Prologue
First - everyone should re-read the post: https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1656748197308674048 which started this panic. In particular, note the second paragraph on how he is becoming the executive chairman instead of CEO.
A lot of people think "the CEO controls the company" and for some companies that is the case. Companies with no board of directors (eg private companies) often have a CEO leading them, like twitter has been since Musk bought it and made it a private company again. However, by making himself the executive chairman (with no other board members), the power still lies with him.
CEO vs Executive Chairman
A Chief Executive Officer is responsible for the strategic direction and the overall running of a company. It is traditionally a position of near ultimate control strategically, and affords a lot of power over appointing other executives and directors. They also have to work out how to get investment under the boards supervision.
The chairman of a company board is above the CEO. the CEO reports to the chairman, and the chairman can fire a CEO, especially if he is the only person on the board (which is the case for musk).
Why no one panicking about the new CEO is playing chess
- Everyone sees the CEO label and thinks "they will control twitter" where in fact musk still has final say on CEO decisions
- Elon is also owning the CTO post, so he still has technical control of code and product development, so the CEO won't be able to steer the direction of technical development and will in effect be reporting to the CTO.
- Given the above, the CEO post is a bit of a "face of twitter" role. It is one which could be anyone and it won't really matter. Musk still will run the important parts directly, and will still have ultimate power over twitter (until a real board forms), while the new CEO has to take the bad press and deflect it.
- This new appointment being a woman who is a WEFer is brilliant to my view when looked at in this lens. Musk has taken a known globalist and made them into a form of human shield for twitter. She now has to run cover for Musk and protect twitter from the bad press financially, in order to attract investment along musk's direction.
Conclusion
I pity whomever takes this role, regardless of who they are. They'll have no real power, they'll be constantly trying to make twitter look good in the face of anti twitter pressures from the lefties they always supported before, and in effect will become pariahs if they come from a globalist position beforehand. Plus, musk can discard them as he sees fit, especially if they a) break ranks with him or b) no longer become useful to him. Once they are no longer effective verbal bullet shields, musk can hire someone new to replace them.
That's my two cents on this shift. It's a game of misdirection and semantics, with no real difference in what will be occurring. Musk wants twitter to be profitable, and this acts as a shield for him to achieve that goal.
Okeefe probably needed to burn Project Veritas. Exposing Pfizer was going to land him in legal heat if he kept the organization going. So his board of directors was left with the bag.
People should also consider the alternative. There have been ALOT of things anons have “looked over” or deemed “optics” when it comes to Elon:
But hey, he says the right things and keeps the us on Twitter. So none of that matters now.
This in a very interesting point.
We have a number of alternative explanations for this.
Elon was always a white hat and playing the long long game, somewhat like Trump -You can say that he has control of transhuman tech and electric car volume and space internet and he has power over those areas for the white hats and denies the area to the cabal.
Elon was a black hat and is now working with the white hats. -Yes, this could be, we might be able to identify a flip time. He might want to be on the winning side.
Elon is a grey hat working with the white hats to his own advantage. -Maybe, personally I don't believe in grey hats at that level in the world. They will have had to pick a side by now.
Elon is a black hat being forced to work with the white hats -Possible
Elon is a black hat being used by the white hats to their own ends without his understanding
-This one is interesting! Elon is a very clever guy. Could he be used against his own judgement in this way? Only if the white hats had strategic knowledge of future outcomes or a totally different quality of control over events - if the white hats do have this, as we probably believe they do, then Elon would probably know about it, therefore realise that he is being played.
I think you forgot one option. Elon is a black hat pretending to be on the right side for profit (More Twitter subscribers requires more users, from both sides, advertised as a free speech safe-haven for all). He then uses the trust to manipulate supporters into buying his products like Starlink, Tesla and eventually receiving his patented brain chips (guised as being used for medical device, then promoted as prevention for the next pandemic) and his aspiration to merge AI with humans (as he’s still vocal and advocates for) can come into fruition… with profit!
Agree.
Elon could be a bad guy pretending to be a good guy.
Many people fit this possibility.
Pretending that this is not possible is very "dangerous to our democracy."
Exactly! Look at Desantis, no one would ever guessed after all these years and what he’s done in Florida. But there were little indications in his past and his connections.
Thanks. I always forget one option!
Sounds like the Anti-Christ
Why would a CIA/Deep State Black Hat reopen Twitter for free speech, undermining their mission when they already had it locked down? Doesn’t make sense.
Because free speech is important, but not necessary to the agenda. The same way other platforms and proofs/information can be found on the same surface web, the internet that everyone uses. If no one (the majority) is paying attention or gives a damn, it goes unnoticed, then buried by “sensational” “news” and FFs. Twitter Files kind of proved that. I don’t know a single normie that even knows what that is and simply doesn’t care when they find out.
They fought it but couldn’t stop it. They are still trying.
How to identify “flip time”
MSM goes into “character assassination mode” on the person
Cabal/deep state financial attacks on persons assets including naked short attacks on any public companies
Lawfare - person is attacked on all fronts with litigation over seemingly minor issues as well as over control of certain assets the cabal wats to “dirty up” to try to pry away
ASSASSINATION attempts - This includes public exposure of person’s location and/or personal data hacks
Abuse of family members by institutions and MSM; including physically disfiguring through “procedures gone awry”, accidents, and other Medfare; including overdoses and damaging psychiatric “evaluations”
True. IElon is a notorious fence sitter and may be a trojan horse. The question is, which side is he a trojan horse for?
Exactly, keep notes on both sides.
Don't forget Matt Taibbi.
But also remember when Trump signaled on Truth Social — someone suspected the Trump and DeSantis feud was all optics and Trump liked the comment, indicating that was the truth. If so, all of this is likely for optics.
False. Musk owns a corporation called X Holdings, Inc.
That corporation owns another corporation (a subsidiary) called X, Inc.
X, Inc. is a corporation that owns and operates the Twitter platform.
So, it IS a corporation, which is also privately owned.
Just because it is privately owned does NOT mean it is not a corporation. It is.
As a corporation, it MUST (by law) have a Board of Directors, which can consist of one or more persons.
Musk is the head as sole shareholder and either sole director or executive director.
So, yes, he is the CEO's boss, but the CEO would most likely still run the day-to-day operations, primarily from a strategic standpoint.
All of that is just a side issue, though.
The REAL issue is THIS woman has previously recommended to Elon to "tone down his rhetoric" and to "censor certain Twitter users."
The only question is: Will Elon Musk allow free speech on Twitter ... or NOT?
The CEO is irrelevant to that question, because Musk can over-rule and/or fire the CEO. So, if the CEO is anti-Free Speech and impliments that with Twitter AND Musk goes along with it, then it IS Elon Musks' doing.
OP may have been trying to clarify that CEO is NOT Chairman of the BOARD. Chairman is top of pyramid, CEO is employee of Corp. Many CEOs hold both roles to prevent themselves from being fired, but this is NOT really “normal”, intended, or desirable. It is intentional cabal corruption of Corporate governance to prevent their cronies from being removed.
In single shareholder private corporation, the Chairman is usually the shareholder or shareholder of Holding Company, and EVERYONE works for him including the CEO.
Ummm I didn't say it wasn't a corporation... Most people think CEO = primary decision maker because in non-Corp entities that is the case. In the case of twitter, which I said has Elon as the only board member, this is a wrong assumption to make.
He can always fire her if she gets to be a stroppy lass who works against his wishes.
Well, you said "companies with no board of directors," which does not apply to Twitter.
My point is that Elon is still in charge, ultimately, and if he allows this WEF puppet (until proven otherwise) to violate free speech of users, then it is really Elon's doing, regardless of the corporate structure of the company.
I know, I wasn't trying to imply that twitter had no board. The fact it has a chairman presumes a board of some sort exists.
A lot of non corporation types will presume CEO = unlimited power, and in this case it isn't so.
And if Elon allows anti free speech in he's a bad actor in the end. He knows it will backfire for twitter to do that. My expectations would be he fires Linda if she tried it.
Oh wow, what a great and hopeful piece of analysis!
It fits in really well with the white hat pattern of putting bad actors like Fauci in ultimate fall guy positions as well.
Can't be her. I saw the pics of her on here yesterday. lol
I should've added a sarcasm tag. The pics on here (if you didn't see them) appeared to be AI-generated images of a female Elon.
Okay, and? She has to get Elon to say yes to any policy she introduces at twitter. You are missing the bigger picture fren.
Wow
WEF was infiltrated by good guys as early as 2012 from what I can tell. We intentionally don’t know who is working with whitehats and who not because blackhat minions must be uncertain as well. Sun Tzu 5 types of spies applies. Particularly confusing with mid-level players like CEOs.
In general, “replacing” a high level cabal player (like HRC, Obama, Biden) is “covered up” by both sides because of the following:
Cabal “blackhats” cannot have it known that one of their senior leaders got taken out because then minions and others start holding “insurance info” on their bosses, become whistleblowers, or create mass flipping of the street level criminals doing cover-your-ass (cya)
Patriot “whitehats” cannot have it known that they took out a major cabal senior leader because it may compromise methods and operations, and it makes them appear very powerful. Cabal must appear “all powerful” and unchallengable in order to get the other cabal players to continue to commit crimes so the whole network is exposed and taken down.
Consider what happens when a mafia boss is publicy taken out by law enforcement. The mafia players cease their activity until they sort out who the snitches and spies are/were. And then they wait after that to see who “new boss” is, so they can do a re-calculation of where they stand in the organization relative to the new boss and HIS organizational pyramid [am I still safe (from my own mafia)? political calculus].
Elon is pulling a James Okeefe move. Okeefe hired a CNN director as his operations guy and then allowed board of directors to take over Project Veritas. It's a repeat op.
Okeefe exposed Pfizer, then he loses control. Elon open sources code and discovers TombStoneGenerator, now he hires deepshit CEO.
Regarding new X/Twitter CEO:
MAGA disrupted WEF agenda. It is way too early for us to TRUST anyone associated with WEF. It is not a benign organization. Even Musk says to trust nothing-even nothing. The cabal’s Modus Operandi: Tell you what they are going to do as if seeking consent. I do not consent.
As the skeptics say if the service is free, then YOU are the product. Will they be doing some product testing? There is a reason they wanted people to come back to Twitter. Fact is that I won’t be trusting WEF or a person of her level of involvement anytime soon. And following Musk’s own tweet about trust…we shouldn’t trust him.
Maybe Twitter is committing suicide so truth social can become the leading free speech platform
Twitter did not kill itself?
That's what I'm thinking too
I agree that it is not a job I would want, regardless of the money or prestige. From a purely business perspective, she is going to have her hands tied just stepping into the role and that is a sure sign in many instances you are being set up to fail. But this is a game of optics. I don't think we have the entire picture yet. Wait and see...
This is nice and well thought-out. But you are missing one VERY IMPORTANT thing.
The SEC will hammer him if this is not real. When he said he hired a CEO that will start in 6 weeks Tesla stock immediately went up over 2%. Tesla investors were worrying that he was spending too much time with Twitter and not enough with Tesla, and by tweeting this he eased their fears. If this was a head fake he is in trouble.
He's done stuff like that in the past. Five years after getting hammered he is still paying the price.. (Sorry about the Yahoo link).
If he is head-faking this he is the stupidest man alive.
SEC has NO AUTHORITY over a PRIVATE corporation (X Corp/Twitter).
Claiming that this is related to Tesla is a stretch -- especially when the SEC is corrupt, too.
Not so much of a stretch, he pretty much confirms it in this tweet. https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1657108798480470018?s=46&t=zKf1kiN4GDyyiOsVRnxBnA Also no coincidences - he announced it yesterday because Teslas shareholder meeting is today. https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1656913020302262272?s=46&t=zKf1kiN4GDyyiOsVRnxBnA
Did you read the linked article? He already can't send out (by court order) tweets without running them through his lawyers. He is currently trying to get that overturned. Doesn't matter if this is for Twitter or Tesla - he is the CEO of a publicly-traded company and has been warned several times and punished.
The Tesla stuff is real - their shareholders have not wanted him to stay away (dealing with Twitter) like he has, and their stock has tanked over that time. A simple Internet search of "tesla elon twitter" will give a bunch of articles.
You can place this broad in legit. She has controllers telling her to do "X,Y and Z" but she simply cannot do those things, but she MUST. It's genius. It's a trap.
Well, I don't think k he's going to falsify the fact a new CEO is coming in. As to whom, well, has he actually said himself "yes it is Linda"? I dunno tbh, don't have a twitter account.
I don't either but he did get in trouble for saying he had funding secured to take Tesla private - and he did not. There is precedence.
I don't have twitter either - good on you. It is a massive life distraction.
Interesting perspective. I still go back to the fact that for Musk, Twitter is only a purchased, existing company. It's not what he may see as his greatest achievements, such as Tesla, etc. Where he gets most of his personal satisfaction, what he built and most loves, how he's identified? Is is possible the Cabal "got him" with those? I noted a headline that Tesla stock had gone up after the Twitter CEO announcement.
u/#q461 u/#q3997
He already confirmed this by tweeting a dog as the new CEO a few months ago.
Good point.