanding of scientific principles.
Which "scientific principle" are we misunderstanding? Einstenian gravity (fraud)? Special relativity (fraud)? General relativity (fraud)? Quantum mechanics (fraud)? Quantum superposition (fraud)? Newtonian gravity (fraud)? Dark matter and dark energy (frauds to uphold the gravity fraud)?
I've educated myself carefully on all of the above as well as the heliosexual MODEL (mental abstraction) for over 5 years.
I'd love to know which "scientific principle" we misunderstand. Are you sure you understand it/them?
As to the $60K, the offer is 100% legitimate. I'm friends with the guy who is offering it and I can guarantee he'll honor the bet.
I think you're afraid to discover you've been duped and your comment is a cognitive dissonance reaction. If you're afraid to claim your prize, give me your irrefutable scientific proof and I'll submit it and we can split the 3 bitcoin.
I'm the first guy in line totally prepared to change my mind at a moment's notice. If you've got an irrefutable proof, I'll return to the heliosexual side of the fence in a heartbeat.
I'm happy to debate you and show you how you don't have any science backing your MODEL, but rather scientism. I spent the first 3 years of my research looking for this proof because, believe it or not, I thought FE was a nutso conspiracy theory too. I didn't set out to join with what I thought were the whackjobs, my goal was to shut them down. Boy was I humbled.
Let's do it via DM. Show me your proof. If I can debunk it and it's scientifically sound, I'll submit it and we split the winnings with you. Sound like a plan?
Noteworthy is that, while I agree ib the sense that each of those is inadequate, for the most part, there's a foundation based on observation. Then you get the theorists who develop these mathematical models that diverge away from the foundation of what can be objectively measured.
Anyway, the most common areas where a principle is used but the effects at a planetary scale are not applied. First, is that liquids volume cannot be compressed, an effect that is neglible in a small scale. Next, how light bends in a fluid. There are others, for example, some extended family came to visit Canada from Texas, where they were commenting on how the sunset was several hours beyond what they were used to at that time of year.
Or, how the north star (polaris) is the only one that remains motionless and if a camera is left focused on that star can see the rest of the sky rotating around that.
These are ground observable factors that fit right in with a spherical planet that requires some very creative work to validate with a flat earth model.
No doubt the offer is sincere, the intent to pay out is not. The whole reason to put out that kind of offer is to say that "we put a reward and nobody came to claim it."
I’ll bite. Take a look at my first comment on another branch of this reply tree, the one with seven observations about the sun.
And give me a consistent flat earth model that explains all that. With distances and equations and assumptions.
Also,
I hope you don’t mind me referring to the “flat brain” model if we’re doing this sort of thing.
Yes. Please share your ground level observations so we can prove once and for all to these flattys the world is a spinning ball. Thank you in advance.
Think about the sun. You can observe that:
The sun appears circular.
The sun appears to maintain its shape as it moves across the sky.
The sun appears to maintain its size as it moves across the sky.
The sun appears to rise from and set beneath ground level.
These phenomena are true no matter your longitude.
Different longitudes observe different times of day simultaneously.
Certain latitudes (above the arctic circle) may not see the sun rise and set every day, though it does move.
All of these facts are verifiable either by yourself, or by talking to trusted people living around the world (and in Alaska).
I have yet to find or be told a flat earth theory that is able to explain all of these factual observations at the same time.
None of your points support that the sun is a SPHERE (a ball), nor that the earth is rotating. In fact, if you carefully read back your own points you will see that this is so.
Evaluate your own points in relation to a MOVING LIGHT (sun) and a STATIONARY PLANE (earth). They all work perfectly.
If the sun were a light moving across a planar earth, it would appear to get smaller as it moves farther away from directly overhead. This is not observed. Try again.
Totally agree about the sun. The moon has me a little perplexed though. It lights up like a flashlight. And sometimes earths shadow is curved impossibly. Also just how sometimes half the moon is completely missing when you should at least see an outline. And why doesn’t the sun pull it into its gravitational pull. It’s always bothered me. Also how the sun and moon are basically the same size as you look at it.
Here’s another thing to think about: the tides. The tides sync up perfectly with the moon’s periodic motion, and do not increase or decrease in intensity with the phase of the moon.
I’m gonna assume you already accept that the same thing pulling us to the ground also governs the motion of the sun and moon. Because we have equations for that. The easiest one to apply would be Newton’s law of gravitation, which is accurate in all but the edge cases (stuff that gets really close to the sun). If you look at the equation, you can see that the force of gravity depends on two things: mass and distance, and these factors act opposite to each other. So, thinking about the gravity of two objects, even if one is much less massive than the other, if you get close enough to the smaller object (and far enough away from the larger one), the smaller object’s gravity dominates. So that’s one explanation why the moon (an object) stays linked to the earth (an object), as opposed to the sun (an object). Look into “Lagrange points” for some interesting extra info resulting from this sort of system.
I don’t know enough to talk about the optical properties of the moon, but remember that (according to the commonly accepted theory) the phases are the moon’s shadow, lunar eclipses are the earth’s shadow.
Scientists consider the relative size of the sun and moon in the sky to be a coincidence. God probably made it that way for good reason.
I can send you a 4th grade science book if you like.
Choose any 3 points on the earth. Make sure they are at least 2000 nm apart to get sufficient resolution. Use flight planning software to draw a round trip triangle direct between these 3 points. Add the interior angles of the triangle. You will find it adds up to more than 180 degrees. That can only happen because you are operating on a positively curved surface. And because it works for ANY 3 points you choose anywhere on the earth's surface, the earth can only be an ellipsoid of some kind. You can do the exact same test with boats on the ocean. You honestly don't need anything more than that. Flat earth is mathematically, provably wrong in so many simple ways when you understand basic geometry.
2000 nano meters? I'm not even clear what you want to replace this with? 2000 kilometers? That would be the only thing that makes any sense. You didn't put much effort into this post, not sure why I'm wasting my time.
A 2000 KM distance implies 1 million feet of curvature (189 miles) on the fantasy ball earth. You need TRIGONOMETRY to solve this math, not geometry.
How can you draw a triangle on a curved surface? It's impossible of course. The sea captains of days gone by all used their sextants in precisely the correct way, with a flat earth at the base of their TRIANGLE, and managed to get to their destinations as calculated. Which of course, is impossible on a curved surface.
"Flight planning software" is all corrupted with the man-made, free mason infused, totally unreal, false "Magnetic declination" fraud. No such thing exists. This is the trick they used to transform a flat surface into a ball. GPS leverages the same deception.
Eliminate magnetic declination and, voila, the deception is exposed and successful sextant navigation works and then another piece of ACTUAL REALITY is restored.
nm = nautical miles. Yes. It can also mean nanometers, but clearly not in this context. You are intentionally trying to be obtuse.
Yes, and for the same reason it is not possible to map the Earth's surface as a flat representation without distortion. The larger the span of the map, the greater the distortion. Surveyors discovered that they couldn't really patch together coordinate grids if they were rectilinear (discrepancies at the edges).
Thank you. I wish I knew geometry better. I’m sure flatheads will argue that the flight planning software is built on the round earth model. But of course it is. Would they build a flight planning software on the back of a giant turtle? Lol.
A better question would be on the implications to physics required to have a flat earth that maintains the consistency it does to corroborate what can be derived from ground levels.