I have watched 3 episodes of the series, since I saw this post. It is very intriguing and his questions compelling. I can’t help but wonder if the pole shift that “supposedly” happens every 12,000 years or so is on tap. Yeah, I have watched some of those pole shift yt videos. If anything is NCSWIC, that would be it.
I, too watched three episodes so far. I put them on my wife's laptop as she's interested in geology & archeology. She watched the first two minutes, screamed "another bloody conspiracy theory" and refused to watch more.
I don't hold out much hope for the rest of the population.
This situation as described would have created a relatively small group of people who in their day could accurately say 'we have everything' and that allowed them 'magical' superiority that translated to 'gods on earth' to the ignorant ('profane'). This developed into 'secret societies' that tied into the huge Gordian Knot that exists today, through intermarriage, business and trade connections and so on......until they had a virtually global (western globe) network in a pyramidal hierarchy with rules and rule books and standards to complete degrees that vetted and determined the amount of secrets, aka 'truths' to divulge. This translated after one (there have been a couple) as The Sea People who used the chaos to advantage and attacked Egypt (at least twice in two major battles).
Well, Hancock has been writing about this stuff since the 1980s so Netflix is just NOW waking up to this. Also read books by Michael Cremo, and an obscure book by Lloyd Pye called "Everything You Know is Wrong." Good stuff.
Loyd Pye was a tremendous researcher. The evolution record for human kind is bullshit, to which the fossil record of early hominids is grossly distorted to make them humanized. Pye pointed out how the curators of ancient extinct apes would shorten the arms and lengthen the legs to suggest, look here's an early human. Even the artist renderings of these extinct primates would use a chimp-like face with a human looking body. Presto! It's our ancient ancestors.
Loyd Pye also addressed the Sasquatch issue convincingly showing all the evidence points to them, if existing are Neanderthals. It's quite a fascinating video of Loyd Pye explaining this.
Believe me, it is a rare treat to find someone else who knows about Lloyd Pye and his book. Yes, for the reasons you stated, it was a wonderful read. I actually have a copy signed by the author. I met him once at a convention and struck up a long conversation with him. Neat guy, I was saddened when he passed away.
Ditto. You were fortunate to have met him and talked with him. I'm envious. His death was suspicious to me. I understand it was a very aggressive cancer that killed him. I think Loyd Pye was starting to get traction publicly and even appeared on Ancient Astronauts at that time. Like Graham Hitchcock, Loyd Pye was intellectually courageous in his analysis. His exposure of the prevailing cult of evolution that is incessantly preached to us, made many apotheosized academics feel uncomfortable. In saying this, I believe Pye made several enemies.
Another book you might want to look into is "Darwin's Black Box" by Michael Behe. He is a scientist who has studied the Darwinian model of evolution and says that the model cannot be valid.
He claims that certain functions of the human body could not have come about via natural selection, and he gives several examples.
He never states it overtly, but one could draw a conclusion that "intelligent design" was at work in the creation of humans.
There's more to this than Darwin's theory, the basis of which was influenced by the Book of Genesis. Even Darwin's work is twisted and misrepresented for Evil Doers.
Although, Charles Robert Darwin contributions borrowed heavily from Jean-Baptiste Lamarck and others, perhaps it was the new era that gave breath to his views. Darwin's views radically changed the debate about the species of animals. In Darwin's time, there was a great scientific debate between monogensism and polygenesism. Darwin originally sided with polygenesists, but changed his tune when criticism from the Church became rather serious. Polygenesists were persecuted by the Church.
Have you noticed even to this day the hostility toward anything promoting polygenesism though? I wonder why? Maybe Darwin himself can answer this. There is no sustainable genetic drift. It's contrary to Nature's Laws. It's contrary to the Eternal Laws. My definition of Eternal Law is different than Thomas Aquinas'. Rather, it involves the Golden Ratio and Fibonacci's spiral. This is demonstrated remarkably through Viktor Schauberger's work, and others and is repeated everywhere throughout the universe.
You mentioned certain functions of the body that come from Natural Selection because all too many human characteristics don't fit at all with the ecology of this world. Here are some:
Humans are the only mammal incapable of producing its own vitamin C.
Most mammals produce Galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose (α-gal) (Alpha-gal) sugars. Humans do not have naturally occurring alpha-gal coating their cell membranes like most other mammals do. Galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose (α-gal) is a sugar structure found in glycoproteins and glycolipids from all mammals except old world primates, including humans. In ancestral Old World monkeys and apes, the gene for the enzyme α-1,3-galactosyltransferase that is essential for the synthesis of α-Gal was inactivated [3]. Therefore, humans and recent Old World primates do not express α-Gal and this structure is highly immunogenic for them.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6344609/
Astronauts stationed in space experience their circadian clock changing to the circadian clock of Mars. To me, that is really weird and perhaps telling.
Compared to animals humans exhibit complete lack of robustness. We have widespread back problems, hip problems, knee problems though out our lifespan that animals lack. As we age, only the adult human brain shrinks.
Are we similar to primates like the apes? Not at all.
Despite the propaganda and lies, we are not even close to being related to apes. Did you know primates can breathe while they drink? How odd. Humans are incapable of this. Did you know apes have more chromosomes than humans? That's right, they have 48 pairs and we have only 46 pairs of chromosomes.
I mentioned earlier robustness that's consistent throughout Nature without exception. Yet, humans are not robust and are frail and weak compared to Nature's creatures. Compared to apes or monkeys our bones are much thinner and lighter. Our muscles are 5 to 10 times weaker. Our skin and adipose tissue are handicaps in this world. Our body hair is missing and the pattern is reversed compared to apes. Our heads and nails must also be trimmed. The human skull is fragile and our brain is not at all similar. Our locomotion is the most obvious difference. Human speech relies on throats that are unlike any other creature on planet Earth and in comparison are completely redesigned. Even our sex is radically different, in that there's no signs of typical oestrus cycles as in animals. Humans have over 4000 genetic disorders, which is not seen in any significant numbers for any species. Compared to animals, even our feet are not designed for walking. It is even thought that our bodies may have been designed for less gravity than this Earth and perhaps for an entirely different world having less gravity.
And another thought: Knowing what we do about the human genome being radically different from other species on Earth, I can see why clinical trials of new medicines and drugs that seem to work (or not) in animal trials so often fail to work in human trials.
I further wonder to what degree the current mRNA "vaccines" (I don't accept the revised definition of "vaccine" to include these gene-modifying products) will have on the human race 3 to 4 generations from now? Has this human trial with millions (perhaps billions) of participants irreversibly damaged our genetic destiny?
I don't expect to know the answer to that in my lifetime, but I do think it's possible that future generations will curse the clumsy, ham fisted "researchers" that are now being revealed as Public Enemy #1.
All excellent points. Yes, Pye also pointed out the difference between the primates (48 chromosomes / 24 pairs) and humans (46 chromosomes / 23 pairs). As he said, "A species does not lose one entire chromosome pair and turn out BETTER." I'm also aware of the many (too many) genetic deficiencies that humans we have, suggesting that we are not a natural species adapted to Earth.
Operating purely from memory here (my copy of "Darwin's Black Box" is on loan right now), two of the complicated systems of the human body used as examples by Michael Behe are the clotting factor and the bacterium flagellum in the human gut. Behe used the term "Irreducible complexity" to describe these functions, in that "certain biological systems with multiple interacting parts would not function if one of the parts was removed, so supposedly could not have evolved by successive small modifications from earlier less complex systems through natural selection, which would need all intermediate precursor systems to have been fully functional."
It's an interesting point you bring up about circadian cycles and Mars, but while I understand it, it's a rabbit hole I won't go down at this time. Suffice it to say that there is more about human origins and human history than could be written about in this limited venue. There is strong circumstantial and a bit of direct evidence that the human genome has been "tweaked" over the past few millennia, including the side insertion of 223 so-called "alien genes" (https://newslog.cyberjournal.org/human-origins-223-mystery-genes/) at some point in our recent history; i.e., within the last 100,000 years.
I'm not sure that we will know the complete picture of human origins in my lifetime, but I remain hopeful that more revelations will be made in coming years.
“[W]here does it end? Believing that election fraud is real? Believing 9/11 was an inside job?”
So your telling me the election was stolen and 9/11 was an inside job...
Thoroughly enjoyable, with some interesting locations. Not sure why it is considered dangerous, but maybe because origin stories from different religions seem to match (which threatens the division of religion), and talk of survivors who set about giving people the knowledge to start civilizing again (which threatens muh evolution theories). These also curiously match with geological records of the scorched layer that covered most of the Northern Hemisphere, and disastrous flooding about 11600 years ago. Also, the ancients had documented in which part of the galaxy the meteors resided, which we appear to be entering shortly.
I've been watching vids of interviews of Hancock for years now. Some good stuff and applies to what we're doing now because so much of it is about active suppression of information, mostly by the ruling elite in academia.
But what I don't like about the guy is his constant promotion of ayahuasca drug and his whine about how if humans would just take the drug and see what he sees, we'd all just magically get along.
In reality, with real humans, what we'd get if we chose his way of being is eventually, everyone that didn't see exactly what was expected to be seen would become enemy and a new reason for wars would begin.
It's not religion that starts wars.
It's not resource scarcity that starts wars.
It's not ideology that starts wars.
Humans are a bunch of contentious asshats for the most part and reasons for wars will be attached to any and every damn thing.
The counter to that would be taking ayahuasca exposes you to potential other dimensions, where extra-dimensional beings battle for humanity's true nature and fate.
I watched it too.. pretty interesting!
I have watched 3 episodes of the series, since I saw this post. It is very intriguing and his questions compelling. I can’t help but wonder if the pole shift that “supposedly” happens every 12,000 years or so is on tap. Yeah, I have watched some of those pole shift yt videos. If anything is NCSWIC, that would be it.
I, too watched three episodes so far. I put them on my wife's laptop as she's interested in geology & archeology. She watched the first two minutes, screamed "another bloody conspiracy theory" and refused to watch more.
I don't hold out much hope for the rest of the population.
Sorry about your wife. Hancock is an investigative reporter and I liked his questions.
This situation as described would have created a relatively small group of people who in their day could accurately say 'we have everything' and that allowed them 'magical' superiority that translated to 'gods on earth' to the ignorant ('profane'). This developed into 'secret societies' that tied into the huge Gordian Knot that exists today, through intermarriage, business and trade connections and so on......until they had a virtually global (western globe) network in a pyramidal hierarchy with rules and rule books and standards to complete degrees that vetted and determined the amount of secrets, aka 'truths' to divulge. This translated after one (there have been a couple) as The Sea People who used the chaos to advantage and attacked Egypt (at least twice in two major battles).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gordian_Knot
Sorry about the wiki ref.
Well, Hancock has been writing about this stuff since the 1980s so Netflix is just NOW waking up to this. Also read books by Michael Cremo, and an obscure book by Lloyd Pye called "Everything You Know is Wrong." Good stuff.
Thanks for the reading ideas u/TNBanjoMan 👈🏻
Loyd Pye was a tremendous researcher. The evolution record for human kind is bullshit, to which the fossil record of early hominids is grossly distorted to make them humanized. Pye pointed out how the curators of ancient extinct apes would shorten the arms and lengthen the legs to suggest, look here's an early human. Even the artist renderings of these extinct primates would use a chimp-like face with a human looking body. Presto! It's our ancient ancestors.
Loyd Pye also addressed the Sasquatch issue convincingly showing all the evidence points to them, if existing are Neanderthals. It's quite a fascinating video of Loyd Pye explaining this.
Believe me, it is a rare treat to find someone else who knows about Lloyd Pye and his book. Yes, for the reasons you stated, it was a wonderful read. I actually have a copy signed by the author. I met him once at a convention and struck up a long conversation with him. Neat guy, I was saddened when he passed away.
Ditto. You were fortunate to have met him and talked with him. I'm envious. His death was suspicious to me. I understand it was a very aggressive cancer that killed him. I think Loyd Pye was starting to get traction publicly and even appeared on Ancient Astronauts at that time. Like Graham Hitchcock, Loyd Pye was intellectually courageous in his analysis. His exposure of the prevailing cult of evolution that is incessantly preached to us, made many apotheosized academics feel uncomfortable. In saying this, I believe Pye made several enemies.
Another book you might want to look into is "Darwin's Black Box" by Michael Behe. He is a scientist who has studied the Darwinian model of evolution and says that the model cannot be valid.
He claims that certain functions of the human body could not have come about via natural selection, and he gives several examples.
He never states it overtly, but one could draw a conclusion that "intelligent design" was at work in the creation of humans.
I highly recommend it to thinking people.
There's more to this than Darwin's theory, the basis of which was influenced by the Book of Genesis. Even Darwin's work is twisted and misrepresented for Evil Doers.
Although, Charles Robert Darwin contributions borrowed heavily from Jean-Baptiste Lamarck and others, perhaps it was the new era that gave breath to his views. Darwin's views radically changed the debate about the species of animals. In Darwin's time, there was a great scientific debate between monogensism and polygenesism. Darwin originally sided with polygenesists, but changed his tune when criticism from the Church became rather serious. Polygenesists were persecuted by the Church.
Have you noticed even to this day the hostility toward anything promoting polygenesism though? I wonder why? Maybe Darwin himself can answer this. There is no sustainable genetic drift. It's contrary to Nature's Laws. It's contrary to the Eternal Laws. My definition of Eternal Law is different than Thomas Aquinas'. Rather, it involves the Golden Ratio and Fibonacci's spiral. This is demonstrated remarkably through Viktor Schauberger's work, and others and is repeated everywhere throughout the universe.
You mentioned certain functions of the body that come from Natural Selection because all too many human characteristics don't fit at all with the ecology of this world. Here are some:
Humans are the only mammal incapable of producing its own vitamin C.
Most mammals produce Galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose (α-gal) (Alpha-gal) sugars. Humans do not have naturally occurring alpha-gal coating their cell membranes like most other mammals do. Galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose (α-gal) is a sugar structure found in glycoproteins and glycolipids from all mammals except old world primates, including humans. In ancestral Old World monkeys and apes, the gene for the enzyme α-1,3-galactosyltransferase that is essential for the synthesis of α-Gal was inactivated [3]. Therefore, humans and recent Old World primates do not express α-Gal and this structure is highly immunogenic for them. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6344609/
Astronauts stationed in space experience their circadian clock changing to the circadian clock of Mars. To me, that is really weird and perhaps telling.
Compared to animals humans exhibit complete lack of robustness. We have widespread back problems, hip problems, knee problems though out our lifespan that animals lack. As we age, only the adult human brain shrinks.
Are we similar to primates like the apes? Not at all.
Despite the propaganda and lies, we are not even close to being related to apes. Did you know primates can breathe while they drink? How odd. Humans are incapable of this. Did you know apes have more chromosomes than humans? That's right, they have 48 pairs and we have only 46 pairs of chromosomes.
I mentioned earlier robustness that's consistent throughout Nature without exception. Yet, humans are not robust and are frail and weak compared to Nature's creatures. Compared to apes or monkeys our bones are much thinner and lighter. Our muscles are 5 to 10 times weaker. Our skin and adipose tissue are handicaps in this world. Our body hair is missing and the pattern is reversed compared to apes. Our heads and nails must also be trimmed. The human skull is fragile and our brain is not at all similar. Our locomotion is the most obvious difference. Human speech relies on throats that are unlike any other creature on planet Earth and in comparison are completely redesigned. Even our sex is radically different, in that there's no signs of typical oestrus cycles as in animals. Humans have over 4000 genetic disorders, which is not seen in any significant numbers for any species. Compared to animals, even our feet are not designed for walking. It is even thought that our bodies may have been designed for less gravity than this Earth and perhaps for an entirely different world having less gravity.
And another thought: Knowing what we do about the human genome being radically different from other species on Earth, I can see why clinical trials of new medicines and drugs that seem to work (or not) in animal trials so often fail to work in human trials.
I further wonder to what degree the current mRNA "vaccines" (I don't accept the revised definition of "vaccine" to include these gene-modifying products) will have on the human race 3 to 4 generations from now? Has this human trial with millions (perhaps billions) of participants irreversibly damaged our genetic destiny?
I don't expect to know the answer to that in my lifetime, but I do think it's possible that future generations will curse the clumsy, ham fisted "researchers" that are now being revealed as Public Enemy #1.
All excellent points. Yes, Pye also pointed out the difference between the primates (48 chromosomes / 24 pairs) and humans (46 chromosomes / 23 pairs). As he said, "A species does not lose one entire chromosome pair and turn out BETTER." I'm also aware of the many (too many) genetic deficiencies that humans we have, suggesting that we are not a natural species adapted to Earth.
Operating purely from memory here (my copy of "Darwin's Black Box" is on loan right now), two of the complicated systems of the human body used as examples by Michael Behe are the clotting factor and the bacterium flagellum in the human gut. Behe used the term "Irreducible complexity" to describe these functions, in that "certain biological systems with multiple interacting parts would not function if one of the parts was removed, so supposedly could not have evolved by successive small modifications from earlier less complex systems through natural selection, which would need all intermediate precursor systems to have been fully functional."
It's an interesting point you bring up about circadian cycles and Mars, but while I understand it, it's a rabbit hole I won't go down at this time. Suffice it to say that there is more about human origins and human history than could be written about in this limited venue. There is strong circumstantial and a bit of direct evidence that the human genome has been "tweaked" over the past few millennia, including the side insertion of 223 so-called "alien genes" (https://newslog.cyberjournal.org/human-origins-223-mystery-genes/) at some point in our recent history; i.e., within the last 100,000 years.
I'm not sure that we will know the complete picture of human origins in my lifetime, but I remain hopeful that more revelations will be made in coming years.
My head doesn't need trimming, thanks. But, seriously, I understand and agree with your points on the human anatomy. We aren't earthlings.
Thanks. I believe that should have been -'head of hair'.
I loved every minute of it. Best lesson I tell people - whatever the media says, do the opposite!
“[W]here does it end? Believing that election fraud is real? Believing 9/11 was an inside job?” So your telling me the election was stolen and 9/11 was an inside job...
Thoroughly enjoyable, with some interesting locations. Not sure why it is considered dangerous, but maybe because origin stories from different religions seem to match (which threatens the division of religion), and talk of survivors who set about giving people the knowledge to start civilizing again (which threatens muh evolution theories). These also curiously match with geological records of the scorched layer that covered most of the Northern Hemisphere, and disastrous flooding about 11600 years ago. Also, the ancients had documented in which part of the galaxy the meteors resided, which we appear to be entering shortly.
Disastrous flooding, you say.
It's almost like there's a very Good Book that told us that happened...
... and others too.
But yes, it seems that Noah's ark really happened.
There is also the Mt Aratat remains that were claimed to have the wreck of Noah's Ark
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/adventure/article/100428-noahs-ark-found-in-turkey-science-religion-culture
I've been watching vids of interviews of Hancock for years now. Some good stuff and applies to what we're doing now because so much of it is about active suppression of information, mostly by the ruling elite in academia.
But what I don't like about the guy is his constant promotion of ayahuasca drug and his whine about how if humans would just take the drug and see what he sees, we'd all just magically get along.
In reality, with real humans, what we'd get if we chose his way of being is eventually, everyone that didn't see exactly what was expected to be seen would become enemy and a new reason for wars would begin.
It's not religion that starts wars. It's not resource scarcity that starts wars. It's not ideology that starts wars.
Humans are a bunch of contentious asshats for the most part and reasons for wars will be attached to any and every damn thing.
The counter to that would be taking ayahuasca exposes you to potential other dimensions, where extra-dimensional beings battle for humanity's true nature and fate.
Or expose a person's mind to The Deceiver which fills it with shit the same as happened to Eve way back in the day.
This makes for some compelling viewing.
Whoa.
I just posted the link to it.
Sorry I stepped on your thread. Really didnt expect it to be posted before, fren.
No worries at all fren. We ride together.
u/#wwg1wga
exactly why I'm watching it lol. Streisand effect.
The new definition of being a conservative is, consuming media from liberal companies due to falling for basic reverse psychology.
Basic fact, any money or views you give to pedo Netflix is directly supporting them and what they do.
The good news is there are plenty of free streaming apps that grab these movies and share them for free. No need to feed netflix.
Anons don't buy streamed media.
BitTorrent.