“Germany issued debt-free and interest-free money from 1935 on, which accounts for Germany’s startling rise from the depression to a world power in five years. The German government financed its entire operations from 1935 to 1945 without gold, and without debt.
You have to read the book "Magic of Money" to understand how this happened. It was fully supported by the central bankers around the world. Schaacht explains the exact mechanism of the labor certificates, and how issuing certificates is just one part of the problem, maintaining foreign exchange rates and not letting Marks collapse was a completely different beast and required the central bankers.
Until Hitler fired Schaacht he was being funded by the Banksters. It is easy to surmise that they hoped Nazis will bring about their dream of a unified Europe which was the precursor to the world government.
If Hitler did anything, his biggest achievement was allowing the destruction of the Nazis - or rather mutual destruction of Nazis and Commies when he attacked USSR - that kept the world free enough for the Q plan to be completed.
I only know stuff from Normie School and what I read here. The contradictory theories of [1] the Rothschilds elevating Hitler, who maybe was a Rothschild, to profit from the war and to fulfill their Zionist plans, with ex-Nazis becoming the CIA Deep State, and [2] posts like OP's, wherein Hitler was basically Q version 1.0, setting out to rid the world of the enslaving cabal and set us all free... Well, both have pieces I can't reconcile with reality. I am interested in what you're talking about, though. Nothing outlandish in it. Where do I begin to learn more?
When I stated digging into Hitler, I ended up in the same place as you did. There is enough documentation to learn that Hitler did not come from thin air. He was well propped up by the same Globalista Banksters through multiple channels.
There is also enough circumstantial evidence to believe that he was a illegitimate descendant of the Rothschild family.
Its also easy to see that he was benign in his plans for Germany. Much like Donetsk in Ukraine, he wanted to free the German lands lost to Poland where Germans were being persecuted (on hindsight, by the same Globalists to provoke a WW2).
I dont think he fully understand all the agenda behind the forces propelling him. Or if he did, he believed that he can make use of them and turn against them in due time.
Either way, thats what he did.
NSDAP, on the other hand is an entirely different story. It started off like MAGA, but imagine a world where there was no Q, just MAGA, and the people like Alex Jones, Ben Shapiro etc. Imagine patriots being part of this group and being mislead with distorted truth and emotional narratives, where you are ready to kill the people you perceive as enemies. Now imagine, in that world, those people subverting MAGA being Satanists themselves and using the legitimate people's anger to cause more human destruction.
That, in a nutshell, is what I believe Nazis were.
I think Hitler fully understood that he could not control these Nazis as time went by. By the time he invaded Poland (exactly as he had always promised he would do if the German persecution did not stop) and in return 12 countries declared war on Germany - it is exactly the same situation we would be with Putin's SMO to take back Donetsk and Luhansk, if US and UK declared war against Russia.
Thats when Hitler fully realised he was on his own. Thats when he had to fire the president of Reichsbank (German central bank) and take control of the finances directly. Thats when he fully turned against the Cabal. I would think that him forfeiting Rothschild was at that juncture.
History can never fully explain why Hitler invaded Russia when he still faced threat from the West and the commonly accepted answer - to stop spread of communism in East Europe - makes no sense because he was in the middle of a freaking war already and he had put in the treaty with Stalin to avoid exactly this 2 front war.
My belief is that, by then he realised that he had to liquidate the Nazis, and i have made the case that Stalin was in the same boat. He was tuning against the Cabal agents in USSR and he wanted to liquidate the hardcore Commies.
Nazis vs Commies is the greatest gift to humanity by Hitler and Stalin.
Hitler's suicide note is worth reading, btw, to understand his state of mind at the end. It makes a lot of sense when you read it from this perspective.
So in a nutshell, to your question:
Hitler was propped up by the Cabal
Nazis were infiltrated by the Satanists right from the beginning and subverted a genuine movement by the people
Hitler turned against the Cabal
Hitler ensured that Nazis did not win, but rather got destroyed.
Hilter set back Cabal ambitions by some 4-5 decades, and gave enough space for the Q team to come up with this long tem plan for Great Awakening, rather than focus on "defeating Cabal" - which has never succeeded precisely because people were not awake and Cabal always changed shape and took control again.
You appear to be willing to debate the ideals of Hitler, and we are all more than willing to take on this debate. But yet again when it comes to discussions on Hitler, Mods on GAW took down my post. I do not believe there was any hatred projected in my post, but what I did see were anons willing to contribute their personal research on a touchy subject, and my post had good traction with a mutitude of opposing oppinions. Yet without notice or even an explanation on the decision by Mods to remove this content, it was removed.
I am trying to be respectful in my conversation here, as I understand some of my previous posts have come without backing or content. I have been trying to follow guidlines in providing more links ect to the topics I present that may not always always feel comfortable to take on, but as you seen today, they do show much interest from people that come to GAW.
Until Hitler fired Schaacht he was being funded by the Banksters
This is straight up false. You cannot be "funded" by someone when what you're being funded by are the Reichsmark revenues from taxation of the currency of which the state solely decides the terms of its issuance.
There was ZERO "funding" involved within the Third Reich's economic recovery. It quite literally was the same thing as a pioneering family on the frontier building their own homestead from scratch but at the national level.
I know that after watching the "Europa: The Last Battle" and other such documentaries, you come out believing Hitler and NSDAP was a purely organic movement that came to power purely by support of people, and they stabilized the crashing German Marks from the Weimar hyper inflation, purely by the labor of their own people.
I had the same reaction as well. So I decided to ensure what was depicted in those shows was actually accurate. What I found was that, these shows gives you the other end of the narrative spectrum: "Hitler and Nazis were wonderful" as opposed to the official narrative that they were evil.
When you dig into the truth, you will learn that the reality lies somewhere in between.
Here are some demonstably false assertions you make:
There was ZERO "funding" involved within the Third Reich's economic recovery. It quite literally was the same thing as a pioneering family on the frontier building their own homestead from scratch but at the national level.
Again, another blatant narrative pushed by these shows that Hitler fixed germany's crashing economy.
Look at it very carefully, and tell me when the Weimar crash happened, when the recovery started and when Hitler came to power.
1921 - 1922: Mark started sliding
1923: Peaked at 25 billion Marks per pound
Nov 12 1923: Hjalmaar Schaacht became currency commissioner at Reichsbank (German CB)
Nov 16 1923: New currency Rentenmark was introduced.
Nov 20 1923: Reichsbank president dies and Schaacht takes over
By 1925: New currency stabilized and is 20 Marks for a pound.
By 1933: New currency steadily increases in value to 14 Marks for a pound.
1933 -> Hitler comes to power.
If you want to live in a different set of delusions than the one pushed by MSM, feel free. You will end up in the exact same place in the end, because they are all part of the same Hagelian Dialectic.
However, if you want to know the truth, and build a better world view thats more closer to reality, you are in the right place. Put your analytic skills and digging abilities to work. Good luck fren!
When you dig into the truth, you will learn that the reality lies somewhere in between.
This is incorrect both objectively and philosophically. By standing on this kind of hill you are upholding trains of thought that are fundamentally similar to gnostic heresies of the “no objective correctness/good” type.
Hjalmar Schaacht source 1
Not a valid source, this is a slideshow of “trust me bro”, and it points to no sources of the period.
source 2
Using an abstract as a source is laughable.
source 3
Not only are there no citations of paper documents of the period on this page, but also the content is edited by a Jew, Levi Bookin, and the content is a part of “European History, Jewish Studies”. Furthermore, the logo at the bottom of the page, depicting a clownish and ugly man in the shape of a swastika is indicative of extreme anti-NSDAP bias.
Other industrialists who funded Hitler and pushed him to power: Fritz von Thyssen
The third citation within your link directly contradicts what you cite afterwards; that many industrialists funded Hitler. In this paragraph below, Thyssen says that only Himself, “...Herr Bruckmann, the well-known printer; and in Berlin there was Carl Bechstein, the world-renowned piano manufacturer, who also contributed large sums. Aside from this, Hitler did not receive many subsidies from individual industrialists…”
(3) Fritz Thyssen, I Paid Hitler (1941)
I have personally given altogether one million marks to the National Socialist Party. Not more. My contributions have been very much overestimated, because I have always been one of the richest men in Germany. But after all, what does it mean to own factories? It does not follow that a man has a lot of cash to spare. In any case, Hitler had other sources of money besides me. In Munich, for instance, there was Herr Bruckmann, the well-known printer; and in Berlin there was Carl Bechstein, the world-renowned piano manufacturer, who also contributed large sums. Aside from this, Hitler did not receive many subsidies from individual industrialists.
Alfred Krupp
Not only does this particular page disclaim “Disclaimer: The translations are mostly done through AI translator and might not be 100% accurate”, but also there are zero paper documents of the period to be found, and there is a litany of advertisements on the page, so there is not any real reason to place confidence in this as the conflict of interest (incentivization of maximum publicity for advertisement revenue) is extremely clear.
and many other industrialists, including IG Farben.
The page linked here, clearly is an excerpt of a book, authored by David de Jong, which I do not have access to, and whatever citations of actual contemporary documents which he may (or may not) include, I cannot comment on, however I do find it interesting that David de Jong lives in Tel Aviv currently.
Source:
https://lithub.com/author/daviddejong/ “David de Jong is a journalist who previously covered European banking and finance from Amsterdam and hidden wealth and billionaire fortunes from New York for Bloomberg News. His work has also appeared in Bloomberg Businessweek, the Wall Street Journal, and the Dutch Financial Daily. A native of the Netherlands, de Jong currently lives in Tel Aviv. He spent four years researching and writing Nazi Billionaires from Berlin.”
Perhaps there is a cultural conflict of interest here? Or perhaps I am simply too cynical. Nonetheless it is my personal opinion that this excerpt reads, essentially, exactly as fiction.
He was also funded by Union Banking Corporation
This is a very interesting read, and I have not read it all but I do intend to. However when looking for the documentation acquired by Buchanan, sadly the images of the documents did not load, both using DuckDuckGo and Google Chrome. I will surely give the benefit of the doubt that this is not intentional by the hosts/adminstrators, but is unhelpful nonetheless and so does not sway me.
I will say, that this is a very interesting excerpt, especially considering the truth about the alleged “death camps”
In 1943, after press reports that the Polish mining interest was employing forced labor by using prisoners from the Auschwitz concentration camp, we are informed that “Prescott Bush distanced himself from UBC and had even engaged in the collection of funds for the victims of the war in his role as president of the National War Fund.” He had, in fact, taken over as head of the United Service Organizations soon after Pearl Harbor, raising “millions for the National War Fund,” according to Mickey Herskowitz, Prescott’s recent biographer. *The declassified papers confirm questionable transactions in violation of the Trading With the Enemies Act, but, as with all examinations of corporate malfeasance, more is needed to establish individual responsibility. * Buchanan himself, when pressed for more details about Auschwitz, was uncharacteristically hesitant.Consolidated Silesian was the only direct link to the notorious death camp. A file in the Library of Congress confirms the business part of the relationship, but does not give any financial details.
Very interesting that Buchanan was not, as he is usually described, being very enthusiastic about telling “the truth”.
which is how Prescott Bush fronted the US funding of Hitler.
This link has no citations of contemporary documents, and the nature of the content is really quite similar to a blog post. Further, surely you do not believe the BBC to be a trustworthy source? As we know, all legacy mass media today is chock-full of outright lies, half-truths and intentional deception.
Bushes are literal Nazis.
I sincerely wish they were.
The rest of your post is quite shallow and pedantic, as surely you do know that the simple exchange rate of a currency alone has essentially no indication of an economy's actual wellbeing. The economy WAS NOT “fixed” or “recovered” before Hitler came to power, as the German employment rate was one of the most abysmal of the period, and you should know these things. If you don't, respectfully you should not be talking on the subject.
Let's dive further and look at the employment rate during that time
Here, the University of Oregon shows with appropriate citation that the employment rate in Germany had skyrocketed to over 30% in 1933. Then, the data shows a very quick fall in the unemployment rate after 1933, due to NSDAP policies imposed under Hitlers leadership.
To imply that anything was “fixed” simply due to exchange rates is enormously ignorant at best, and totally disingenuous at worst. The implementation of a revalued German Mark under the Weimar Republic had absolutely negligible effects on the wider economy, and that is obvious. I find it hilarious that (((Dan P. Silverman))) does his damnedest to downplay the extreme success of these policies, as though even if they did cook the books to “employ” 600,000 people, it somehow ruins the other 9,400,000 jobs created by the NSDAP regime.
On the other hand in the U.S., you can see from this data (appropriately sourced), that U.S. unemployment did not dip below 10% until 1941, which in comparison to Germany as a “recovery” is abysmally pathetic.
Ok, I gotta go get groceries now. I think you should spend some time analyzing just how large the jewish presence within "history" as a field of study actually is, and how unprecedented this ethnic over-representation is compared to the rest of human history. It's quite alarming, and sadly has forced me to begin scrutinizing the truthfullness of sources from a racial and ethnic standpoint. Obviously this answer to a problem is a problem in and of itself. I like to stick to God's saying of "You will know them by their fruits", so I try to dig into people's personal lives but thats fiarly hard to do.
This is incorrect both objectively and philosophically. By standing on this kind of hill you are upholding trains of thought that are fundamentally similar to gnostic heresies of the “no objective correctness/good” type.
I think you mistook my statement to be philosophical in nature, where as what I wrote was analytical and very specifically to Hitler and Nazis, not some generalization of the nature of knowledge.
Well it was both a critique of the statements and also the general philosophy of "both sides are grey" which i believe is in particular inextricably linked to the "both sides were funded" point of view. IMO, analagous to "as above so below" at the most fundamental level, strictly speaking.
which i believe is in particular inextricably linked to the "both sides were funded" point of view
All sides of all conflicts have always been funded by the same people. No, not just Jews, not just Jesuits, not just Freemasons, and any other specific secret society, but rather by the Mystery Babylon. The whole world has always been their theatre.
I hope this point is clear to Anons by now. A very good research series to really understand the origin of all secret societies and how they are all linked to together, and who is really behind all of them is the Mystery Babylon series by the late Bill Cooper.
IMO, analagous to "as above so below" at the most fundamental level
Nope, not the same. "As above so below" is the crux of Luciferianism, where their core belief is that the realm of God and realm of Man are the same, so Man can become God by his Works.
Funding all sides of all conflicts is a specific method of performing this Work to help Lucifer defeat God and take over the throne, so he can in turn help all his followers ascend. Here are many many other methods they use.
So they are at two different levels of abstraction, strictly speaking.
There is no better source than Hjalmar Schaacht when understanding German economics, not because he was the president of the Reichsbank, but because he has that unique attribute that is very hard to find most of the times.
He has demonstrable connections to both Hitler, NSDAP and the London Banksters.
He wrote his entire book to prove he was not aligned with Hitler's ideology and yet the best he could come up with was "Yeah I funded Hitler but I did not know he was gonna kill people and I was fired when the war started".
I would dare you to find a better first hand source than this. And no, nice sounding documentaries are not "sources".
I do agree that a lot of other sources are tainted by the Jewish lens, but the depositions from Nuremberg trials were again people trying to prove they were not funding Hitler and yet the were obligated to accept they did indeed fund him.
As for Prescott Bush and Union Banking Corporation connection to Hitler, the original source are congressional testimony when they investigated them under "trading with the enemy act". I will try and find the actual congressional records, that is a very reasonable thing to do.
If you are still maintaining that Hitler came to power with no powerful funding and that NSDAP did not get subverted by the Satanists (and hence I have no qualms calling them Nazis) especially after watching the replay of the same unfold in Ukraine last 2 years, I sincerely wish you good luck as we approach the precipice.
If you are still maintaining that Hitler came to power with no powerful funding and that NSDAP did not get subverted by the Satanists (and hence I have no qualms calling them Nazis) especially after watching the replay of the same unfold in Ukraine last 2 years, I sincerely wish you good luck as we approach the precipice.
Would any of this matter when almost all nazis today are Christians? IMO, no. Also Ukraine and AZOV is run and funded by jews (satanists). But I would suppose that would be your point? Then to connect that meaningfully in any way, youd have to prove that those who allegedly funded Hitler and the NSDAP were jewish. Because thats really what it all comes down to.
Would any of this matter when almost all nazis today are Christians? IMO, no
They may call themselves Christians, but they surely dont follow Christianity.
Also Ukraine and AZOV is run and funded by jews (satanists).
Not all jews but those who are Satanists - whatever you want to call them - Khazarians, Zionists.
But I would suppose that would be your point?
Yes, my point would be that all sides of all conflicts are funded by the same Luciferians - Mystery Babylons - blood line families - whatever you want to call. They do this through their intermediaries - secret societies, organizations etc such as Zionists, Freemasons, controlled congress through budget, etc.
Then to connect that meaningfully in any way, youd have to prove that those who allegedly funded Hitler and the NSDAP were jewish. Because thats really what it all comes down to.
Again, we have to prove that ultimately he was funded by the Luciferians.
World financial system is funded by the same Luciferians via their Banksters. All corporations are laundering vehicles for this purpose. Prescott Bush was a representative of this same Banksters. Hjalmar Schaacht was also a representative of the same Banksters. When Jacob Schiff funded Trotsky to over throw Tsar and usher in Communism, he was also representing the same Banksters.
Nazis vs Commies was a theatre to pitch to idealogies for a purposely created problem to give people the false feeling of choice, and whatever they choose would have enslaved them - in one way or another. Luckily for us, we had people like Hitler and Stalin who saw through this deception (to what extent? Thats debatable) and decided to help each other annihilate the Luciferian armies under each other's control.
Honestly, the question how Hitler was funded is not the real question. The real question is whether Hitler did the bidding of their funders or did he wise up and turn against them. All signs indicate that he indeed turned against them.
All the nazis I know are Christian. I am essentially a nazi and I am a Christian. Not many are pagans and the non-4chan ones that claim to be that ive interacted with respect Christianity and have very similar values, basically they are Christian without knowing it or without liking that fact.
It really is all jews, the rare exceptions prove the rule. I suppose thats a reality you're trying not to come to. Also I really hope you dont think Stalin was somehow against the jews... He hired Yagoda to write and carry out the purge quotas of Christians which he approved, then shat the bed and went to hell...
If we find ourselves in a trench together fighting for our hometowns, against Feds, Cartel spics or any other idiots, I hope flying a swastika wont be a problem for you because we'd be fighting for the exact same things. The same things your average nazi fought for in WWII
People really find it hard to comprehend just how the NatSocs did it, even those who study economics and thats why it is still called to this day "The German Miracle". If there was ever a people who actual pulled themselves up form their bootstraps, it was the Germans. I don't blame them, because fiat currency (printing without restriction) is so destructive and terrible, and in their mind secret jewish gold is required for anything significant, which is true 99.5% of the time.
The issue of 6 million Jews was being discussed in a newspaper article around WW1. That decades before the so called holocaust. I know this can be a touchy subject so thanks for posting this subject of Hitler OP, a very informative post.
This video has a few of the instances of the use of "six million." https://rumble.com/v2w9he6-six-million-jews-1915-1938-full-hd.html I have a more complete list of all the papers, but it's too much to cut-and-paste here. The "six million" number is also used in many of their Kabbalistic writings.
George W. Bush did a handful of good things, didn't change who he was and who was behind him. If Dan Crenshaw ever became President he'd do a handful of genuinely good things. That's how these people gain public trust. The more aware the public in a nation is, the further these people are willing to go in order to create the appearance that they are on our side.
Given the early backing from international interests, the connections to the modern Bush family, accusations of Hitler hiding his own ancestry, the elements of occultism and hostility to Christianity in Nazi ideology, socialist elements, etc etc. I can only assume Nazism as Germany experienced it was either infighting among the elites one faction vs another, or just a ruse altogether. Too many irredeemable qualities. Reminds me of their usual style of creating a problem then offering a solution but on the scale of a full totalitarian regime. Scare the living shit out of people with communism then offer Nazism as an alternative.
I seen this on X earlier, I also read that Hitler's mother was a servant at a Rothchild mansion and Hitler was possibly the son of a Rothchild banker.
Hitler had plastic surgery to hide his big Rothchild jew nose and tried to hide the fact he was a born from the Rothchild family.
Given the Rothchilds were Ashkenazi Jews and leased the land to create Israel in the Balfour agreement and the Israeli government are Kazarian jews, it is odd that Angela Merkel not follow her fathers lead? Instead she reverted back to her wealthy Rothchild jewish heritage.
Germany, (Angela Merkel) gave Israel submarines that were equipped with nuclear missiles.
The story about Hitler's mother ad nauseum was a relatively recent jewish psyop to turn supporters against him, covered in this short documentary: https://www.bitchute.com/video/6Eyy71szPzrJ/
Hitler's bloodline has been settled for decades, and none of it has anything to do with the Rothschilds.
100%. The information shared in the documentary "Europa The Last Battle" is largely legit (some I cannot prove one way or another with absolution.)It is NOT a comfy-cozy reality, but in fact the very ugly truth regarding historical FACTS and not the victor's story of bullshit and fluff.
V.K. Clark does a very thorough job of debunking a lot of fallacies regarding Hitler & WW2. Here is her debunking that Hitler was a Rothschild as well as explaining why Japan entered the war, which was a result of allied forces attempting to starve their nation with embargos.
"The Baron left immediately for Paris, where the English, French, and Swiss members of the family will gather to hear his account of the seizure of the Rothschild properties in Germany and Austria.
The Baron told the Zurich correspondent of the London Daily Express that the Nazis had made him scrub floors."
First: The Nazis were socialists, a left party. NSDAP means national socialist german workers party.
2. They turned fascist because they were funded by big business. Kind of a thing, that the Davos people around Klaus Schwab want.
3. They killed millions of people, especially Russian, not just Jews.
4. They thought they were better than other people for they considered themselves to be the Arians.
Even if true it does not need to be discussed here as we're already a target. Saying that interesting turn of events (war in gaza) has made it semi acceptable to question this sort of thing with the left LOL.
My question is I don't remember q ever mentioning anything about it? Maybe a autist anon can interject?
What we have come to know as Operation Paperclip is a bundle of lies/half truths in which you are made to believe that 1,000s of "Nazis" occupy key positions in the US. Out of 1500 German scientists captured, almost 99% were executed or abandoned in 3rd World Countries.
The reality of Operation Paperclip is that there are only 14 documented cases of Germans being granted positions within the United States. Most of the 14 were simply to valuable to kill or already in cahoots with the US government during WW2.
The cia is a bundle of half truths and lies, that’s a given. So to base your conclusion on them legitimately documenting what they’re doing would be a rather naive assumption and that’s what your stating.
Secondly those numbers your links throw out are very large numbers, why does every recorded American veteran contradict what your links state.
Wouldn’t some of them come out on their death bed under with the guilt of killing so many prisoners?can you find direct testimony of a veteran backing these claims?
So, was Hitler /goodguy/ through and through, comp'd at some point, or just doing some patriot shit along the way while he plotted much evil on behalf of Rome? Is my next question
I think the biggest thing you can is try to go to primary sources. Why would you listen to what anyone else has to say about AH? Go listen to HIM. Read his no no book that you are supposed to believe was evil incarnate so that you can see first hand that it isn’t at all what you’re told. Go find and watch his speeches with English subtitles so you can understand why the History channel will never show them to you with subtitles, or why they won’t even play them with sound in Europe. Go find the original documents people spin narratives with and form your own opinions.
There is a reason that all of your gatekeepers, jewish historians, main stream media, etc try and make Hitler look like an eccentric madman. There’s a reason they have to pump out 5 to 10 movies a year depicting “Nazis” as the most evil force to walk the earth. There’s a reason for the last 80 years they have said the Germans committed all the atrocities that were actually carried out by the Bolsheviks.
Because if you shut out all of the noise of people telling you what you should think and go watch his speeches for yourself, go read his words on your own without the input of others…. It’s all so obvious how much you have been lied to.
Its hard calling out Hitler in a positive light without immediate severe backlash, so I have been researching and collecting the information I need to defend my opinion before I open my mouth.
From the research I have been doing thus far, Im finding that Hitler may not have been exactly what we were taught about him. I have been listening to many of his speeches and although he is very loud and appears to be shouting in anger, once you read the subtitles in his speeches, you will see that he was speaking with not anger, but was very passionate about the well being of the Germans and Germany. The media used to share his speeches without subtitles so the public were not aware of what he was speaking about.
I also see many similarities in what was happening in Germany back then to what is happening in our society today. For example.....
IN 1919, Magnus Hirschfeld and Arthur Kronfeld, founded the “Institut für Sexualwissenschaft” (Institute for ‘Sexual Research’) in Berlin. Both were active in the German Communist Party and were prominent members of Berlin’s Jewish community.
A multitude of degenerate services were offered at the institute, including the first surgical sex changes in modern history, abortions, lectures and ‘sex counseling’, room rentals, a large library of pornography and erotic literature on every possible perversion (including bestiality and pedophilia), and a Museum of Sex featuring a wide array of homosexual fetish items, dildos, “masturbation machines”, etc.
By the 1920s, Berlin Germany was known as the center of sexual perversion, drugs and depravity. Back in the 1920s, Berlin had already become a haven and refuge for gays and lesbians from all over the world. There are 170 clubs, bars and pubs for gays and lesbians, and well as riotous nightlife and a gay neighbourhood. This was followed by the transgender movement, and by 1930 Berlin would perform the first modern gender-affirmation surgeries in the world.That such idiologies existed as early as 1919, recognizing the plurality of gender identity and offering support, comes as a surprise to many.
By 1933, when Hitler rose to power, Berlin had become the sex capitol of Europe. On January 30, 1933, Adolf Hitler was officially appointed chancellor of Germany. One of the first things Hitler did when appointed was that he ordered the city cleansed of these devient elements. Obscene books, pornography and Communist literature were all burned by the National Socialists. The clampdown would force Jews, promiscuous liberals, gays, bisexual, and trans to leave for the US.
It appears we have the same enemies, and they are up to their old tricks, the collective west and Europe now being the targets.
Also General Patton and even JFK have stated some interesting words.
"Gentlemen, I have come this morning to the inexcusable conclusion that we have fought on the wrong side. This entire war we should have fought with the fascists against the communists and not the other way around.
I fear that perhaps in fifty years America will pay a dear price and become a land of corruption and degenerate morals."
General George S. Patton (July 21, 1945)
KENNEDY, THEN 28, PREDICTED "HITLER WILL EMERGE FROM THE HATRED THAT SURROUNDS HIM NOW AS ONE OF THE MOST SIGNIFICANT FIGURES WHO EVER LIVED".
"HE HAD IN HIM THE STUFF OF WHICH LEGENDS ARE MADE" HE CONTINUED.
KENNEDY WROTE THE ENTRY IN THE SUMMER OF 1945 AFTER TOURING THE GERMAN DICTATOR'S BAVARIAN MOUNTAIN RETREAT.
IT IS THOUGHT BY HISTORIANS TO BE THE ONLY DIARY EVER KEPT BY THE 35TH US PRESDENT.
My grandparents were Catholics who emigrated to this country just before WW1. They were from the Alsace Lorraine region which now belongs to the French but was part of Germany prior to WW2 I believe
My mom said my grandmother would listen to Hitler’s speeches on the radio and she really liked him and what he had to say. He was a powerful speaker who gave the Germans hope
Because of how the Americans treated the Germans after WW1 my grandparents never spoke German after the war. So my mom who was born here never learned to speak it.
I am always prepared to have mine taken down as well. Im not sure if my post is still up. I cant find it in the feed, and it stopped getting new commenta or likes. Its funny how on a platform called the great awakening, on some subjects they want us to ignore and hit the snooze button. I think like most things, GAW has been infiltrated and controlled.
If you look at the mod log it was taken down, even though Bubble_Burst (my fav mod) commented and had no probs with the post.
Totally agree: think it was controlled from the start. Keep the Goim running round for the latest decode etc. Probaly Alexandra did a good series on DJT, the Cult of Kek; Dark to Light and An Inconvenient Truth. I am keeping an open mind: DJT could well be a Judas goat.
Hope for the best, expect the worst. I only trust Jesus :)
100%. I Hope Trump doesnt disapoint us in the end but I accept this is a possibility as well. I only trust Jesus.
I had the post up for awhile but at 81 likes it was gaining too much poularity. At least people are open minded to Germany and Hitler and are showing interest on understanding truth about him. This goes to show people are no longer sold on WW2 as we knew it.
I was totally sold - cried buckets over anything to do with the holocaust etc. Then I saw the David Cole Video on Auschwitz and a few other similar exposes and woke up. I'm now reading Deanna Spingola's "the Ruling Elite" which lays everything out in amazing detail. Those hailed as heroes in WW2 should have been hung for war crimes. So many lies, so much death, misery and destruction for the benefit of a few.
Declaring Ps 94 daily and praying for their satanic empire to come crashing down. Would be great if DJT and White Hats were for real; JFK Jr returned from the dead and all that, but seriously - what are the chances?
Keep praying and walking in the light fren. Even if we don't succeed we are winners in Christ and have something better than this life to look forward to.
Its the H word - knee jerk rection - we don't want people to think we're Nazis! Or ever consider anything to do with Flat Earth - I'd love that to be true, would be so funny.
the entire purpose of hitler and the nazis was to build up the german army in order to invade britain and depose the monarchy. The nazis were funded by the vatican and the stuarts (the eternal enemy of the windsors!)
In spite of all that, Germany went on a huge building spree. They installed the autobahns and built up the biggest army in Europe. I often wondered how they turned things around so quickly.
I did notice that things seemed to pick up quite quickly in the US after 2016 as well. These financiers need to be kicked into touch to use a rugby football saying.
You have to read the book "Magic of Money" to understand how this happened. It was fully supported by the central bankers around the world. Schaacht explains the exact mechanism of the labor certificates, and how issuing certificates is just one part of the problem, maintaining foreign exchange rates and not letting Marks collapse was a completely different beast and required the central bankers.
Until Hitler fired Schaacht he was being funded by the Banksters. It is easy to surmise that they hoped Nazis will bring about their dream of a unified Europe which was the precursor to the world government.
If Hitler did anything, his biggest achievement was allowing the destruction of the Nazis - or rather mutual destruction of Nazis and Commies when he attacked USSR - that kept the world free enough for the Q plan to be completed.
I only know stuff from Normie School and what I read here. The contradictory theories of [1] the Rothschilds elevating Hitler, who maybe was a Rothschild, to profit from the war and to fulfill their Zionist plans, with ex-Nazis becoming the CIA Deep State, and [2] posts like OP's, wherein Hitler was basically Q version 1.0, setting out to rid the world of the enslaving cabal and set us all free... Well, both have pieces I can't reconcile with reality. I am interested in what you're talking about, though. Nothing outlandish in it. Where do I begin to learn more?
When I stated digging into Hitler, I ended up in the same place as you did. There is enough documentation to learn that Hitler did not come from thin air. He was well propped up by the same Globalista Banksters through multiple channels.
There is also enough circumstantial evidence to believe that he was a illegitimate descendant of the Rothschild family.
Its also easy to see that he was benign in his plans for Germany. Much like Donetsk in Ukraine, he wanted to free the German lands lost to Poland where Germans were being persecuted (on hindsight, by the same Globalists to provoke a WW2).
I dont think he fully understand all the agenda behind the forces propelling him. Or if he did, he believed that he can make use of them and turn against them in due time.
Either way, thats what he did.
NSDAP, on the other hand is an entirely different story. It started off like MAGA, but imagine a world where there was no Q, just MAGA, and the people like Alex Jones, Ben Shapiro etc. Imagine patriots being part of this group and being mislead with distorted truth and emotional narratives, where you are ready to kill the people you perceive as enemies. Now imagine, in that world, those people subverting MAGA being Satanists themselves and using the legitimate people's anger to cause more human destruction.
That, in a nutshell, is what I believe Nazis were.
I think Hitler fully understood that he could not control these Nazis as time went by. By the time he invaded Poland (exactly as he had always promised he would do if the German persecution did not stop) and in return 12 countries declared war on Germany - it is exactly the same situation we would be with Putin's SMO to take back Donetsk and Luhansk, if US and UK declared war against Russia.
Thats when Hitler fully realised he was on his own. Thats when he had to fire the president of Reichsbank (German central bank) and take control of the finances directly. Thats when he fully turned against the Cabal. I would think that him forfeiting Rothschild was at that juncture.
History can never fully explain why Hitler invaded Russia when he still faced threat from the West and the commonly accepted answer - to stop spread of communism in East Europe - makes no sense because he was in the middle of a freaking war already and he had put in the treaty with Stalin to avoid exactly this 2 front war.
My belief is that, by then he realised that he had to liquidate the Nazis, and i have made the case that Stalin was in the same boat. He was tuning against the Cabal agents in USSR and he wanted to liquidate the hardcore Commies.
Nazis vs Commies is the greatest gift to humanity by Hitler and Stalin.
Hitler's suicide note is worth reading, btw, to understand his state of mind at the end. It makes a lot of sense when you read it from this perspective.
So in a nutshell, to your question:
Hitler was propped up by the Cabal
Nazis were infiltrated by the Satanists right from the beginning and subverted a genuine movement by the people
Hitler turned against the Cabal
Hitler ensured that Nazis did not win, but rather got destroyed.
Hilter set back Cabal ambitions by some 4-5 decades, and gave enough space for the Q team to come up with this long tem plan for Great Awakening, rather than focus on "defeating Cabal" - which has never succeeded precisely because people were not awake and Cabal always changed shape and took control again.
Wow, I was not expecting such an in-depth response, but I thank you for it.
You appear to be willing to debate the ideals of Hitler, and we are all more than willing to take on this debate. But yet again when it comes to discussions on Hitler, Mods on GAW took down my post. I do not believe there was any hatred projected in my post, but what I did see were anons willing to contribute their personal research on a touchy subject, and my post had good traction with a mutitude of opposing oppinions. Yet without notice or even an explanation on the decision by Mods to remove this content, it was removed.
I am trying to be respectful in my conversation here, as I understand some of my previous posts have come without backing or content. I have been trying to follow guidlines in providing more links ect to the topics I present that may not always always feel comfortable to take on, but as you seen today, they do show much interest from people that come to GAW.
Thanks for this respectful comment. Let me get back to you on this.
Thanks
This is straight up false. You cannot be "funded" by someone when what you're being funded by are the Reichsmark revenues from taxation of the currency of which the state solely decides the terms of its issuance.
There was ZERO "funding" involved within the Third Reich's economic recovery. It quite literally was the same thing as a pioneering family on the frontier building their own homestead from scratch but at the national level.
Hitler WAS NOT FUNDED. Period.
The NSDAP WAS NOT FUNDED. Period.
I know that after watching the "Europa: The Last Battle" and other such documentaries, you come out believing Hitler and NSDAP was a purely organic movement that came to power purely by support of people, and they stabilized the crashing German Marks from the Weimar hyper inflation, purely by the labor of their own people.
I had the same reaction as well. So I decided to ensure what was depicted in those shows was actually accurate. What I found was that, these shows gives you the other end of the narrative spectrum: "Hitler and Nazis were wonderful" as opposed to the official narrative that they were evil.
When you dig into the truth, you will learn that the reality lies somewhere in between.
Here are some demonstably false assertions you make:
Hitler was funded by Hjalmar Schaacht source 1, source 2 =, source 3
Other industrialists who funded Hitler and pushed him to power: Fritz von Thyssen, Alfred Krupp, and many other industralists, including IG Farben.
He was also funded by Union Banking Corporation which is how Prescott Bush fronted the US funding of Hitler.
Bushes are literal Nazis.
Again, another blatant narrative pushed by these shows that Hitler fixed germany's crashing economy.
Here is the graph of he Deutshe Mark
Look at it very carefully, and tell me when the Weimar crash happened, when the recovery started and when Hitler came to power.
1921 - 1922: Mark started sliding
1923: Peaked at 25 billion Marks per pound
Nov 12 1923: Hjalmaar Schaacht became currency commissioner at Reichsbank (German CB)
Nov 16 1923: New currency Rentenmark was introduced.
Nov 20 1923: Reichsbank president dies and Schaacht takes over
By 1925: New currency stabilized and is 20 Marks for a pound.
By 1933: New currency steadily increases in value to 14 Marks for a pound.
1933 -> Hitler comes to power.
If you want to live in a different set of delusions than the one pushed by MSM, feel free. You will end up in the exact same place in the end, because they are all part of the same Hagelian Dialectic.
However, if you want to know the truth, and build a better world view thats more closer to reality, you are in the right place. Put your analytic skills and digging abilities to work. Good luck fren!
This is incorrect both objectively and philosophically. By standing on this kind of hill you are upholding trains of thought that are fundamentally similar to gnostic heresies of the “no objective correctness/good” type.
Not a valid source, this is a slideshow of “trust me bro”, and it points to no sources of the period.
Using an abstract as a source is laughable.
Not only are there no citations of paper documents of the period on this page, but also the content is edited by a Jew, Levi Bookin, and the content is a part of “European History, Jewish Studies”. Furthermore, the logo at the bottom of the page, depicting a clownish and ugly man in the shape of a swastika is indicative of extreme anti-NSDAP bias.
The third citation within your link directly contradicts what you cite afterwards; that many industrialists funded Hitler. In this paragraph below, Thyssen says that only Himself, “...Herr Bruckmann, the well-known printer; and in Berlin there was Carl Bechstein, the world-renowned piano manufacturer, who also contributed large sums. Aside from this, Hitler did not receive many subsidies from individual industrialists…”
Source:
Perhaps there is a cultural conflict of interest here? Or perhaps I am simply too cynical. Nonetheless it is my personal opinion that this excerpt reads, essentially, exactly as fiction.
This is a very interesting read, and I have not read it all but I do intend to. However when looking for the documentation acquired by Buchanan, sadly the images of the documents did not load, both using DuckDuckGo and Google Chrome. I will surely give the benefit of the doubt that this is not intentional by the hosts/adminstrators, but is unhelpful nonetheless and so does not sway me.
I will say, that this is a very interesting excerpt, especially considering the truth about the alleged “death camps”
Very interesting that Buchanan was not, as he is usually described, being very enthusiastic about telling “the truth”.
This link has no citations of contemporary documents, and the nature of the content is really quite similar to a blog post. Further, surely you do not believe the BBC to be a trustworthy source? As we know, all legacy mass media today is chock-full of outright lies, half-truths and intentional deception.
I sincerely wish they were.
The rest of your post is quite shallow and pedantic, as surely you do know that the simple exchange rate of a currency alone has essentially no indication of an economy's actual wellbeing. The economy WAS NOT “fixed” or “recovered” before Hitler came to power, as the German employment rate was one of the most abysmal of the period, and you should know these things. If you don't, respectfully you should not be talking on the subject.
Let's dive further and look at the employment rate during that time
Here, the University of Oregon shows with appropriate citation that the employment rate in Germany had skyrocketed to over 30% in 1933. Then, the data shows a very quick fall in the unemployment rate after 1933, due to NSDAP policies imposed under Hitlers leadership.
To imply that anything was “fixed” simply due to exchange rates is enormously ignorant at best, and totally disingenuous at worst. The implementation of a revalued German Mark under the Weimar Republic had absolutely negligible effects on the wider economy, and that is obvious. I find it hilarious that (((Dan P. Silverman))) does his damnedest to downplay the extreme success of these policies, as though even if they did cook the books to “employ” 600,000 people, it somehow ruins the other 9,400,000 jobs created by the NSDAP regime.
On the other hand in the U.S., you can see from this data (appropriately sourced), that U.S. unemployment did not dip below 10% until 1941, which in comparison to Germany as a “recovery” is abysmally pathetic.
Ok, I gotta go get groceries now. I think you should spend some time analyzing just how large the jewish presence within "history" as a field of study actually is, and how unprecedented this ethnic over-representation is compared to the rest of human history. It's quite alarming, and sadly has forced me to begin scrutinizing the truthfullness of sources from a racial and ethnic standpoint. Obviously this answer to a problem is a problem in and of itself. I like to stick to God's saying of "You will know them by their fruits", so I try to dig into people's personal lives but thats fiarly hard to do.
Good luck in your quest of knowledge.
I think you mistook my statement to be philosophical in nature, where as what I wrote was analytical and very specifically to Hitler and Nazis, not some generalization of the nature of knowledge.
Well it was both a critique of the statements and also the general philosophy of "both sides are grey" which i believe is in particular inextricably linked to the "both sides were funded" point of view. IMO, analagous to "as above so below" at the most fundamental level, strictly speaking.
All sides of all conflicts have always been funded by the same people. No, not just Jews, not just Jesuits, not just Freemasons, and any other specific secret society, but rather by the Mystery Babylon. The whole world has always been their theatre.
I hope this point is clear to Anons by now. A very good research series to really understand the origin of all secret societies and how they are all linked to together, and who is really behind all of them is the Mystery Babylon series by the late Bill Cooper.
Nope, not the same. "As above so below" is the crux of Luciferianism, where their core belief is that the realm of God and realm of Man are the same, so Man can become God by his Works.
Funding all sides of all conflicts is a specific method of performing this Work to help Lucifer defeat God and take over the throne, so he can in turn help all his followers ascend. Here are many many other methods they use.
So they are at two different levels of abstraction, strictly speaking.
There is no better source than Hjalmar Schaacht when understanding German economics, not because he was the president of the Reichsbank, but because he has that unique attribute that is very hard to find most of the times.
He has demonstrable connections to both Hitler, NSDAP and the London Banksters.
He wrote his entire book to prove he was not aligned with Hitler's ideology and yet the best he could come up with was "Yeah I funded Hitler but I did not know he was gonna kill people and I was fired when the war started".
I would dare you to find a better first hand source than this. And no, nice sounding documentaries are not "sources".
I do agree that a lot of other sources are tainted by the Jewish lens, but the depositions from Nuremberg trials were again people trying to prove they were not funding Hitler and yet the were obligated to accept they did indeed fund him.
As for Prescott Bush and Union Banking Corporation connection to Hitler, the original source are congressional testimony when they investigated them under "trading with the enemy act". I will try and find the actual congressional records, that is a very reasonable thing to do.
If you are still maintaining that Hitler came to power with no powerful funding and that NSDAP did not get subverted by the Satanists (and hence I have no qualms calling them Nazis) especially after watching the replay of the same unfold in Ukraine last 2 years, I sincerely wish you good luck as we approach the precipice.
Would any of this matter when almost all nazis today are Christians? IMO, no. Also Ukraine and AZOV is run and funded by jews (satanists). But I would suppose that would be your point? Then to connect that meaningfully in any way, youd have to prove that those who allegedly funded Hitler and the NSDAP were jewish. Because thats really what it all comes down to.
They may call themselves Christians, but they surely dont follow Christianity.
Not all jews but those who are Satanists - whatever you want to call them - Khazarians, Zionists.
Yes, my point would be that all sides of all conflicts are funded by the same Luciferians - Mystery Babylons - blood line families - whatever you want to call. They do this through their intermediaries - secret societies, organizations etc such as Zionists, Freemasons, controlled congress through budget, etc.
Again, we have to prove that ultimately he was funded by the Luciferians.
World financial system is funded by the same Luciferians via their Banksters. All corporations are laundering vehicles for this purpose. Prescott Bush was a representative of this same Banksters. Hjalmar Schaacht was also a representative of the same Banksters. When Jacob Schiff funded Trotsky to over throw Tsar and usher in Communism, he was also representing the same Banksters.
Nazis vs Commies was a theatre to pitch to idealogies for a purposely created problem to give people the false feeling of choice, and whatever they choose would have enslaved them - in one way or another. Luckily for us, we had people like Hitler and Stalin who saw through this deception (to what extent? Thats debatable) and decided to help each other annihilate the Luciferian armies under each other's control.
Honestly, the question how Hitler was funded is not the real question. The real question is whether Hitler did the bidding of their funders or did he wise up and turn against them. All signs indicate that he indeed turned against them.
All the nazis I know are Christian. I am essentially a nazi and I am a Christian. Not many are pagans and the non-4chan ones that claim to be that ive interacted with respect Christianity and have very similar values, basically they are Christian without knowing it or without liking that fact.
It really is all jews, the rare exceptions prove the rule. I suppose thats a reality you're trying not to come to. Also I really hope you dont think Stalin was somehow against the jews... He hired Yagoda to write and carry out the purge quotas of Christians which he approved, then shat the bed and went to hell...
If we find ourselves in a trench together fighting for our hometowns, against Feds, Cartel spics or any other idiots, I hope flying a swastika wont be a problem for you because we'd be fighting for the exact same things. The same things your average nazi fought for in WWII
No problem.
People really find it hard to comprehend just how the NatSocs did it, even those who study economics and thats why it is still called to this day "The German Miracle". If there was ever a people who actual pulled themselves up form their bootstraps, it was the Germans. I don't blame them, because fiat currency (printing without restriction) is so destructive and terrible, and in their mind secret jewish gold is required for anything significant, which is true 99.5% of the time.
The issue of 6 million Jews was being discussed in a newspaper article around WW1. That decades before the so called holocaust. I know this can be a touchy subject so thanks for posting this subject of Hitler OP, a very informative post.
This video has a few of the instances of the use of "six million." https://rumble.com/v2w9he6-six-million-jews-1915-1938-full-hd.html I have a more complete list of all the papers, but it's too much to cut-and-paste here. The "six million" number is also used in many of their Kabbalistic writings.
This is a link to a list from 1900 onwards.
Which then leads you into finding out Nukes are fugazi. Then come the Dino bones. And I'm not being facetious.
George W. Bush did a handful of good things, didn't change who he was and who was behind him. If Dan Crenshaw ever became President he'd do a handful of genuinely good things. That's how these people gain public trust. The more aware the public in a nation is, the further these people are willing to go in order to create the appearance that they are on our side.
Given the early backing from international interests, the connections to the modern Bush family, accusations of Hitler hiding his own ancestry, the elements of occultism and hostility to Christianity in Nazi ideology, socialist elements, etc etc. I can only assume Nazism as Germany experienced it was either infighting among the elites one faction vs another, or just a ruse altogether. Too many irredeemable qualities. Reminds me of their usual style of creating a problem then offering a solution but on the scale of a full totalitarian regime. Scare the living shit out of people with communism then offer Nazism as an alternative.
This makes actual sense.
I seen this on X earlier, I also read that Hitler's mother was a servant at a Rothchild mansion and Hitler was possibly the son of a Rothchild banker.
Hitler had plastic surgery to hide his big Rothchild jew nose and tried to hide the fact he was a born from the Rothchild family.
Given the Rothchilds were Ashkenazi Jews and leased the land to create Israel in the Balfour agreement and the Israeli government are Kazarian jews, it is odd that Angela Merkel not follow her fathers lead? Instead she reverted back to her wealthy Rothchild jewish heritage.
Germany, (Angela Merkel) gave Israel submarines that were equipped with nuclear missiles.
https://www.timesofisrael.com/new-submarines-will-have-second-strike-nuclear-capability/
I wonder if the above fact had anything to do with Q's "Hunt for Red October" quotes.
The story about Hitler's mother ad nauseum was a relatively recent jewish psyop to turn supporters against him, covered in this short documentary: https://www.bitchute.com/video/6Eyy71szPzrJ/
Hitler's bloodline has been settled for decades, and none of it has anything to do with the Rothschilds.
i have been trying to understand what happened during ww2 for years, thanks for the video.
If you've got the time, watching Europa will help make more sense of that time period.
100%. The information shared in the documentary "Europa The Last Battle" is largely legit (some I cannot prove one way or another with absolution.)It is NOT a comfy-cozy reality, but in fact the very ugly truth regarding historical FACTS and not the victor's story of bullshit and fluff.
V.K. Clark does a very thorough job of debunking a lot of fallacies regarding Hitler & WW2. Here is her debunking that Hitler was a Rothschild as well as explaining why Japan entered the war, which was a result of allied forces attempting to starve their nation with embargos.
https://twitter.com/utism_/status/1753899758949720217?
V.K. Clark video clip origin (a great 15 min watch on the propaganda the allies pushed to get everyone into WW2):
https://www.bitchute.com/video/exfhrgvrltim/
Warwolves of the Iron Cross:
https://library.frenschan.org/read/5762/pdf
The crime and punishment of I.G. Farben:
https://t.co/XgrhQ9a8Pf
Politifact (Lists sources for some of the origins of this myth):
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2011/oct/06/critics-water-fluoridation/truth-about-fluoride-doesnt-include-nazi-myth/
Another example of a website pushing this with zero credibility:
https://rielpolitik.com/2019/07/23/did-hitler-really-put-fluoride-in-the-water-at-concentration-camps-if-so-why-do-we-put-it-in-are-water/
Justice 4 Germans article:
https://justice4germans.wordpress.com/2013/06/09/debunking-the-myth-of-water-fluoridation-by-hitler-and-those-evil-nazis/
Thank you Ehjax78 for sharing your research on this! 💯🎯❤️🙏
Thanks for taking the time to look it over.
great post op
Thanks fren
u/#pepehug
The Nazis had him scrub the floors.😆😆😆
"The Baron left immediately for Paris, where the English, French, and Swiss members of the family will gather to hear his account of the seizure of the Rothschild properties in Germany and Austria.
The Baron told the Zurich correspondent of the London Daily Express that the Nazis had made him scrub floors."
First: The Nazis were socialists, a left party. NSDAP means national socialist german workers party. 2. They turned fascist because they were funded by big business. Kind of a thing, that the Davos people around Klaus Schwab want. 3. They killed millions of people, especially Russian, not just Jews. 4. They thought they were better than other people for they considered themselves to be the Arians.
I cannot see a positive side on it, not one.
Even if true it does not need to be discussed here as we're already a target. Saying that interesting turn of events (war in gaza) has made it semi acceptable to question this sort of thing with the left LOL. My question is I don't remember q ever mentioning anything about it? Maybe a autist anon can interject?
A very honest and simple question
why do so many nefarious programs research and modern day globalists and traitors all tie back to the Nazis?
What we have come to know as Operation Paperclip is a bundle of lies/half truths in which you are made to believe that 1,000s of "Nazis" occupy key positions in the US. Out of 1500 German scientists captured, almost 99% were executed or abandoned in 3rd World Countries.
The reality of Operation Paperclip is that there are only 14 documented cases of Germans being granted positions within the United States. Most of the 14 were simply to valuable to kill or already in cahoots with the US government during WW2.
https://web.archive.org/web/20240127011812/https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1751022726326751261.html
The cia is a bundle of half truths and lies, that’s a given. So to base your conclusion on them legitimately documenting what they’re doing would be a rather naive assumption and that’s what your stating.
Secondly those numbers your links throw out are very large numbers, why does every recorded American veteran contradict what your links state.
Wouldn’t some of them come out on their death bed under with the guilt of killing so many prisoners?can you find direct testimony of a veteran backing these claims?
Very interesting bit of missing history. Germany also took the assets of other national banks starting with Poland.
So, was Hitler /goodguy/ through and through, comp'd at some point, or just doing some patriot shit along the way while he plotted much evil on behalf of Rome? Is my next question
I think the biggest thing you can is try to go to primary sources. Why would you listen to what anyone else has to say about AH? Go listen to HIM. Read his no no book that you are supposed to believe was evil incarnate so that you can see first hand that it isn’t at all what you’re told. Go find and watch his speeches with English subtitles so you can understand why the History channel will never show them to you with subtitles, or why they won’t even play them with sound in Europe. Go find the original documents people spin narratives with and form your own opinions.
There is a reason that all of your gatekeepers, jewish historians, main stream media, etc try and make Hitler look like an eccentric madman. There’s a reason they have to pump out 5 to 10 movies a year depicting “Nazis” as the most evil force to walk the earth. There’s a reason for the last 80 years they have said the Germans committed all the atrocities that were actually carried out by the Bolsheviks.
Because if you shut out all of the noise of people telling you what you should think and go watch his speeches for yourself, go read his words on your own without the input of others…. It’s all so obvious how much you have been lied to.
Its hard calling out Hitler in a positive light without immediate severe backlash, so I have been researching and collecting the information I need to defend my opinion before I open my mouth.
From the research I have been doing thus far, Im finding that Hitler may not have been exactly what we were taught about him. I have been listening to many of his speeches and although he is very loud and appears to be shouting in anger, once you read the subtitles in his speeches, you will see that he was speaking with not anger, but was very passionate about the well being of the Germans and Germany. The media used to share his speeches without subtitles so the public were not aware of what he was speaking about.
I also see many similarities in what was happening in Germany back then to what is happening in our society today. For example.....
IN 1919, Magnus Hirschfeld and Arthur Kronfeld, founded the “Institut für Sexualwissenschaft” (Institute for ‘Sexual Research’) in Berlin. Both were active in the German Communist Party and were prominent members of Berlin’s Jewish community.
A multitude of degenerate services were offered at the institute, including the first surgical sex changes in modern history, abortions, lectures and ‘sex counseling’, room rentals, a large library of pornography and erotic literature on every possible perversion (including bestiality and pedophilia), and a Museum of Sex featuring a wide array of homosexual fetish items, dildos, “masturbation machines”, etc.
By the 1920s, Berlin Germany was known as the center of sexual perversion, drugs and depravity. Back in the 1920s, Berlin had already become a haven and refuge for gays and lesbians from all over the world. There are 170 clubs, bars and pubs for gays and lesbians, and well as riotous nightlife and a gay neighbourhood. This was followed by the transgender movement, and by 1930 Berlin would perform the first modern gender-affirmation surgeries in the world.That such idiologies existed as early as 1919, recognizing the plurality of gender identity and offering support, comes as a surprise to many.
By 1933, when Hitler rose to power, Berlin had become the sex capitol of Europe. On January 30, 1933, Adolf Hitler was officially appointed chancellor of Germany. One of the first things Hitler did when appointed was that he ordered the city cleansed of these devient elements. Obscene books, pornography and Communist literature were all burned by the National Socialists. The clampdown would force Jews, promiscuous liberals, gays, bisexual, and trans to leave for the US.
It appears we have the same enemies, and they are up to their old tricks, the collective west and Europe now being the targets.
Also General Patton and even JFK have stated some interesting words.
"Gentlemen, I have come this morning to the inexcusable conclusion that we have fought on the wrong side. This entire war we should have fought with the fascists against the communists and not the other way around.
I fear that perhaps in fifty years America will pay a dear price and become a land of corruption and degenerate morals."
General George S. Patton (July 21, 1945)
KENNEDY, THEN 28, PREDICTED "HITLER WILL EMERGE FROM THE HATRED THAT SURROUNDS HIM NOW AS ONE OF THE MOST SIGNIFICANT FIGURES WHO EVER LIVED".
"HE HAD IN HIM THE STUFF OF WHICH LEGENDS ARE MADE" HE CONTINUED.
KENNEDY WROTE THE ENTRY IN THE SUMMER OF 1945 AFTER TOURING THE GERMAN DICTATOR'S BAVARIAN MOUNTAIN RETREAT.
IT IS THOUGHT BY HISTORIANS TO BE THE ONLY DIARY EVER KEPT BY THE 35TH US PRESDENT.
My grandparents were Catholics who emigrated to this country just before WW1. They were from the Alsace Lorraine region which now belongs to the French but was part of Germany prior to WW2 I believe
My mom said my grandmother would listen to Hitler’s speeches on the radio and she really liked him and what he had to say. He was a powerful speaker who gave the Germans hope
Because of how the Americans treated the Germans after WW1 my grandparents never spoke German after the war. So my mom who was born here never learned to speak it.
Its the opposite in my opinion. I made a comment before outlining what I think happened.
You guys should have a field day on Hitler in a dedicated thread, I mean one for the archives. Plan that shit out etc. This is mind-blowing stuff
See what Bro Nathanael has to say about H's rising popularity. I posted the vid but it was taken down.
It was actually taken down
Not surprised, makes me wonder who is running this.
I posted A Bro Nathanael about how H was becoming more popular and it only lasted long enough to get 26 upvotes.
Things that make me go hmmm...
I am always prepared to have mine taken down as well. Im not sure if my post is still up. I cant find it in the feed, and it stopped getting new commenta or likes. Its funny how on a platform called the great awakening, on some subjects they want us to ignore and hit the snooze button. I think like most things, GAW has been infiltrated and controlled.
If you look at the mod log it was taken down, even though Bubble_Burst (my fav mod) commented and had no probs with the post.
Totally agree: think it was controlled from the start. Keep the Goim running round for the latest decode etc. Probaly Alexandra did a good series on DJT, the Cult of Kek; Dark to Light and An Inconvenient Truth. I am keeping an open mind: DJT could well be a Judas goat.
Hope for the best, expect the worst. I only trust Jesus :)
100%. I Hope Trump doesnt disapoint us in the end but I accept this is a possibility as well. I only trust Jesus.
I had the post up for awhile but at 81 likes it was gaining too much poularity. At least people are open minded to Germany and Hitler and are showing interest on understanding truth about him. This goes to show people are no longer sold on WW2 as we knew it.
I was totally sold - cried buckets over anything to do with the holocaust etc. Then I saw the David Cole Video on Auschwitz and a few other similar exposes and woke up. I'm now reading Deanna Spingola's "the Ruling Elite" which lays everything out in amazing detail. Those hailed as heroes in WW2 should have been hung for war crimes. So many lies, so much death, misery and destruction for the benefit of a few.
Declaring Ps 94 daily and praying for their satanic empire to come crashing down. Would be great if DJT and White Hats were for real; JFK Jr returned from the dead and all that, but seriously - what are the chances?
Keep praying and walking in the light fren. Even if we don't succeed we are winners in Christ and have something better than this life to look forward to.
God bless.
Its the H word - knee jerk rection - we don't want people to think we're Nazis! Or ever consider anything to do with Flat Earth - I'd love that to be true, would be so funny.
the entire purpose of hitler and the nazis was to build up the german army in order to invade britain and depose the monarchy. The nazis were funded by the vatican and the stuarts (the eternal enemy of the windsors!)
No. Just no.
Germany was knee-deep in reparations after WW1 and, I believe, they were still paying in the 1980s. Then we had: The Jewish "Declaration of War" against the Nazis Then there was hyper-inflation so everyone lost their savings.
In spite of all that, Germany went on a huge building spree. They installed the autobahns and built up the biggest army in Europe. I often wondered how they turned things around so quickly.
I did notice that things seemed to pick up quite quickly in the US after 2016 as well. These financiers need to be kicked into touch to use a rugby football saying.
He took it all too far, but boy could he play guitar...