I will research this further. In medical research there are factions which as we see can gain dominance. I think he is part of the “amyloid mafia” in the field of Alzheimer’s research. Big pharma just released a shitty anti Alzheimer’s drug which is the culmination of Team Amyloids goal. The drug is not really that efficacious yet as surprise to no one here got approved recently. I think Stanford President not getting investigated publicly is a push to get drug approved. The amyloid mafia has control of all research funding over the last 30 years in this area of research. Dr Tessier LeVigne’s CV is a nightmare to those here. Before Stanford he was at Genentech so the big pharma ties are real.
Fun fact: several years back I went to a place called the Ahmen Clinic - to have scans of my brain. It turns out with the scans. They can tell if you’re going to have Alzheimer’s. I’m not a candidate. So that was good news?
I joked with them, because I’ve been suffering with depression most of my life. So I told them - so up until the day I die I get to remember how miserable I’ve been all this time. Lol 😂
A lot has changed since then for me, as I am getting closer to Jesus. Spending time in his word, at church, and then fellowship with others can’t really change your brain!
Anyway, the point is… I won’t have to be taking any stupid Alzheimer’s drugs.
The cause of Alzheimers/Dementia is something that cannot be believed by virtually anybody. I don't even mention it to people as I always get laughed out of the room.
Suffice it to say, as with virtually ALL western medical nonsense, no drug/chemical could prevent it. Materialism is madness...
Not laughing in advance, as I'm familiar with your line of thinking. I have a theory about alzheimers too, but I don't even like to THINK about it because my own mind laughs at me.
Good to hear from you Hundro. Make any progress with the Mulford book?
The problem with my theory, not really "mine", but what I've come to the conclusion is the only rational explanation does not sit well with anybody I've explained it to. I've yet to explain to anybody that would resonate with it.
The slightly "bad news" is, there isn't much that can be done to avoid it. It's quite beyond any "human intervention" once it sets in.
Do you have a friend or loved one showing signs? Perhaps such a person could be helped if so. But once it's full blown, there's no coming back.
I've gotten only as far as acquiring Mulford's book. Reading season is usually limited to winter for me, as during the snowless months I'm outside working. Problem is, I've built up a pile of books to read over the past few years. So many unexplored topics have become intriguing since the thing happened.
I’m of the opinion the majority of “research” at these institutions is downright lies. Or controlled to fit a narrative. Consequently, the investors are likely in on the ruse.
Stanford probably has an endowment that would last a hundred years, already, although there are precedents for donors to renege. The investors in business could be funding the research. Then we might expect they are getting the numbers they want. It's the next circle of affected people who are the victims and should be jumping on this.
This is done everywhere. There's no money in duplicating someone else's labwork to verify results, so no one does it. They cherry pick the results they want and throw out the rest. Corruption is EVERYWHERE.
Remember: Accusations and investigations are not proof of guilt. Many times on this board Trump is defended by nearly everyone on those grounds since Trump has been accused of everything under the sun and then some, investigated continuously for ANY dirt they can find, and some they have to fabricate.
The irony of an empty headed neurobiologist.
The irony of being 'investigated' by a board of Trustees that you are the President of.
I will research this further. In medical research there are factions which as we see can gain dominance. I think he is part of the “amyloid mafia” in the field of Alzheimer’s research. Big pharma just released a shitty anti Alzheimer’s drug which is the culmination of Team Amyloids goal. The drug is not really that efficacious yet as surprise to no one here got approved recently. I think Stanford President not getting investigated publicly is a push to get drug approved. The amyloid mafia has control of all research funding over the last 30 years in this area of research. Dr Tessier LeVigne’s CV is a nightmare to those here. Before Stanford he was at Genentech so the big pharma ties are real.
https://www.science.org/content/article/potential-fabrication-research-images-threatens-key-theory-alzheimers-disease
https://www.statnews.com/2022/11/30/stanford-tessier-lavigne-research-misconduct/
Please do look into this. I am aware of other theoretical lines and they don't seem to be going anywhere.
Fun fact: several years back I went to a place called the Ahmen Clinic - to have scans of my brain. It turns out with the scans. They can tell if you’re going to have Alzheimer’s. I’m not a candidate. So that was good news?
I joked with them, because I’ve been suffering with depression most of my life. So I told them - so up until the day I die I get to remember how miserable I’ve been all this time. Lol 😂
A lot has changed since then for me, as I am getting closer to Jesus. Spending time in his word, at church, and then fellowship with others can’t really change your brain!
Anyway, the point is… I won’t have to be taking any stupid Alzheimer’s drugs.
Look forward to your digz!
The cause of Alzheimers/Dementia is something that cannot be believed by virtually anybody. I don't even mention it to people as I always get laughed out of the room.
Suffice it to say, as with virtually ALL western medical nonsense, no drug/chemical could prevent it. Materialism is madness...
Not laughing in advance, as I'm familiar with your line of thinking. I have a theory about alzheimers too, but I don't even like to THINK about it because my own mind laughs at me.
Yeah, that's what I remember being told decades ago. I'm still unsure.
Pectin is in lots of fruits. Good to know that, thanks.
Good to hear from you Hundro. Make any progress with the Mulford book?
The problem with my theory, not really "mine", but what I've come to the conclusion is the only rational explanation does not sit well with anybody I've explained it to. I've yet to explain to anybody that would resonate with it.
The slightly "bad news" is, there isn't much that can be done to avoid it. It's quite beyond any "human intervention" once it sets in.
Do you have a friend or loved one showing signs? Perhaps such a person could be helped if so. But once it's full blown, there's no coming back.
I've gotten only as far as acquiring Mulford's book. Reading season is usually limited to winter for me, as during the snowless months I'm outside working. Problem is, I've built up a pile of books to read over the past few years. So many unexplored topics have become intriguing since the thing happened.
Good to see your words on the screen again.
Roger that. And good to hear from you as well. Enjoy the outdoors!
Isn't it linked to fluoride in the water?
Could be. We're swimming in so many toxins, it's hard to know what is doing what to us.
No idea on the validity of the sauce
https://truthaboutfluoride.com/does-fluoride-lead-to-alzheimers/
Crime is rampant. Unless the greatest criminal MSM 'reports' it, It will mean Nothing.
Stanford received a ton of of money from Epstein.
Look at who is on the board at Stanford. that’s a lot of investing Owls and one investing Monarch. The board includes the President of Stanford, btw.
I’m of the opinion the majority of “research” at these institutions is downright lies. Or controlled to fit a narrative. Consequently, the investors are likely in on the ruse.
A lot of research is misleading or misunderstood or downright lies, period.
Stanford probably has an endowment that would last a hundred years, already, although there are precedents for donors to renege. The investors in business could be funding the research. Then we might expect they are getting the numbers they want. It's the next circle of affected people who are the victims and should be jumping on this.
I actually overheard this conversation between two professors. One had just submitted a research paper that had been rejected.
Prof 1 : Why did they reject my paper?
Prof 2: Because they didn't like your conclusions.
Prof 1: Well if they'd just told me what conclusion they wanted, I'd have written that.
I would go with the, "Only 4?" Position on the matter.
This is done everywhere. There's no money in duplicating someone else's labwork to verify results, so no one does it. They cherry pick the results they want and throw out the rest. Corruption is EVERYWHERE.
He would come out as a gay man and get a raise?
Or just buy a skirt and some heels.
The love of money......
Trust the science, bigot!
[Don't] Trust the Science™
Promotion and a raise.
Nothing would happen
From a San Francisco television station:
https://abc7news.com/stanford-president-resigns-marc-tessier-lavigne-university-news-misconduct/13522724/
It wouldn't be the first time plagiarism or outright data fabrication has happened with these people.
Remember: Accusations and investigations are not proof of guilt. Many times on this board Trump is defended by nearly everyone on those grounds since Trump has been accused of everything under the sun and then some, investigated continuously for ANY dirt they can find, and some they have to fabricate.
I'd like to see evidence.