I could certainly have this wrong, but I am pretty sure wherever I found it referred to it that way, as the 3rd proof....
Maybe because the first Q post sort of had two parts...?
497 as I recall:
Good/[win] - Bob Good changed vote to McCarthy
[Win]/when
[15] - McCarthy won the 15th round of voting
Note there that the second line of that post, win/when, basically connects the post I put up here with the other one. So I guess that's why they called it the 3rd one and I did also...
There are 2 things in 497
The Bob [Good]
And the [15]
And I guess the 2nd line in 497 win/[when] is pointing us to this post. So this is where I was getting 3 Maybe I have what constitutes a proof incorrect, or where I saw it did and messed up my thinking
I would ask for your help deciding that because I really don't know the answer, not trying to do anything screwy I promise
I agree. Trump siding with electing Kevin complicated the Swamps plan to have selected democrats cross the aisle so Kevin didnt need Rebel Republican votes
With Trump siding with Kevin, risk/reward calculations changed., .Any democrat who voted for kevin would face A progressive primary challenger in less than 2 years. This challenger would screech "OMG he installed Drumps guy as Speaker! Primary him!!!!"
Fwiw, Leftist/Progressive influencers like Jimmy Dore have been praising the MAGA House Rebels resisting Kevin's Coronation. Influencers have contrasted the MAGA Rebels with Progressives who bent over for Pelosi. Consequently, these influencers would be likely to amplify attacks on Establishment democrats during the upcoming primaries.
Bloody hell. I CAN'T GET INTO QAGG ON MY DAMN PHONE BROWSER NOW!??! Gahhh!! ANYWAYS.
Post 492 - We will never lose again win this is finished. The word "when" replaced with [win]
Edit: thanks for the sticky!
qagg being down is a big deal. I had just learned about their .json files and it is (was?) a fantastic resource.
I pinned one of them in IPFS (qdropslite.json). We really need to get all of Q on IPFS and run copies of sites like qagg locally.
ipfs://QmSuGedcj7G4oz3aLuTTj3LETfNThKaJ7F6rUZw7JTgZmu
If anyone has the rest of the .json files please message me and maybe we can work together to get them pinned.
Its been down for at least 4 days for me
Wow, good to know. I was wondering...
https://qanon.pub Maybe this will work?
4days u say? Interesting
Nice find. I'm reminded of this drop (not a delta)
u/#q3165
#3165 [They] thought it was coming last Friday. Ammunition spent. Q
Never lose again? Does that mean the upcoming Brunson case is a win?:)
From your mouth to God's ears, as they say...
If we lose the Brunson case, I'm sure someone will twist it into meaning we won somehow. All this winning makes my head hurt.
The normies are NEVER going to wake up, so I wish the white hats would just haul all the traitors to GtB already.
Trump didn't win on the 17th but after this Q post, I still crapped my pants!
I missed the second Q proof, what was it?
I could certainly have this wrong, but I am pretty sure wherever I found it referred to it that way, as the 3rd proof....
Maybe because the first Q post sort of had two parts...? 497 as I recall: Good/[win] - Bob Good changed vote to McCarthy [Win]/when [15] - McCarthy won the 15th round of voting
Note there that the second line of that post, win/when, basically connects the post I put up here with the other one. So I guess that's why they called it the 3rd one and I did also...
Ok sorry. It is a real q post. I think maybe the number is what's off. I didn't mean to suggest the post itself was not authentic
No I guess you didn't. This would be 2. I got it wrong sorry. Idk why I did but I did. Oops
There is only two posts so it's incorrectly titled. Like I said I am messed up how I'm thinking of it
There are 2 things in 497 The Bob [Good] And the [15] And I guess the 2nd line in 497 win/[when] is pointing us to this post. So this is where I was getting 3 Maybe I have what constitutes a proof incorrect, or where I saw it did and messed up my thinking I would ask for your help deciding that because I really don't know the answer, not trying to do anything screwy I promise
Thanks for clarifying. My fault
WOW! Awesome!
This Q Post Q Proof with this speech! Listen carefully! https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ebr9Er8ZdVo
For those limited on time skip to 6:30 I postulate this line is missing from the speech when McCarthy is referencing President Washington...
Not listening to it all. Does he say it?
Skip to 6:30 I surmise the statement is [omitted] from the speech
How about this from the 4th?
https://greatawakening.win/p/16ZqdZo2KJ/reposting-q-comms-from-jan-4-goo/c/
WIN this is finished?
“Win” this is finished ????
Did we lose? Trump endorsed McCarthy for a reason. Even if we do not understand it yet, if we trust Trump, this is a victory.
Trump endorsement was garlic to keep the leftist demons from crossing over and putting kalifornia kevin in before it was time
I agree. Trump siding with electing Kevin complicated the Swamps plan to have selected democrats cross the aisle so Kevin didnt need Rebel Republican votes
With Trump siding with Kevin, risk/reward calculations changed., .Any democrat who voted for kevin would face A progressive primary challenger in less than 2 years. This challenger would screech "OMG he installed Drumps guy as Speaker! Primary him!!!!"
Fwiw, Leftist/Progressive influencers like Jimmy Dore have been praising the MAGA House Rebels resisting Kevin's Coronation. Influencers have contrasted the MAGA Rebels with Progressives who bent over for Pelosi. Consequently, these influencers would be likely to amplify attacks on Establishment democrats during the upcoming primaries.
I'm with you, hugely.
We won. We have gained MOMENTUM. NO MORE LOSSES.
Throughout history, how people choose to define and respond to "LOSSES" determines whether they will ultimately prevail or fail.
A pyrhhic victory == a "win" that triggers a chain of events leading to the "winners" total destruction.
Remember the Alamo?
Losers == Ultimate winners. The "loss" became their battle cry.
I'm gonna go Dave x22 on this, and say.....
"But we have to see how this is all going to pan out....."
Thank you everybody for your optimism. A chance I have you frends.