I've made up to three posts about this in the last few months, because for some reason, some of the most prolific posters to the board fall into posting completely fabricated information as if it were true, and far too many (imo) board members swallow it whole, without a second thought.

For a Q board, posting this stuff is the epitome of the opposite of Q, (IMO).

Ps. Good reminder. Thank you!

It was in general chat, I remember now. Because I had never heard of half of the the names mentioned! I ways like your posts. Thank you fren.

Is that the Health Ranger? I have always found his headlines very clickbaity, although not quite as high on the BS scale as NP.

The know that we've increasingly abandoning the MSM so they try to set up their mockingbirds in the alt-media in an attempt to corral us again.

winn, you're a legend. Love your quality posting (far more than I could do).

It's curious, because I've seen at least 3 of our prolific posters post NewsPunch stuff to the board in the last two months. And, because they are prolific posters, they draw attention and a lot of folks fall for the BS, before it gets exposed. But the mods also sticky some of my posts in this area, so I think in the end its actually good.

Gives the newcomers a run for their money. What doesn't kill you makes you stronger.

PS. If you take a read, and do a b it of analysis, their approach and pattern becomes immediately obvious.

I mean, for Pete's sake. "Fact-Checked Double Tick"? Bwahahahhaha.

Wow. Thank you very much for this research. I think that a alook through that instagram account would pretty much dispel any illusions frogs are still under that TPV has any bona fide objectives re: disseminating truth.

Not exactly based personalities there.

Thanks for asking. I don't pay attention to Infowars, as I think there are infinitely better sources for the information I want to access. But generally speaking...

I saw in real time how Jones attempted to hijack the Q movement (2018), use it for his personal gain, with Jerome Corsi, and as such, I generally adopt the position that IW is controlled opposition.

My impression is that they oversensationalize, but do not indulge in out-and-out fabrication in the way that NewsPunch and REAL RAW News do.

I have many friends who only started waking up with the advent of Covid, and I've observed the destructive (IMO) impact of disinfo websites targeting the newly awakened. However, I'd be more comfortable with those friends tuning in to Jones than taking the lies of NP etc, for real.

As long as people are sincere in searching out the truth and in developing their discernment muscles, then eventually operations like Infowars will be swapped for better sources as the truth seeker matures. But operations like NP etc, inject informational poison and actually retard the awakening process, imo.

Thanks for the comment.

I would put to you that they are not simply 'misleading', but are in fact complete fabrications, aka out and out lies and disinformation. Also, we should be aware of the purpose and intent behind an operation that spreads this stuff.

They are more than sensationalist. Would you think they are merely 'misleading' if the subject of the article was Q and anons? "Q advocates for the overthrow of the United States government"? Would you be as tolerant of such lies if the target audience was the normies and the lefties, instead of anons and truth seekers who are struggling to wake up to see the distinction between truth and lies? I would not.

IMO, one real problem here is that the headline plus the first few paragraphs actually destroy the true picture of what is going on. By being lies, they inherently undermine truth. They poison, and trigger reactive responses that most anons are attempting to be free from.

Another problem is how these sorts of lies perpetuate old models of behavior that the Cabal have groomed in use for generations.

What's the difference between a normie simply swallowing CNN lies about DJT, because they play right into his prejudices, and a truth seeker who simply swallows fabricated lies about people like Obama, Clinton, et all, because those lies play into our views? No real difference, in terms of thought process, and behavioral response. The same behavior is being recruited and facilitated.

The lies and clickbait perpetuate emotionally reactive responses and approaches to truth. They simply redirect it. Thus, awakening folks simply end up trading one matrix for another, instead of building the discernment muscle that values real truth, whether it makes you feel comfortable or not.

Anyway, that's my view.