Trump and Elon both make a post on 1/16/23 @ at 2247 creating a zero delta. Now look at Q post 2247. No coincidences.
No Q-incidences!
Trump post on 1/16/23 @ 2247
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/109702495721978394
Elon post on 1/16/23 @ 2247
But it still has to be Trump posting AFTER, not BEFORE. Anyone could wait for Trump to post, get an alert, and then quickly send a message
This is still solid. Even if Musk is trolling with an automated script, he couldn’t line it up with post 2247 without coordinating with Trump. Which brings us full circle back to, not a Q proof, but a proof that Trump and Musk are working together.
And the posts should be related, this is just stupid.
During the days of Q / Trump Zero Deltas, the zero deltas were used as a way to prove Trump was following or involved with the Q group, thus giving validity to the things Q was saying. Not every zero delta had corresponding or related topics. The deltas were only used to show cooperation between the President and Q.
The zero deltas showed that Trump was following Q and Q was not a larp sitting in his mother's basement gaslighting the public.
The topics of the zero deltas could be meaningless, the important part was the timestamp. Validating Q with Trump's cooperation was the sole purpose of the zero deltas in the initial stages. The corresponding topics with zero deltas came later.
As others here are saying, Q would post first and Trump would post after. This would show that Q was not waiting for Trump to post something and follow up with an immediate post himself. With Q posting first it showed that Trump was following Q.
In this instance with Elon and Trump we are not validating either. We know they both are real people and not larps. In this instance we are only showing they are working together, posting a zero delta with a timestamp that has a corresponding Q post talking about zero deltas. Both Elon and Trump are giving validity to Q in my opinion.
Yeah, but in Q post 2247 the example Q uses has Q posting after Trump. Seems odd.
Edit:
Unless Q was just showing 0 delta in general between two posts. But for Trump confirming Q, it would seem the 0 delta would have to be a Q post followed by a Trump post.
Lol. C'mon, that's retarded.
You could claim a 0 delta with any two people if you take Q drops out of it.
I don't know. u/jhartz39 does make a good point. Yeah, any two, or more for that matter, people could post at the same time. But the fact that both Trump and Elon did and the timestamps can be linked to a Q post talking about zero deltas is interesting. While I believe that there can be coincidences, maybe this is not a coincidence.
Heheh. Your reasoning seems kinda foolish. This is NOT just any two people. This is DJT (Q+) and New DJT-like Super Troll Elon Musk. To propose that this could be any two people ignores the highly relevant context.
I'm not saying that the OP is 100% correct. I'm just saying that your argument against the assertion is lame.
Check my math..
Q0 = Total number of Q posts talking about 0 deltas
Qt = Total number of Q posts
ET0 = Total number of Elon & Trump 0 deltas
Et = Total number of Elon's tweets
Tt = Total number of Trump's tweets
Probability = Q0/Qt * ET0/MIN(Et,Tt)
Probably pretty close to mathematically impossible.
That's not how math even works.
Oh, how embarrassing for me then considering I've studied a ton of math, including probability & statistics.
Can you show me why this wouldn't give a ballpark estimate?
/s cuz I know you cannot. If you could, you would understand how extremely unlikely of a coincidence this is.
Btw calling people retarded is a bad idea because if you're wrong, then you're automatically retarded, instead of just mistaken.
Someone had to say it.
Good call fren. Big stupid.
Read my reply to BumbleHill.
What is going on at this board tonight, it's like everybody took stupid pills and decided to start posting all at once.
"" Everybody took stupid pills and decided to start posting".
"Everybody" who posted "took stupid pills"? Interesting opinion.
But the example shown in Q-Post #2247 is exactly opposite of what you're saying is the definition of a 0D. Trump's timestamp in the Q-Post is 12:05:52am and the corresponding Q-Post has a timestamp of 12:06:09am. According to at least Q-Post #2247, Trump posted first then Q posted. This is shown as a literal definition example of a 0D.
Was there somewhere else that Q specified that Trump should be posting after a Q-Post to make it a 0D? I'm not an "old-timer" like you and several others here so I'm confused by what you're saying.
I'm no Q expert, but certainly Trump posting after Q seems to be a more secure indication of the link between Q and Trump because, as u/CQVFEFE points out, people could have an alert setup when Trump posts and then posts shortly afterwards. The reverse, ie Trump having an alert when Q posts which causes him to create a twitter post shortly afterwards, only confirms the link between Q and Trump.
I assume your question is why would Q show an example of the opposite in one of their posts. I don't have an answer for that.
Agreed regarding the security of the order. That's why the example provided in an actual Q-Post seems odd. Also, I wasn't here when Q was posting so don't know if there was any discussion of this back then and/or if Q either stated or implied a particular order in the 0Ds. If he/they never specified then we can't say this recent occurrence of Trump-Musk "coincidentally timed/synchronized" messages does not count as comms. Anon CQVFEFE stated "it has to be" in a specific order and I'm just trying to determine if I've missed some rule, implied or stated, that would agree with this.
On the other hand, the old "no outside sources" comes into play. There are no coincidences. The one facet pushing this towards a signal of some sort is POTUS posting at 22:47 - and I'm assuming here that this is the time he actually posted and not some other time that someone else retrieved it or such. I've gotten caught up before with assuming a timestamp which was not correct, not sure I fully understand these mechanics of the timestamps.
Appreciate the info. I never noticed that. And, makes sense. Thanks 👍