ICYMI - WHAT?! Top Democrat On Pelosi rump J6 Committee: We Actually Didn’t Review Any Of The Surveillance Video
(twitter.com)
🚔 Crime & Democrats 💸
Comments (27)
sorted by:
They are just looking for scapegoats.... "You cannot blame me...I was relying on staffers and investigators to look at the footage...and they must have done a terrible job."
Yup, what sucks for them is the argument doesn't work.
Ultimately you are responsible for the mistakes of those you employ who work on your behalf.
This is also why cultivating your employees' skills and loyalty is important, you want your employees to do a good job, and you want them to do a good job for you.
these people are absolutely allergic to responsibility. it will be good to see them held accountable.
You're right that the argument doesn't work, but what has he got, other than, "I staffed it out"? He's the top Dem on a panel investigating an event with thousands of hours of evidence, and he didn't view any of the evidence? Yikes!!!
RICO = Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations.
Under RICO law, any individual who is the head (leadership) of a corrupt organization can be prosecuted for any crime committed by an underling within that organization, as if that leader had actually committed the criminal act of the underling, because it is presumed that the underling only engaged in that criminal act due to orders given above.
These motherfuckers can be prosecuted for TREASON ... which has NO STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS.
And since Fuck Joe Biden was not LAWFULLY elected as President, any so-called pardon is not legally binding.
There are ALSO civil RICO statutes, in the various States, where these individuals can be personally sued for damages (in addition to criminal charges).
This also goes for the Covid lies, the uncontitutional lockdowns, and all the rest.
Just sayin' ...
Of course they didn’t 🤣 You can’t make this shit up!
Except, they did!
when you are lying, and you know that you are lying, why bother looking at the evidence? it will just disprove your lies.
A well known person once said: "At this point what difference does it make?"
Oh, then you're negligent. That makes you absolutely unfit for your office, get out.
It is called Plausible Denialbilty.
How long have people been sitting in jail again?
What?? Did they just have their Hollywood person put together something that looked good and may have resembled what they wanted? This is the standard for them. I would say they need to be prosecuted for keeping these people jailed and no hearing in a timely manner, at the least. They are idiots, or they may be lying like they always do and knew it would hurt them more than help them.
I like that idea. Let the TRAITORS who were involved in the sham spend 2 1/2 years without representation in the same cells of the J6 PATRIOTS before they are fairly tried and hung.
Hahahaha!
Read my lips - "Plausible Deniability" This is always the way that corrupt politicians save their asses. Tony Bobulinski knows.
HEY MORON...THE reason YOUR investigators didn't find anything was that there was NOTHING there to INVESTIGATE!!!
They should all be in jail!
This what is so disconcerting, they get elected but then become just mouthpieces because others do all the work. Then the politician just parrots what is told to them. Few if any have the ability to think for themselves.
They will try to hide behind incompetence, because they think there won't be any consequences for incompetence, and they think they can avoid the consequences for treason there.
Accountability
Good strategy on their part...
Benny knew it was a farce. Admitting he didn't watch the video yet sat a judge and juror speaks loud and clear that the agenda is all that mattered to them!