" The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration. "
Income" ... means "gain" "derived" from, and not accruing to, capital or labor or from both combined, including profit gained through the sale or conversion of capital, the gain not being taxable until realized, and, in such connection, "gain" means profit or something of exchangeable value, and "derived" means proceeding from property, severed from capital, however invested or employed, and coming in, received or drawn by taxpayer for his separate use, benefit, and disposal.
[Staples v. U.S., E.D. Penna., 21 F.Supp. 737]
.
There is a clear distinction between "profit" and "wages" or compensation for labor. Compensation for labor cannot be regarded as profit within the meaning of the law.
[Oliver v. Halstead, 196 Va. 992; 86 S.E. 2d 858]
There are a number of illegitimate amendments. We need a republic review: reclaimingtherepublic.org This guy and many around the country are doing some great work.
I noticed that there was no commentary that followed Milley's very curious pronouncement. I'm thinking that they all know this to be true......hence, a movie!!!
That's correct, the Organic Act. "Sov-cit?" Those who know this are Americans who've paid attention for many years and yes, we are sovereign citizens. You might want to dip your toe in that area of knowledge.
Yeah, I'm talking Sovereign Citizens who believe in legal mumbo-jumbo gotchas like gold fringe on flags, 'traveling' instead of driving so no need for a Driver's license, secret government money tied to your name, etc. etc. etc. For some reason Q seemed to attract them, flerfers, and new-new-agers - I have zero patience for any of them.
Well, it has a point. All the things I've read here about the US being sold points to language talking of "corporations" and people just think there's only one type of corporation, that being of a business. But yeah, people working together towards a common goal are also corporations.
Sov-cit is like Flat Earth. Clown invention to put everyone in wrong direction.
However, it seems to be true that we lost our rights undeer Common Law when the US moved from Republic into a Corporation.
Look into what Senator James Traficant put into congressional record in 1993 regarding Emergency Banking Act of 1933.
He claims that, that is when America switched to a corporation.
There are some interesting coincidences as well. The date of the Act coincides with the end of the 44th Speaker of Congress (a week or so before).
When Mike Johnson took oath the person introducing him said he was the 45th Speaker and we all knew there was some code there.
What is required, I believe, is restoration of the Republic at al local levels. Not by claiming Sov-Citizen (btw the word Citizen refers to a corporate entity like person and is self defeating for this), but by getting your local Sherriff to become a constitutional sherriff and restoring constitutional local government.
Some have commented on here, 2018 or 2019; I've heard it before but have no sauce....probably because POTUS is staying in the background and the majority of the people are clueless about most everything.
Trump (aka The President) does not repeal laws unless Congress has passed a law to repeal the previous law. Then the President can sign the new law into effect.
For all we know SCOTUS held a private session and declared that law unConstitutional (which it blatantly is) and kept that secret so that the machine could devour itself.
Can somebody post a link to Milley's comments.
It came from here at about 31:10 Afghanistan Withdrawal: Deadly and chaotic Afghan exit hearing
https://files.catbox.moe/m3yvr5.mp4
Minus the bogus 16th amendment, one would hope....
Also, I hope they change the name to REPUBLIC OF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Sixteenth Amendment:
" The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration. "
When you examine Title 26, the definition of "income" has nothing to do with the people....it applies to government workers.
"Income" means "gain" -- "gain" means "profit":
Income" ... means "gain" "derived" from, and not accruing to, capital or labor or from both combined, including profit gained through the sale or conversion of capital, the gain not being taxable until realized, and, in such connection, "gain" means profit or something of exchangeable value, and "derived" means proceeding from property, severed from capital, however invested or employed, and coming in, received or drawn by taxpayer for his separate use, benefit, and disposal. [Staples v. U.S., E.D. Penna., 21 F.Supp. 737]
.
There is a clear distinction between "profit" and "wages" or compensation for labor. Compensation for labor cannot be regarded as profit within the meaning of the law. [Oliver v. Halstead, 196 Va. 992; 86 S.E. 2d 858]
Bogus.
Never properly ratified.
There are a number of illegitimate amendments. We need a republic review: reclaimingtherepublic.org This guy and many around the country are doing some great work.
Why does it skip at 18 seconds? Do we have another source for this to corroborate this one?
https://www.youtube.com/live/Y0xtXlJD6fc?si=iFrTHeqe_ctTxX6d&t=1037
I noticed that there was no commentary that followed Milley's very curious pronouncement. I'm thinking that they all know this to be true......hence, a movie!!!
Thank you!
Can someone post a link to the Banking Act of 1871 ?
Because I don't see any info on this. as like I don't think it exists.
I think a lot of psuedo-lawyer, sov-cit types point to this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_of_Columbia_Organic_Act_of_1871
Edit: Ha! Just saw the 'conspiracy theories' section. We're famous!
ha.
The funny part is there is an 1871 banking law......it's just not in the US.
and I did not know this Most U.S. cities and counties are municipal corporations.
That's correct, the Organic Act. "Sov-cit?" Those who know this are Americans who've paid attention for many years and yes, we are sovereign citizens. You might want to dip your toe in that area of knowledge.
Yeah, I'm talking Sovereign Citizens who believe in legal mumbo-jumbo gotchas like gold fringe on flags, 'traveling' instead of driving so no need for a Driver's license, secret government money tied to your name, etc. etc. etc. For some reason Q seemed to attract them, flerfers, and new-new-agers - I have zero patience for any of them.
Well, it has a point. All the things I've read here about the US being sold points to language talking of "corporations" and people just think there's only one type of corporation, that being of a business. But yeah, people working together towards a common goal are also corporations.
Sov-cit is like Flat Earth. Clown invention to put everyone in wrong direction.
However, it seems to be true that we lost our rights undeer Common Law when the US moved from Republic into a Corporation.
Look into what Senator James Traficant put into congressional record in 1993 regarding Emergency Banking Act of 1933.
He claims that, that is when America switched to a corporation.
There are some interesting coincidences as well. The date of the Act coincides with the end of the 44th Speaker of Congress (a week or so before).
When Mike Johnson took oath the person introducing him said he was the 45th Speaker and we all knew there was some code there.
What is required, I believe, is restoration of the Republic at al local levels. Not by claiming Sov-Citizen (btw the word Citizen refers to a corporate entity like person and is self defeating for this), but by getting your local Sherriff to become a constitutional sherriff and restoring constitutional local government.
Organic Act of 1871.
When did Trump repeal it?
Some have commented on here, 2018 or 2019; I've heard it before but have no sauce....probably because POTUS is staying in the background and the majority of the people are clueless about most everything.
Trump (aka The President) does not repeal laws unless Congress has passed a law to repeal the previous law. Then the President can sign the new law into effect.
For all we know SCOTUS held a private session and declared that law unConstitutional (which it blatantly is) and kept that secret so that the machine could devour itself.
How weird is this. I find a link from 2010 in ...thedailykos??? https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2010/1/21/828050/-
This is a fantastic read. Deserves its own post.
Not weird at all. This has long been a theory among a certain demographic. It's not new.