There's no need for a fucking death star. This shit can be fired off of planes, drones, whatever. Lockheed Martin SELLS this stuff to "customers". Look up their website.
No magical death beam satelites, no death stars, just some existing technology. Why are some drifting into fantasyland? Wake the fuck up.
I was merely using 'death star' as a euphemism. This reminds me of the death ray Nikola Tesla supposedly designed way back in the day. It's just surreal actually seeing a laser come out of the sky like that honestly. It looks like it should come out of a star wars movie. I'm very awake, and you need to chill the fuck out
Has it been used in Lahaina? I don't know. But I can't rule it out regarding the tech that's available. Implemented in a Lockheed AC-130, there you go.
Hey I appreciate it fren. Tensions are high and I was unclear with my terminology. I mean yeah for sure it's been around for awhile. My theory is that it's just an evolved and updated form of what Nikola Tesla invented before the clowns stole most of his stuff.
As u/ruffthesuspect states, the article is non-existent as far as I can find. However, that doesn't really matter. The fact that the drone footage shows a blue car and blue umbrellas unburnt, but surrounded by devastation is itself good evidence to support the "anti-blue laser" theory.
Honestly, I think the "blue celebrity house" thing might be intentional C_A fuckery to steer people away from that evidence.
The best way to discredit real evidence is to show the good evidence, then add in "evidence" that can't be corroborated; claims that look a lot like bullshit. This discredits everything by association. It doesn't really, but it does to those who have not yet learned discernment.
Frankly, I think that video has C_A written all over it.
The umbrellas and car were not disputed in the "fact checker" articles, on the contrary, their rhetoric corroborates it. Only the "blue houses" were disputed.
You can find the blue umbrellas and car in the original drone footage.
That doesn't mean it was an "anti-blue laser." I don't have any idea. I think it was a laser, I am not convinced it was of the "anti-blue" variety. But what I said stands. The good evidence in support of the idea was discredited by association, not by direct address. This is exactly the way the C_A does business.
Anyone notice the kamehameha is also the BLUE BALL/BEAM OF ENEGRY that gets shot out of the hands of the characters from dragon ball z. Just thought it was weird. Could be nothing but I have to say it.
I see a video of Tommy Bahamas total burn out/vaporization EXCEPT for the canvas umbrellas, the Blue canvas umbrellas are unscathed. Blue t-shirts were recovered on top of the rubble, from another video of a “burned” out store.
can we confirm the video clip at the end is legit... because WHAT THE FUCK WHEN DID THE DEEP STATE GET A DEATH STAR
There's no need for a fucking death star. This shit can be fired off of planes, drones, whatever. Lockheed Martin SELLS this stuff to "customers". Look up their website.
No magical death beam satelites, no death stars, just some existing technology. Why are some drifting into fantasyland? Wake the fuck up.
I was merely using 'death star' as a euphemism. This reminds me of the death ray Nikola Tesla supposedly designed way back in the day. It's just surreal actually seeing a laser come out of the sky like that honestly. It looks like it should come out of a star wars movie. I'm very awake, and you need to chill the fuck out
Yeah, excuse my wording. Each time it comes to DEWs, folks are talking about "magic killer sattelites", "death stars" and what not.
Look at this stuff, it's already available, nothing magical to it, no science fiction:
https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/capabilities/directed-energy.html
https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/products/MORFIUS.html
Has it been used in Lahaina? I don't know. But I can't rule it out regarding the tech that's available. Implemented in a Lockheed AC-130, there you go.
Hey I appreciate it fren. Tensions are high and I was unclear with my terminology. I mean yeah for sure it's been around for awhile. My theory is that it's just an evolved and updated form of what Nikola Tesla invented before the clowns stole most of his stuff.
The tech has been in the work for years.
Of course it has, just watch the Movie Real Genius from the 80s. A movie about space lasers that cook popcorn from space. A house full of popcorn.
Yeah i should've been more clear, I know that already. it's just surreal actually witnessing it
That was the creepiest thing I've seen in a long time.. The audio is so distopian.
Here's the music video for the song. It came out about 13-15 years ago. My kids loved the song & video. It's quite catchy.
Eiffel 65 - Blue (Da Ba Dee) [Gabry Ponte Ice Pop Mix] (Original Video with subtitles)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=68ugkg9RePc
I'm not talking about the very well known song I grew up with. I'm talking about the audio at the end.
Sorry, what audio at the end? Please clarify. I don't know what you mean.
Shady as fuck. I think I need more about the Blue colored house's of the elite
As u/ruffthesuspect states, the article is non-existent as far as I can find. However, that doesn't really matter. The fact that the drone footage shows a blue car and blue umbrellas unburnt, but surrounded by devastation is itself good evidence to support the "anti-blue laser" theory.
Honestly, I think the "blue celebrity house" thing might be intentional C_A fuckery to steer people away from that evidence.
The best way to discredit real evidence is to show the good evidence, then add in "evidence" that can't be corroborated; claims that look a lot like bullshit. This discredits everything by association. It doesn't really, but it does to those who have not yet learned discernment.
Frankly, I think that video has C_A written all over it.
You can fake that as well. I am not saying it is but shit is getting weird for sure. I don't dismiss anything at this point
The umbrellas and car were not disputed in the "fact checker" articles, on the contrary, their rhetoric corroborates it. Only the "blue houses" were disputed.
You can find the blue umbrellas and car in the original drone footage.
8:52: blue umbrellas
9:00: blue car
That doesn't mean it was an "anti-blue laser." I don't have any idea. I think it was a laser, I am not convinced it was of the "anti-blue" variety. But what I said stands. The good evidence in support of the idea was discredited by association, not by direct address. This is exactly the way the C_A does business.
Thanks fren. I definitely want to explore more odd that the frequency of Blue is 666
It's possible that the red house with the metal roof could also have avoid this type of attack (metal roof is uncommon there)
nobody can locate that article, at least that was the case a few days ago
😂😂😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
That was funny.😁
Anyone notice the kamehameha is also the BLUE BALL/BEAM OF ENEGRY that gets shot out of the hands of the characters from dragon ball z. Just thought it was weird. Could be nothing but I have to say it.
Always putting it in front of our face, knowing...🤬😡
I see a video of Tommy Bahamas total burn out/vaporization EXCEPT for the canvas umbrellas, the Blue canvas umbrellas are unscathed. Blue t-shirts were recovered on top of the rubble, from another video of a “burned” out store.
How does the fire go from concrete street to cars then across brick walls then houses.
We had a fire in the neighborhood next to me today. Nothing of the sort happened.
Embers blowing around.
Hmmm... the guy also released a video of a bunch of unburnt blue t-shirts in the middle of totally scorched earth homes.
I wonder if any footage of the suspicious fires in prior years shows the "untouched blue DEW" phenomenon.