Be very careful of this. This was part of a PsyOp . First off, it wasn't Stew Peters that brought the 'snake venom' to the public. Just as Alex Jones is discredited for "frogs turning gay"..... doesn't mean AJ is wrong either. In fact, AJ was quoting a study, but INFO warfare used an Alinsky tactic to smear and discredit Jones for it. The same can be said for Stew Peters.
So, let's take a look at the 2 big 'gotcha' narratives that have been used to discredit Stew Peters and Alex Jones. The first question to be asked, Are they right? With Stew Peters, there was the following guest, Dr. Bryan Ardis, who was interviewed and claimed that the 'COVID' vax☠xine had snake venom in it.
The snake venom "conspiracy theory" was successfully used to discredit anyone who disagrees with the official propaganda concerning the modRNA jab. This was the same tactic they used against Alex Jones who said the chemicals in insecticides and herbicides like Atrazine that was running off into the water shed were "turning frogs gay". Even Wikipedia cites this as being true.
"with some studies reporting causing demasculinization in male northern leopard frogs even at low concentrations,[51] and an endocrine disruptor."
The use of Atrazine is nearly ubiquitous in farming and lawn care. "Atrazine has been a suspected teratogen, with some studies reporting causing demasculinization in male northern leopard frogs even at low concentrations,[49] and an endocrine disruptor,[50]." There's much more to what Alex Jones was reporting and he is at least partially correct. Yet, the left used this against AJ to discredit him.
Likewise, the snake venom is being used against Stew Peters, and not the guest, Dr. Bryan Ardis, who raised this issue. Nevertheless, Ardis is at least partially correct here. There are plenty of sources to confirm this. One needs to ask why is Stew Peters being targeted with this? It was his guest that exposed this revelation. The reason is due to Peters being a much bigger and effective messenger than Dr. Ardis. Marxism always attempts to kill the messenger. It's an easier target and shuts down any further messaging.
To some people, it's a lot easier to join in the Left's propaganda campaign using Alinsky tactics to discredit speakers. This acts in decapitating right-wing leaders. Former KGB defector Yuri Bezmenov was asked why this was so. His response was if those helpers betrayed their own countrymen, they'd do it again under the new regime.
I feel negative on Stew Peters. Up in the air on Dom.
We definitely have to keep our eyes open for Alex Jones types in our midst.
I believe white hats have people like Ian Copeland out there to assist us in this process (basically fake establishment scientists). These people are wrong in substance but correct in their approach and can help gird and test our theories.
In the future we will see a lot of people that are partially awake I don't expect them to be up to speed the same as us. We just have to share info with them and not attack them.
I followed Peters' stuff for a while but then out of nowhere he went off on an absolutely lunatic, apropos of nothing rant about that homosexuality should be re-criminalised and we should be locked up, and that he was saying that as a 'true' conservative and 'true' bible follower, and that there was no compromise. No censure of anything else outlawed in Leviticus but still happening though. I've tried to watch some of his stuff since but he's always evangelical about bringing anything remotely back to 'gay' again and again. It doesn't offend me at all, it's his belief and his absolute right to spout it. He did put me on to a few good sources to listen to, Maria Zee for example.
Yeah he seemed promising at first then one day he just started glowing hard and was having on various guests that we had already discredited a good while ago.
I don't understand this worshipping of people on a platform that just allows you to drop any info you want without proof. That goes for Peters, Cates and all of them.
I'm fine with people doing it, freedom of speech and all.
I'm an not fine with the dopey followers hanging on every word. Look at the comments and tell me that 90% of them aren't working at McDonald's or not working at all. Ok, or working in "tech".
But freedom, true freedom of speech on a certain site allows you to pick and choose the level of what You wish to believe. And that should be the same for anyone, of course depending on the site and how the company moderates it as such. Anything otherwise is just outright censorship if it’s an “open” town square type site.
But your opinion of such stupidity isn’t always others. And in order to block such “conspiracy” or stupidity, censorship is the usual weapon of choice.
Yes Donny not your weapon choice though Anon.. But others. Sadly just some people can’t see past themselves or outside that wet paper bag haha.
You aren’t one my friend. You’re obviously here because you’re awake, like most of us here…. minus the Trolls and Glowies lurking haha! They just pretend to be smart. ;)
Dom Lucre doesn't add anything. He just regurgitates whatever conspiracy he most recently heard. I don't think he's a fed and I don't know or care if he's a mason. He doesn't do anything.
One of them tried to sell the anon community on snake venom in the water, and the other is currently exposing high-level cabal members like Obama.
Seems pretty clear to me.
Be very careful of this. This was part of a PsyOp . First off, it wasn't Stew Peters that brought the 'snake venom' to the public. Just as Alex Jones is discredited for "frogs turning gay"..... doesn't mean AJ is wrong either. In fact, AJ was quoting a study, but INFO warfare used an Alinsky tactic to smear and discredit Jones for it. The same can be said for Stew Peters.
So, let's take a look at the 2 big 'gotcha' narratives that have been used to discredit Stew Peters and Alex Jones. The first question to be asked, Are they right? With Stew Peters, there was the following guest, Dr. Bryan Ardis, who was interviewed and claimed that the 'COVID' vax☠xine had snake venom in it.
The snake venom "conspiracy theory" was successfully used to discredit anyone who disagrees with the official propaganda concerning the modRNA jab. This was the same tactic they used against Alex Jones who said the chemicals in insecticides and herbicides like Atrazine that was running off into the water shed were "turning frogs gay". Even Wikipedia cites this as being true.
The use of Atrazine is nearly ubiquitous in farming and lawn care. "Atrazine has been a suspected teratogen, with some studies reporting causing demasculinization in male northern leopard frogs even at low concentrations,[49] and an endocrine disruptor,[50]." There's much more to what Alex Jones was reporting and he is at least partially correct. Yet, the left used this against AJ to discredit him.
Likewise, the snake venom is being used against Stew Peters, and not the guest, Dr. Bryan Ardis, who raised this issue. Nevertheless, Ardis is at least partially correct here. There are plenty of sources to confirm this. One needs to ask why is Stew Peters being targeted with this? It was his guest that exposed this revelation. The reason is due to Peters being a much bigger and effective messenger than Dr. Ardis. Marxism always attempts to kill the messenger. It's an easier target and shuts down any further messaging.
To some people, it's a lot easier to join in the Left's propaganda campaign using Alinsky tactics to discredit speakers. This acts in decapitating right-wing leaders. Former KGB defector Yuri Bezmenov was asked why this was so. His response was if those helpers betrayed their own countrymen, they'd do it again under the new regime.
I feel negative on Stew Peters. Up in the air on Dom.
We definitely have to keep our eyes open for Alex Jones types in our midst.
I believe white hats have people like Ian Copeland out there to assist us in this process (basically fake establishment scientists). These people are wrong in substance but correct in their approach and can help gird and test our theories.
I ignore failed rapper Stew. These are accusations and not facts.
Noticing a pattern of "alt-right" misinfluencers who are failed musicians.
The masonic ring is sus as hell.
But he is red pilling people.
He might not have learned the full story yet......
If he's low-level he might very well not know.
I will give him the benefit of the doubt for now.
Lots of good people haven't waken up to the masons.
That's fair. I hope you're right.
There are lots of cool-looking symbols I used to keep around myself, until I learned "Wait, THAT'S what it means?!"
He's doing good work we have nothing to lose.....
In the future we will see a lot of people that are partially awake I don't expect them to be up to speed the same as us. We just have to share info with them and not attack them.
Faggots eating their own.
I followed Peters' stuff for a while but then out of nowhere he went off on an absolutely lunatic, apropos of nothing rant about that homosexuality should be re-criminalised and we should be locked up, and that he was saying that as a 'true' conservative and 'true' bible follower, and that there was no compromise. No censure of anything else outlawed in Leviticus but still happening though. I've tried to watch some of his stuff since but he's always evangelical about bringing anything remotely back to 'gay' again and again. It doesn't offend me at all, it's his belief and his absolute right to spout it. He did put me on to a few good sources to listen to, Maria Zee for example.
Yeah he seemed promising at first then one day he just started glowing hard and was having on various guests that we had already discredited a good while ago.
Add the big larp Ariel to the list too.
I don't understand this worshipping of people on a platform that just allows you to drop any info you want without proof. That goes for Peters, Cates and all of them.
I'm fine with people doing it, freedom of speech and all. I'm an not fine with the dopey followers hanging on every word. Look at the comments and tell me that 90% of them aren't working at McDonald's or not working at all. Ok, or working in "tech".
But freedom, true freedom of speech on a certain site allows you to pick and choose the level of what You wish to believe. And that should be the same for anyone, of course depending on the site and how the company moderates it as such. Anything otherwise is just outright censorship if it’s an “open” town square type site.
I'm not talking censorship, I'm talking stupidity.
But your opinion of such stupidity isn’t always others. And in order to block such “conspiracy” or stupidity, censorship is the usual weapon of choice.
Yes Donny not your weapon choice though Anon.. But others. Sadly just some people can’t see past themselves or outside that wet paper bag haha.
You aren’t one my friend. You’re obviously here because you’re awake, like most of us here…. minus the Trolls and Glowies lurking haha! They just pretend to be smart. ;)
I've never really read anything from Dom. I've seen stuff Stew put out (like the snake venom crap) and don't believe anything he says.
I can't say if Dom did any of that stuff, but if Stew says he did then he most likely did not.
it's all so gay.
Dom Lucre doesn't add anything. He just regurgitates whatever conspiracy he most recently heard. I don't think he's a fed and I don't know or care if he's a mason. He doesn't do anything.
I'm much more insulted by his "English" than any Masonic leanings he may have.