Musk tweets things to get people buzzing. He's a marketer who makes outlandish statements that he never is able to back up. This is part and parcel to get people talking but mean nothing
Coincidence? Nope. He wouldn't have written "Anon"
Q* = related to the article.
Most importantly, in my opinion, this seems that Elon is not only referencing Q & the Anons... but, he is dispelling "QAnon" by signifying a separation with Q & Anons via the asterisk.
The Employees circulated a petition. Demanding he be rehired and the board resign or else they would resign and go to work at Microsoft who already promised them jobs. 700 of 770 employees apparently signed on to it.
Caught between a rock and a hard place. Most of the board resigned.
Losing almost 90% of your workforce is pretty hard to come back from, though Elon did it with Twitter/X
It sounds like this could have had potential to get rid of some bad apples & have the AI truly be a great open source option again that wouldn't be driven by agenda.
That said, maybe I am misunderstanding something as I havent dug in too deep yet.
Frankly. Unlike the bloated mess of Twitter. The majority of OpenAI staff at least according to some reports are actually useful and engaged in some facet of R&D. Improvement of existing systems. Or Bug fixing.
This is the way. Maybe he’s highlighting the open AI debacle as a parallel for GEOTUS? They got rid of a leader and those he led wanted it reversed and took action to get him back?
it's my opinion open AI is trying to create correlation and make it seem as if the real Q was an open AI project all along, another effort to squash the movement and make Q followers look retarded, also maybe loose hope thinking it could have just been an AI all along, lead people astray so to speak.
Would I be out of my fucking mind if it were Hillary or Obama? No, because that would mean a war truly was brewing and people would need to nut up and get ready, and I (we) simply can't afford that.
Would they be Q? No, because Q didn't kill people who were naysaying and Q also didn't go on an apology tour to destroy America's credibility.
As for the last line... there was literally nothing Q did that brought people to the capitol. Trump brought people there, and the bad guys exploited their presence.
If Q turns out to be AI or is just going to be used as a skin-suit by the AI, then I'm out. AI is not sentient, cannot be sentient. It's just a bunch of transistors, diodes, and resistors that can only imitate sentience and it does what it's told and programmed to do.
Q said you won't believe who you've been talking to...
Going to be blown away if the first thing AGI does is figure out the government is run by pedophiles and post about it on 4chan.
https://qalerts.app/?n=749
"Deeper we go, the more unrealistic it all becomes"
I think heads are going to blow when we find out, and it does sound like a when not an if.
Relax already, it's a pun on the AI they were developing called "Q Star" aka "Q*."
https://x.com/JackPosobiec/status/1727501682903249319?s=20
Musk tweets things to get people buzzing. He's a marketer who makes outlandish statements that he never is able to back up. This is part and parcel to get people talking but mean nothing
Coincidence? Nope. He wouldn't have written "Anon"
Q* = related to the article.
Most importantly, in my opinion, this seems that Elon is not only referencing Q & the Anons... but, he is dispelling "QAnon" by signifying a separation with Q & Anons via the asterisk.
Sounds like Sam (the head that got fired) was rehired 4 days later. Maybe I misunderstood the article.
He was.
The Employees circulated a petition. Demanding he be rehired and the board resign or else they would resign and go to work at Microsoft who already promised them jobs. 700 of 770 employees apparently signed on to it.
Caught between a rock and a hard place. Most of the board resigned.
Losing almost 90% of your workforce is pretty hard to come back from, though Elon did it with Twitter/X
It sounds like this could have had potential to get rid of some bad apples & have the AI truly be a great open source option again that wouldn't be driven by agenda.
That said, maybe I am misunderstanding something as I havent dug in too deep yet.
The "workforce" Elon lost were a bunch of woke leftists who never did any work anyways. I doubt they even showed up for work lol.
Frankly. Unlike the bloated mess of Twitter. The majority of OpenAI staff at least according to some reports are actually useful and engaged in some facet of R&D. Improvement of existing systems. Or Bug fixing.
This is the way. Maybe he’s highlighting the open AI debacle as a parallel for GEOTUS? They got rid of a leader and those he led wanted it reversed and took action to get him back?
it's my opinion open AI is trying to create correlation and make it seem as if the real Q was an open AI project all along, another effort to squash the movement and make Q followers look retarded, also maybe loose hope thinking it could have just been an AI all along, lead people astray so to speak.
That’s my thinking, too.
Quantum AI?
Q is the mathematical symbol for heat. This makes sense as it is a security clearance for the Department of Energy.
Could Q also mean Quantum now? Sure I guess.
Knowing that Q means heat, this is one of my favorite Q drops.
u/#q2830
No chance. Q said nothing that would promote j6.
You must not have been here long.
u/#mikeyep
KEK
Would I be out of my fucking mind if it were Hillary or Obama? No, because that would mean a war truly was brewing and people would need to nut up and get ready, and I (we) simply can't afford that.
Would they be Q? No, because Q didn't kill people who were naysaying and Q also didn't go on an apology tour to destroy America's credibility.
As for the last line... there was literally nothing Q did that brought people to the capitol. Trump brought people there, and the bad guys exploited their presence.
Derp
yes, it's something like that. reminds me of the movie with Robert Redford & Paul Newman; The Sting. keep people guessing until the end.
Robert Redford and Paul Newman; eye candy for women.
People are referring to it as Q star in relation to AI. For what its worth.
Looking glass on steroids
I thought it was the general consensus that Q was some type of supercomputer. AI seems equally believable.
If Q turns out to be AI or is just going to be used as a skin-suit by the AI, then I'm out. AI is not sentient, cannot be sentient. It's just a bunch of transistors, diodes, and resistors that can only imitate sentience and it does what it's told and programmed to do.
Undiscovered STARS learned...
yes that was strange.
What have the stars learned? about us?