No doubt, it was decided before the event that no question and no remark from anyone, including Trump, could concern the 800-pound gorilla/elephant hybrid in the room: the 2020 election, which was stolen. Baier never lets a syllable creep out about that without jumping in with his insipid, puerile admonishment that not a single shred of evidence suggests any wrongdoing in the election.
It's like saying there's no evidence that grass grows on the planet. Shut up, we can all see and smell it.
I don’t doubt that! I remember thirty years ago when he was on WRAL news in Raleigh NC. He was so low down the totem pole he was covering everything outside or remote sites. I don’t remember the hurricane that got him noticed. Next thing you know he’s on Fox News. I don’t know the steps between WRAL and fox.
WEEEEE$LLLL, He does have FREEEEEDOM OF SPEECHA (BEING a news reporter) HOWEVER, his stock will be sinking to the bottom like the Titanic when all is said and done...he is are a harbinger of what is going to happen to ALL THE NEWSIES..."LEFT OUT IN THE COLD" comes to mine!!!!
Trump explains in simple words for the regular people to understand. He has to make money from his hotels, that is the point. It is also not illegal, immoral, fraudulent, etc. Hunter and the rest produce nothing good and they get paid enormously for it, and no one questions it.
I never even considered that before, i usually just saw whatever amount of millions for people stating in his hotels seemed like a reasonable figure. But when you think about it, the profit to the Trump organization is far less than that. Democrats love to twist the facts, that's not net revenue to trump from foreign countries, thats Gross. So deducting the cost of goods or services that figure is substantially less. Probably at least by a figure of 50%. But that's the game they play because even i uncritically just accepted that figure at face value.
Far better man than I. I would have returned a question to Brett asking if his brain is so small, or 'washed', which is it to cause him to ask such a stupid question?
Sir, would you peruse this and give us an opinion. I've one of my own but this seems really important and yet barely in the news or at least it's the first time I've heard about it. Thank you.
Sorry to post it here, you have a large audience and a habit for relevant postings and I thought this may be one.
In the suit brought by Congress, the justices simply declined to review the case in October, thus upholding the ruling by the DC Circuit Court of Appeals that members of Congress lacked the legal standing to sue under the Foreign Emoluments Clause. And on January 25, the Supreme Court dismissed the other two cases as moot since Trump was no longer in office.
Brett Baier is a cabal controlled POS.
He is constantly trying to paint Trump in a bad light. I hope to one day see the turd in an orange jumpsuit.
No doubt, it was decided before the event that no question and no remark from anyone, including Trump, could concern the 800-pound gorilla/elephant hybrid in the room: the 2020 election, which was stolen. Baier never lets a syllable creep out about that without jumping in with his insipid, puerile admonishment that not a single shred of evidence suggests any wrongdoing in the election.
It's like saying there's no evidence that grass grows on the planet. Shut up, we can all see and smell it.
Maybe, but I'm all for a national platform where Trump can answer these 'allegations' so folks can hear it's a nothing burger.
I don’t doubt that! I remember thirty years ago when he was on WRAL news in Raleigh NC. He was so low down the totem pole he was covering everything outside or remote sites. I don’t remember the hurricane that got him noticed. Next thing you know he’s on Fox News. I don’t know the steps between WRAL and fox.
WEEEEE$LLLL, He does have FREEEEEDOM OF SPEECHA (BEING a news reporter) HOWEVER, his stock will be sinking to the bottom like the Titanic when all is said and done...he is are a harbinger of what is going to happen to ALL THE NEWSIES..."LEFT OUT IN THE COLD" comes to mine!!!!
Trump explains in simple words for the regular people to understand. He has to make money from his hotels, that is the point. It is also not illegal, immoral, fraudulent, etc. Hunter and the rest produce nothing good and they get paid enormously for it, and no one questions it.
Yes but no one will see it
Not true, you see it.
She started giggling and Brett was upset, camera man just wasn't fast enough.
He forgot to mention that all profits from the foreigners staying at his hotels goes to the US treasury.
And he didn't mention he didn't take a salary while president
Trump should do podcasts
I mentioned the immoluments thing with DC property when this latest came up. People really do have short memories.
I never even considered that before, i usually just saw whatever amount of millions for people stating in his hotels seemed like a reasonable figure. But when you think about it, the profit to the Trump organization is far less than that. Democrats love to twist the facts, that's not net revenue to trump from foreign countries, thats Gross. So deducting the cost of goods or services that figure is substantially less. Probably at least by a figure of 50%. But that's the game they play because even i uncritically just accepted that figure at face value.
Far better man than I. I would have returned a question to Brett asking if his brain is so small, or 'washed', which is it to cause him to ask such a stupid question?
https://www.cnbc.com/2024/01/11/panama-canal-drought-moves-maersk-to-start-using-land-bridge-for-cargo.html
Sir, would you peruse this and give us an opinion. I've one of my own but this seems really important and yet barely in the news or at least it's the first time I've heard about it. Thank you.
Sorry to post it here, you have a large audience and a habit for relevant postings and I thought this may be one.
But understand that the normies will not see the truth. So WTF does it matter. End MSM and you end the Dems
Main point being, "I was already sued for this and the courts ruled that it is legal."
Does anyone have the link to this lawsuit? It would be the best simple reply...over and over...when addressing this current accusation.
I did find this.
https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/supreme-court-ducks-opportunity-trump-emoluments-cases
And
In the suit brought by Congress, the justices simply declined to review the case in October, thus upholding the ruling by the DC Circuit Court of Appeals that members of Congress lacked the legal standing to sue under the Foreign Emoluments Clause. And on January 25, the Supreme Court dismissed the other two cases as moot since Trump was no longer in office.