I get selective enforcement of a Fake Legal system all the way back to the time od Our Lord when the Sanhedrin ran him into Pilate and they crucified him.
so, I wanted to qualify the link to support Alex Jones and patriot.win shadowbanned me.
So which is is Mods ? think A.J. is controlled opposition?
I can never write off Alex Jones completely because he was one of the first ones who helped me to open my eyes and start doing my own research. Infowars was around long before so many other alternatives back in the 90s. I can't watch him much because he is loud and obnoxious at times. I believe he is right about a lot of things but it's his presentation that turns people off. I also believe it is possible that he has become controlled opposition, but I don't believe that is how he started. Money ruins many good people with good intentions and he may have fallen in that trap. I don't listen to him much anymore because there are so many others who deliver the message better, but like I said, I can't write him off completely.
Thank you. He was the one who woke me up many years ago.
yes, all the good ones come off as cO ! why is that ?
MOSSAD-backed Strawman, Disinfo agent mixing truth with faggotry, larping ass "I talked to Q on the phone"
Look into what Bill Cooper said about him, and this was WAY before the Q operation.
Vanilla MAGA and alt-right glowfags, Hitler worshippers et. al. love the guy, probably because he's hilarious, and because there's a spiritual aspect to him and his operation to disable the real truth-seekers before they can get started. "Tickling their ears"
The Boomerwaffen love him
remember him going to Hillary's book signing in the tank with the megaphone,
its beyond classic,
like icing on icing.
One of the parents sitting in the courtroom looked an awful lot like someone filmed roaming around Sandy Hook in a swat uniform. Alex Jones lawers didn’t question this? All theatre to take the ability away from you to protect yourself and enact complete and unfettered control over you. Just my opinion.
AJ and his lawyers had no ability to question anything, nor had they the ability to respond to most of the accusations thrown at him...
It was a literal kangaroo court with a pre-stated verdict (guilty). Shit that makes 3rd world hell holes look civilised.
not to fuel this kind of thing.....but....Derek Chauvin was a crisis actor that was at the boston marathon playing a cop or person there, I saw the video. I think your latter comment is well taken, the figurative prison has been built around Mr. jones so he can not have free speech enough to conject if there are crisis actors at Sandy Hook.
Agreed
https://qalerts.app/?n=2089
All the AJ supporters pretend to believe in Q, but they will ignore what Q told them about their hero.
Are they really believers in Q? Their hero wasn't. First he tried to associate himself to Q, and when that didn't work he began to attack Q.
if q is all we have, then would that in itself inspire people to take initiative and enforce our natural rights?
I believe he is controlled opposition, trying to make dissenters look crazy. He has awakened many including me many years ago. He became too popular though so they deplatformed him.
The awards against him are warning to other patriots to keep their mouths shut. He was used up as an attempt to silence the patriots. The cabal will use every last puppet under their control even to the point of killing some of them.
at least someone else is stating what I am warning my friends that: what the enemy thinks says and does has no foundation in any thing that we hold as important, so why would I think we can police the world from my perspective.
cops have the tough jobs, for what they see every day.
He definitely was Mossad controlled opposition, and the overwhelming majority of his work reflects that.
There is a slim chance that he flipped or was freed (recently divorced his wife... handler strings removed?) and he might be playing his part for WH now. That would mean this verdict is part of winding down his operation or BH removing support. But the folks on this board have mostly evolved beyond his captive sphere of influence anyway, so there's no need to be certain either way. Time and patience will reveal, but no need to depend on him in the meantime. It would be nice if he could go back to being Bill Hicks.
yep, what is real !
I’m so interested in this question!!! I vacillate between belief & non-belief and I’d love to hear what others are thinking. This morning on Warroom he was making sense but there are times when I have to just walk away because he’s over the top loud & obnoxious.
he is real, I met the other members of infowars at an event
good luck, defend our Constitution !
I want to read his book. He made so much sense this morning. He said the reason they’re pushing e-cars is to eventually prevent us from owning & operating vehicles. Then they own us. Of course I’m paraphrasing but it goes along with Agenda 21 & Schwab. You’ll own nothing and you’ll be happy. Thanks for your response. I’m so anxious to see the replies on your question!
nearly all EVs are dependant on Chinese batteries. By killing IC engines and promoting EVs, who stands to lose and who stands to profit?
I'm still more than happy with my diesel and I own it.
does the electric car narrative go along with Constitutional Values ? If not, why are We paying to upgrade the grid when yuppies don't feel like smelling octane?
they can all sniff my exhaust :)
I was in Lymme in the 90s, stayed at a Benny Hill type hotel with an outdoor calisthenics gym. It was a hoot, the beer was great and I got my first taste of 'The Daily Mail' on my doorstep.
now I've got Benny Hill music in my head lol
Well, lets say he also recommends good books, try The Killing of Uncle Sam, by Brown and Williams, it spelled out what the F-Reserve did to us. I truly could not finish it, I will work on my issues, then give the book its due.
Hannity, Tucker and Jones mix in the truth and enough of it to pull you in. That is how controlled opposition works.
So when they said (eg Alex Jones and Info wars) they lost control of "Q" what they are saying if you read between the lines is that people do not buy all in with what they are selling (eg info).
Bottom line is that do your research yourself and be an independent thinker.
it was a real shocker seeing Fox call Arizona for Biden after everything was either shut down or "water pipes were breaking in Georgia"...
I know something is "off" about AJ but for me it may just be a hypersensitivity to people who have drug and alcohol issues when their health is already such that their heads coud explode like the old SNL skit about that singer. And I observed just how icy a shoulder Flynn gave Alex at an event even tho he had done an interview on his show. But do I think AJ made up the whole issue he has about Sandy Hook? No. And recent highly sus similar occurences make me think he is onto something all right. Anyway I go back a long way with Alex Jones. I'm hangin' in there from a distance.
wait a minute, don't the 3-letters over do it a bit in their work? so if aj is cO, then that tells me WE aren't doing enough and getting fooled by this.
regardless, for me, I've got to be involved locally.
there is no ability to know for certain.
I believe the only truism that holds, has been true, and is still true, is what Jesus James Angleton once called the "wilderness of mirrors". He was not just speaking of clandestine work, but potentially any of the channels of information available to the public.
In a wilderness of mirrors, the whole point is to convey the sensation that a truth is disclosed or clarified by a trustworthy source. Just like a mirror can reflect truth but based on how its calibrated it can also distort that reflection just enough to achieve additional purposes.
And who has the time and resources to verify for themselves information by cross checking independent (not coordinated) sources, etc? In a wilderness of mirrors, you'd have to make it your whole reason of existence to get anywhere meaningful.
I can give you my take on Alex Jones. You could allow him to tell us all about the dubious goings on behind the scenes so we think he is telling us the truth. We check Jones against stuff we find out elsewhere. Which means that he is not actually divulging any secrets.
Then, when a topic enters the news that needs to be suppressed they can set Jones up - or get him to cooperate. Either works. For instance, you could find him a super pizzagate witness who has all the correct facts and one wrong one. Jones broadcasts the news and is caught out by that one incorrect fact. That could go to court and Jones could be sued into oblivion but somehow he manages to bounce back.
Later, he might spill the beans on, say, a mass shooting. Again, they get him to say one thing that is incorrect and they go after him on that basis. It is what lawyers do in court. If they want to discredit someone they find a lie they once uttered and use that as proof that their entire testimony was a lie.
it would be nice to be able to look at the mechanisms of controlled opposition in this case of Mr. Jones, since we are shielded from the truth, we can't see it. Lets say Bush 43 was controlled opposition, what emotions were fostered during that time when the WTC 1&2 and Building #7 all had to fall down more or less within a day? Do you remember him going to the debris and shouting down into the rubble with a megaphone ? (like Alex Jones ! )