The Nazis moved the Jews into ghettos under the pretense of temporary safety. They complied. Then the streets were bricked up. Only fools would comply with this nonsense. That's why they need your weapons.
obviously we will never know the truth about ww2. So assuming the official stories are true, German citizens were slowly and methodically moved from society as they were dehumanized. We could look at more recent events where Australia and new Zealand were was disarmed before extreme draconian covid restrictions. There are some places in america that would tolerate 15 minute BS while other would bury those tyrants. Once the people start to comply, it will never stop until everyone is in camps or dead.
Then why do you make such leading unsubstantiating statements? I asked you information on your statement. What does the following mean? "...we will never know the truth about ww2"? and "...assuming the official stories are true"? Where's the source of your statement?
I'm not going to prove or disprove the holocaust to you. Its a trap. We have stories. The fact that you got the point is sufficient. If you're government tells you to take your shot or give up your weapons, hiStory suggests its time to use them. If you are triggered by my example, then simply insert elves and orcs. It matters not if Santa clause is real or fiction, the fact that you know exactly what I mean when you read it is sufficient. Ultimately you shouldn't take advice from strangers on the internets anyway. Enjoy your shot, your bike, and your ever shrinking neighborhood if you blindly trust your government. Aaaaand scene. Cut. Moving on.
You mentioned "holocaust". I never did. This was never about the holocaust from the beginning. You provided a false pretense when you stated-- "The Nazis moved the Jews into ghettos under the pretense of temporary safety. They complied. Then the streets were bricked up."
@/u/Rootcause was good enough to provide the following link for me. The problem with your statement is that the Ashkenazis already lived in the ghettos of Poland and it was the Poles and Polish Jews, not the Germans that built a wall separating a ghetto from the rest of the city. The rabbis wanted to keep the influences of the goyim (a Yiddish derogatory term) from influencing their young daughters and preventing outbreeding. In fact, in France the Yiddish section of the ghetto was called -- 'Jeuerie' in Old French, a derogatory word, to which became the English version of 'Iewry' or 'Jewry'. Your analogy undermines the post with a false pretense.
I didn’t want to type into a search engine for you because the next step is attacking history or the hundreds of results that support what I said. I will concede the fact that you are correct and all the search results are not. If you are interested, and I doubt it, type this phrase into duck duck go
“did germans move jews to ghetto”
Right or wrong, the current culture understands what I said even if it is not true.
Before you reply, please cut and paste and look at the results.
did germans move jews to ghetto
If you move into a 15 minute city, 80 years from now, we will be arguing if it was thought to be safe and effective for climate warming. My kids will argue that the leftists lived in the 15 minute cities and loved it. We never moved there.
The only thing dumber than the 15 minute city concept is the way it is being implemented which actually has nothing to do with the idea. They are basically shutting down roads because they hate cars for ... 15 minute city reasons.
It doesn't take a lot of thought to figure out why this idea is dumb. People in big cities like the idea of having convenient access to various services in their area. 15 minutes cities basically takes all the downsides of living in a big city (crime, pollutions, noise, etc.) and removes the advantages of having quick and convenient access to a large and varied selection of businesses. Basically, you only get convenient access to what is within 15 minutes and really inconvenient access to anything outside that. A 15 minute walking radius is not enough space to have a descent selection of services which people in big cities like, which is partly why they live there.
For example, people with very specific hobbies can attest to the advantage of being in a big city. You can (or used to be able to, maybe not so much anymore) find a store in a big city that caters to your hobby (for example, model airplanes). If you live outside a big city, you have to order these things and have them shipped to you which has its downsides (takes time, you generally can't inspect what you are getting in person, etc.).
Also, do they plan to have a hospital in every 15 minute neighborhood. That is another advantage of more built up areas. Distance to hospitals and healthcare facilities.
If they implement this in rural areas, it's even more downsides (with no upsides at all, just like in big cities) although I don't think the people in more rural areas will stand for it. But I think that's who they want to attack. Force everyone into cities so they can control them as this policy could be used to make rural towns unlivable.
If they actually wanted to implement this idea (instead of what they are actually doing), they might consider creating policies that would encourage more services at a local level to a neighbourhood. Maybe changing the zoning laws to allow more low intensity businesses in suburban neighborhoods so people can have more options closer to home. But that is not what they did. They intentionally tired to make traffic worse to frustrate people to such an extent that they decide not to bother going anywhere.
Also, if you think this is just restricted to Britain and France, think again. It could very well be coming to a neighborhood near you. And if it does, fight it. No doubt this is a small part of their plan. It can also allow them to more easily implement their climate lockdowns. Basically, restrict you to your 15 minute cell for the good of the environment. It actually makes more sense as a tool to control movement within a population than anything else. Next, 15 minute neighbor hood passports, just like the Soviets had (internal passports, you needed them to travel around the Soviet Union, everyone also had to have their ID on the at all times).
Just another step in the dystopian nightmare they want to implement.
Can confirm, even in the suburbs near a certain large city, it's really hard to feed my model addiction (various types, though right now Gunpla has been a lot of fun since they don't take as much space as, say, trains) because most "fun" stores are hours long drives.
If they tried to rip that away from me, then suddenly they've taken away the biggest time sink hobby I have...and as they are still working to destroy my other hobbies, they are eventually going to corner people in situations like mine into being really, really ornery with no stress relieving outlets.
Gotta disagree. The suburban sprawl model of development that we have been doing for about the past sixty years is not gonna make it, and I will give you the main reasons (and I don’t really think climate change is real or not an issue, there are bigger ones to consider):
paves over our countryside to make way for globohomo box stores and woke corporations, instead of traditional small town main street type development which favors smaller local mom and pop true American stores and businesses
the road infrastructure it requires is ridiculously expensive and is paid for with money borrowed against the debt we borrow from china, soros, etc. once they quit loaning us money or we default guess what will happen to all those roads? They only last about 30 years or so before they need a full reboot. To continue to build in this way puts our country in a very weak position if supply lines were to be interrupted for example, and leads us down a fiscal path to bankruptcy
forcing people to drive everywhere, instead of having the car be an instrument of freedom to be used more occasionally, puts citizens under the thumb of globalist car companies who keep pumping out more and more expensive cars. So we are all paying for two expensive cars every month just because, well when you live in the globohomo sprawl you need two cars
loss of town identity - everything is just six lane roads and sprawl
kids stuck at home till they can drive instead of being able to walk to a job at the hardware etc they just get stuck out in the sprawl dressing up in their sisters clothes and streaming on tictok
It’s not a healthy way to build a civilization. We can have city, and country, but the middle part the sprawl is what is bankrupting us.
15m neighborhoods where you have a school and a store and a church all steps away are a good idea
And yet, you dont take into account how many more schools and big box retailers will need to be built and how many more bodies will need to be stuffed into each 15 minute zone to make paying for that added infrastructure, without debt, feasible.
Go look at the megacities in fiction like Judge Dredd. Thats what you are advocating for. High crime, distopian, state above all else.
Kids in suburbia can usually access jobs - if their parents will let them. Unfortunately, the media has convinced everyone that not having your children in line of sight is bad.
No dumba ass I am not advocating for megacities those are terrible and are the result of sprawl. I'm talkikng about the return to small-town type development, walkable small neighborhoods like our forefathers built and the type of towns which made america great in the first place.
Not concrete jungles - real neighborhoods which are suitable places to call American towns.
"Walkable small town neighborhoods" are either urban hell holes or sprawl. Our forefathers didnt have that, they had a main street that everyone would horse and later drive into where they could walk around, but they lived away from main street. First in farms, then in suburban homes, then in urban high density housing. Housing was always located away from shopping and industry.
You are quite obviously thinking with rose tinted glasses.
You sound like someone who knows absolutely dick about urban planning or the patterns which underly and drive our built environment. Our forefathers knew what they were doing - they may not have called it 'walkable' or whatever it was just the way they built, and they learned it from their forefathers, who had been perfecting it since the dawn of time. Starting in WW2 we threw all that out the window and embraced the globohomo pattern of sprawl. We fucked ourselves big time.
Sprawl is not sustainable from a financial standpoint - IDGAF about the 'environment' I'm talking about creating a country worth caring about, and which is financially solvent. Right now we are paving our own road to hell (bankruptcy) with the way everything is built. Say what you want but the numbers don't crunch and we are in for a rude awakening.
So, how have I gotten it wrong? I explained in general detail how our forefathers operated. You pretend to be an authority, but instead demonstrat poor critical thinking skills backed by nothing but teenager level insults.
I feel that that's just silly. I'm not gonna use the "modern meaning" of it. We want something like a forest to be sustainable, a large farm to be sustainable, mining and oil to be sustainable. If you chop down an entire forest, you can't use it anymore. Conservation, not environmentalism.
But if you want to read about it, you can find it.
All roads lead to Racine, including Agenda 2030 and the 2020 election.
Follow Zuckerberg’s money. Where did he funnel his election money in 2020 to gain control over the “Famous Wisconsin Five” and why?
Follow Bill Clinton, the President’s Council for Sustainable Development and the Earth Summit in Brazil. Why was Sustainable Racine the key model used to form the 17 goals of Sustainable Development as the foundation of Agenda 21, and how is Racine closely connected with both Brazil and UN? What was the story of the Rio Olympics, and who benefited most from Zika and why?
These are only a few connections.
Look at major corporations around the world that are part of the Agenda.
The Nazis moved the Jews into ghettos under the pretense of temporary safety. They complied. Then the streets were bricked up. Only fools would comply with this nonsense. That's why they need your weapons.
I get the analogy, but from what source do you make this claim? I've never heard this before.
It was done in the polish ghetto. Not in germany.
https://collections.ushmm.org/search/catalog/pa3450
obviously we will never know the truth about ww2. So assuming the official stories are true, German citizens were slowly and methodically moved from society as they were dehumanized. We could look at more recent events where Australia and new Zealand were was disarmed before extreme draconian covid restrictions. There are some places in america that would tolerate 15 minute BS while other would bury those tyrants. Once the people start to comply, it will never stop until everyone is in camps or dead.
Then why do you make such leading unsubstantiating statements? I asked you information on your statement. What does the following mean? "...we will never know the truth about ww2"? and "...assuming the official stories are true"? Where's the source of your statement?
I'm not going to prove or disprove the holocaust to you. Its a trap. We have stories. The fact that you got the point is sufficient. If you're government tells you to take your shot or give up your weapons, hiStory suggests its time to use them. If you are triggered by my example, then simply insert elves and orcs. It matters not if Santa clause is real or fiction, the fact that you know exactly what I mean when you read it is sufficient. Ultimately you shouldn't take advice from strangers on the internets anyway. Enjoy your shot, your bike, and your ever shrinking neighborhood if you blindly trust your government. Aaaaand scene. Cut. Moving on.
You mentioned "holocaust". I never did. This was never about the holocaust from the beginning. You provided a false pretense when you stated-- "The Nazis moved the Jews into ghettos under the pretense of temporary safety. They complied. Then the streets were bricked up."
@/u/Rootcause was good enough to provide the following link for me. The problem with your statement is that the Ashkenazis already lived in the ghettos of Poland and it was the Poles and Polish Jews, not the Germans that built a wall separating a ghetto from the rest of the city. The rabbis wanted to keep the influences of the goyim (a Yiddish derogatory term) from influencing their young daughters and preventing outbreeding. In fact, in France the Yiddish section of the ghetto was called -- 'Jeuerie' in Old French, a derogatory word, to which became the English version of 'Iewry' or 'Jewry'. Your analogy undermines the post with a false pretense.
I didn’t want to type into a search engine for you because the next step is attacking history or the hundreds of results that support what I said. I will concede the fact that you are correct and all the search results are not. If you are interested, and I doubt it, type this phrase into duck duck go “did germans move jews to ghetto” Right or wrong, the current culture understands what I said even if it is not true. Before you reply, please cut and paste and look at the results.
did germans move jews to ghetto
If you move into a 15 minute city, 80 years from now, we will be arguing if it was thought to be safe and effective for climate warming. My kids will argue that the leftists lived in the 15 minute cities and loved it. We never moved there.
I don't think he/she is government.
I should blame auto correct but have you seen Biden’s administration? Lots of he/shes everywhere.
So because my father spent 4.5 years as a POW in Germany, I am somehow responsible and deserve punishment?
Bist Du Deutscher bzw. Jude?
It’ll happen again
Playbook known - Q https://qalerts.app/?n=4650
Way to polite. You can see how they lost the revolution.
Yep; both sides are too weak
The only thing dumber than the 15 minute city concept is the way it is being implemented which actually has nothing to do with the idea. They are basically shutting down roads because they hate cars for ... 15 minute city reasons.
It doesn't take a lot of thought to figure out why this idea is dumb. People in big cities like the idea of having convenient access to various services in their area. 15 minutes cities basically takes all the downsides of living in a big city (crime, pollutions, noise, etc.) and removes the advantages of having quick and convenient access to a large and varied selection of businesses. Basically, you only get convenient access to what is within 15 minutes and really inconvenient access to anything outside that. A 15 minute walking radius is not enough space to have a descent selection of services which people in big cities like, which is partly why they live there.
For example, people with very specific hobbies can attest to the advantage of being in a big city. You can (or used to be able to, maybe not so much anymore) find a store in a big city that caters to your hobby (for example, model airplanes). If you live outside a big city, you have to order these things and have them shipped to you which has its downsides (takes time, you generally can't inspect what you are getting in person, etc.).
Also, do they plan to have a hospital in every 15 minute neighborhood. That is another advantage of more built up areas. Distance to hospitals and healthcare facilities.
If they implement this in rural areas, it's even more downsides (with no upsides at all, just like in big cities) although I don't think the people in more rural areas will stand for it. But I think that's who they want to attack. Force everyone into cities so they can control them as this policy could be used to make rural towns unlivable.
If they actually wanted to implement this idea (instead of what they are actually doing), they might consider creating policies that would encourage more services at a local level to a neighbourhood. Maybe changing the zoning laws to allow more low intensity businesses in suburban neighborhoods so people can have more options closer to home. But that is not what they did. They intentionally tired to make traffic worse to frustrate people to such an extent that they decide not to bother going anywhere.
Also, if you think this is just restricted to Britain and France, think again. It could very well be coming to a neighborhood near you. And if it does, fight it. No doubt this is a small part of their plan. It can also allow them to more easily implement their climate lockdowns. Basically, restrict you to your 15 minute cell for the good of the environment. It actually makes more sense as a tool to control movement within a population than anything else. Next, 15 minute neighbor hood passports, just like the Soviets had (internal passports, you needed them to travel around the Soviet Union, everyone also had to have their ID on the at all times).
Just another step in the dystopian nightmare they want to implement.
Can confirm, even in the suburbs near a certain large city, it's really hard to feed my model addiction (various types, though right now Gunpla has been a lot of fun since they don't take as much space as, say, trains) because most "fun" stores are hours long drives.
If they tried to rip that away from me, then suddenly they've taken away the biggest time sink hobby I have...and as they are still working to destroy my other hobbies, they are eventually going to corner people in situations like mine into being really, really ornery with no stress relieving outlets.
It's a REALLY bad plan.
Just like all other forms of communism, it sounds great on paper. In practice? Totalitarian garbage.
Gotta disagree. The suburban sprawl model of development that we have been doing for about the past sixty years is not gonna make it, and I will give you the main reasons (and I don’t really think climate change is real or not an issue, there are bigger ones to consider):
paves over our countryside to make way for globohomo box stores and woke corporations, instead of traditional small town main street type development which favors smaller local mom and pop true American stores and businesses
the road infrastructure it requires is ridiculously expensive and is paid for with money borrowed against the debt we borrow from china, soros, etc. once they quit loaning us money or we default guess what will happen to all those roads? They only last about 30 years or so before they need a full reboot. To continue to build in this way puts our country in a very weak position if supply lines were to be interrupted for example, and leads us down a fiscal path to bankruptcy
forcing people to drive everywhere, instead of having the car be an instrument of freedom to be used more occasionally, puts citizens under the thumb of globalist car companies who keep pumping out more and more expensive cars. So we are all paying for two expensive cars every month just because, well when you live in the globohomo sprawl you need two cars
loss of town identity - everything is just six lane roads and sprawl
kids stuck at home till they can drive instead of being able to walk to a job at the hardware etc they just get stuck out in the sprawl dressing up in their sisters clothes and streaming on tictok
It’s not a healthy way to build a civilization. We can have city, and country, but the middle part the sprawl is what is bankrupting us.
15m neighborhoods where you have a school and a store and a church all steps away are a good idea
And yet, you dont take into account how many more schools and big box retailers will need to be built and how many more bodies will need to be stuffed into each 15 minute zone to make paying for that added infrastructure, without debt, feasible.
Go look at the megacities in fiction like Judge Dredd. Thats what you are advocating for. High crime, distopian, state above all else.
Kids in suburbia can usually access jobs - if their parents will let them. Unfortunately, the media has convinced everyone that not having your children in line of sight is bad.
No dumba ass I am not advocating for megacities those are terrible and are the result of sprawl. I'm talkikng about the return to small-town type development, walkable small neighborhoods like our forefathers built and the type of towns which made america great in the first place.
Not concrete jungles - real neighborhoods which are suitable places to call American towns.
"Walkable small town neighborhoods" are either urban hell holes or sprawl. Our forefathers didnt have that, they had a main street that everyone would horse and later drive into where they could walk around, but they lived away from main street. First in farms, then in suburban homes, then in urban high density housing. Housing was always located away from shopping and industry.
You are quite obviously thinking with rose tinted glasses.
You sound like someone who knows absolutely dick about urban planning or the patterns which underly and drive our built environment. Our forefathers knew what they were doing - they may not have called it 'walkable' or whatever it was just the way they built, and they learned it from their forefathers, who had been perfecting it since the dawn of time. Starting in WW2 we threw all that out the window and embraced the globohomo pattern of sprawl. We fucked ourselves big time.
Sprawl is not sustainable from a financial standpoint - IDGAF about the 'environment' I'm talking about creating a country worth caring about, and which is financially solvent. Right now we are paving our own road to hell (bankruptcy) with the way everything is built. Say what you want but the numbers don't crunch and we are in for a rude awakening.
So, how have I gotten it wrong? I explained in general detail how our forefathers operated. You pretend to be an authority, but instead demonstrat poor critical thinking skills backed by nothing but teenager level insults.
Ok dad you tell me why sprawl is so great
I sayid they built fucking towns that were compact for people to walk in what’s hard to understand about that
Sustainability (Satan’s Ability) is the Great Deception to forge the Agenda.
The real Agenda is beyond what most could comprehend or realize possible.
Racine, Wisconsin is the Root and model of the entire Agenda.
Sustainable Racine was the originally name and model used to forge UN Agenda 21 and 2030. It goes far beyond the 17 original goals.
Racine is also the national and global model for Community Policing and 8K+5G AI.
The Truth of Racine has been shared since the beginning.
It takes One Word to Expose the Root, Reveal The Agenda, and Deny the Mark.
The Word is Racine.
I feel that that's just silly. I'm not gonna use the "modern meaning" of it. We want something like a forest to be sustainable, a large farm to be sustainable, mining and oil to be sustainable. If you chop down an entire forest, you can't use it anymore. Conservation, not environmentalism.
Sustainable for who?
How do you measure Sustainability?
Who measures it?
Is there not enough water or oxygen for the planet?
Is global warming real and the greatest threat to mankind?
Satan’s Ability and the Great Deception are not silly.
It is simple and accurate.
Sustainability is the Great Deception used to forge UN Agenda 21, 2030 and the real Agenda beyond.
Satan is the Great Deceiver.
What was broadcast on television to millions of children last night and every night?
Do not be deceived.
I think you're reading way too much into that.
We are not reading into anything.
We do not guess or speculate.
We know what you could never imagine possible.
But if you want to read about it, you can find it.
All roads lead to Racine, including Agenda 2030 and the 2020 election.
Follow Zuckerberg’s money. Where did he funnel his election money in 2020 to gain control over the “Famous Wisconsin Five” and why?
Follow Bill Clinton, the President’s Council for Sustainable Development and the Earth Summit in Brazil. Why was Sustainable Racine the key model used to form the 17 goals of Sustainable Development as the foundation of Agenda 21, and how is Racine closely connected with both Brazil and UN? What was the story of the Rio Olympics, and who benefited most from Zika and why?
These are only a few connections.
Look at major corporations around the world that are part of the Agenda.
What is the one word they all use most?
15 Minute Cities = prison
Control grows
Freedom shrinks
FIGHT back
The great awakening is happening right before our very eyes!
I believe there are great warriors across the pond. They’re long overdue for a revolution.
This is the return of Bishoprics and the reversal of the industrial revolution for normies.
I wonder if they miss their guns.
This is so ridiculous. Climate nonsense is so easy to disprove.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/rrX0mzJ0aZz5/
Citizens are stupid, and we need not bother with them.
Oh come on now, you don't think that is what those community boards think. Just look at our school boards here and you know we do not count.