Is there really such a thing as a virus with a 50% mortality rate? The assumption here of course is also that it will be a human-to-human transmissible virus. These types of “Breakings” stories are virtual non-starters. Until we can be certain there are invisible pathogens called viruses that spread and cause disease, and until we are equally certain there is such a phenomenon as contagion, we’re in the realms of speculation and pseudo-science. It’s like saying invisible carbon dioxide is responsible for all climate change, and that it is specifically the human-generated carbon dioxide that is worst.
I’ll go up against the “virus” if I get unfettered access to all available, uncensored remedies, mainstream and alternative, without fear or favor, if you take the vaccine. And only the vaccine.
Ironically I had to already take the vaccine for rabies, when I was bitten by a raccoon. So considering I already took the vaccine - when we will get this update to your scientific study with your personal exposure to rabies and the natural remedies you used?
Taking a vaccine after you were bitten by a raccoon - which, even if rabid would be no guarantee of your own exposure to the infectious agent - in a country with next to zero human cases per year makes zero sense but then very little makes objective sense when it comes to vaccines or the people administering them. But as we now know, “imagine how bad it could have been for you without it.” For my original position to be challenged, I would first have to contract the rabies “virus” from human to human transmission, display symptoms and require treatment, but:
“Despite there being tens of thousands of rabies cases each year worldwide, there has never been a laboratory-documented case of human-to-human transmission, other than a very few cases resulting from organ or tissue transplant. Despite the lack of evidence for human-to-human transmission, people who are identified as contacts of a patient with rabies will sometimes be offered immunisation, purely as a precautionary measure. Spread of rabies by kissing or intimate contact remains a theoretical route of transmission that has never been laboratory confirmed. However, rabies virus can be found in saliva and other body fluids after the onset of rabies symptoms and clinical disease, so there is a small theoretical risk of infection at this stage of disease.”
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/rabies-epidemiology-transmission-and-prevention
What if I just contract the condition known as rabies directly from a raccoon bite? Well, that would be rough, of course, and I would have to seek out remedies to which I referred (and definitely avoid any rabies “protocols” if I am in the iatrogenic pharma-controlled West!) Clearly, while species to species transmission of a pathogen and the role of a bite might be assumed, it wouldn’t be proof of a virus. In much the same way if I got sick from eating the faeces of a wild dog, it wouldn’t be proof of a virus.
I’m gonna go with ‘probably’, certainly for iver which has been shown to have effectiveness against cancer, the implication being that at least some cancers are parasitic.
It is proof of a virus, because you wouldn’t get sick like toxicity or poison, like you would from consuming feces. The symptoms are quite different, especially regarding water consumption with rabies. The only way you can disprove viruses exist, is to be exposed and not acquire it. Again, expose yourself to rabies and treat yourself with natural remedies - then let us know how it works out. You won’t do it because you deep down you know viruses do exist and that particular virus is over 90% fatal. When I got the vaccine is insignificant, you said you would acquire rabies and treat yourself to disprove viruses exist - so long as I got the vaccine.
Because viruses exist in all
mammals, not just humans, human-to-human transmission is not necessary to prove viruses exist.
No, I won’t expose myself to rabies because I know there is a disease-causing agent transmitted from other species that infects humans with a deadly condition we call rabies that is 90% fatal and could kill me if I am first exposed and then infected (these 2 scenarios are mutually exclusive). Although exposure doesn’t guarantee infection, and sometimes transmission appears to be via bites, saliva or blood, I would still not want to contract the disease rabies. My point about medications isn’t the thrust of my position except to say I would reserve the right to ignore the advice of mainstream (Western) medicine. What I am saying is that whatever causes the disease rabies in humans, and transmits it from other species to humans, but obviously not between humans, isn’t conclusively a virus. Given other modes of transmission and types of pathogen and causes of disease we do and don’t know about, virus is low down in the possibilities.
Why do they need to be reverse engineered if they were engineered in the first place?
They wanted to add a booster rocket to it
Excellent point.
You guys are funny.
Huh?
I understood that as a serious comment, didn't you?
AKA "gain of function"
They're probably cooking up COVID-24 right now. Except next time it will be a real pandemic. Corona was just a test run.
According to the election cycle it’d be COVID-23.
Correct. Thoughts on current issue in China and children? Relation?
They're saying thats jus idiots still not used to being unmasked since covid last I heard
Which organization made the statement? Need the sauce
I saw a bunch of news articles today essentially reporting same thing so no great sauce sorry to say
Natalie Winters is a smokeshow hot damn
Slide k to the DMs
Is there really such a thing as a virus with a 50% mortality rate? The assumption here of course is also that it will be a human-to-human transmissible virus. These types of “Breakings” stories are virtual non-starters. Until we can be certain there are invisible pathogens called viruses that spread and cause disease, and until we are equally certain there is such a phenomenon as contagion, we’re in the realms of speculation and pseudo-science. It’s like saying invisible carbon dioxide is responsible for all climate change, and that it is specifically the human-generated carbon dioxide that is worst.
Rabies virus has a much higher fatality than 50% but if you want to test the actuality of the virus and it’s contagion, be my guest.
I’ll go up against the “virus” if I get unfettered access to all available, uncensored remedies, mainstream and alternative, without fear or favor, if you take the vaccine. And only the vaccine.
Ironically I had to already take the vaccine for rabies, when I was bitten by a raccoon. So considering I already took the vaccine - when we will get this update to your scientific study with your personal exposure to rabies and the natural remedies you used?
Taking a vaccine after you were bitten by a raccoon - which, even if rabid would be no guarantee of your own exposure to the infectious agent - in a country with next to zero human cases per year makes zero sense but then very little makes objective sense when it comes to vaccines or the people administering them. But as we now know, “imagine how bad it could have been for you without it.” For my original position to be challenged, I would first have to contract the rabies “virus” from human to human transmission, display symptoms and require treatment, but:
“Despite there being tens of thousands of rabies cases each year worldwide, there has never been a laboratory-documented case of human-to-human transmission, other than a very few cases resulting from organ or tissue transplant. Despite the lack of evidence for human-to-human transmission, people who are identified as contacts of a patient with rabies will sometimes be offered immunisation, purely as a precautionary measure. Spread of rabies by kissing or intimate contact remains a theoretical route of transmission that has never been laboratory confirmed. However, rabies virus can be found in saliva and other body fluids after the onset of rabies symptoms and clinical disease, so there is a small theoretical risk of infection at this stage of disease.” https://www.gov.uk/guidance/rabies-epidemiology-transmission-and-prevention
What if I just contract the condition known as rabies directly from a raccoon bite? Well, that would be rough, of course, and I would have to seek out remedies to which I referred (and definitely avoid any rabies “protocols” if I am in the iatrogenic pharma-controlled West!) Clearly, while species to species transmission of a pathogen and the role of a bite might be assumed, it wouldn’t be proof of a virus. In much the same way if I got sick from eating the faeces of a wild dog, it wouldn’t be proof of a virus.
I’ll give Dr Sam Bailey the last word:
https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/What-About-Rabies:a?src=embed&t=815.2237693834287
I wonder if iver or hcq would work against rabies?
I’m gonna go with ‘probably’, certainly for iver which has been shown to have effectiveness against cancer, the implication being that at least some cancers are parasitic.
Only way is try it out.
It is proof of a virus, because you wouldn’t get sick like toxicity or poison, like you would from consuming feces. The symptoms are quite different, especially regarding water consumption with rabies. The only way you can disprove viruses exist, is to be exposed and not acquire it. Again, expose yourself to rabies and treat yourself with natural remedies - then let us know how it works out. You won’t do it because you deep down you know viruses do exist and that particular virus is over 90% fatal. When I got the vaccine is insignificant, you said you would acquire rabies and treat yourself to disprove viruses exist - so long as I got the vaccine.
Because viruses exist in all mammals, not just humans, human-to-human transmission is not necessary to prove viruses exist.
Hey Fren… saw this and thought of us…
https://open.substack.com/pub/officialbrendanmurphy/p/the-rabies-delusion-revealed?r=pezuu&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
No, I won’t expose myself to rabies because I know there is a disease-causing agent transmitted from other species that infects humans with a deadly condition we call rabies that is 90% fatal and could kill me if I am first exposed and then infected (these 2 scenarios are mutually exclusive). Although exposure doesn’t guarantee infection, and sometimes transmission appears to be via bites, saliva or blood, I would still not want to contract the disease rabies. My point about medications isn’t the thrust of my position except to say I would reserve the right to ignore the advice of mainstream (Western) medicine. What I am saying is that whatever causes the disease rabies in humans, and transmits it from other species to humans, but obviously not between humans, isn’t conclusively a virus. Given other modes of transmission and types of pathogen and causes of disease we do and don’t know about, virus is low down in the possibilities.
So thought that thumbnail was Buffy....
Irrelevant sidebar, Natalie Winters is a total babe
But....PFDs!
Why were they engineered in the first place and by who and for what reason?