Nope Bitcoin and Alt coins are only the beginning. Please consider studying the capabilities of Blockchain. Think Napster. Decentralizing any and all means of trade and commerce. Bigger that we think.
Ownership in any meaningful sense would involve having the ability to reverse SHA256 and/or majority control of the mining pool...
That vulnerability is known, but unproven that it could or does exist or have the potential to exist.
So even if it were created by Intel, it is secure by design, provided the majority of the mining pool is acting in good faith and the hash remains too hard to brute force reverse and/or cannot be backdoored (nobody has shown that ability), they could not exercise "ownership". In fact any demonstration of control/ownership would instantly destroy the entire thing, as its trust-ability would evaporate.
Nice to see someone say it, 99.999% can’t wrap their head around that part. There is only one company making the CBDC’s and building all the rails, they were chosen by the government and they sit on the board of WEF and are integrated into everything and everyone and that company’s name is RIPPLE. Everyone should know who they are and what they are doing
Unless we're successful in draining the swamp during his next term, [they] will just wait until [they] install someone else in '28 that will bring us a CBDC.
the CDC can't mandate, as it has no real power to do so. The CDC is a PRIVATE organization that is funded by the Government to push paid pseudo-health to enact an objective. It is a "suggested course of action body" to the Government only, nothing more.
Mandates cannot be given to a private citizen that has not been convicted, by a judge, of a felony offense, as a general rule. Mandates from a judge will pertain to the felony only.
A Mandate CAN be given to a State or Government employee, but must come from an authority given power to do so; e.g. A city mayor giving mandate to city government workers. It does NOT extend to private citizens of said city and cannot, legally, be enforced to do so. Same applies to Governor of a state to state government employees, but not the citizens thereof.
Finally, NO ONE can mandate, no matter the source, a person to inject themselves with a known poison/biohazard under any form of threat, coercion, or action, under penalty of Law under 18 USC 242.
The sources for the above can be found in Law Dictionaries and Government regulation/Rules/Law.
These MFers get thier perceived power out of the ignorance of the governed. Just say no.
These MFers get thier perceived power out of the ignorance of the governed. Just say no.
The CDC made the recommendation. The executive branch is acting on that recommendation and are refusing to grant a visa.
The only option is to keep saying no and continue to get denied. I've talked to three different lawyers so far who have given me the opinion that fighting this would take years and boat loads of cash.
To my understanding what I can do is continue to point out that these mandates are being treated with the force of law to draw enough attention to them to get them removed.
Understand completely. When all else fails (including those lawyers), revert to 18 USC 242. If you haven't read it, it's a powerful piece. Teach those lawyers something 😉
(a) Classes of aliens ineligible for visas or admission
Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, aliens who are inadmissible under the following paragraphs are ineligible to receive visas and ineligible to be admitted to the United States:
(1) Health-related grounds
(A) In general
Any alien-
(ii) except as provided in subparagraph (C), who seeks admission as an immigrant, or who seeks adjustment of status to the status of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence, and who has failed to present documentation of having received vaccination against vaccine-preventable diseases, which shall include at least the following diseases: mumps, measles, rubella, polio, tetanus and diphtheria toxoids, pertussis, influenza type B and hepatitis B, and any other vaccinations against vaccine-preventable diseases recommended by the Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices,
This is the reason the embassy gave me. The lawyers said the lower courts were likely to side with the government with how the law is written. Any constitutional arguments would need to happen on appeal.
They said the process would be too long and expensive to be worth it. I might as well give up, live in Mexico and "wait for Trump".
Pray for Trump's protection & safety he just kicked the Hornets nest u/#trumpnato
My favorite GIF of all time!!
Bravest man of our time
Buh Bye BitCoin....
It was created BY a CIA OPERATIVE, and you people probably didn't eve know that....
What this means is that the CIA OWNS BitCoin, 100% owns it....
Care to elaborate?
Bitcoin's creation is credited to an unknown Japanese man named Satoshi Nakamoto.
Elon Musk himself once shared a meme on Twitter (before he bought it) that pointed out the following:
SAmsung
TOSHIba
NAKAmichi
MOTOrola
That's convenient for an entity created tool.
Right, he was a CIA Agent....
Possibly a Double Agent for Japan and the CIA....
You're talking about a guy.
I'm talking about four companies.
There WAS NO Satoshi Nakamoto. It was made by corporations.
Well that's even more of a reason to not trust it, just look at what Corporations have been and are currently doing to us all around the Globe....
Nope Bitcoin and Alt coins are only the beginning. Please consider studying the capabilities of Blockchain. Think Napster. Decentralizing any and all means of trade and commerce. Bigger that we think.
Napster....
Was....
Ownership in any meaningful sense would involve having the ability to reverse SHA256 and/or majority control of the mining pool... That vulnerability is known, but unproven that it could or does exist or have the potential to exist. So even if it were created by Intel, it is secure by design, provided the majority of the mining pool is acting in good faith and the hash remains too hard to brute force reverse and/or cannot be backdoored (nobody has shown that ability), they could not exercise "ownership". In fact any demonstration of control/ownership would instantly destroy the entire thing, as its trust-ability would evaporate.
Oh right, I forgot that Quantum Computers running on Unix, or Linux or even Unicode, cannot unravel Code above 8 bits....
And I also forgot that the U.S. Govt is soo POOR that they can scarcely afford to buy old Computers running on Windows 9x....
/sarc
I have always suspected that, HOWEVER, no one has ever proven anything good or bad.
The Proof will come, for now I just wait....
Does this include bitcoin? I think he's talking about the banks "crypto dollar" or whatever they were trying to call it.
As far as I'm aware "crypto" as we know it is not backed by a central bank.
Currently, the only thing backing Crypto is thin air and the Value placed on it by the Fed Dollars thrown at it....
So when the Dollar Collapses, with it goes the Crypto....
But yeah, Trump was talking about the CBDC....
This is key. Digital currencies controlled by banks, centralized. They’ve done it with money printing and the digital dollar.
With blockchain CBDC, central banks and governments in lock step could track and control all that we do
And it would be the absolute Worst and Largest version of Direct Slavery this planet has ever seen....
Nice to see someone say it, 99.999% can’t wrap their head around that part. There is only one company making the CBDC’s and building all the rails, they were chosen by the government and they sit on the board of WEF and are integrated into everything and everyone and that company’s name is RIPPLE. Everyone should know who they are and what they are doing
Nice. Promises made promises kept. This is why the swamp hates him. He will stop the theft of America's wealth.
Good.
Meaning it won’t happen before he gets back in AND he won’t allow it ????
Or….. as your current POTUS I won’t allow it to happen now, or anytime…?
The left: "He wants to kill grandma's retirement fund!"
Unless we're successful in draining the swamp during his next term, [they] will just wait until [they] install someone else in '28 that will bring us a CBDC.
What about other kinds of tyranny? Like vaccine mandates in 2024. Still... https://www.cdc.gov/immigrantrefugeehealth/panel-physicians/vaccinations.html#covid-19-vaccination
Trump vocally opposed vaccine mandates.
Yeah, that's why at minimum he can remove it when he gets back.
A few things:
the CDC can't mandate, as it has no real power to do so. The CDC is a PRIVATE organization that is funded by the Government to push paid pseudo-health to enact an objective. It is a "suggested course of action body" to the Government only, nothing more.
Mandates cannot be given to a private citizen that has not been convicted, by a judge, of a felony offense, as a general rule. Mandates from a judge will pertain to the felony only.
A Mandate CAN be given to a State or Government employee, but must come from an authority given power to do so; e.g. A city mayor giving mandate to city government workers. It does NOT extend to private citizens of said city and cannot, legally, be enforced to do so. Same applies to Governor of a state to state government employees, but not the citizens thereof.
Finally, NO ONE can mandate, no matter the source, a person to inject themselves with a known poison/biohazard under any form of threat, coercion, or action, under penalty of Law under 18 USC 242.
The sources for the above can be found in Law Dictionaries and Government regulation/Rules/Law.
These MFers get thier perceived power out of the ignorance of the governed. Just say no.
The CDC made the recommendation. The executive branch is acting on that recommendation and are refusing to grant a visa.
The only option is to keep saying no and continue to get denied. I've talked to three different lawyers so far who have given me the opinion that fighting this would take years and boat loads of cash.
To my understanding what I can do is continue to point out that these mandates are being treated with the force of law to draw enough attention to them to get them removed.
Understand completely. When all else fails (including those lawyers), revert to 18 USC 242. If you haven't read it, it's a powerful piece. Teach those lawyers something 😉
I think they're aware of it.
https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title8-section1182&num=0&edition=prelim
This is the reason the embassy gave me. The lawyers said the lower courts were likely to side with the government with how the law is written. Any constitutional arguments would need to happen on appeal.
They said the process would be too long and expensive to be worth it. I might as well give up, live in Mexico and "wait for Trump".
I already said I was voting for you. Stop trying to make me love you.
If the whole world is digital and u r not then trade will not b possible
Gold, silver backed cryptocurrency?
To back a virtual currency with dictatorship of thought is wrong and if that does happen. I will be one of the poorest people in the world.
I have already been censored for almost a decade now on many platforms because I believe in freedom of thought.
Many have speculated that the government will give all their favs a huge amount of free (fake) money to get it going and to force the rest to follow.
Very Biblical stuff really. Especially with the Davo’s witches chanting on stage.
It continues to make me wonder are they trying to manufacture the end times?
Ooo...I am liking this.
YUGE!