This has been my pet theory with no crumbs to offer. The logic that came to me was, give the way Cabal works they exaggerate everything. So why would we believe thats not the case with population?
Also, the way census was done, it was pretty obvious that there was no accountability and it would have been easy to fudge the numbers a lot. Later on, looking at the shenaigans with census in US during Obama time, makes me think this was not their first picnic with census.
That said, I always felt it would be more like 5 billion. 2.5 billion is an interesting thought.
BTW, remember the first time they really pushed the depop agenda in literature? "Stand on Zanzibar"
In was written in 60s, and the premise was that 2010 we would have 7 billion people in the world and if they all stood next to each other, they would fit on Zanzibar.
So when did authors start predicting trends that perfectly? Oh yeah, when they are pre-programming us.
Btw, that book has everything - Eugenic Laws, A Supercomputer, Mental programming, and tons of stuff that Clown Schwab would be jealous of.
Only if that idiot Congressman from Georgia says so. I give you Hank Johnson, the man who thinks islands float around. This man makes laws. Let that sink in.
It just goes to show that almost all Americans are either idiots or completely brainwashed and misinformed. I know PHDs who won't listen to or believe shit and they'd vote for him even if they saw the videos because they would day it was misinformation. Fucking morons.
The last U.S. census was rigged. I tried to apply to work on the census, but was bombarded by Woke questions about my "identity" and backed off. No doubt the employee based was deliberately skewed.
“So when did authors start predicting trends that perfectly?”
Population growth is trivially easy to model, basic population growth equations are taught in high school and college math (Calc and pre Calc). Once you get to differential equations you can even accurately model the effects of limited resources and predation, and accurately predict the effects for years.
While I agree that some countries like China are probably fudging their numbers, the total global population figure is probably pretty close to reality. Just because people in the 60s could predict it doesn’t mean it’s fake; it’s just math.
People in the 1960’s predict that the global population in circa 2010 will be 7 billion people. This prediction comes to pass. You assert that everyone is fudging their numbers because you think it’s impossible for such a prediction to be made. I explain the math behind such predictions, and your response is that the math doesn’t correspond to reality, despite the fact that the original prediction is, as far as we know, accurate.
So population modeling is inaccurate because population statistics are being fudged, and the statistics must be fudged because the modeling must be inaccurate. This is circular reasoning.
Again, I agree that some countries, particularly China, are probably fudging their population stats. However, if you’re going to assert that the global population numbers are off by, for example, 10% or more, then you’re obligated to provide more evidence for this than “it can’t be that many people because it matches predictions from 50+ years ago; there’s no way they could predict that”.
So population modeling is inaccurate because population statistics are being fudged, and the statistics must be fudged because the modeling must be inaccurate. This is circular reasoning.
Let me help you by breaking down the circular reasoning.
Lets start with the elites with an agenda of depopulation in early 1900s. These elites are the same ones funding academic research (amongst many other things).
Step 1: Their agenda requires making people believe that there is a population explosion.
Step 2: Fund those research that helps with your agenda, push them to mainstream. In this case, the models that predict this particular growth
Step 3: Ensure population numbers as accepted are fudged enough to follow this model.
None of these steps are unbelievable, infact they pretty much exposed themselves last two years when they showed us how badly medical research field has been controlled by these same people.
They do it all the time. They tried to do it with "climate change", they do it with pandemics, they do it with pretty much everything.
Climate change didnt work because temperatures can be recorded by anyone, anywhere.
With pandemics it worked pretty well. They predicted pandemics, they funded the research, and then suddenly we had pandemics.
I could understand this kind of incredulity 3 years ago, even amongst the most awake people, but at this point we can decide to be this naive at our own peril.
Careful now, I've brought this up two times before myself. The first time we had a pretty good conversation about how there's incentive to do so (voting redistricting in favor of the cabal, siphoning off social security and retirement funds, etc. siphoning off foreign aid, etc. etc.). The second time was basically a bunch of people telling me I'm saying something I wasn't and insisting over and over again that I was wrong for saying something I never said.
Either way, there's some logic to this theory. We know that, here in the USA for example, they lie on the census to manipulate the redistricting process. As has been proven time and again. But since you brought up China, we can talk about them as well.
EVERYTHING that comes out of china is a lie. They fraudulently pump up every possible number to make things look better for them. So things like "having the world's largest population", should be looked at with a magnifying glass when it comes to china.
I've seen many estimates that say that the actual Chinese population is closer to the 250-300 million range with 500 million being an absolute upper limit. But because they want everyone to think there's more of them, they artificially pump up their population numbers by refusing to list deaths for 10+ years at a time.
I'm sure China isn't the only one doing crap like this either, they may be doing it at a higher level than other countries, but I'm sure every single "developed" nation" does this same crap for all the various reasons pointed out above. There's too much financial and political incentive to not do it.
Besides, we know for a fact that there are dead and non existent people on the voter rolls, which are a source that auditors use for the final numbers on the census. So pump those up with enough fake/dead people, and then you start having a pretty large portion of your population as being non existent.
And with decades of One Child Policy, and now that they are allowed 2 kids, I've read many don't even want two, just keep status quo. Their view of life is heinous. I watched a documentary on Amazon about how it is now, and some of the women are just incredibly cold hearted. The one midwife murdered countless newborns and her conscience is seared. The kids they didn't kill they consider to have been trafficked in the documentary. The population is aging and dying and they aren't replacing themselves so likely numbers are overinflated. Also look at all the empty new cities.
Agreed that China is fudging their numbers and are the worst offender.
Decades of one child policies, combined with lack of sanitation and safety standards, not to mention communism’s tendency to murder and starve its people, does not add up to 1 billion+ people.
NO. Having lived in china for a year 2007 and travelled extensively. Spent time in all major cities, but flew over so many green lands, mountains ,rivers ,waterways etc. Not to mention the long drives or train trips that would look like vast sways of route 66. I for one am not buying their population totals ever.
By my calculations 7 billion people could fit in Texas, and each person would have 1,000 square feet, about the size of a two bedroom apartment where I’m from.
Texas has 0.136% of Earth’s total land area.
Your observation of vast stretches of uninhabited (or at least not urbanized) land says more about the vastness of earth than the alleged inaccuracy of population data.
The earth has more than enough room for 7 billion people, could probably support several times this number if it weren’t for corrupt governments.
TL;DR: the Earth is a lot bigger than a lot of people think. It’s hard to contextualize numbers on this scale.
There should be a visual way to determine this, like satellite images of populated areas that could obtain a pretty good estimate of how many people per square mile.
This has been my pet theory with no crumbs to offer. The logic that came to me was, give the way Cabal works they exaggerate everything. So why would we believe thats not the case with population?
Also, the way census was done, it was pretty obvious that there was no accountability and it would have been easy to fudge the numbers a lot. Later on, looking at the shenaigans with census in US during Obama time, makes me think this was not their first picnic with census.
That said, I always felt it would be more like 5 billion. 2.5 billion is an interesting thought.
BTW, remember the first time they really pushed the depop agenda in literature? "Stand on Zanzibar"
In was written in 60s, and the premise was that 2010 we would have 7 billion people in the world and if they all stood next to each other, they would fit on Zanzibar.
So when did authors start predicting trends that perfectly? Oh yeah, when they are pre-programming us.
Btw, that book has everything - Eugenic Laws, A Supercomputer, Mental programming, and tons of stuff that Clown Schwab would be jealous of.
Wouldn't Zanzibar tip over if everyone stood on it?
Only if that idiot Congressman from Georgia says so. I give you Hank Johnson, the man who thinks islands float around. This man makes laws. Let that sink in.
https://youtu.be/cesSRfXqS1Q
If islands floated us Brits would of cut the anchors and sailed them home.
🤣🤣🤣👍💥💥
Exactly!
It just goes to show that almost all Americans are either idiots or completely brainwashed and misinformed. I know PHDs who won't listen to or believe shit and they'd vote for him even if they saw the videos because they would day it was misinformation. Fucking morons.
Not if we put Stacey Abrams in the middle.
The last U.S. census was rigged. I tried to apply to work on the census, but was bombarded by Woke questions about my "identity" and backed off. No doubt the employee based was deliberately skewed.
“So when did authors start predicting trends that perfectly?”
Population growth is trivially easy to model, basic population growth equations are taught in high school and college math (Calc and pre Calc). Once you get to differential equations you can even accurately model the effects of limited resources and predation, and accurately predict the effects for years.
While I agree that some countries like China are probably fudging their numbers, the total global population figure is probably pretty close to reality. Just because people in the 60s could predict it doesn’t mean it’s fake; it’s just math.
Oh, I don't doubt all this modeling is taught in high school and college math. That doesn't mean it has anything to do with reality.
So let me get this straight:
People in the 1960’s predict that the global population in circa 2010 will be 7 billion people. This prediction comes to pass. You assert that everyone is fudging their numbers because you think it’s impossible for such a prediction to be made. I explain the math behind such predictions, and your response is that the math doesn’t correspond to reality, despite the fact that the original prediction is, as far as we know, accurate.
So population modeling is inaccurate because population statistics are being fudged, and the statistics must be fudged because the modeling must be inaccurate. This is circular reasoning.
Again, I agree that some countries, particularly China, are probably fudging their population stats. However, if you’re going to assert that the global population numbers are off by, for example, 10% or more, then you’re obligated to provide more evidence for this than “it can’t be that many people because it matches predictions from 50+ years ago; there’s no way they could predict that”.
Let me help you by breaking down the circular reasoning.
Lets start with the elites with an agenda of depopulation in early 1900s. These elites are the same ones funding academic research (amongst many other things).
Step 1: Their agenda requires making people believe that there is a population explosion.
Step 2: Fund those research that helps with your agenda, push them to mainstream. In this case, the models that predict this particular growth
Step 3: Ensure population numbers as accepted are fudged enough to follow this model.
None of these steps are unbelievable, infact they pretty much exposed themselves last two years when they showed us how badly medical research field has been controlled by these same people.
They do it all the time. They tried to do it with "climate change", they do it with pandemics, they do it with pretty much everything.
Climate change didnt work because temperatures can be recorded by anyone, anywhere.
With pandemics it worked pretty well. They predicted pandemics, they funded the research, and then suddenly we had pandemics.
I could understand this kind of incredulity 3 years ago, even amongst the most awake people, but at this point we can decide to be this naive at our own peril.
They give countries aid based on how big the population is so there is definitely some 3rd world overestimating
So they can launder $$ back to their own pockets.
We can't count ballots in 1 county so who knows.....
Careful now, I've brought this up two times before myself. The first time we had a pretty good conversation about how there's incentive to do so (voting redistricting in favor of the cabal, siphoning off social security and retirement funds, etc. siphoning off foreign aid, etc. etc.). The second time was basically a bunch of people telling me I'm saying something I wasn't and insisting over and over again that I was wrong for saying something I never said.
Either way, there's some logic to this theory. We know that, here in the USA for example, they lie on the census to manipulate the redistricting process. As has been proven time and again. But since you brought up China, we can talk about them as well.
EVERYTHING that comes out of china is a lie. They fraudulently pump up every possible number to make things look better for them. So things like "having the world's largest population", should be looked at with a magnifying glass when it comes to china.
I've seen many estimates that say that the actual Chinese population is closer to the 250-300 million range with 500 million being an absolute upper limit. But because they want everyone to think there's more of them, they artificially pump up their population numbers by refusing to list deaths for 10+ years at a time.
I'm sure China isn't the only one doing crap like this either, they may be doing it at a higher level than other countries, but I'm sure every single "developed" nation" does this same crap for all the various reasons pointed out above. There's too much financial and political incentive to not do it.
Besides, we know for a fact that there are dead and non existent people on the voter rolls, which are a source that auditors use for the final numbers on the census. So pump those up with enough fake/dead people, and then you start having a pretty large portion of your population as being non existent.
And with decades of One Child Policy, and now that they are allowed 2 kids, I've read many don't even want two, just keep status quo. Their view of life is heinous. I watched a documentary on Amazon about how it is now, and some of the women are just incredibly cold hearted. The one midwife murdered countless newborns and her conscience is seared. The kids they didn't kill they consider to have been trafficked in the documentary. The population is aging and dying and they aren't replacing themselves so likely numbers are overinflated. Also look at all the empty new cities.
Agreed that China is fudging their numbers and are the worst offender.
Decades of one child policies, combined with lack of sanitation and safety standards, not to mention communism’s tendency to murder and starve its people, does not add up to 1 billion+ people.
NO. Having lived in china for a year 2007 and travelled extensively. Spent time in all major cities, but flew over so many green lands, mountains ,rivers ,waterways etc. Not to mention the long drives or train trips that would look like vast sways of route 66. I for one am not buying their population totals ever.
By my calculations 7 billion people could fit in Texas, and each person would have 1,000 square feet, about the size of a two bedroom apartment where I’m from.
Texas has 0.136% of Earth’s total land area.
Your observation of vast stretches of uninhabited (or at least not urbanized) land says more about the vastness of earth than the alleged inaccuracy of population data.
The earth has more than enough room for 7 billion people, could probably support several times this number if it weren’t for corrupt governments.
TL;DR: the Earth is a lot bigger than a lot of people think. It’s hard to contextualize numbers on this scale.
After watching global election scams, it's obvious our modern culture struggles with math, so you may be right.
Our modern culture struggles with simply thinking.
There should be a visual way to determine this, like satellite images of populated areas that could obtain a pretty good estimate of how many people per square mile.
Um, sauce? Anything at all?
Whim worship.
https://youtu.be/cesSRfXqS1Q
What are you basing your feelings on?
Lol whut?