Some blacks also owned black slaves in this country. Blacks also owned slaves in other countries. Many Irish were sold as slaves in this country also. These facts are conveniently omitted.
Yep, there used to be a nice wikipedia article about his rise to success. He was born in Africa and got brought with his family to Barbados. But he was young so he got resold in America. He got free got a plantation and went to Barbados to free his family. He was into freeing people from the specific area of Africa he was from and had lots of lighter skinned black slaves. He was super against race mixing.
The point is that people have been enslaving other people forever, as noted in the Bible. Those who conquered, enslaved the conquered. Jesus did not order slaves to be freed, but told the masters to treat their slaves well. Some actually sold themselves into slavery (indentured servitude). Slavery is ongoing today, likely in all countries. We should work to end slavery everywhere, especially for those enslaved illegally, especially the children.
I met a guy from one of the slave states in South America. His ancestors were slaves. The family name inherited from the moment slavery was abolshed, which by the way was agreed upon in 1814 by treaty of Vienna: Jewish family name.
If one look more closely, that 1.6% will drop below a half a percent, especially when compared to some other ethnicity I could mention that kept slaves for
much longer,
and more sizeable.
En then of course there are other mechanism by which a man can be held in bondage: especially debt based on fiat.
I’ve said for years that if all this reparation crap is so important, we should know every single slaveowner, all their descendants, every ship they came over on, who owned and operated those ships, for who, and who sold them initially.
Funny enough, the people who would say to my face how bad slavery was, didn’t have any interest in knowing who did it.
Odd!
More odd, it didn’t seem like they were of relation…
Every person on earth has an ancestor that was enslaved at one point.
America was the last country to enter the slave trade which was predominantly dominated by jews.
Best for last: an equal number of African slaves went to Muslim countries. They were all castrated so they would NOT have descendants to bitch about slavery and reparations for two hundred years. American and European slaves have descendants.
even crazier, take any phoenician language. look up "slave" and "the slave" in that language. now go find a phone book. i know they're tough to find, but check the white pages. now look up how many people who have a family name corresponding to "slave" in your state. shit even in the US, there are tens of thousands of people whose family name is literally "slave" in english.
bonus fun fact: there are more black babies aborted every year than there were ever slaves of all races in america in the history of legalized slavery combined.
I had to dig a little on this one, statistics being what they are. Turns out, this one's misleading, so context is important.
1.6% is calculated by taking the number of slave-owning citizens in 1860 and dividing it by the population of the US. There were 395K slave owners and 31.4M people. 395/31400 = ~1.6%. It's closer to 1.4%, but I'm rounding so it's inexact, but still illustrates how the number is calculated.
This is also 1860. Slavery was outlawed in most states by this point. It legal in 15 of 33 states. If we want to get a real sense of the social impact where slavery actually was, in the Antebellum South, we have to use only the population in only those states. Do it that way, and you get closer to 5%.
This is still the wrong method. It includes all citizens, including children, and ~3.9 million slaves who obvious didn't own themselves. A better assessment would be to divide free adults, or better yet, heads of household, since slaves were typically held by the family, not individually. Husbands and wives didn't typically have their own slave accounts, for example. Do it that way, and you get closer to 20% of households in the South owned slaves.
Lastly, it is portrayed as if WASP (white Anglo-Saxon Protestant) citizens were the only ones to own slaves. That's false too. Getting the data to evaluate this is far more difficult, but it is clear that black freedmen and Native Americans also owned slaves, as well as a particular ethnic group that looks white but likes to separate themselves off when politically expedient. The group in particular represented a very small fraction of the overall population but a large per capita rate of slave ownership since guess who was in the merchant class which would have taken on slaves as a business "necessity"?
Ultimately, he is right that slavery is talked about as if it were a universal thing, an original sin only white people committed. Even when we make an effort to get a very accurate statistical picture, we still find that 80% of households in the South owned no slaves, as well as all of the residents of the states where slavery was illegal. Slavery was a business decision. Those who owned and operated what was Big Ag back then owned slaves the way farmers own combines and other tractors today - as a business expense. Their arguments for it very strongly focused on the economic necessity in order to compete with other growers worldwide who also used slave labor. That doesn't make it moral, but it does help explain the mentality was very different from what it alleged by today's Leftists. As is their SOP, they take the exception and try to portray it as if it were the rule. They want to tar and feather an entire country and an entire race. My ancestors worked their own damn farms and never owned a slave. They would have been repulsed by the idea given their religious views.
Is also portrayed as if only black people were slaves, ignoring all the Irish slaves that were brought over, even before the first Africans. Then you have to look at the owners of the ships that made the trades...
Now, how many slaves exist today? More than there ever were in the USA.
Please don't keep falling for that crap. They were registered slaves and then "indentured servants" that were involuntary, meaning did not sign up themselves, weren't released from it, could be tortured and killed, bought and sold... Seriously man, wake up.
Indentured servants were freed once their debt was paid.
Slaves were Owned for generations and generally not allowed to pay their way to freedom.
Southern plantation owners would not pay a dime for a white slave as the climate in the south was detrimental.
Slavery was about cheap labor more than it was racism. Poor whites resented black slaves understandably .
Often the slaves were better educated than the poor whites in the surrounding neighborhoods..
Jefferson Davis and Stonewall Jackson educated their slaves.
I grew up in Southern history, with Southern Christian white teachers as well as black teachers and children of slaves.
It's sad that y'all are so keyed up on race than MAGA.
Coincidentally, and this per the documents of the era, the debt almost never got paid off... Familiar with the concept of the company store? You're keyed up on race, I think. Every master was a different case, just as in Europe and rest of the Americas, and even now in the middle east, which holds more slaves than ever were in the USA. You may not have seen these in the south, but one can still find antique signs prohibiting Irish and negroes. The white slaves wound up in northern factories, horrendous sweatshops and physical and sexual abuse abounding. "All y'all" need to open up to the crucial things from other places and not focus too narrowly on your own places.
Slavery Wasn't legal in Union States. So factory workers got paid wages. Why would the FREE States fight against their interests?Not logical by any stretch of imagination.
Recorded info as well as oral history bears witness to my response.
Oh my gosh, that's a dense response. Slavery want legal so factory tyrants happily used "indentured servants," and recorded info had their letters to reach other and their purchased elected officials discussing such. Not logical, lol! The northern money wanted to take out the southern money, not sure why you think 'free' states ever fought against their interests, hahaha. Unless you actually believe propaganda, oh wait... You think that the plebes who fought actually knew the reasons for the wars. Hate to tell you fren, but a deeper look into those who really ran things is required. It's painful.
Whites were never slaves in the south. Southern slave owner Whites preferred Blacks over Whites.
Jeff Davis Confederate PRESIDENT plantation was ran by a Black man while he was in office.
Stonewall Jackson made it a priority that his slaves be able to read and write.
Slavery wasn't necessarily a racist system mostly economic.
That's because they fear satan more than they fear GOD. That's why it is easy for jews to manipulate them.
The white soul brothers that stand in righteousness are abandoned, killed or jailed.
Whites act horribly to each other as well because of this phenom as well.
I can assure you that AJs experience does not reflect the the general experience of enslaved blacks.
He is typical of the black Democrats of today that attempt to keep Blacks on the Democrat plantation.
He's no Black hero. Nothing to see here.
OK.. @trapedinbluestate- this is today's winner!! But holy bat fuck Riddler.......
OMG!! Choo choo Chucky's wife is bad enough ( not her, or "his" fault ), but this image you portend of little Chucky as Dylan Mulvaney for us to ponder? Dude... seek help!!! 🤔🤣🤣🤣
Mommy!!! Make the bad man go away.....
No.. on 2nd thought, I need help...that's a vision I cannot easily erase. LOL
Some blacks also owned black slaves in this country. Blacks also owned slaves in other countries. Many Irish were sold as slaves in this country also. These facts are conveniently omitted.
Yes! I have two relatives who owned a total of three slaves. My black husband's relatives owned hundreds. Our simple view of history is often wrong.
Your black husband had white slaves?
Yep, there used to be a nice wikipedia article about his rise to success. He was born in Africa and got brought with his family to Barbados. But he was young so he got resold in America. He got free got a plantation and went to Barbados to free his family. He was into freeing people from the specific area of Africa he was from and had lots of lighter skinned black slaves. He was super against race mixing.
Wow.
Yeah but which group owned the majority of the slaves? Not just in america but in africa where they were bought, and are still traded today.
Who nose?
stop noticing
The point is that people have been enslaving other people forever, as noted in the Bible. Those who conquered, enslaved the conquered. Jesus did not order slaves to be freed, but told the masters to treat their slaves well. Some actually sold themselves into slavery (indentured servitude). Slavery is ongoing today, likely in all countries. We should work to end slavery everywhere, especially for those enslaved illegally, especially the children.
Ask Larry David.
https://youtu.be/DLBva_3E2Ts?si=ABG0CKaKH83pualv
I met a guy from one of the slave states in South America. His ancestors were slaves. The family name inherited from the moment slavery was abolshed, which by the way was agreed upon in 1814 by treaty of Vienna: Jewish family name.
If one look more closely, that 1.6% will drop below a half a percent, especially when compared to some other ethnicity I could mention that kept slaves for
En then of course there are other mechanism by which a man can be held in bondage: especially debt based on fiat.
Whole nations are in bondage.
Guess who are running the fiat scheme .....
I’ve said for years that if all this reparation crap is so important, we should know every single slaveowner, all their descendants, every ship they came over on, who owned and operated those ships, for who, and who sold them initially.
Funny enough, the people who would say to my face how bad slavery was, didn’t have any interest in knowing who did it.
Odd!
More odd, it didn’t seem like they were of relation…
The top ten slave owners were blacks
Link please.
slavers, the same who owned trans Atlantic saver ships and the same who organized Muslim slavers...
I love this game! Also…
African slaves were sold by other Africans.
Over 3000 free blacks owned slaves.
Slave comes from the word slav. A White race.
Some of the first slaves in America were Irish.
Every person on earth has an ancestor that was enslaved at one point.
America was the last country to enter the slave trade which was predominantly dominated by jews.
Best for last: an equal number of African slaves went to Muslim countries. They were all castrated so they would NOT have descendants to bitch about slavery and reparations for two hundred years. American and European slaves have descendants.
even crazier, take any phoenician language. look up "slave" and "the slave" in that language. now go find a phone book. i know they're tough to find, but check the white pages. now look up how many people who have a family name corresponding to "slave" in your state. shit even in the US, there are tens of thousands of people whose family name is literally "slave" in english.
bonus fun fact: there are more black babies aborted every year than there were ever slaves of all races in america in the history of legalized slavery combined.
Correct! Also;
More soldiers died freeing slaves than there were slaves.
And of that 1.6%, 90% were Khazarian.
I guess not yet.
Today 2% of the whole population owns the entire rest of us
Also the first Barbary war.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Barbary_War
The USMC freed a bunch of slaves from horrific conditions under horrible barbarian/ pirate leadership.
Democrats, cough Democrats.
Dude is almost there. So close. Dig juuuuust a little deeper….
I had to dig a little on this one, statistics being what they are. Turns out, this one's misleading, so context is important.
1.6% is calculated by taking the number of slave-owning citizens in 1860 and dividing it by the population of the US. There were 395K slave owners and 31.4M people. 395/31400 = ~1.6%. It's closer to 1.4%, but I'm rounding so it's inexact, but still illustrates how the number is calculated.
This is also 1860. Slavery was outlawed in most states by this point. It legal in 15 of 33 states. If we want to get a real sense of the social impact where slavery actually was, in the Antebellum South, we have to use only the population in only those states. Do it that way, and you get closer to 5%.
This is still the wrong method. It includes all citizens, including children, and ~3.9 million slaves who obvious didn't own themselves. A better assessment would be to divide free adults, or better yet, heads of household, since slaves were typically held by the family, not individually. Husbands and wives didn't typically have their own slave accounts, for example. Do it that way, and you get closer to 20% of households in the South owned slaves.
Lastly, it is portrayed as if WASP (white Anglo-Saxon Protestant) citizens were the only ones to own slaves. That's false too. Getting the data to evaluate this is far more difficult, but it is clear that black freedmen and Native Americans also owned slaves, as well as a particular ethnic group that looks white but likes to separate themselves off when politically expedient. The group in particular represented a very small fraction of the overall population but a large per capita rate of slave ownership since guess who was in the merchant class which would have taken on slaves as a business "necessity"?
Ultimately, he is right that slavery is talked about as if it were a universal thing, an original sin only white people committed. Even when we make an effort to get a very accurate statistical picture, we still find that 80% of households in the South owned no slaves, as well as all of the residents of the states where slavery was illegal. Slavery was a business decision. Those who owned and operated what was Big Ag back then owned slaves the way farmers own combines and other tractors today - as a business expense. Their arguments for it very strongly focused on the economic necessity in order to compete with other growers worldwide who also used slave labor. That doesn't make it moral, but it does help explain the mentality was very different from what it alleged by today's Leftists. As is their SOP, they take the exception and try to portray it as if it were the rule. They want to tar and feather an entire country and an entire race. My ancestors worked their own damn farms and never owned a slave. They would have been repulsed by the idea given their religious views.
Is also portrayed as if only black people were slaves, ignoring all the Irish slaves that were brought over, even before the first Africans. Then you have to look at the owners of the ships that made the trades...
Now, how many slaves exist today? More than there ever were in the USA.
The Irish were indentured servants that were paying off debts and not generational. Blacks were slaves for generations. 2 different systems.
Please don't keep falling for that crap. They were registered slaves and then "indentured servants" that were involuntary, meaning did not sign up themselves, weren't released from it, could be tortured and killed, bought and sold... Seriously man, wake up.
Indentured servants were freed once their debt was paid. Slaves were Owned for generations and generally not allowed to pay their way to freedom. Southern plantation owners would not pay a dime for a white slave as the climate in the south was detrimental. Slavery was about cheap labor more than it was racism. Poor whites resented black slaves understandably . Often the slaves were better educated than the poor whites in the surrounding neighborhoods.. Jefferson Davis and Stonewall Jackson educated their slaves. I grew up in Southern history, with Southern Christian white teachers as well as black teachers and children of slaves. It's sad that y'all are so keyed up on race than MAGA.
Coincidentally, and this per the documents of the era, the debt almost never got paid off... Familiar with the concept of the company store? You're keyed up on race, I think. Every master was a different case, just as in Europe and rest of the Americas, and even now in the middle east, which holds more slaves than ever were in the USA. You may not have seen these in the south, but one can still find antique signs prohibiting Irish and negroes. The white slaves wound up in northern factories, horrendous sweatshops and physical and sexual abuse abounding. "All y'all" need to open up to the crucial things from other places and not focus too narrowly on your own places.
Slavery Wasn't legal in Union States. So factory workers got paid wages. Why would the FREE States fight against their interests?Not logical by any stretch of imagination. Recorded info as well as oral history bears witness to my response.
Oh my gosh, that's a dense response. Slavery want legal so factory tyrants happily used "indentured servants," and recorded info had their letters to reach other and their purchased elected officials discussing such. Not logical, lol! The northern money wanted to take out the southern money, not sure why you think 'free' states ever fought against their interests, hahaha. Unless you actually believe propaganda, oh wait... You think that the plebes who fought actually knew the reasons for the wars. Hate to tell you fren, but a deeper look into those who really ran things is required. It's painful.
Someone tell Mark blacks owned slaves and white people were slaves also. Stupid pFucks.
Whites were never slaves in the south. Southern slave owner Whites preferred Blacks over Whites. Jeff Davis Confederate PRESIDENT plantation was ran by a Black man while he was in office. Stonewall Jackson made it a priority that his slaves be able to read and write. Slavery wasn't necessarily a racist system mostly economic.
how convenient that the number matches the percent of one smallish dumb tribe
I agree but he should list what % of blacks owned slaves as well.
Liberal elites know this.
We have to keep in mind. They are narrative pushers.
So they understand how to fight against what they know to be true.
I have a feeling the deleted comments named the demographic of the owners.
Most whites will now do anything just to prove they are not racist including putting up with horrible behavior.
That's because they fear satan more than they fear GOD. That's why it is easy for jews to manipulate them. The white soul brothers that stand in righteousness are abandoned, killed or jailed. Whites act horribly to each other as well because of this phenom as well.
they never want to talk about anthony johnson........https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Johnson_(colonist)
I can assure you that AJs experience does not reflect the the general experience of enslaved blacks. He is typical of the black Democrats of today that attempt to keep Blacks on the Democrat plantation. He's no Black hero. Nothing to see here.
Hold my queer
Anyone work and require vaccines are basically modern slave if they can’t quite immediately
How many were Black ?
Or Indian.
Or Mexican.
As long as hes not wearing his Dylan Mulvaney outfit thats fine
OK.. @trapedinbluestate- this is today's winner!! But holy bat fuck Riddler....... OMG!! Choo choo Chucky's wife is bad enough ( not her, or "his" fault ), but this image you portend of little Chucky as Dylan Mulvaney for us to ponder? Dude... seek help!!! 🤔🤣🤣🤣
Mommy!!! Make the bad man go away..... No.. on 2nd thought, I need help...that's a vision I cannot easily erase. LOL
Great comment/image projection on your part. 👍👍👍👍
Every. Single. Time.