Well, it was most likely a group of people because they had such a varied knowledge. (e.g. from Hashcat, programming, cryptography, economics, etc.)
Look up the meaning of Satoshi and Nakamoto.
It roughly translates to Central Intelligence. I wouldn't be shocked if the CIA created it. But note, BTC is not the enemy, nor is crypto. Just complementary.
"Is Bitcoin connected to Japan? Well.. the biggest and original Bitcoin bank just so happened to be in Japan, and the founder of Bitcoin has a Japanese name.
A man named “Satoshi Nakamoto” who over the years has been attributed to many identities but nobody can ever pinpoint the person. The only thing that most agree on is it’s not the real name of whoever it really is.
09/26/2012 Japanese automakers suspend operations in China
09/26/2012 Bitcoin founder contender “Satoshi Nakamoto” Le Roux arrested for importing drugs to USA
That mystery of identity means it’s a comm. The primary of which is simply Bitcoin being untraceable. It’s an effective way to communicate it because, with any other type of currency, they could just find the guy through money movement, but that’s the point here, you can’t. At least not in a regular way.
First Name: Satoshi = Pokémon. A reference to the main character from the most popular media franchise in the world. The catcher of “Monsters”. Note Mt. Gox in Japan has it’s origin tied to Magic the Gathering which itself is tied to the Pokémon Card Game as heir biggest contract, but that part is highly speculative."
Well I'm certainly not going to default to it being bad news just because Biden is supposedly the one appointing him. Beyond that, we will have to see.
"#SOFTWAR discusses the possibility of nations swapping some of their mass-based (kinetic) security systems with energy-based (electric) security systems for physical security and national defense. The idea of using electricity in this manner to mitigate the threat of war has been around for over a century, with Nikola Tesla and Henry Ford proposing their own theories related to the matter.
Lowery suggests that Tesla & Ford's ideas could be combined and implemented through the same open-source "softwar" protocol that utilizes the global electric power grid and existing internet infrastructure. This new form of power projection technology could empower every nation to physically secure their interests and potentially reduce casualties associated with traditional kinetic warfighting. The author explores the idea that perhaps this electro-cyber warfighting technology already exists and is being adopted by nations, but people don’t recognize it yet because they think it is only a peer-to-peer electronic cash system."
"#SOFTWAR explores the concept of "softwar," a potential future method of conducting warfare that combines traditional warfare with non-military strategies such as cyberattacks and economic warfare. The author questions whether society would be able to quickly adopt and master this technology, given the history of slow consensus and adoption of game-changing technologies. Lowery argues that speed of adoption is crucial to maintaining national security and that any barriers to consensus pose a hazard. Lowery provides historical examples of technologies such as cannons, airplanes, and nuclear energy, which took time to be recognized as strategically important. The slow adoption of these technologies caused some hiccups and jeopardized national security. Lowery emphasizes that the US has dodged several strategic bullets throughout the 20th century but wonders if they will continue to do so with the emergence of new, game-changing technologies in the 21st century."
I feel like I may have come off as a dick here posting about this topic recently, but it is only because I believe that Lowery's work is a massive element of the Plan that anons have been sleeping on, or dismissing because of its association with Bitcoin. This is potentially as big, or bigger than MajicEyesQnly's Law of War decodes, imo, as it provides a roadmap for taking down the central banks in non-violent manner, which I believe has to happen before we can finally have the arrests we have been waiting for since the first drops.
I keep wondering how the white hats are going to remove power from the cabal. Switching currencies and leaving the elite .01% multi trillion airs somehow wallowing in trillions of useless fiat and unable to change the direction of laundered tax monies turns powerful trillionaires into crying bitches.
A lot of my Ron Paul associates were early adopters of bitcoin because of this “fuck the banksters” attitude. I had 100 dollars of bitcoin at $3 ready to “click buy” and decided I needed more research on the wallet security. A few days later it was $80 and then…shit!
Happy to help fren! It is worth checking out, even if you have to listen at a faster playback speed than normal. This is info that no other anons are talking about.
Another great example anon's, BTC is NOT the enemy. Nor is crypto. It is a help during this transition actually. Not the answer but a step in the right direction.
BTC is not Bitcoin though. Read the whitepaper and you will find that BTC does not match the description of p2p electronic cash, only BCH does. Also read the block wars. The swamp tried to take over Bitcoin a long time ago.
The swamp goes deep but it does not have many tricks other than divide and conquer + censorship.
Yes and no. BTC has changed but Satoshi knew that would happen.
Remember, btc isn‘t the answer, but just a disruptive step away from centralized control and separates money from State.
Consider the bitcoin whitepaper the constitution of Bitcoin. BTC does not follow it even one bit any more. Marxists have taken it over. Just look at BlockStream (double meaning), and the blue haired fucker and his team that subverted the control over the bitcoin repo.
I get the arguments but Satoshi never said anything about the forks.
For sure BTC has become a store of value and not a currency. Slick bad guys and I agree with you re Blockstream (and name! LOL), Marxists taking it over, etc.
We can just use BCH but CBDC‘s are coming ro the rescue! /s
The man credited with the invention of Bitcoin is named Satoshi Nakamoto.
SAmsung TOSHIba NAKAmichi MOTOrola
Discuss.
Well, it was most likely a group of people because they had such a varied knowledge. (e.g. from Hashcat, programming, cryptography, economics, etc.)
Look up the meaning of Satoshi and Nakamoto. It roughly translates to Central Intelligence. I wouldn't be shocked if the CIA created it. But note, BTC is not the enemy, nor is crypto. Just complementary.
Central Intelligence? Wouldn't surprise me at this point.
Still, the four companies' names, I first had that pointed out to me by Elon Musk, so...
Zero chance the CIA created it
Open source - anyone can inspect the code.
No central point of control - the rules are set in stone, and cannot be changed without expending an astronomical amount of energy.
Absolutely limited supply, with a fixed rate of issuance that is halved every 4 years and eventually is reduced to zero.
Instantly transmissible to anyone in the world, with no permission from a bank or other 3rd party required.
Instantly auditable by anyone with a node, much more difficult to conceal transactions for nefarious purposes.
Bitcoin is literally everything that the Cabal would NOT want in a digital currency.
Not saying I believe they created it but there are good people there too. (3 of them.)
"Is Bitcoin connected to Japan? Well.. the biggest and original Bitcoin bank just so happened to be in Japan, and the founder of Bitcoin has a Japanese name.
A man named “Satoshi Nakamoto” who over the years has been attributed to many identities but nobody can ever pinpoint the person. The only thing that most agree on is it’s not the real name of whoever it really is.
That mystery of identity means it’s a comm. The primary of which is simply Bitcoin being untraceable. It’s an effective way to communicate it because, with any other type of currency, they could just find the guy through money movement, but that’s the point here, you can’t. At least not in a regular way.
Which is why it became a tool for drug dealers and worse.
So what was the comms community being told?
Last Name: Nakamoto = CIA symbolism.
First Name: Satoshi = Pokémon. A reference to the main character from the most popular media franchise in the world. The catcher of “Monsters”. Note Mt. Gox in Japan has it’s origin tied to Magic the Gathering which itself is tied to the Pokémon Card Game as heir biggest contract, but that part is highly speculative."
https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2023/01/31/the-invisible-war/
That's Gen. Charles Q. Brown to you, sir!
https://t.me/rugpullradio/190578
Trump noticed it too. Vid is from General Brown's appointment by Trump to be Air Force Chief of Staff.
so are we taking this as good news???
I mean we don’t know but it’s sure interdasting. Devolution.link and all
https://patriots.win/p/4AsNsWn/president-trump-has-nominated-th/c/
PDW hype post from three years ago, when Trump nominated Brown to serve as Air Force Chief of Staff.
Watch them immediately turn to hating him now because he is being nominated, supposedly by Sleepy Joe, to head the JCS.
It will also be interesting to see if Trump gives him a nickname.
ya PW is trash now...so are we taking this as GOOD news??? id say yes...
Well I'm certainly not going to default to it being bad news just because Biden is supposedly the one appointing him. Beyond that, we will have to see.
I thought that name sounded familiar.
Jason Lowery wrote the book "Softwar: A Novel Theory on Power Projection and the National Strategic Significance of Bitcoin"
https://www.amazon.com/Softwar-Projection-National-Strategic-Significance/dp/B0BW358F37
which has been gone over pretty extensively in the Rugpull Radio podcast on Badlands Media.
https://rumble.com/search/all?q=rugpull%20radio
Two summaries of Jason Lowery's Softwar by ChatGPT
Sauce: https://twitter.com/JasonPLowery/status/1635967428843675651 https://twitter.com/JasonPLowery/status/1637508252685443078
"#SOFTWAR discusses the possibility of nations swapping some of their mass-based (kinetic) security systems with energy-based (electric) security systems for physical security and national defense. The idea of using electricity in this manner to mitigate the threat of war has been around for over a century, with Nikola Tesla and Henry Ford proposing their own theories related to the matter.
Lowery suggests that Tesla & Ford's ideas could be combined and implemented through the same open-source "softwar" protocol that utilizes the global electric power grid and existing internet infrastructure. This new form of power projection technology could empower every nation to physically secure their interests and potentially reduce casualties associated with traditional kinetic warfighting. The author explores the idea that perhaps this electro-cyber warfighting technology already exists and is being adopted by nations, but people don’t recognize it yet because they think it is only a peer-to-peer electronic cash system."
"#SOFTWAR explores the concept of "softwar," a potential future method of conducting warfare that combines traditional warfare with non-military strategies such as cyberattacks and economic warfare. The author questions whether society would be able to quickly adopt and master this technology, given the history of slow consensus and adoption of game-changing technologies. Lowery argues that speed of adoption is crucial to maintaining national security and that any barriers to consensus pose a hazard. Lowery provides historical examples of technologies such as cannons, airplanes, and nuclear energy, which took time to be recognized as strategically important. The slow adoption of these technologies caused some hiccups and jeopardized national security. Lowery emphasizes that the US has dodged several strategic bullets throughout the 20th century but wonders if they will continue to do so with the emergence of new, game-changing technologies in the 21st century."
I feel like I may have come off as a dick here posting about this topic recently, but it is only because I believe that Lowery's work is a massive element of the Plan that anons have been sleeping on, or dismissing because of its association with Bitcoin. This is potentially as big, or bigger than MajicEyesQnly's Law of War decodes, imo, as it provides a roadmap for taking down the central banks in non-violent manner, which I believe has to happen before we can finally have the arrests we have been waiting for since the first drops.
I keep wondering how the white hats are going to remove power from the cabal. Switching currencies and leaving the elite .01% multi trillion airs somehow wallowing in trillions of useless fiat and unable to change the direction of laundered tax monies turns powerful trillionaires into crying bitches.
A lot of my Ron Paul associates were early adopters of bitcoin because of this “fuck the banksters” attitude. I had 100 dollars of bitcoin at $3 ready to “click buy” and decided I needed more research on the wallet security. A few days later it was $80 and then…shit!
And Ron Paul did short bitcoin.
Thanks for the summary! I havent had the time to sit through the entire podcast discussions on the book so this is very helpful!
Happy to help fren! It is worth checking out, even if you have to listen at a faster playback speed than normal. This is info that no other anons are talking about.
Another great example anon's, BTC is NOT the enemy. Nor is crypto. It is a help during this transition actually. Not the answer but a step in the right direction.
BTC is not Bitcoin though. Read the whitepaper and you will find that BTC does not match the description of p2p electronic cash, only BCH does. Also read the block wars. The swamp tried to take over Bitcoin a long time ago.
The swamp goes deep but it does not have many tricks other than divide and conquer + censorship.
Yes and no. BTC has changed but Satoshi knew that would happen. Remember, btc isn‘t the answer, but just a disruptive step away from centralized control and separates money from State.
Consider the bitcoin whitepaper the constitution of Bitcoin. BTC does not follow it even one bit any more. Marxists have taken it over. Just look at BlockStream (double meaning), and the blue haired fucker and his team that subverted the control over the bitcoin repo.
I get the arguments but Satoshi never said anything about the forks. For sure BTC has become a store of value and not a currency. Slick bad guys and I agree with you re Blockstream (and name! LOL), Marxists taking it over, etc.
We can just use BCH but CBDC‘s are coming ro the rescue! /s
https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/posts/bitcointalk/485/
This suggestion would require a fork :)
Agreed! I wish they would have increased the block size a while ago, but they want lightening.
Yeah, which in turn will become centralized based on hub liquidity resulting in only big entities controlling the money flow on that layer.
Banking 2.0 swamp edition.
Klausy needs a medium for his buddies to store wealth whilst they crumble the economy to install cbdc’s after all.
I am so sick to death of everything being about the first of-color this or that.