Newsweek is another Forbes (Rothschild) piece of toilet paper. Anything using MSM as a foundation for "truth" really needs to be dismissed.
It's all about control of the narrative - they will throw any number of people under the bus (I fucking hate that expression) to maintain narrative control. Where did Malone get his first exposure? Joe Freemason Rogan. What more do you need to know? Makes the link below seem somewhat feasible.
He said he saved 100 millions of lives with the vaccine rollout. Sure he may mean he saved lives cause we didn't lockdown for a decade but he needs to straighten out his statement and make it real clear because it doesn't sound that way and it's very concerning.
Maybe it’s just a troll on normies. They must either:
“Admit” that Trump is a superhero who saved many gorillions of lives with his amazing “vaccines”
OR
Admit that they got played and never trust Pharma or take more injections ever again and actually trust their conscience and fight for their rights and their children’s rights next time around.
Does Trump have to be POTUS to finish what he started? He's done a stint and it changed the world. He can permeate his ideology without necessarily taking the helm at nearly 78.
Right now it's good for us to have him as POTUS as our aim, even if it doesn't come to pass. The reason is that nobody owns and scares the cabal like Trump - 'cept maybe Putin.
When we root for Trump, we're keeping up the psychological pressure on the cabal. He freaks them out.
Trump as president again would have nothing holding him back. I want to see super sayan Trump go scorched earth. Plus he's hilarious and tells it like it is, nobody else does it like Trump.
Oh I totally agree. I just mean I'd understand if he preferred to 'produce' rather than 'direct' next time round. After all, he has plenty of capable acolytes.
As the reality of the jab becomes more apparent to the sheep, the MSM will pivot to pinning the countless deaths and injuries on POTUS. Positively inevitable. "They" have little choice..
That being said, I wish President Trump just wouldn't talk about it. I understand why he issued the EO, I understand why he doesn't speak badly of the jab, but I see little benefit in him touting the jab's "benefits".
Just avoid the subject or focus on the fact that he acted quickly and decisively. But don't tout it.
The only way for the media to go from pro to anti anything is to blame trump. so if he keeps crowing about the effectiveness, they will eventually turn on him and it will be the REeEEEeEeE heard around the world. in unison.
just like his taxes.
just like mar-a-lago.
just like the perfect phone call.
just like a boomerang.
i can’t believe it’s taken the THEM this long to pin this all on trump. wonder why they are waiting?
I'm viewing this as POTUS skillfully baiting the DS minions into a trap to end all. Do they continue to push for more death jabs and boosters (what they really want)? They've lost their iron grip on information flow as more and more truth reaches the masses, more people are waking up. I think a recent Rasmussen poll had about fifty percent of polled individuals not trusting the jabs anymore.
POTUS is flat-out reminding everyone who was forcing jabs (and lockdowns) by mandate and that he never wanted anyone to be forced. He's reminding everyone that all drugs have risks and that there were reports from both sides of the medical community, pro and con.
Now, WE know this because we sought the contrary ones out and tried, mostly in vain, to share them with others. It's an exercise in personal responsibility - being offered (and even seeking and digging out) information from both sides and making an informed decision or just blindly trusting? But beyond that, the DS deliberately throttled all information on cures for the contagion and on the risks associated with the jabs. Deliberately.
Now, back to the DS... too many cracks in the dam and no way to stop the flow of truth to the masses. At what inflection point now do they try and flip the narrative and project blame onto POTUS? Well, they can TRY, of course, but they've already dug their own graves. There are other issues I'm not going to get into now, but here's the kicker...
Just what do you suppose these malevolent turds (like the genocidal gnome, heads of WHO, CDC, and NIH, the evil Governors who deliberately killed nursing home elderly, the evil, sadistic Governors, Senate and House members who are deliberately letting crime run rampant, etcetera) were "privately" talking to each other about in their "super secret backdoor" communication channels on Twitter, for example? Dump a tranche of those little conspiracy chats out to the public - or even, oops, LEAK them out (easy to do since the old marxist gatekeepers were summarily and unceremoniously canned). Then the sheep learn that, not only are the jabs dangerous, but that they've been designed to be. Knowingly. And that many of the people the sheep trusted are eugenicists. POTUS was assured by the "experts" that the risks were reasonable; it was the FNM and bad tech firms that deliberately quashed the truth.
The DS has a choice - either slowly bleed to death as jab aversion increases and more truth reaches the masses, thus waking them up -or- go for a Hail Mary and try to flip the narrative and project blame on POTUS when he, quite obviously, had no control over the bad tech firms (who literally banned him) nor FNM. I'm sure there's tons of footage of the experts assuring POTUS as to the safety of the jabs - you know, from the WEEKS and MONTHS of DAILY meetings he had with them before he gave us the daily public briefings. And the folks running the show in Congress now will be happy to run a real investigation/hearing into what the experts told POTUS during those meetings -- make it public, too. Ought to be riveting.
Malone is a spook.
Newsweek is another Forbes (Rothschild) piece of toilet paper. Anything using MSM as a foundation for "truth" really needs to be dismissed.
It's all about control of the narrative - they will throw any number of people under the bus (I fucking hate that expression) to maintain narrative control. Where did Malone get his first exposure? Joe Freemason Rogan. What more do you need to know? Makes the link below seem somewhat feasible.
https://www.anonymousconservative.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Vax-World-Order.jpg
Malone has always given me the heebiejeebies. I felt it straightaway and then felt bad about feeling it.
He's far too smooth. What is going on with him suing other doctors as well?
Agreed. He tries way too hard to keep the virus myth alive.
He said he saved 100 millions of lives with the vaccine rollout. Sure he may mean he saved lives cause we didn't lockdown for a decade but he needs to straighten out his statement and make it real clear because it doesn't sound that way and it's very concerning.
Maybe it’s just a troll on normies. They must either:
OR
… while blaming Trump for all of it because my guess is that’s coming soon…
Does Trump have to be POTUS to finish what he started? He's done a stint and it changed the world. He can permeate his ideology without necessarily taking the helm at nearly 78.
this
Right now it's good for us to have him as POTUS as our aim, even if it doesn't come to pass. The reason is that nobody owns and scares the cabal like Trump - 'cept maybe Putin.
When we root for Trump, we're keeping up the psychological pressure on the cabal. He freaks them out.
Trump as president again would have nothing holding him back. I want to see super sayan Trump go scorched earth. Plus he's hilarious and tells it like it is, nobody else does it like Trump.
Oh I totally agree. I just mean I'd understand if he preferred to 'produce' rather than 'direct' next time round. After all, he has plenty of capable acolytes.
If Trump waits until 2024. I think he will lose even more support.
People are fed up waiting for retards to wake up.
I feel that.
As the reality of the jab becomes more apparent to the sheep, the MSM will pivot to pinning the countless deaths and injuries on POTUS. Positively inevitable. "They" have little choice..
That being said, I wish President Trump just wouldn't talk about it. I understand why he issued the EO, I understand why he doesn't speak badly of the jab, but I see little benefit in him touting the jab's "benefits".
Just avoid the subject or focus on the fact that he acted quickly and decisively. But don't tout it.
We had to reach the pinnacle somehow to show the world what kind of evil we've been dealing with. Sadly there always has to be casualties of war.
The only way for the media to go from pro to anti anything is to blame trump. so if he keeps crowing about the effectiveness, they will eventually turn on him and it will be the REeEEEeEeE heard around the world. in unison.
just like his taxes. just like mar-a-lago. just like the perfect phone call. just like a boomerang.
i can’t believe it’s taken the THEM this long to pin this all on trump. wonder why they are waiting?
........they control all of the narratives
Thank you for the link. Very interesting.
I'm viewing this as POTUS skillfully baiting the DS minions into a trap to end all. Do they continue to push for more death jabs and boosters (what they really want)? They've lost their iron grip on information flow as more and more truth reaches the masses, more people are waking up. I think a recent Rasmussen poll had about fifty percent of polled individuals not trusting the jabs anymore.
POTUS is flat-out reminding everyone who was forcing jabs (and lockdowns) by mandate and that he never wanted anyone to be forced. He's reminding everyone that all drugs have risks and that there were reports from both sides of the medical community, pro and con.
Now, WE know this because we sought the contrary ones out and tried, mostly in vain, to share them with others. It's an exercise in personal responsibility - being offered (and even seeking and digging out) information from both sides and making an informed decision or just blindly trusting? But beyond that, the DS deliberately throttled all information on cures for the contagion and on the risks associated with the jabs. Deliberately.
Now, back to the DS... too many cracks in the dam and no way to stop the flow of truth to the masses. At what inflection point now do they try and flip the narrative and project blame onto POTUS? Well, they can TRY, of course, but they've already dug their own graves. There are other issues I'm not going to get into now, but here's the kicker...
Just what do you suppose these malevolent turds (like the genocidal gnome, heads of WHO, CDC, and NIH, the evil Governors who deliberately killed nursing home elderly, the evil, sadistic Governors, Senate and House members who are deliberately letting crime run rampant, etcetera) were "privately" talking to each other about in their "super secret backdoor" communication channels on Twitter, for example? Dump a tranche of those little conspiracy chats out to the public - or even, oops, LEAK them out (easy to do since the old marxist gatekeepers were summarily and unceremoniously canned). Then the sheep learn that, not only are the jabs dangerous, but that they've been designed to be. Knowingly. And that many of the people the sheep trusted are eugenicists. POTUS was assured by the "experts" that the risks were reasonable; it was the FNM and bad tech firms that deliberately quashed the truth.
The DS has a choice - either slowly bleed to death as jab aversion increases and more truth reaches the masses, thus waking them up -or- go for a Hail Mary and try to flip the narrative and project blame on POTUS when he, quite obviously, had no control over the bad tech firms (who literally banned him) nor FNM. I'm sure there's tons of footage of the experts assuring POTUS as to the safety of the jabs - you know, from the WEEKS and MONTHS of DAILY meetings he had with them before he gave us the daily public briefings. And the folks running the show in Congress now will be happy to run a real investigation/hearing into what the experts told POTUS during those meetings -- make it public, too. Ought to be riveting.
MHO.