Not because Linda is the new James Woods or anything . . . but because every woke, pro-tyranny, WEF-supporting thing she says or does will be analyzed, torn apart, and commented on by sane people on and off Twitter itself.
You know how Trump puts people in the spotlight so they can show the normies how (evil, corrupt, stupid, whatever) they really are?
^This.
Linda Yaccarino will be posting on Twitter (not just "running" it) -- where Tucker and James Woods and Elon himself and thousands of other sane, non-Woke people will also be posting and, in some cases, hosting actual shows -- like Tucker's.
Putting Linda in the CEO spot will probably encourage lefties to stay at or move to Twitter, but with Musk's insistence that conservatives be allowed to speak, things won't go as they did before at Twitter.
She will be increasingly seen, by millions including by current normies and lefties, to be exactly as Woke-headed and pro-tyranny and harmful as she really is. And in turn, Wokeness itself will be seen for what IT is, as will tyranny in general. "Care for another Red-Pill, sir or madam?"
I'm not worried about her becoming CEO at all; Musk will still own Twitter and be involved as executive chair and chief technology officer. I don't expect Twitter to devolve back into a cringe-worthy hellscape of censorship and Wokeness; I expect any censorship and Wokeness to be eviscerated by people who are sane and compassionate and actually awake to reality, and for that to help build the avalanche of awakening we have already begun.
This is just another brilliant move by Elon and the White Hats, IMO.
If I'm wrong . . . well, shite happens. But I don't think it'll go that way.
Agreed— we need to “ hide and watch “ before judging anything these days— animals know this by instinct— learn to observe before knee jerk reaction
Exactly...Why people are so quick to judge baffles me...Have we Not learned Anything over the years??...SMFH
Instead of virtue signaling we have corruption knowledge signaling haha
Nailed it. We’ve got to stay aware that we’re not somehow on a higher plane of existence free of sin just because we know some things about the way the world works.
On that note, here is Kaitlan Collins talking openly about George Soros (and not in a positive way:
"George Soros is a foreign born left-wing guy who wants to change the nature of our country...."
How about that....
I think her performance on CNNs townhall was excellent. Perfectly made it possible for DJT to shine!
The more you know.
I only watched two of those, but point taken.
I didn't forget, because I didn't know - I watched almost no Trump press conferences during the Trump Administration (not my govt.).
This is good and valuable info, and I'm surprised you got a downvote.
So, a few things: While Collins was originally a reporter with Daily Caller (aka Con. Inc.), she became a CNN reporter and as you point out, she had numerous clashes with DJT.
Thinking about the way she talked about Soros suggests to me that she was ambitious, and was mouthing off what the bosses at DC wanted hear, even if her own sympathies lie elsewhere, but who knows.
Based on this information, it's easy to imagine that in fact, she was put in by CNN dumbos in hopes of flustering/triggering and tripping up DJT.
And I agree with you, considering this background (I'd never even heard of Collins 2 days ago), it makes no sense to call her Town Hall behavior a performance, at least, certainly not one intended to make Trump look good.
The lesson here (for me) is to dig moa before drawing any conclusions, so I'll take the "ludicrous" characterization with my lumps. (Even a cursory glance thru wikipedia delivers enough info to reject the idea that she is somehow a plant or a positive).
Kind of weird how you got a downvote, tho.... O.o
Updoogle from me.
Ahaha. Yeah, I suppose. I think its possible that the top at CNN deployed her for that purpose, but based on further knowledge (including your linked clips) I'd say that she was not in on any such move, if it took place.
One of the things I've come to realize recently is that a person doesn't need to be a 'white hat' or on 'our side' in order for them to be deployed and used to advance the awakening agenda.
Eg. Joe Biden. Is he controlled by the good guys, somehow? Is he controlled by the black hats? Or is he simply cut off from communications and thus have no real power?
In any of these cases, he's been a major source of red-pilling for America, so even if he is still full blackhat controlled, the overall effect of him being in the WH is positive for MAGA.
(I like the theory that DJTs team taunted and maneuvered the Dems to make Biden front runner and then the ideal candidate to step into the WH while the Cabal system is being burnt to the ground by the good guys, preparing for the return of DJT.)
One of the top comments on the first video you linked to:
So the idea is that white hats are not capable of planting someone in CNN?
Too true, and something that needs to be worked on consistently (to keep such a tendency in check).
IN that clip where he stopped the conference, I think it was 100% appropriate. he's the goddam president. Some bimbo thinks she's going to push him around, and dictate the situation? Fat chance.
I am much less interested in backfilling a story to match my narrative than I am in expanding my thinking.
I think she is a white hat. Will have to wait and see. I am not sure of the roll she will play.
scaramouche, scaramouche, will you do the fandango?
https://greatawakening.win/p/15IXpPIZuu/-anonian-rhapsody--is-this-the-r/c/
This guy gets it 👆
Well said!!
Top post.
Logical, reasoned, not-reactive analysis.
Understanding > Reacting.
Love it.
Crazy how skittish the purpled pilled are on Twitter.
Oh no! WEF! End of the world, aghhhhhh!
I agree and I am seeing a pattern
This is very good analysis. People need to wait and see what happens.
Matt Taibbi…Same thing.
Because he bought twitter & exposed the censorship at a time when free speech was at an all time low. Period. No one who was part of the agenda of getting us all vaxed up would have done that. The black hats made it impossible for us to even reach normies. Why would another black hat on the same team all of a sudden let there be a route for this to happen? You know? If the enemy has the us surrounded then why would one of their captains give us an escape route? Why?
That proves to me that he's on our side. Yes, you could argue that he's a lone actor trying the seize an opportunity. That is a reasonable assumption but even that is unlikely. It's less likely because it's more complicated. It's a twisted idea that he's risking 40 billion - half of which he already lost - in order to somehow make shitloads more down the line. What makes the most sense is that he saw the future of humanity in peril & knew he could do something to possibly stop that. OR he's been on the white hat team all along. It's got to be one of those 2.
I would, of course, have loved to have Don Jr as CEO but then the normies might really leave. He needs to bring in someone that at least appears to be more like one of them
I disagree, it is not lockstep for the reasons I wrote. At worst, he could maybe be trying to get a larger hunk of power from the cabal by challenging them. That's it but I don't think it's even that because he does live interviews & speaks on the spot, like Trump does. Cabal rats need to have preset things to say.
Besides the fact that anything is always possible why do you think he has the mental slack to be that complicated while on the spot? Musk's brilliance is in business & inventing not acting.
Twitter is mentioned in many prominent places in the drops.
Is your position that Elon’s takeover of Twitter is not part of the plan?
Not you, apparently. But plenty of others do. This board is actually CALLED "The Great Awakening."
Narg for the win!