If gay means Pedophile, then we are on board with that. I think the overwhelming majority of gay people will have a problem with CNN calling them Pedophiles.
The problem is the gays assured us it all stops at gay marriage, contrary to what the Bible, common sense, and intuition all say about caving to sexual deviance. So since they have proven they are incapable of self policing they should be deemed cancerous to society and forced back into a closet
No ftiggin kidding! Keep it in your bedroom with age appropriate or fk you ! This statement is more then tolerant and I say it often ! Enough is enough with this sickness ! How it ever got to where it is, is friggin revolting!
Although CNN is most likely fine with pedos what you are reading is likely a misunderstanding -let me explain.
The Ugandan Law that these pedos are breaking is called the Anti-Homosexuality Act. so in other words CNN is accurate to nick name it the anti-gay law because that's what the law is.
They also call the law controversial, but then go on to explain that under this same law, all gay acts, result in life in prison which is technically against the Ugandan constitution. CNN IS WRONG on this:
Chapter 4 section 21 of the Ugandan constitution states:
(2) Without prejudice to clause (1) of this article, a person shall not be discriminated against on
the ground of sex, race, colour, ethnic origin, tribe, birth, creed or religion, or social or economic standing, political opinion or disability.
Nowhere does it prevent discrimination based on sexual orientation.
Discriminating based on someone's choice of sexual partner is discriminating based on sex, because it applies the law differently solely based on the sex of the participants
Sex as in gender. If a law prohibits homosexual sex, then it is by definition discriminating against a gay man or woman based on the gender of their sex partner. Ergo unconstitutional, as it was here in the US to allow male/female couples to legally marry but not male/male or female/female couples.
This is incorrect on a few levels. But i cant get deep into right now, We have a different constitution. In Ugandan law, Each individual is sovereign, meaning they are their own. The persons rights are their own. The point being, the government would have to discriminate on that individuals sex directly and Not in relation to the sex of another. I will make a comparative of your argument later. I am a little busy at the moment.
Im Back, so essentially the argument you are using could also be used to advocate for pedophilia since the government is discriminating against the age of their partner.
In the end this is not the way the law works, constitutional laws are based on actions not traits. The government of Uganda is not acting against the traits of the parter but the act of pedophilia as well as the act of homosexual intercoarse.
There are clearly other factors in the case of an underage partner that don't invalidate age-related discrimination laws. That's an absurd and simplistic view. US also has laws against age discrimination, but they don't apply until a child has reached the age of majority which is usually 18. There's no such restriction on discriminating by gender.
It should be clear that the comparison is very similar.both cases deal with intercoarse, both cases deal with constitutional rights. Both cases are using the persons partner as justification. Both cases deal with morality. There is not a closer comparison, if there is I would love to hear it.
All pedophiles are spychopaths. You can not gain sexual pleasure, or pleasure alone, from the pain and suffering of another human unless you are a psychopath. "Normal" people become traumatized if they try to do what a spychopath does.
"Normal" people would live with a constant nagging guilt that would eat at them for the rest of their lives.
Being gay is simply a reproductive disorder. Being a pedophile is multiple layers of neurological issues, narcissism and a neurological disability to feal empathy.
Wait, really? Or is this just wishful thinking? I’ve taken a major hiatus from all things political and GAW but I can’t believe I’ve been gone long enough to miss a law being proposed that would give the death penalty for molesting children. I feel like this might be too good to be true. Lol
These people need to be charged criminally for advocating pedophilia. Even the gay community would interpret this as slander. So, there's plenty of criminal and civil opportunities here.
Pedophiles lurk in bathrooms waiting for whatever age boy they "Like" to come in. That's why there are Glory Holes in many bathrooms... If you see one demand the bathroom owner has it fixed!
If gay means Pedophile, then we are on board with that. I think the overwhelming majority of gay people will have a problem with CNN calling them Pedophiles.
And yet, many of them are actually pedophiles.
Why do gay male couples only ever seem to adopt boys?
leave Pete Booty Juice alone!!!
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 My husband just showed me a video of Biden Saying that!!! We are rolling!
Right on!
I love how they've been trying to normalize pedophilia for decades. When nambla didn't work, they tried making it a protected sexuality
I don't know about the anti gay angle but I think it is wrong to prosecute them as well. They should be instantly executed.
The problem is the gays assured us it all stops at gay marriage, contrary to what the Bible, common sense, and intuition all say about caving to sexual deviance. So since they have proven they are incapable of self policing they should be deemed cancerous to society and forced back into a closet
No ftiggin kidding! Keep it in your bedroom with age appropriate or fk you ! This statement is more then tolerant and I say it often ! Enough is enough with this sickness ! How it ever got to where it is, is friggin revolting!
That’s called a sexual crime against a child. Life in prison without parole or execute them. End of story.
Bordering on criminal activity now...
ALL pedophiles need to go. No exceptions.
Put me down as "anti-gay", then.
Word
Attention (CNN SUCKS) BUT:
Discriminating based on someone's choice of sexual partner is discriminating based on sex, because it applies the law differently solely based on the sex of the participants
Either you are conflating "sex" with "intercoarse" or you are assuming gay is only guy on guy and not girl on girl. In either case you would be wrong.
Sex as in gender. If a law prohibits homosexual sex, then it is by definition discriminating against a gay man or woman based on the gender of their sex partner. Ergo unconstitutional, as it was here in the US to allow male/female couples to legally marry but not male/male or female/female couples.
This is incorrect on a few levels. But i cant get deep into right now, We have a different constitution. In Ugandan law, Each individual is sovereign, meaning they are their own. The persons rights are their own. The point being, the government would have to discriminate on that individuals sex directly and Not in relation to the sex of another. I will make a comparative of your argument later. I am a little busy at the moment.
Im Back, so essentially the argument you are using could also be used to advocate for pedophilia since the government is discriminating against the age of their partner.
In the end this is not the way the law works, constitutional laws are based on actions not traits. The government of Uganda is not acting against the traits of the parter but the act of pedophilia as well as the act of homosexual intercoarse.
There are clearly other factors in the case of an underage partner that don't invalidate age-related discrimination laws. That's an absurd and simplistic view. US also has laws against age discrimination, but they don't apply until a child has reached the age of majority which is usually 18. There's no such restriction on discriminating by gender.
It should be clear that the comparison is very similar.both cases deal with intercoarse, both cases deal with constitutional rights. Both cases are using the persons partner as justification. Both cases deal with morality. There is not a closer comparison, if there is I would love to hear it.
Except one case involves minors who are covered differently under the law. What about this is difficult for you to comprehend?
Being gay != Being a pedophile
All pedophiles are spychopaths. You can not gain sexual pleasure, or pleasure alone, from the pain and suffering of another human unless you are a psychopath. "Normal" people become traumatized if they try to do what a spychopath does.
"Normal" people would live with a constant nagging guilt that would eat at them for the rest of their lives.
Being gay is simply a reproductive disorder. Being a pedophile is multiple layers of neurological issues, narcissism and a neurological disability to feal empathy.
Thanks Obama. /s
It's called Pedophilia.
Soon to be punishable by death (finally)
Wait, really? Or is this just wishful thinking? I’ve taken a major hiatus from all things political and GAW but I can’t believe I’ve been gone long enough to miss a law being proposed that would give the death penalty for molesting children. I feel like this might be too good to be true. Lol
Trump had said it a while ago.
These people need to be charged criminally for advocating pedophilia. Even the gay community would interpret this as slander. So, there's plenty of criminal and civil opportunities here.
Well, guess I'm big anti-gay
Pedophiles lurk in bathrooms waiting for whatever age boy they "Like" to come in. That's why there are Glory Holes in many bathrooms... If you see one demand the bathroom owner has it fixed!