The Scale of the FRAUD in Arizona !!🤯🤯😡
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (28)
sorted by:
Provide source please.
Assumedly, its using registered PRIMARY voter roles, public, vs poll books. But....... Dems probably participate in primaries a lot less in states with "pure primaries"
If not using PRIMARIES data, then I bet its probably a few percent more Dems, maybe 35%.
Meghan McCain voted 800,000 times because she's that big
Yuge
Bigly
Source?
... was TOTAL.
What's the source for this?
This is just random text without any sauce
I would like source also please.
Did you type these numbers into a notepad and post it?
that is exactly what it looks like
The statistics from the drops of the last day votes are not really possible if drawn from a truly random sample of last day voting in Maricopa county. See for yourselves.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/11/impossible-maricopa-officials-now-report-democrats-independents-voted-katie-hobbs-election-day/
I have models that could easily show this, and I might just have time to put out a report to this effect later this weekend.
Yes, there was rampant fraud - but...
There were Independents that showed up also - so where did these percentages come from?
There are more registered Independents than there are Rs and Ds. Independents have almost always majorly swung R in AZ. Regardless, massive fraud in AZ. Probably a good 50k Lake votes that vanished and were never counted, not to mention votes that were switched.
Look, I live in Arizona. Lake signs everywhere. Very few of the enemy. She did NOT have the votes. Lake is the winner.
The problem is proving that. Give me access and I will fucking get the answers but no one that will be appointed is like me, they are bought and paid for months ago.
AZ is kinda fucked right now.
I’m not saying there isn’t fraud .. But signs are zero evidence, just as registered for one party or another is zero evidence just as turnout to polls is zero evidence.
Proof to that point? I’m registered independent, NEVER put anyones sign in my yard EVER, and often have voted absentee ballot for the convenience due to the jobs I worked most of ny life making it more difficult to go in person.
i'm not buying that stupid 50/50 split anymore. they start cheating right off the bat with that trick.
Democrat common core math finally paying off for them.
Sauce please.
I saw another source yesterday that showed Democrats being only ~15% of the electorate in Arizona. I will see if I can find it but I am nearly certain it was posted here.
Edit: It wasn't here. This is what I saw yesterday showing Dems in Maricopa County being only 15% of the electorate.
https://pic8.co/sh/omFWKM.png
Get bent, shill
Imagine calling him a shill when he has multitudes more positive history over yours.
Weird. Maybe he just.. doesn't agree with the situation?
Or is that too hard to grasp?
His "positive history" has no bearing on my comment.
Many of us came to the same conclusion, based on strong signals from respected sources. Rubbing our faces in it, within a movement that is intend to unite (and not divide) us is VERY shill-like.
Further, "positive history" on GA does not serve as a basis for attempting to belittle other pedes, in any respect. That was a petty move, so I called him on it. Neither of you are my judge, fren.
I, along with many others here, was disappointed that the signs we saw so clearly did not signal what we and those who brought them to our attention thought and hoped they might. Being highly intelligent, I stand by my conclusions. "Positive history" doesn't outweigh my intellect, by any means, and I reject simply mockery by someone who may well have had the same perceptions as I and many others did, if exposed to the same information we were.
Having "positive history" on GA is not a measure of intellect. IQ could certainly be a factor, but patriotism, support for President Trump, Q and this Movement are the more likely factors in an upvoting history. Also a strong factor is both longevity here - I came here almost 2 years ago after free-floating for a few months (I think) after VOAT shut down and I stumbled into GA in the early days. I was at VOAT starting in November of Q's first year. So, there's a "positive history" on my side that you don't see in my GA "score". Your response was based on your perception of some kind of rank the gloater- yes, shill, in this case - may have over me (which I flatly reject as irrelevant, as my "score" clearly demonstrates that I contribute well here, and as any such rank is relative). If you want to join the floater in throwing smack at me and any others for OUR perceptions, then that makes you both hypocrites. Your perception of this matter was different than mine. That's it. I was disappointed. You and the floater were not. I didn't see any point in the gloating post, and in the moment I was offended by it - so I responded accordingly. No GA 'ranking' would have made a difference either way, in my position or in my response. Of course, prayer WOULD have, and had I gone to the Lord first I know that He would have shown me that what I perceived to be a smack post - whether it was or wasn't - didn't matter in the least, and was not a valid source of angst for me. I did go to Him afterward, praying that all I had hoped and expected PDJT would come to fruition soon, but understanding that all will be revealed according to His Godly Order. THAT matters, to me.
Although I was disappointed that President Trump "only" announced his candidacy - which to me was a foregone conclusion - I remain fully committed to this Movement and do not waver in the least.
Where We Go One We Go ALL -- NOT just those of us who have positive history, and certainly not just those who have MORE "positive history" on GA than others.
Thank you for the opportunity to clarify my position on this matter. Once again, WWG1WGA. Accordingly, you will never see me mock a fellow pede for their perception(s) orreasonably-supported conclusions.
Have a wonderful day, Patriot.