I'm not blaming all jews. But many jews know what's up and letting it slide to capitalize on the situation. That does not help one bit and it fosters suspicions and resentments that will never heal.
The problem is by using a catch all ("the Jews") which not only falls into a pitfall, but empowers and enhances the impact when you hit the spikes at the bottom.
There are better ways to target different sects or specific groups of people, but it's incredibly easy to generalize ("the Jews") and ultimately destroy any point you are trying to make in the eyes of the pedestrian.
But you have to remember that you aren't usually debating or arguing a point for the person you're talking to to change their tune, you are arguing for the onlookers.
So when you are making an overgeneralization that comes across as incredibly dishonest (unless anyone who says "the Jews" actually does believe that Average Joe Jew down the road is part of a global effort to control and/or destroy the world or its population) you are turning the onlookers against you.
But if you talk about the Khazarians, you'll incite a few people to start their journeys down that rabbit hole.
What do you suggest we do? The Jews are in control of the world, that is undeniable, what better ways are there to target different sects? I am not going to hit any spikes, the Jews are. To discriminate about the ones who eat children would give the perps an escape route, "it wasn't us it was the others!"
There's the problem; it's not "The Jews are in control of the world", it's "Some Jews, with others, are in control of the world". Through your generality, you could say, "Indians (from the country of India) are in control of the hotel industry", or "The Irish are all alcoholics!".
But the difference is, when you even HINT that a Jewish person did something wrong, you're deplatformed instantly and in some countries you're even jailed.
That is what you do to HIDE things, not to stop hate speech.
"We" might, if Catholics controlled the media, a huge swath of our banking system and much of our government. And if any individual's life and livelihood could be ruined for criticizing Catholics as a group.
There is only one group that may not be criticized.
I'm not blaming all jews. But many jews know what's up and letting it slide to capitalize on the situation. That does not help one bit and it fosters suspicions and resentments that will never heal.
And the fact that no one is allowed to speak out against ANY of them without their livelihoods & lives being threatened.
RINOs are even pushing laws trying to make "antisemetic" speech illegal at the state level. DeSantis already did it in Florida.
Yeah, another red flag to add to the desantis pile of red flags
What???
See exactly "disavow antisemitism."
you mean, they operate like a tribe or something? whodda thunkit
I agree with that. Just wanted to let you know we do call those motherfuckers out.
George Carlin is a bigger historical figure than people realize.
he never mentioned them by their race
What did he say about them?
The problem is by using a catch all ("the Jews") which not only falls into a pitfall, but empowers and enhances the impact when you hit the spikes at the bottom.
There are better ways to target different sects or specific groups of people, but it's incredibly easy to generalize ("the Jews") and ultimately destroy any point you are trying to make in the eyes of the pedestrian.
Going down the khazarian rabbit hole is deep, dark and long, and will still end up with you being called an anti-semite.
Going down any of these rabbit holes gets you called something,
Q supporters are crazy conspiracy theorists that are somehow dangerous violent people despite not being Antifa/BLM who openly have been.
But you have to remember that you aren't usually debating or arguing a point for the person you're talking to to change their tune, you are arguing for the onlookers.
So when you are making an overgeneralization that comes across as incredibly dishonest (unless anyone who says "the Jews" actually does believe that Average Joe Jew down the road is part of a global effort to control and/or destroy the world or its population) you are turning the onlookers against you.
But if you talk about the Khazarians, you'll incite a few people to start their journeys down that rabbit hole.
What do you suggest we do? The Jews are in control of the world, that is undeniable, what better ways are there to target different sects? I am not going to hit any spikes, the Jews are. To discriminate about the ones who eat children would give the perps an escape route, "it wasn't us it was the others!"
There's the problem; it's not "The Jews are in control of the world", it's "Some Jews, with others, are in control of the world". Through your generality, you could say, "Indians (from the country of India) are in control of the hotel industry", or "The Irish are all alcoholics!".
But the difference is, when you even HINT that a Jewish person did something wrong, you're deplatformed instantly and in some countries you're even jailed.
That is what you do to HIDE things, not to stop hate speech.
If they don't control the world then who does?
Take this for example. We know the pope is corrupt and lots of pedophile priests. Do we say "Catholics are pedos" ?
"We" might, if Catholics controlled the media, a huge swath of our banking system and much of our government. And if any individual's life and livelihood could be ruined for criticizing Catholics as a group.
There is only one group that may not be criticized.
In general, yes. At least the Catholic clergy.
A lot of people do and very often as well.
Also when you do call out individuals the rest still dogpile on you anyway.
Ve didn't know. Ve vere good jews.