I read somewhere that someone said that there is a chance to reverse gay marriage in USA since it's not in the Constitution, and that it's because the case that made it legal points to non existing "rights" almost out if a porn novel. Idk I just want to stop seeing fags in media and what not. Plus we have the Supreme Court on our side, so is there a chance?
Comments (27)
sorted by:
Don't care about them getting "married" by some court document - they're not married in the eyes of God, even if some pastor agrees to do the ceremony. It is still their individual freedom to be romantic with any (consenting) adult of their choosing. The thing that matters is that children are kept safe & are allowed to grow up with a mom and dad.
I don't care what adults do, but they made sure they called it marriage, there's a reason for this. They could've called it civil union, anything. But nope the powers that be wanted the specific word Marriage.
That’s the catch tho.
“Give them an inch (Gay Marriage);
They’ll take a mile (Globohomo).”
Gay marriage was the start that led to all this fake and gay shit.
They gotta go back in the closet.
They even try to spread it with the way they talk.
Why does everything have to be gay with them?
Don’t they have anything else to do besides making everything gay in their life?
Simple, That's all they have. Without their gayness, they have no identity.
The part everyone is missing is the two concepts are separate, but they're not treating it as such.
MARRIAGE is different from a CIVIL UNION.
A CU is a legal status recognized by the government which confers recognized benefits, such as relational status, certain rights, and tax benefits.
Marriage is a religious function with explicitly defined frameworks with religious and spiritual concepts, and real life implications as to expectations of behavior , living conditions (together), family orientation, having kids, raising them, and bonds and relationships.
The CU gave married people the nuts and bolts of a relationship as to how it functioned in a governed society.
Marriage itself is a religious device and should not be defined by any governing body.
.
THIS is the example and fight that should be happening.
Let the fans have CU all day long. Go to the judge and say they are living together in a civil union, I don't care.
However, they are not married in the eyes of God. They CANNOT get married, as that is anathema to the very concept and nature of marriage. Government has no business defining or regulating Marriage. They are required to recognize it in conferring CU, that's it. Stay out of it
Agree. Besides, there is civil unions where they have same 'rights, privileges and benefits' of being married for purpose of passing on property, financial responsibility to each other and health insurance. Have no problem with that as they have to then go through same process when they want a divorce. Kids, wow, a shame, but normalizing this lifestyle for them too is sad as many will probably feel very comfortable being in same sex relationships as that is what they live 24/7.
The problem is they could adopt or pay woman to give birth to their kid… in the past I thought it was service for woman that can’t give birth
Of course. Just like Roe v Wade was reversed, the case establishing gay marriage can be overturned as well. After all, it was wrongly decided, so it should be reversed.
I mean...it would be better if we just got government all around not involved in marriage, would it not?
Yes. Before the civil war, marriage licenses were not even a government thing, from what I've read.
I have never really understood why people have concerned themselves so much with what gay people do. I honestly don't have a single iota of care in my entire being. I have to be entirely honest, I also don't care about regular couples either. I simply don't think about what people do in the privacy of their own homes. The only thing that causes me any concern is seeing public displays of affection that are over the top. This goes for any type of romantic display that goes beyond the public propriety boundary. It makes me uncomfortable and I quickly look somewhere else. Maybe I am just old fashioned, but too much PDA seems trashy to me. Obviously there are exceptions that are more romantic because of extreme hardship scenario's, but these are somewhat rare. As far as whether or not they can be prey for divorce lawyers, I actually think it is funny. Seeing gay people suffer through a costly and awful divorce makes me smile, I recall them publicly ridiculing the regular folks for lamenting the horrors of divorce. I have had two divorces in my life, both were fairly awful and set back my fortunes dramatically. I have chosen to never marry again because I Simply cannot afford to jeopardize my retirement goals. I don't think it is up to me or any of us to disallow what other people wish to do within the bounds of the law. While I don't believe that gay people should call their unions "marriage" because it is quite clearly that "marriage" is a concept borne from a religion that does not accept homosexuality, I also know that it is not my place to judge nor "cast stones". In the meantime, I will continue not to care and avoid witnessing any PDA that makes me uncomfortable. As long as it is between consenting adults, it is none of my business.
Now that they are allowed to get "married" we can't call them "gay" anymore. Gay is a term for happy and "happy marriage" is an oxymoron! 😁🤣
There is no going back with any of this. I hope you realize that. The oppression olympics have already ruined the world.
Any step against their agenda and they will destroy civilization.
Try working for any company now days - you have to watch yearly trainings about how to be accepting and affirm their mental illness. Tell me how anyone is going to fix this - I do not see it ever happening.
Watch God.
Well look at it this way, once it comes out the last three presidents sans Trump (biden, hussein, and Bush Jr.) were all illegally elected in some way (Jr. and biden cheated to get in, and while obama MAY have been elected legitamately the first time, he was never eligible as a kenyan native), then everything signed into law by them, or done by their supreme court justices will be overturned because it was all illegal in the first place.
That include legalizing gay marriage among many other things (like the establishment of the NSA, the patriot act, etc. etc.). Though I will admit that it WOULD be better for the government to just get out of marriage in general, but at the same time, I believe the better way to deal with "the gay problem", is to take the route Russia, Hungary, and Poland did.
Ban all public expressions of sexuality and forbid any kind of talk about sexuality or sexual expression with children except for parents. Boom, the alphabet populations in all three countries crashed. They didn't go away entirely (there's always been gays), but they don't proliferate without the brainwashing propaganda apparatus that is being used in most of the west.
Truth be told, I personally don't think it will be much of a problem in the future. I firmly believe that it's a mental illness (whether you think it's parasites, or something else is up for debate), and I think there's a cure for it just like there's a cure for diabetes, cancer, etc. etc. But it's being withheld by the cabal because queers are easy to manipulate and make into an "oppressed group".
The only problem I see going into the future is how do you get all the current gays to take the cure. You can't force them (obviously), and who knows how many will willingly take it. I suppose you COULD feasibly force them to take it like you would a schizophrenia patient if they're unhinged enough (let's be real a lot of gays are just insane), but it's a problem for the future, no use worrying over it right now.
It'll be a problem that has to be solved during the rebuilding phase, right now we need to finish winning the war.
I dislike the fact that the children of gays will grow up without the benefit of either a mother or father in the home. They will always be missing that connection. Sad.
I wish they had just fixed the whole thing and said the government paperwork involvement part was a “civil-union”. Whatever you do on your part with the church side of it is your marriage.
If you have some kind of fake ass heathen church that’s gonna call you and your gay partner married, well, that’s between you and Moloch, but the government has no business in it.
Gay's won't stop for anything. They are rebellion.
The cabal is behind this, pushing it. I think it's part of their depopulation program. The gay couples I have known had no interest in campaigning or waving signs. When we get rid of the cabal, people will return to keeping their private lives private.
I’ve always watched Wheel of Fortune. I enjoy seeing if ai can solve the thing first! Anywho, whenever I hear some feminine looking man talk about his husband I want to throw up. It makes me turn the episode off immediately. This leads to acceptance by young skulls full of mush, which steers them away from God. It dooms their lives to sadness and ruin.
Gen Z ( those in middle and High School now) has little to no respect for woke (and unfortunately much else held sacred by their elders) in my experience- the meme savagery that circulates among those kids is slightly frightening. My concern is when the pendulum swings back away from woke, those without historical understanding will gravitate towards a strongman authoritarian leader rather than a constitutional republican one. Our job as pedes is to guide them towards the founders system, and away from despotism.
Where is straight marriage mentioned in the Constitution?
Same place that it says muskets.
Fuckin fags never quit.
Truth hurts, right? You just said it, you hate fags. Pretty sure we're taught to not hate anyone, yet here we are. Fine, you attack the low hanging fruit when there are so many bigger things happening to go after. Yet "fags" is what you choose.
Ok, faggot.