Loy Brunson Gives Update On Supreme Court Case
For everyone who has been emailing me and asking, I have an update on the Brunson Brothers Supreme Court case! The next big date on the calendar is January 6th (how perfectly poetic is that?), but in the meantime there is a lot to talk about. Both Loy Brun...
Loy Brunson EXPLAINS His Historic Supreme Court Case!
https://welovetrump.com/2022/12/19/loy-brunson-explains-his-historic-supreme-court-case/
lol good luck. the machine will never let him do something so drastic. He'll be Clintoned if the SCOTUS actually goes nuts and decides to finally hear such a case.
This is sadly going to be dead on arrival. It won't even be heard in conference. It will be summarily thrown out before ever reaching the ears of the Justices, by their assistant Para legals.
Can you imagine SCOTUS Justices, the Judicial branch being able to remove members of the legislative branch? It would inevitably be used against us, they would have thrown Trump out for starters. I don't know if this is even in their power to do.
Yes. I read another post about this a couple days ago. As they said, if SCOTUS as the court of original jurisdiction wouldn't hear Texas V Pennsylvania and 20 other states, they sure won't consider this one.
You’re right. And you are being downvoted by people who know you’re right but are pissed off by that reality.
Correct. The suit was brought against the wrong people, and for the wrong reasons, legally speaking. Though the general gist, e.g. that several elections were fraudulent, is valid and that case should be heard in court, the way this case has been presented, will 99.9% end up being rejected.
Miracles are always possible, but a wise man wouldn't expect this to do anything.
the suit has nothing to do with election fraud persay but instead congressman taking it upon themselves to disregard rules laid down according to the constitution for elections...not only should the SC take it..it should be a 9-0 vote
The Constitution? Pray tell, where in the Constitution, specifically, is Congress delegated the authority or responsibility to adjudicate election disputes?
a constitutional amendment becomes part of the constitution after it is ratified...ninth amendment
No mention of any authority given to Congress, rather quite the opposite in the recognition that the people retain certain rights not explicitly enumerated in the Constitution.
So I'll ask again, where in the Constitution, including Amendments which are indeed part of the Constitution, specifically, is Congress delegated the authority or responsibility to adjudicate election disputes?
I am wondering if the naysayers on here have watched, listened, and read what this is all about. This truly is quite a case and how it got to SCOTUS is very pertinent.
Indeed, I was quite surprised.
LFG!
Congress is not an investigatory body.
Meaning what?
Meaning they have no constitutional authority to parade themselves around as if they are a judicial body.
Specifically pertaining to this case, much of 3 USC (incorporating most of the ECA 1887) is unconstitutional, as far as Congress' attempts to give itself power the Constitution never delegated to it.
Election dispute adjudication is the responsibility of the Judiciary, not the Legislative branch. If Congress never had the authority to investigate election disputes, let alone render judgement as to the legitimacy of fraud claims, the body's members are not liable for failing to perform said non-existent alleged responsibility.
The more of it I see and assess, the more certain I become that Brunson is noise and not signal.
Great post; thanks for this.
Q said military is the only way.
Based on that, the final update on the Brunson case is it's a nothing burger.
Back in the day I would have hopes that the SCOTUS would do do the right thing.
Not anymore. Don't fall for the disappointment they are baiting you for.
They are compromised and corrupted-- remember the "leaker" to Roe v Wade?
Only a corrupt court would be ok with that, not persue it and let it drop it like they did.
juan o'savin.
it is getting ridiculous. clowns abound
In-fucking-deed.
The fact Juan O Bullshillin and his merry band of disinfo paytriots were the original source for pushing this case is all you need to know it's going to go absolutely nowhere.
loy, mentioning special ops teams going into broadcast stations to calm the public is very telling!!!
kash pretending he has never heard of the case isn't even laughable. his hard swallows were a tell he's completely aware
several of these whitehat actors are poor actors
Not in the script