She's been working on exposing this situation for a couple years now. The wheels of justice turn so slowly, especially when a major corporation with unlimited funds is involved. They do everything they can to avoid culpability and then expect the public to trust them?
From the article - "... Furthermore, there is now video evidence that Pfizer employees had concerns about the mRNA shots being linked to heart inflammation as early as 2021. The company did nothing to warn the public about the potential complication. Instead, it was granted 100% liability protection by the United States government, perhaps indefinitely. ..."
The first two sentences should negate the second. It's my understanding that indemnity is only valid if the Bad-Pharma companies acted in good faith. Knowingly putting out a dangerous drug leaves them open to liability. The above statements should also insure that Pfizer can't wiggle out of liability by pointing it's finger at the little secondary firm there, Ventavia.
The evidence of foreknowledge of dangers should be the nails in the coffins of these bad-pharma firms.
Civil action = civil case, this could never result in people getting arrested, at BEST a slap on the wrist with a fine. It also does absolutely nothing to prove theyre criminals in the eyes of the courts.
And it says on the sheet that the other parties have requested motions to dismiss, i can almost grantee that this hearing is about those and nothing else.
Can we skip to the part where they fail to appear and the Texas rangers execute the bench warrants?
I will gladly take Bourla as the first arrest
I am happy already that there's bunch of pedo being caught. Wish they would show that to normies.
Bourla would be a feather in our cap
Pretty sure they have enough time between now and then to purchase anyone with authority to side against them.
I hope there's video streaming.
signed this 17th day of Feb.--- nice
Sharp eyes. I didn't even catch it. Just March 1. LOL
"brook jackson" and "jack brooks" fed. courthouse
Yeah. LOL
βAnd this Judge is happy, weβll adjusted and in no way suicidal.β
Amen.
Yeah. I would love it.
Judge Truncale did not die kill himself. Sorry just need to say that.
She's been working on exposing this situation for a couple years now. The wheels of justice turn so slowly, especially when a major corporation with unlimited funds is involved. They do everything they can to avoid culpability and then expect the public to trust them?
Brook Jackson tweeted about a case at the Jack Brooks Courthouse, on the 17th?
I noticed that. Wondering what the relationship between the tweeter and the courthouse.
On my birthday π go get 'em, Brook!
Happy bday.
Thank you :) it's a big one π hopefully it's a good day for justice, too!
https://thekylebecker.substack.com/p/see-you-in-court-criminals-pfizer
From the article - "... Furthermore, there is now video evidence that Pfizer employees had concerns about the mRNA shots being linked to heart inflammation as early as 2021. The company did nothing to warn the public about the potential complication. Instead, it was granted 100% liability protection by the United States government, perhaps indefinitely. ..."
The first two sentences should negate the second. It's my understanding that indemnity is only valid if the Bad-Pharma companies acted in good faith. Knowingly putting out a dangerous drug leaves them open to liability. The above statements should also insure that Pfizer can't wiggle out of liability by pointing it's finger at the little secondary firm there, Ventavia.
The evidence of foreknowledge of dangers should be the nails in the coffins of these bad-pharma firms.
Thanks. This is good.
Agree maybe should be its own post.
Thanks.
My HOME STATE...WOWZA...mucho grande el brassos bollos!!!!!!!!ππππ
AND THEY BE A-CLANGIN'
Love it. Brave patriots.
Michael Truncale didn't kill himself.
and there's this too: https://twitter.com/realjimmylondo/status/1626793564146475009
Yes. Need to be said.
If only political corporate hybrid chicanery wasn't a thing.
Sigh...good luck to this person. Nothing comes out of it tho. It isn't dooming. Its just the truth.
Pray. I hope she wins.
what happened the the bronson case or what ever their name was?
I think it is coming up in March
SCO TUS to rule something today.
holiday?
Yea it is tomorrow.
Civil action = civil case, this could never result in people getting arrested, at BEST a slap on the wrist with a fine. It also does absolutely nothing to prove theyre criminals in the eyes of the courts.
And it says on the sheet that the other parties have requested motions to dismiss, i can almost grantee that this hearing is about those and nothing else.
Im not sure she knows how the court system works.
Even if it is civil, still better than nothing. Do you know about the vaccine court? You cannot sue vaccine manufacturers in any of the court system.