This article caught my eye. People are being scared in the movie. Many generations are unfamiliar with the threat of a very possible nuclear war.
The guys on Badlands Media Devolution Power Hour #160 were talking about how movies and TV shows could have been used to increase our fear over the years. So this was timely.
We suspect important timing in the release of Sound of Freedom. Why the Oppenheimer movie now and why release this month? 🤔
I agree. But I found the audience reaction interesting. What if they are using the movie to amp up the normie reaction to the possibility of nukes? The precipice will have to be huge to the normies. Threat of nuclear war, on top of hyper inflation from dollar being dropped as reserve currency, human trafficking/pedophilia disclosures, what else? Also remember the storm that Trump said we would find out about…
And to be extra gratuitous with my response... Tom Lehrer worked for the NSA. Some of his biggest hits included "So Long Mom, I'm Off to Drop the Bomb," and "We'll All Go Together When We Go."
The more I think about it, the more I think "former NSA" is kinda like how Anderson Cooper was "former" CIA.
I'm sure you're right; that's exactly what it's for. If Covid didn't scare you ... how about total nuclear annihilation? And now, black iodine pills and even bigger masks!
Wow, who could've guessed that a hyperactive CGI team, combined with an uber-edgy script writer, would make a horror movie of the Manhattan project? This is to make everyone scared of nuclear energy and everyone hate America for nuking Japan. The movie barely scrapes the surface of the actual justifications to nuke Japan. The movie likes to focus on stuff that probably didn't happen or did happen but wasn't as big of a deal as the movie portrays. Totally stupid. Just another Pedowood flop that will get steamrolled by Sound of Freedom!
The Japanese High Command were already considering surrender as starvation and fire bombings took their toll on the Axis populace.
Don't buy into the Globalist propaganda. WWI and II were started by the bankers. Nukes were developed for control purposes and instilling fear. The bankers decided the US would be their Puppet, not Germany.
Hard to digest that most wars are a fixed game to kill off young men and civilians while making gobs of money for the Elite.
My Dad and others in my family fought or died in WWII, the Korean War and Vietnam. Before my father passed away he became convinced the Korean, Vietnam and Middle East wars weren't legit. Don't think he ever had doubts about being in the Pacific Theater during WWII. He and other Americans were fed the line that ALL Japanese would fight to the death and that's why the USA had to bomb Japan and deliberately kill women, children and old folks.
You are correct, Radwoody: There were no honest justifications for dropping nukes on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, non-military targets that also had Allied POWs interned. (Of course, the Allies had already incinerated numerous cities both in Japan, including Tokyo, and in Europe, using incendiary bombs, but that's not the point).
Japan was already TRYING to surrender; the only sticking point was that they wanted to retain their Emperor in a ceremonial mode, and we said "no, you have to surrender unconditionally." Then after they surrendered, we let them KEEP their Emperor, which they still have today.
In other words, we could have ended the war EARLIER -- under the SAME TERMS, unconditional but with the ceremonial position of Emperor retained -- but we chose not to.
Japan was fully broken and could NOT have won at that point regardless, and the "500,000 Allied deaths from a necessary invasion" were fantasy.
Those two atomic bombs were dropped on civilian populations TO PROVE WE HAD THEM AND WOULD USE THEM CALLOUSLY. They cemented our status as the unbeatable bully in the schoolyard.
Many of the survivors of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings suffered (and some died) of radiation sickness, but a single ~20k bomb contains a LOT less radioactive material than a nuclear power plant.
Yes, actual atomic bombs were used on those two cities.
Also: If atomic bombs aren't real, why do nuclear power plants work?
Is there any real evidence that nuclear fission isn't real? A LOT of scientific theory AND real-world data, "scientific" and otherwise, support the facts of nuclear fission and of actual, functioning atomic fission bombs.
Draws false equivalencies, absolutely certain of things he can't be certain about, relies on appealing to authority of "science" in place of individual thinking.
There's no "false equivalency" here: both fission bombs and nuclear power plants use fissionable material AND use the same natural process -- radioactive decay -- to generate heat. One is designed to create a runaway process that generates an explosion, the other moderates the process to PREVENT an explosion and instead uses the heat to boil water to spin a turbine to create electricity.
As far as relying on an appeal to authority -- so far, I don't have any reason to believe that's not what you're doing, because you've said nothing about where your opinion comes from. Did you read something on the internet and decide it had to be true? I'm relying on data from a number of sources, as I pointed out, ranging from university physics to historical accounts and more.
That is because your exercise in thought theory here is as relevant as wondering if a cow is a horse and horse is a cow because they have 4 legs and stand on them. These examples used to form the basis of questioning are in no way similar in conditions and there fore extent of impact based on the actual conditions of the events.
Loved the Sound of Freedom, however Christoper Nolan's films are the ONLY movies that bring me to the theater. Have you seen Interstellar or The Prestige or Dunkirk? Nolan never insults the intelligence of his audience, that's why I respect him as a film maker. Hardly typical Hollywood 🙄
We tell others things and they call us conspiracy theorists and claim big things can not be hidden from them.
For instance Epstein stuff, voting and other such things.
Then they will watch this movie in which they keep this hidden until Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
They have so many double standards. Basically they have all built their homes on sand. Even the 3 little pigs with their straw and sticks homes had a better foundation than our American Citizens do.
No wonder people walk out. -shaken-. They see their own foundations crumbling and they need a safe space to feel superior again.
Horror because it’ll have scenes in it like the Nazi melting Ark scene from Raiders of the Lost Ark or the awful scenes from that animated Hiroshima movie from the 70s PBS would play on the anniversary, showing people literally having their skin melting or their skin just peeling off? Yep, I bet if they show the CGI explosions and what happens, it should be horror and disturbing!
ignorant and should delete this nonsense immediately. Air is fake also if we are now playing candyland antics, and so is the words your keyboard managed to regurgitate.
This article caught my eye. People are being scared in the movie. Many generations are unfamiliar with the threat of a very possible nuclear war.
The guys on Badlands Media Devolution Power Hour #160 were talking about how movies and TV shows could have been used to increase our fear over the years. So this was timely.
We suspect important timing in the release of Sound of Freedom. Why the Oppenheimer movie now and why release this month? 🤔
Don't be afraid of the invisible things they tell you to be afraid of.
Not everybody agrees, but imo the nuke scare is the biggest psyop of the last century.
I agree. But I found the audience reaction interesting. What if they are using the movie to amp up the normie reaction to the possibility of nukes? The precipice will have to be huge to the normies. Threat of nuclear war, on top of hyper inflation from dollar being dropped as reserve currency, human trafficking/pedophilia disclosures, what else? Also remember the storm that Trump said we would find out about…
And to be extra gratuitous with my response... Tom Lehrer worked for the NSA. Some of his biggest hits included "So Long Mom, I'm Off to Drop the Bomb," and "We'll All Go Together When We Go."
The more I think about it, the more I think "former NSA" is kinda like how Anderson Cooper was "former" CIA.
I'm sure you're right; that's exactly what it's for. If Covid didn't scare you ... how about total nuclear annihilation? And now, black iodine pills and even bigger masks!
Until [they] decide to use them on us.
Well, then they do and we die. And? Cant stop it if that really happens.
Hey, that's MY opinion.
Wow, who could've guessed that a hyperactive CGI team, combined with an uber-edgy script writer, would make a horror movie of the Manhattan project? This is to make everyone scared of nuclear energy and everyone hate America for nuking Japan. The movie barely scrapes the surface of the actual justifications to nuke Japan. The movie likes to focus on stuff that probably didn't happen or did happen but wasn't as big of a deal as the movie portrays. Totally stupid. Just another Pedowood flop that will get steamrolled by Sound of Freedom!
There were no justifications
^^^THIS!^^^
The Japanese High Command were already considering surrender as starvation and fire bombings took their toll on the Axis populace.
Don't buy into the Globalist propaganda. WWI and II were started by the bankers. Nukes were developed for control purposes and instilling fear. The bankers decided the US would be their Puppet, not Germany.
Hard to digest that most wars are a fixed game to kill off young men and civilians while making gobs of money for the Elite.
My Dad and others in my family fought or died in WWII, the Korean War and Vietnam. Before my father passed away he became convinced the Korean, Vietnam and Middle East wars weren't legit. Don't think he ever had doubts about being in the Pacific Theater during WWII. He and other Americans were fed the line that ALL Japanese would fight to the death and that's why the USA had to bomb Japan and deliberately kill women, children and old folks.
You are correct, Radwoody: There were no honest justifications for dropping nukes on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, non-military targets that also had Allied POWs interned. (Of course, the Allies had already incinerated numerous cities both in Japan, including Tokyo, and in Europe, using incendiary bombs, but that's not the point).
Japan was already TRYING to surrender; the only sticking point was that they wanted to retain their Emperor in a ceremonial mode, and we said "no, you have to surrender unconditionally." Then after they surrendered, we let them KEEP their Emperor, which they still have today.
In other words, we could have ended the war EARLIER -- under the SAME TERMS, unconditional but with the ceremonial position of Emperor retained -- but we chose not to.
Japan was fully broken and could NOT have won at that point regardless, and the "500,000 Allied deaths from a necessary invasion" were fantasy.
Those two atomic bombs were dropped on civilian populations TO PROVE WE HAD THEM AND WOULD USE THEM CALLOUSLY. They cemented our status as the unbeatable bully in the schoolyard.
If you like your emperor, you can keep your emperor
Ding. [°~°]
Except that the bombs were fake.
No, they weren't.
Many of the survivors of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings suffered (and some died) of radiation sickness, but a single ~20k bomb contains a LOT less radioactive material than a nuclear power plant.
Yes, actual atomic bombs were used on those two cities.
How do you know? Were you high ranking military at the time? Research and development?
Did you see it with your own eyes?
Or are you believing what you've been told
I could ask you the same thing.
Also: If atomic bombs aren't real, why do nuclear power plants work?
Is there any real evidence that nuclear fission isn't real? A LOT of scientific theory AND real-world data, "scientific" and otherwise, support the facts of nuclear fission and of actual, functioning atomic fission bombs.
Draws false equivalencies, absolutely certain of things he can't be certain about, relies on appealing to authority of "science" in place of individual thinking.
NGMI
There's no "false equivalency" here: both fission bombs and nuclear power plants use fissionable material AND use the same natural process -- radioactive decay -- to generate heat. One is designed to create a runaway process that generates an explosion, the other moderates the process to PREVENT an explosion and instead uses the heat to boil water to spin a turbine to create electricity.
As far as relying on an appeal to authority -- so far, I don't have any reason to believe that's not what you're doing, because you've said nothing about where your opinion comes from. Did you read something on the internet and decide it had to be true? I'm relying on data from a number of sources, as I pointed out, ranging from university physics to historical accounts and more.
That is because your exercise in thought theory here is as relevant as wondering if a cow is a horse and horse is a cow because they have 4 legs and stand on them. These examples used to form the basis of questioning are in no way similar in conditions and there fore extent of impact based on the actual conditions of the events.
Exactly
Loved the Sound of Freedom, however Christoper Nolan's films are the ONLY movies that bring me to the theater. Have you seen Interstellar or The Prestige or Dunkirk? Nolan never insults the intelligence of his audience, that's why I respect him as a film maker. Hardly typical Hollywood 🙄
imagine unironically seeing this movie when Barbie (2023) is playing next door...
The disconnect is interesting to me.
We tell others things and they call us conspiracy theorists and claim big things can not be hidden from them.
For instance Epstein stuff, voting and other such things.
Then they will watch this movie in which they keep this hidden until Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
They have so many double standards. Basically they have all built their homes on sand. Even the 3 little pigs with their straw and sticks homes had a better foundation than our American Citizens do.
No wonder people walk out. -shaken-. They see their own foundations crumbling and they need a safe space to feel superior again.
Someone please bring Tommy Shelby a cheeseburger
Timing is everything. No coincidences.
Anyone decent person with a brain should be afraid of anyone having access to nuclear weaponry. Especially since [they] are clearly ready to use them.
I'd bet $5 that "Oppenheimer" is a dud, pun intended.
I'm got nuclear sub AND ICBMs on my movie bingo card for October...
Horror because it’ll have scenes in it like the Nazi melting Ark scene from Raiders of the Lost Ark or the awful scenes from that animated Hiroshima movie from the 70s PBS would play on the anniversary, showing people literally having their skin melting or their skin just peeling off? Yep, I bet if they show the CGI explosions and what happens, it should be horror and disturbing!
Since nuclear bombs are fake, fear is the only reason why they hang them over our heads.
ignorant and should delete this nonsense immediately. Air is fake also if we are now playing candyland antics, and so is the words your keyboard managed to regurgitate.
Confession through projection. Your keyboard, apparently, can't even regurgitate English correctly. LOL!