Hell, I'm all in! We've had our dick's slapped a bajillion times already, so what's one more dick slap at this point? Amirite Frens?!

u/#q3872

Pray for justice 🙏

I just read 1Thess 5:20, but sorry Lord but this case is BS.

They’re asking the SCOTUS to unseat elected members of the two other branches..

There’s no way that the SCOTUS will rule (or even hear) the case on those premises.

Imagine f the SCOTUS could unseat the POTUS, Trump would’ve lasted 5 seconds as the president.

Put again, I pray 🙏 for justice every day, but I’m afraid tomorrow is not the day we will see it.

They don't post results until Monday.

Just don't hold your breath. We never know where this is going to go or not go, at all.

Until you have a DOJ that delivers equal justice for all and holds all accountable, they too are worthless.

I’ve already opined on the retard level of this case. Feel free to read my post history if so inclined.

If I lie to myself and tell myself this case rests on solid legal grounds, this post is totally wrong. The issue in this case before the Supreme Court is NOT “if there is no penalty for breaking the oath of office, then why have it at all.” It is whether or not the district court has subject matter jurisdiction over the claims. IF SCOTUS heard this case, that is the only issue that would get decided.

The claims for relief arise out of contract law and tort law. So the issue is whether contract and/or tort law govern what Congress did when certifying the election. No serious legal scholar would argue it does. And that is why these grifters have been booted from the courts 3 times, and have asked to get kicked out a 4th time.

Interesting four-year delta since the day Q and Trump did THREE zero-deltas, 2/17/19.

For newbies, that means three times in one day, Trump posted to social media within less than 60 seconds ("zero" full minutes) after Q did. One of the three was under 10 seconds later.

The odds against that happening purely by chance all in one day were calculated by autists back in the day to be...almost incalculable.

Personswithout proper Oaths do not and cannot have proper Bonds OR satisfy thenecessary requirements to “hold” a bona fide “Office”, by ‘commission’,“election”, or “appointment”.　 In short, an ‘Officer’ or “Office Holder” cannot but ‘occupy’ the officeunder false and misleading pretense, misrepresentation, and FRAUD, which stripsthe ‘individual’ of ‘law authority’ and ‘immunity’ under well-seasoned law ofthe land and sea.　 Brutum fulmen!!　 　Bonds that are attached to such juristic ‘persons’ are subjectto claim and lien, after “adequate assurance of due performance” has been found lacking pursuant to U.C.C. 2-619. 　　A proper Oath and Bond are but two of the three primary “poles”of “Office” [Oath, Bond, Commission].　 One cannot act upon being ‘dulyappointed’ or ‘duly elected’ or ‘duly commissioned’ simply by INCORPORATION and CORPORATE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS.

 ------------------------------------------  

The obligation imposed by the Public Officers Law statuteis personalto plaintiff, it is an act he is required to do and theoffice becamevacant by the mere failure to file the oath, whether or notthedefendants knew or were chargeable with notice thatplaintiff hadfailed to file his oath, and they are not required to makeanydeclaration or give any notice. On his default in' filinghis official oath"the appointment was vitiated and the office * * *became vacant"

[citing Ginsberg v. City of Long Beach, 286N.Y. 400, 36 N.E.2d 637; and also People ex reI. Walton v. Hicks,infra]. 

======================================================================  

Cooperv. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S. Ct. 1401 (1958)

Note: Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States wars against that Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the supreme law of the land. The judge is engaged in acts of treason. The U.S. Supreme Court has stated that "no state legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it". See also In Re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (188); U.S.v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S. Ct. 471, 66 L. Ed. 2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L. Ed 257 (1821)   Cooper v. Aaron, 358U.S. 1, 78 S.Ct. 1401 (1958). "No state legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it."The constitutional theory is that we the people are the sovereigns, the state and federal officials only our agents.""The individual, unlike the corporation, cannot be taxed for the mere privilege of existing. The corporation is an artificial entity which owes its existence and charter powers to the state; but, theindividual's rights to live and own property are natural rights for the enjoyment of which an excise can not be imposed."  

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------  

U.S. v. Throckmorton, 98 US 61 

WHEREAS, officials and even judges have no immunity  (See, Owen vs. City of Independence, 100 S Ct. 1398;Maine vs. Thiboutot, 100 S. Ct. 2502; and Hafer vs. Melo, 502 U.S. 21; officials and judges are deemed to know the law and sworn to uphold the law; officials and judges cannot claim to actin good faith in willful deprivation of law, they certainly cannot plead ignorance of the law, even the Citizen cannot plead ignorance of the law, the courts have ruled there is no such thing as ignorance of the law, it is ludicrous for learned officials and judges to plead ignorance of the law therefore there is no immunity, judicial or otherwise, in matters of rights secured by the Constitution for the United States of America. See: Title 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. "When lawsuits are brought against federal officials, they must be brought against them in their"individual" capacity not their official capacity. When federal officials perpetrate constitutional torts,they do so ultra vires (beyond the powers) and lose the shield of immunity."

I'm glad it's the 17th!

Don't these guys play trumpet? I hope they have a cool song planned for if they win.