If I want to market something, be it homeopathy or anything at all, I’ll do so without any disclaimer related to the FDA or any government body. And so should anyone else who wants to.
you can do that privately, but marketing is subject to legal implications. I can harvest dandelion root, sell it to the co-op in town, and they will buy it, but they cannot say " dandelion root, good as a tonic for liver and iron defiiency" What they can say is, " dandelion root has been used for generations as a health tonic, reported to be good for the liver." It's just splitting hairs around language, which is all law is, anyway. Of course, do what you want. The law is in place to protect the retailer from lawsuit if they claim a cure , and someone comes along saying "this did not cure my cancer".
One of my sayings has been to believe the opposite of what MSM says and one will be 95% closer to the truth.
I think I should update that to include the CDC and FDA too. Probably nearly all of the government. The truth is pretty much the opposite of what they say.
They already have been doing that, even when the FDA has confirmed results.
Sell cherries, no problem. Put "heart healthy" cherries (FDA confirmed studies) and the cherries are a drug.
Also worth noting that GRAS is anything that was thought of as "safe" while doctors were prescribing cigarettes for sore throat is SAFE until proven otherwise.
I say it's not there to protect the retailer at all. it's there to benefit Rockefeller and the cabal in their long term mission of depopulation via, among many evil systems, western medicine and the self poisoning of one's body under the illusion it's making them healthier
conversely in a just world without FDA interference, if one marketed say ivermectin and the label stated "this cures cancer" or "guaranteed to cure cancer" that person is setting themselves up for a lawsuit, but if instead one is more reasonable and puts on the label "some users have testified it cured their cancer" and such statement is truthful and can be backed up, well then there ought not be any reasonable lawsuit against the supplier or retailer
just my 2 cents fren. if you haven't seen documentary about how Rockefeller created western medicine I strongly recommend you look it up
If I want to market something, be it homeopathy or anything at all, I’ll do so without any disclaimer related to the FDA or any government body. And so should anyone else who wants to.
you can do that privately, but marketing is subject to legal implications. I can harvest dandelion root, sell it to the co-op in town, and they will buy it, but they cannot say " dandelion root, good as a tonic for liver and iron defiiency" What they can say is, " dandelion root has been used for generations as a health tonic, reported to be good for the liver." It's just splitting hairs around language, which is all law is, anyway. Of course, do what you want. The law is in place to protect the retailer from lawsuit if they claim a cure , and someone comes along saying "this did not cure my cancer".
Also, these things came to be because of snake oil salesmen. At best it did nothing for people, and at worst people were dying because of it.
That said, when the FDA is supporting things like the vaccines from clotsville it's hard not to want to slap them across the face for this move.
FDA really has no credibility left.
Exactly!
CDC = Modern Day Snake Oil Salesman
All PROVEN Lies.
But, because the government lies, and they make the rules, they expect us to be okay with it.
DEPOPULATION
Good analysis. Notwithstanding, what about the FDA calling GRAS "drugs"? Isn't this all part of the Codex Alimentaris?
The vaxx is not GRAS either.
One of my sayings has been to believe the opposite of what MSM says and one will be 95% closer to the truth.
I think I should update that to include the CDC and FDA too. Probably nearly all of the government. The truth is pretty much the opposite of what they say.
💉👹🌎
Stop considering them and what they say.
Exactly. I never recognized their authority and never will. You?
Shooting all lawyers would be an alternate remedy for this situation.
They already have been doing that, even when the FDA has confirmed results.
Sell cherries, no problem. Put "heart healthy" cherries (FDA confirmed studies) and the cherries are a drug.
Also worth noting that GRAS is anything that was thought of as "safe" while doctors were prescribing cigarettes for sore throat is SAFE until proven otherwise.
I say it's not there to protect the retailer at all. it's there to benefit Rockefeller and the cabal in their long term mission of depopulation via, among many evil systems, western medicine and the self poisoning of one's body under the illusion it's making them healthier
conversely in a just world without FDA interference, if one marketed say ivermectin and the label stated "this cures cancer" or "guaranteed to cure cancer" that person is setting themselves up for a lawsuit, but if instead one is more reasonable and puts on the label "some users have testified it cured their cancer" and such statement is truthful and can be backed up, well then there ought not be any reasonable lawsuit against the supplier or retailer
just my 2 cents fren. if you haven't seen documentary about how Rockefeller created western medicine I strongly recommend you look it up