Trump Must Pay Half a Billion Dollars Before He Can Appeal New York Decision (Can they do this, any Lawyers out there to comment on this?)
(www.breitbart.com)
🧐 Research Wanted 🤔
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (125)
sorted by:
It dont sound right to me. Kinda defeats the point of the appeal if you have to pay anywaus then basically make the state give a half billion refund after
NY is a lousy financial bet. They are beyond broke. But I have never heard of paying a bond to be able to appeal a decision. NY has gone full blown nazi dictatorship.
They are used across the country.
This is not a NY thing .
You can find your state rules here.
https://www.americanbar.org/groups/judicial/publications/appellate_issues/2019/summer/staying-judgment-with-appeal-bonds/
Thank you. Honestly didn't think this through in terms a plaintive who has an honest case against an insurance company or a large corporation. A bond makes sense if there's a victim. In this particular case Trump is the victim and this is a ny pile-on.
Has anyone determined who gets the money?
10% for the big guy
Illegal immigrants, most likely.
I think it goes to NY state.
I know there is a fund for victims of crime, but I don't know if civil judgements go into that
This was a provision written directly into this NY 'get Trump' law.
That's not true, it's been on the books in New York since the 60s
The law the case was tried under passed 67 years ago. When Trump was 10.
It's separate from the rules on appeals.
They will then try to tax you on the money they gave back to you
Then Trump's gonna sue NY and that hellhole city into the dirt.
Either that, or he could start denying federal funds until they correct this injustice once he is president.
This is standard practice.
Let's say you sue me and you are awarded $100,000.
If I didn't want to pay you or just delay paying you I could spend $30 and file an appeal. Even if I had no chance of winning. So to prevent frivolous appeals they make you put up the money.
It's standard practice when there is a victim, there is no victim. Kinda renders that logic useless.
In this case the state is considered the victim. Not saying I agree, just pointing out why they're using that standard here
Not the state "The People of New York"
"Frivolous appeals".
Anyway, it should not be higher than what is stated in the initial ruling. In the case of what is stated in the initial ruling, only a retarded TDS addled Epstein supporter would agree with.
The number is based on the original ruling plus interest.
LMFAO!!!!!
https://files.catbox.moe/f0mams.jpg
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_85VrWHQ-fo
Had to use the Russian search engine to find it, lol
Yandex.com
I use Yandex more than any other search engine. It’s crazy how much is censored.
I grew up in 80's and the height of cold War.
Blows my mind that we now use a Russian search engine to find stuff.
Our country is beautiful, but it's leaders are lost.
I grew up in the 70s and we learned Russia was bad! I now believe it was lies maybe to make us fear something. It was great growing up in the 70s even though the blissful peace was fake. I’m grateful I grew up in the 70s & 80s. They were great! I believe it was the fifties when people started building bunkers because Russia would release the nukes. Yes our country is beautiful and we have good people here. Sadly for decades we trusted our gov was looking out for our best interest. Instead like every villain they have only looked out for themselves.
I do too. It is amazing. Just look at the difference in search results.
yandex.eu gets you results in English.