RIGHT ON CUE: What is the logical media response to "Lawful gun owners are never the ones carrying out mass shootings"???
(media.greatawakening.win)
🔍 Notable
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (64)
sorted by:
Wrong house, wrong driveway, wrong car...
What a week.
I'm not so sure I buy that at all. My guess is they are purposely omitting a lot of salient facts to push a "senseless violence" or "wild west" narrative.
I also don't buy it.
It's basically nonsensical to shoot someone for a "mistaken turn" or "wrong house".
The first thing that will happen in almost every instance is being warned away.
There is clearly more to each and every story.
One million percent!
I’ll go out on a limb and say it wasn’t an accident that they took a “wrong turn” on that long ass driveway. I was a young person once and these “kids” were probably looking to investigate / break into a cool looking house on the top of a hill.
Not judging a book by its cover but this chick has some sus looking photos, weird piercings in her face and tattoos - not that that means anything but it does when they are using an early photo where she looks sweet and innocent.
I’m not buying the “wrong turn” narrative at all.
What do you mean sus looking photos with piercings and tats mean nothing. It means everything. You're entitled 100% to judge a book by its cover. Normal people act normal and have normal photos. Freaks and degenerates don't.
Exactly.
Let's say, for argument's sake, that there was nothing more to it, there were no warnings... It's the criminality in today's society that makes people nervous enough to shoot first and ask questions later. It's the fact that crime has been allowed to increase and fester. Real justice is needed to cut down on crimes and people will feel comfortable enough to trust strangers more.
I did read the lawyer's statement about the guy who shot kaylin gillis. He says it wasnt just a random car pulling into a driveway.
It was a whole convoy of cars, driving up a 1/8th of a mile "driveway" marked with No Trespassing signs.
And according to the lawyer they were all revving their engines and trying to be intimidating.
The main hole in the defense is that the shot seems to have been fired after the cars decided to leave, but it could just be they decided to leave when shots rang out.
They might really have been there by accident but i wouldnt put it past a bunch of punks to try to bully some hillbilly
I dont know the shooter or the kids involved so who knows. Gonna have to wait for the trial
That changes the story ... DRAMATICALLY.
Yeah of course the kids wouldnt say "we were trying to intimidate this hillbilly but we ran when he opened fire". But also the hillbilly wouldnt say "so there i was opening fire on some lost children for no reason".
Only one version is true or maybe something in the middle, so i'm content to await the trial
His lawyer also said he didn’t intend to hurt anyone when he fired. It was an accident because he didn’t mean to shoot them, just scare them off.
Ole Joe Biden advice, just go out and shoot your shot gun into the air....
Makes perfect sense. Dude was probably just sick of people trespassing on his property, throwing trash, making noise, causing damage, etc. I know several property owners who have had rando assholes dump piss stained sofas, mattresses, etc. Or even have had contractors dump construction waste there. Guy likely just wants to be left TF alone on HIS PROPERTY and some rando "yoofs" decide to hassle him for laughs.
Oh really? Yeah, wow, that makes way more sense now. It also jibes with what neighbors have said about the guy being pissed about people using his driveway. NO shooting is just "random". Even gang shootings have some rhyme or reason.
Thanks for sharing some actual facts. It really sickens me that to so many truth and facts no longer matter, just some BS narrative.
Of course. There's always bullshit there.
They leap on it don't they. It is so sickening for the families involved.
I'm with you, facts are omitted. I'm wondering, for example, if the dude in NY was purposefully selected and egged on/encouraged (somehow?) to commit that shooting.
Someone posted info from the shooters lawyer - scroll up a little. Short story is there was a group of them in cars trespassing on his driveway, sounding like this was not an isolated incident. He's had problems before with trespassers, guy wants them gone, shoots, gets "lucky" and hits the girl in a car.
"Stupidity can get you killed."
Confucius, probably.
I'm not stupid, and I have gone to the wrong address before. I've tried to put my key in the wrong car door before to, until I realized I'm not the only one that drives an F-150 painted white.
The stupidity is what happens after your mistake, not the mistake itself.
I guarantee you're going to be asked "what the fuck you're doing" well before any discharge.
The only time where this might not be the case is someone who is jumpy because they have been the victim of prior crimes in the area.
Also, generally speaking, aside from some insane murderhobo, people WILL give you some sort of verbal warning before throwing lead at you. Even if it's the racking sound.
It's really hard for me to see someone taking a wrong turn and being shot at by some homeowner. By some thug in the ghetto, maybe, but even then...what's the point. Thug probably would want your stuff.
This is partly why these stories stink.
Looks like I picked the wrong week to stop sniffing glue.
Mockingbird operation?