Been somewhat out of the loop, so while I am aware of the Supreme Court agreeing to take up the Immunity case and the Deep State and their puppets having a collective meltdown as a result, I am still a bit confused on why they are melting down so badly.
From what I know, the Supreme Court did not even rule on the case yet; they just gotten started and I have been told that the process will take months and that no progress on Jack Smith's work can be made in the meantime.
Is that what is the Deep State and the Left melting down about: a delay in their timeline? How poor their plans must be if they can't even tolerate a delay in the timeframe?
A delay in their time frame puts DJT in office and them in hell.
AND HELL WOULD BE....(wait for it).....GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA!!!!😂😂😂😂
Because once these morooons get there...it is in a cell, food given, clothing and then the WAITING UNTIL THEIR TRIAL...I have heard it said that the waiting before a trial such as this is EXTREEEEEEMELY EXCRUCIATING...
And then of course, when the sentence is handed out, hanging, firing squad, or life (which I hope that is NOT on the books-but it is) due to someone guarding them all the time...
Once again, they never expected her to lose…AND, they NEVER banked on DJT being squeaky clean or the power of MAGA! Finally, it’s so much fun to watch the mouse taps snapping many, many times a day! WWG1WGA
"They" wanted a conviction in these cases BEFORE the ballot and machine fraud was proven.
Malicious prosecution
Liberals NOT thinking things through?...That is a given.
If Trump gets immunity these cases are done.
Erm, it is not a matter of getting immunity. Never in history has an ex-US-president been prosecuted for actions taken during presidency. Why is that?
I know he has immunity but they want to take it away.
And if they take away Trump's immunity they have to take all presidential immunity away from all living presidents.
They want to jail Trump so badly on fake BS that they are willing to sacrifice all of their former puppets to keep Trump out of office.
Amen.
If Trump loses the Immunity case at the Supreme Court then Biden, Obama, Bush, and Clinton can/will ALSO lose their IMMUNITY! ALL can be arrested, arraigned, indicted, and tried in a court of law AFTER they leave office! They ALL LOSE PRESIDENTIAL IMMUNITY!
They desperately need a narrative for why the democrat won, to cover up their cheating. They have done this for decades. Soccer moms, youth vote, first black, first female, etc. All just a cover story for stealing the election.
I am bewildered that they'd be operating under the assumption that Jack Smith is legit. Although many here still are as well.
Look at his press conference. Why is he being led in like a prisoner to this shitty trailer conference facility? Where the ceilings are scarcely high enough to fit our nation's flag? Why are two television screens prominently placed? It's like some David Lynch set.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F0dRPNxFBPs
The DoJ has legitimate facilities for these sorts of announcements. Why weren't they used to announced what should have been their biggest case ever: an indictment of a President?
https://greatawakening.win/p/16c1zPz4WT/real-doj-press-conferences/c/
Who the heck is this guy?
https://www.syracuse.com/news/2022/12/how-jack-smith-went-from-liverpool-football-bench-to-a-starring-role-in-trumps-prosecution.html
You can read one of his indictments here, oddly enough it's charges related to obstructing official proceedings:
https://repository.scp-ks.org/LW/Published/Filing/0b1ec6e9803b6ab3/Annex%202%20-%20Redacted%20Indictment.pdf
His wife is a documentary filmmaker and produced a documentary called "Innocent Until Proven Guilty"
https://web.archive.org/web/20150527180619/https://www.nytimes.com/2001/09/30/style/weddings-katy-chevigny-jonathan-chen.html
I actually am not seeing anything in this guy's background that indicates he's a bad apple... Very dasting... I just don't get it...
https://www.justice.gov/storage/US_v_Trump_23_cr_257.pdf
Is Jack Smith even confirmed as a special prosecutor?
Our the question should be did he take an oath of office? I think think that is what we should be asking. Like the City Council in Arizona. Let’s start with the entire Biden Administration
We all know that Joe Biden and Kamala Harris did take an oath, but their oaths took place at least an half-hour before the prescribed time of 12 noon. At the very least, the Presidential oath is timed so that the first notes of "Hail to the Chief" are sounded at high noon.
I believe so, as far as this goes...
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/appointment-special-counsel-0
But I think they want us to see him differently.
If we're lucky. The SCOTUS will ask what standing does Jack Smith have to prosecute this case?
They will probably decide the Immunity question along the lines of If what POTUS did while he was President, was legal, but politically unpopular, he is immune, If anything has been proven criminal, then Immunity does not apply.
It will draw a distinction between Criminal acts and Legal acts. They have already spent many millions of Dollars and how many thousands of government man-hours trying to frame DJT and have had to fabricate fake crimes to advance their agenda.
The criminality of certain recent Presidents will thus be judged as not covered by Presidential Immunity.
Then, under a straight system these criminals can finally be held to account.
Don't forget, the Supreme court might schedule the oral arguments for Presidential immunity for November 4th. In the grand scheme of things, the "January 6th insurrection" was not a violent affair despite the deaths that took place.
Truth prevail
So I guess they're lacking the truth
I believe you're correct on your assessment. Their window keeps getting shorter and shorter. This may be the militaries way of shortening their timeline so they can make impulsive moves. That's when the people can see the obvious bias in our government. It serves several purposes I'm sure but this will force them to do something desperate.
The implication is, the Supremes could have let the lower court decision stand and refuse to hear the case.
WHY would they hear the case at all, if the lower court was right?? They would not.
So they at least have doubts, and hopefully will assert that the President in office did indeed have immunity. At least they want to hear the arguments!
That is why they are melting down.