Makes me wonder 👉Q 4743. What did we learn this week?
Durham 'true' start?
Durham 'take-over' Huber [select parts re: CF-i]?
WHAT IF THERE's another prosecutor (outside of DC) assigned by SESSIONS w/ the same mandate/authority?
Q
Going forward, I would love to see this come outside of the DOJ\FBI or federal jurisdiction. Federal agents should be held accountable by state DOJ's or maybe even sheriffs. I don't know the mechanics of how it would work but I like to see things be decentralized whenever possible.
“The FBI discounted or willfully ignored material information that did not support the narrative of a collusive relationship between Trump and Russia.”
Crossfire Hurricane “was opened as a full investigation without [the FBI] ever having spoken to the persons who provided that information.” Days after it was opened, Peter Strzok was telling a London FBI employee that “there’s nothing to this.”
Internal FBI communications discussing the Crossfire Hurricane during its early stages: it’s “thin” and “it sucks”.
British Intelligence pushed back on Mueller requests for assistance: “[a British Intelligence person] basically said there was no [expletive] way in hell they were going to do it.”
Durham documents TWO investigations into Hillary Clinton - one involving the Clinton Foundation and one involving illegal foreign contributions to Clinton’s Campaign.
In one Clinton Campaign investigation, an FBI confidential human source (CHS) had offered an illegal foreign contribution to the campaign through an intermediary. The Clinton Campaign was “okay with it” and “were fully aware”. The CHS offered the FBI a copy of the credit card charge; the FBI never got receipts. In fact, the FBI handling agent told the CHS “to stay away from all events relating to Clinton’s campaign.”
Absolutely. What do you believe is the reason behind the extensive display of corruption across all aspects of the govt and agencies? It seems necessary for them to showcase pervasive corruption in order to justify a military intervention as a means of cleansing and restoring integrity.
I'm happy the Durham report is out because it indicates motion, but Q has stated numerous times that papa Durham is not the only investigator involved.
So I expect as usual for there to be some useful info in this report that nudges the needle a bit but nothing too crazy.
Durham 'take-over' Huber [select parts re: CF-i]?
WHAT IF THERE's another prosecutor (outside of DC) assigned by SESSIONS w/ the same mandate/authority?
Q
Thanks for this link. It explains why the whole investigation took so long. There is a multiplicity of rabbit holes and a general lack of documentation, exacerbated by the directive to provide reports orally, within the department, so that much of what was going on was hidden. It is all very suspect. H. Clinton was busy, very busy.
Also, Durham had to be very careful to verify his facts for this reason.
"We’ll follow this up with a much deeper analysis hopefully by tomorrow. Part of that story is the problem with the Durham investigation: the fact that its scope didn’t include the attribution of the DNC hack."
I know people are tired of Hopium but that's a curious thing to leave out. Maybe the Seth Rich thing really will be revealed in June?
I think some people are missing this important part of the report:
We note that the Classified Appendix contains some information that is derived from
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act ("FISA") authorities. Accordingly, to the extent the
Department determines that it is appropriate to share information contained in the Classified
Appendix with congressional or other government entities outside of the Department, steps will
need to be taken in accordance with that Act and any relevant Orders that have been issued by
the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.
Well now. I wonder what might be in that appendix?
So the question now is, Who enforces The Law, when the DOJ is corrupt?
Makes me wonder 👉Q 4743. What did we learn this week?
"Durham is not the only game in town." - Q
The 'Just US' department will continue to investigate the 'Just US' department. Currently we have no further statement; due to ongoing investigations.
FBI = 'Just US' department.
Going forward, I would love to see this come outside of the DOJ\FBI or federal jurisdiction. Federal agents should be held accountable by state DOJ's or maybe even sheriffs. I don't know the mechanics of how it would work but I like to see things be decentralized whenever possible.
If that is your question, you havent been paying attention.
Correct, the swamp removing the swamp.
Here are some of the main findings:
“The FBI discounted or willfully ignored material information that did not support the narrative of a collusive relationship between Trump and Russia.”
Crossfire Hurricane “was opened as a full investigation without [the FBI] ever having spoken to the persons who provided that information.” Days after it was opened, Peter Strzok was telling a London FBI employee that “there’s nothing to this.”
Internal FBI communications discussing the Crossfire Hurricane during its early stages: it’s “thin” and “it sucks”.
British Intelligence pushed back on Mueller requests for assistance: “[a British Intelligence person] basically said there was no [expletive] way in hell they were going to do it.”
Durham documents TWO investigations into Hillary Clinton - one involving the Clinton Foundation and one involving illegal foreign contributions to Clinton’s Campaign.
In one Clinton Campaign investigation, an FBI confidential human source (CHS) had offered an illegal foreign contribution to the campaign through an intermediary. The Clinton Campaign was “okay with it” and “were fully aware”. The CHS offered the FBI a copy of the credit card charge; the FBI never got receipts. In fact, the FBI handling agent told the CHS “to stay away from all events relating to Clinton’s campaign.”
Of all the Durham threads, this one should be stickied since it includes the Technofog analysis and isn't posted for the purpose of dooming.
military is the only way imo.
Absolutely. What do you believe is the reason behind the extensive display of corruption across all aspects of the govt and agencies? It seems necessary for them to showcase pervasive corruption in order to justify a military intervention as a means of cleansing and restoring integrity.
Continuity of Govt
I think it has been this way for a while now IMO.
u/#q4486
I'm happy the Durham report is out because it indicates motion, but Q has stated numerous times that papa Durham is not the only investigator involved.
So I expect as usual for there to be some useful info in this report that nudges the needle a bit but nothing too crazy.
Is it possible Durham is the end of the line before the last resort is necessary? Exhausting every legal avenue of justice before the hammer drops.
Yes. But that will happen after the "precipice" occurs. Watch and see.
Absolutely ! Q 3581 What did we learn this week?
Thanks for this link. It explains why the whole investigation took so long. There is a multiplicity of rabbit holes and a general lack of documentation, exacerbated by the directive to provide reports orally, within the department, so that much of what was going on was hidden. It is all very suspect. H. Clinton was busy, very busy.
Also, Durham had to be very careful to verify his facts for this reason.
"We’ll follow this up with a much deeper analysis hopefully by tomorrow. Part of that story is the problem with the Durham investigation: the fact that its scope didn’t include the attribution of the DNC hack."
I know people are tired of Hopium but that's a curious thing to leave out. Maybe the Seth Rich thing really will be revealed in June?
Hur dur... military enters the chat.
I think some people are missing this important part of the report:
Well now. I wonder what might be in that appendix?
Good, but seems like a nothing burger that will get buried and downplayed and forgotten then lied about and misrepresented
You expect him to recommend charges to a DOJ that's just going to say "Yeah ok we'll get right on that lol."