Clott Adams needs to take the L and find a different use of his time than ranting on Twitter about satire, which is entirely ironic considering that's how he made his money for a large portion of his existence.
Yeah, he still has tons of followers. During the pandemic, being a pro Trump figure, lots of people accepted his view about the pandemic and vaccination. Already a lot of harm done.
Now he is repeating it by pretending to never have been pro-vaccines pro-lockdowns etc, and then telling his still substantial followers that there is no grand conspiracy.
He still has close to a million followers and even if we discount half of that as bots and shills, thats close to half a mil followers. People like him because of his cartoons and because he was supporting Trump long before it was fashionable in creative circles and surprisingly he never had to pay a price for that.
You seem to believe his behaviour helps us somehow. Your turn to give examples.
My theory for Scott being a white hat is that he trail blazes a path for intelligent but arrogant liberal people who ended up brainwashed to follow back to reality.
He does this by publicly taking some big intellectual losses but still coming out ahead in terms of career and stature. He becomes social proof that there is a light at the end of the tunnel for the liberal red-pilled.
We're at the darkest part of that process but he's obviously a very driven person who is gradually shifting our direction in his own obnoxious way.
He has a lot of followers but I don't think they are following his advice. He's a fun guy to spitball ideas with and a lot of his follower interaction, as I recall it when I listened, is argumentative. He basically got his start by analyzing Trump's success in an objective way.
We know he had a private meeting with Trump and it was just before he kicked off his podcasting project. I just kinda suspect he was roped in around then.
It seems our disagreement comes down to how much sway we believe Scott has with his followers.
Should I feel guilty about how much joy I take from Scott Adams' self-destruction?
He is really intensly unlikable
The Dude is an arrogant worm. Another controlled blowhard.
Starting to think he is a cabal agent.
Wow Scott Adams turned into a real life Dilbert character. What a douche.
Best comment.
Did Mr. Adams just call Ben Garrison an "idiot"??!! That sure sounds like libel and defamation to me!! Mr. Garrison should sue!!
A beyter question is "how many people unsub from Scott because of this recent spat with another cartoonist lampooning him?"
Clott Adams needs to take the L and find a different use of his time than ranting on Twitter about satire, which is entirely ironic considering that's how he made his money for a large portion of his existence.
Sauce: https://twitter.com/ScottAdamsSays/status/1609953506051653642
Luckily I had some receipts that I posted to Clot Adams
MuH DeFaMaTiOn
Clott Adams should just hush and take the 'L'.
Clott Adams always thinks he's the smartest guy in the room, doesn't seem to know about " fair use " and " parody " but he's an artist.
Scott adams is retarted.
Lol I thought this was the Bee for a second🐸
You’re not going to win this, Adams. Sit down and eat your lunch.
I maintain Scott is one of ours and an actor and yes I very much hope he files the suit. 🤣
At this point, no way Jose. Just a very bad controlled opposition.
How do you believe Scott's ridiculous behavior does anything but help us? Have any examples?
Yeah, he still has tons of followers. During the pandemic, being a pro Trump figure, lots of people accepted his view about the pandemic and vaccination. Already a lot of harm done.
Now he is repeating it by pretending to never have been pro-vaccines pro-lockdowns etc, and then telling his still substantial followers that there is no grand conspiracy.
He still has close to a million followers and even if we discount half of that as bots and shills, thats close to half a mil followers. People like him because of his cartoons and because he was supporting Trump long before it was fashionable in creative circles and surprisingly he never had to pay a price for that.
You seem to believe his behaviour helps us somehow. Your turn to give examples.
My theory for Scott being a white hat is that he trail blazes a path for intelligent but arrogant liberal people who ended up brainwashed to follow back to reality.
He does this by publicly taking some big intellectual losses but still coming out ahead in terms of career and stature. He becomes social proof that there is a light at the end of the tunnel for the liberal red-pilled.
We're at the darkest part of that process but he's obviously a very driven person who is gradually shifting our direction in his own obnoxious way.
He has a lot of followers but I don't think they are following his advice. He's a fun guy to spitball ideas with and a lot of his follower interaction, as I recall it when I listened, is argumentative. He basically got his start by analyzing Trump's success in an objective way.
We know he had a private meeting with Trump and it was just before he kicked off his podcasting project. I just kinda suspect he was roped in around then.
It seems our disagreement comes down to how much sway we believe Scott has with his followers.
Liberal people don't follow Scott, as far as I can tell.
I disagree with this assessment. He is not shifting our direction, we are shifting his direction.