The original two got sticked; so plenty of attention. The one I provided a link for was a later third post on the same topic.
I did the math the first time and got 561.170454545. I nearly fell out of my chair. I commented that I found the "170454545..." on another post, but that was all. I didn't know what to make of the "561".
Shortly thereafter Trump was saying that he faced 561 years in jail for all of those charges, even though he faced 641 according to Politico. Forbes had over 700; 717.5. So, why 561? Comms? That is when I did my first post.
For my second post I did some digging into how he got his inmate ID. I found it was just the next number in the sequence of numbers they were given out to new inmates. To get that number and make the math work, they would have had to schedule his booking so that he could get that number.
For this third post, here comes 561 yet again. Awfully exact number for the number of miles of wall built.
Also note the "0" in the math. This happens a lot, including the video in the link I provided "Text Trump to 88022". This is also interesting.
The degree of coincidence among events is directly proportional to the number of colored lines it takes to support the hypothesis that events are not coincidence. :p
Interesting on that one post regarding imports and cars. Trump recently called out China trying to make cheap EV's in Mexico to bypass tariffs. Trump said he would slap a 100% tariff on their vehicles.
The Q proofs were a critical tool for verifying and confirming the veracity of the Q operation and it's connections with Q+ in particular. That was a clear and specific purpose. Also, the proofs were clear, concise and pretty obvious (imo). They served their purpose at that time by providing evidence for anyone asking: "hey, is this really legit?"
But personally, I have to question what purpose this 'proof' serves. Let's turn the soil a bit to see what's going on.
Chongqing was a significant data point during the drops drops 1067, 1120, 2516. I recall there being photos of, and allusion to activities of, specific persons in that city. But this was the Chongqing district (Chongqing City) in China (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chongqing).
We can see some easy correlation between the photo here (on X) and the Q drops 1067 and 1120. That's because it's the same name. But just like in cities and countries all over the world, places in two different nations can share the same name. (Compare "Birmingham" (city) in the UK with "Birmingham Rd" elsewhere).
So is there a real connection here? In both Q1067 and Q 2516, Q specifically references China and the city of Chongqing in China (mainland). Not Taiwan.
The 'proof' here cites a correlation between the X post by "Insider Paper" (aka date April 2, 2024) and post 1067, but the event happened in Taiwan on April 3. It only appears as April 2 because the person using the X account is on the other side of the date line from Taiwan. The earthquake in question happened on April 3.
TAIPEI, Taiwan (AP) — Taiwan was struck Wednesday by its most powerful earthquake in a quarter of a century. At least nine people were killed and hundreds injured, buildings and highways damaged and dozens of workers at quarries stranded.
Nine people are dead and more than 1,000 reported injured in Taiwan after the island nation was rocked by the strongest earthquake in a quarter-century Wednesday.
For someone using X in a different location, the date is April 3
So the connection between "Tuesday" and the chongqing rd photo aka Huelin City Earthquake, which happened on Wednesday, is a false positive.
I have to go out, so I cannot post more or dig more on this now. But I encourage all serious Anons to DIG first and not just jump to "ooooh, this is a Q proof" because of what looks like apparent connections.
And, if this is a q proof, what is it proving? That's the important question.
I'm glad this one random Twitter account has a random photo from Taiwan being used by Q team 6 years later to verify the greatest mission in US history!
I don't understand this. Can someone explain like I'm 5.
No, not really, they can't. The connections are too thin.
This kind of stuff is a direct result of Q disappearing shortly after the stolen election and having no time to drop us a bone to say hi anons, hang in there, we're still going. Just vanished, at the exact instant it was clear there would be no righting of the election and no more Trump as president. The timing couldn't be more suspicious-looking if he'd tried. Makes it look like "Hoke-kayy, my work is done, I'm outa here, mission accomplished!" I'm not saying Q is an anti-Trump larp; most definitely not. I'm saying if he were, the timing is EXACTLY what you'd expect. Maddening. So it was either just a wild coincidence or error (not likely), or he's dead, or there's some other explanation nobody can figure out.
So we have people literally believing that when Q wrote of great things about to happen tomorrow, this week, in a few days, next week, this month,....he actually meant six [or more] years into the future with lots of colored lines.
...Kinda sounds like you're saying Q was either a DS psyop or failed...
If so we're all fucked then.
I don't think so. Too many people are waking up. Trump's legal cases are blowing up in their faces and exposing their own criminality so I think the plan is clearly continuing in the background. It's just Q has said all he needed to say.
The delta proofs are activating from the past as we go forward, which acts like Q confirming and communicating to us from the past!
Correct me if I’m wrong, but wasn’t the theory floated before that taiwan was a DS stronghold, Xi wasn’t necessarily good but not the bad guy in comparison and that the push to take taiwan was some sort of Chinese fight for its own freedom?
All Q stuff is coincidences, I give up on trying to prove you guys wrong. /sarcasm
I did this one and even I’m astounded. The odds must be astronomical.
https://greatawakening.win/p/17sOZiEihf/heres-that-pesky-number-yet-agai/c/
That is a post that certainly deserved more attention. Good work anon.
The original two got sticked; so plenty of attention. The one I provided a link for was a later third post on the same topic.
I did the math the first time and got 561.170454545. I nearly fell out of my chair. I commented that I found the "170454545..." on another post, but that was all. I didn't know what to make of the "561".
Shortly thereafter Trump was saying that he faced 561 years in jail for all of those charges, even though he faced 641 according to Politico. Forbes had over 700; 717.5. So, why 561? Comms? That is when I did my first post.
For my second post I did some digging into how he got his inmate ID. I found it was just the next number in the sequence of numbers they were given out to new inmates. To get that number and make the math work, they would have had to schedule his booking so that he could get that number.
For this third post, here comes 561 yet again. Awfully exact number for the number of miles of wall built.
Also note the "0" in the math. This happens a lot, including the video in the link I provided "Text Trump to 88022". This is also interesting.
u/#q88
u/#q22
Really interesting is "Text Tucker to 44055". (for something for Tucker Carlson, you can look it up)
u/#q44
u/#q55
Very interesting. Re: Trump's inmate number, have you seen this:
https://greatawakening.win/p/16c2WEcQEw/trumps-inmate-number-is-a-dod-ip/c/
Yeah, I commented a few times in your post.
Ok, that was pretty impressive :)
... but
... but
.... but
He used YELLOW lines. Not those ghey red ones.
Thanks for chuckle, fren!!! 😂
Q's Law
The degree of coincidence among events is directly proportional to the number of colored lines it takes to support the hypothesis that events are not coincidence. :p
Interesting on that one post regarding imports and cars. Trump recently called out China trying to make cheap EV's in Mexico to bypass tariffs. Trump said he would slap a 100% tariff on their vehicles.
I kinda get it, but I don't. One Q post says Tuesday, but it is 4/10/18. And it has the name of the roadsign. So I don't follow the "to the day" .
It would be so helpful if the Q-Proofe would provide a narrative to explain.
Thanks
The Q proofs were a critical tool for verifying and confirming the veracity of the Q operation and it's connections with Q+ in particular. That was a clear and specific purpose. Also, the proofs were clear, concise and pretty obvious (imo). They served their purpose at that time by providing evidence for anyone asking: "hey, is this really legit?"
But personally, I have to question what purpose this 'proof' serves. Let's turn the soil a bit to see what's going on.
Chongqing was a significant data point during the drops drops 1067, 1120, 2516. I recall there being photos of, and allusion to activities of, specific persons in that city. But this was the Chongqing district (Chongqing City) in China (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chongqing).
The photo presented in the X tweet here is Chongqing rd, in the district of Hualien City in Taiwan. Note: it is NOT Chongqing Rd in the Zhongzheng district of Taipei, capital of Taiwan.
We can see some easy correlation between the photo here (on X) and the Q drops 1067 and 1120. That's because it's the same name. But just like in cities and countries all over the world, places in two different nations can share the same name. (Compare "Birmingham" (city) in the UK with "Birmingham Rd" elsewhere).
So is there a real connection here? In both Q1067 and Q 2516, Q specifically references China and the city of Chongqing in China (mainland). Not Taiwan.
The 'proof' here cites a correlation between the X post by "Insider Paper" (aka date April 2, 2024) and post 1067, but the event happened in Taiwan on April 3. It only appears as April 2 because the person using the X account is on the other side of the date line from Taiwan. The earthquake in question happened on April 3.
https://apnews.com/article/taiwan-earthquake-explainer-hualien-8c3de7d63c964ae460424aa7e52581a2
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2024/apr/3/strongest-earthquake-25-years-kills-nine-injures-o/
For someone using X in a different location, the date is April 3
So the connection between "Tuesday" and the chongqing rd photo aka Huelin City Earthquake, which happened on Wednesday, is a false positive.
I have to go out, so I cannot post more or dig more on this now. But I encourage all serious Anons to DIG first and not just jump to "ooooh, this is a Q proof" because of what looks like apparent connections.
And, if this is a q proof, what is it proving? That's the important question.
Critical thinqing.
upvoted
I don't mind being wrong, as long as I am doing critical thinking!
Thanks for all of that!
‘To the Day!’ And then proceeds to show 3 Q drops from a week apart.
The decoder things that somehow the Q drop on April 3 is related to the events. Pretty stretchy, imo.
Agreed. The name of the town on the street sign and Q drop during the same week is curious, but it isn’t ‘to the day’
Note: not name of town. Simply name of road. Town is Hualien.
Stretchy and sketchy so we're gettin' kvetchy :)
I wonder if a “MOAB” underground is what caused said “earthquake”.
Trump’s been saying that China will go after Taiwan for years now.
I'm glad this one random Twitter account has a random photo from Taiwan being used by Q team 6 years later to verify the greatest mission in US history!
Do I detect a modicum of sarcasm?
The bonus puzzle on tonight's Wheel of Fortune was the Phrase "ON SHAKY GROUND"
I don't understand this. Can someone explain like I'm 5.
No, not really, they can't. The connections are too thin.
This kind of stuff is a direct result of Q disappearing shortly after the stolen election and having no time to drop us a bone to say hi anons, hang in there, we're still going. Just vanished, at the exact instant it was clear there would be no righting of the election and no more Trump as president. The timing couldn't be more suspicious-looking if he'd tried. Makes it look like "Hoke-kayy, my work is done, I'm outa here, mission accomplished!" I'm not saying Q is an anti-Trump larp; most definitely not. I'm saying if he were, the timing is EXACTLY what you'd expect. Maddening. So it was either just a wild coincidence or error (not likely), or he's dead, or there's some other explanation nobody can figure out.
So we have people literally believing that when Q wrote of great things about to happen tomorrow, this week, in a few days, next week, this month,....he actually meant six [or more] years into the future with lots of colored lines.
Kekolicious. Well written!
...Kinda sounds like you're saying Q was either a DS psyop or failed...
If so we're all fucked then.
I don't think so. Too many people are waking up. Trump's legal cases are blowing up in their faces and exposing their own criminality so I think the plan is clearly continuing in the background. It's just Q has said all he needed to say.
The delta proofs are activating from the past as we go forward, which acts like Q confirming and communicating to us from the past!
The Chongqing in the Q post is not Taiwan where the Earthquake was.
Correct me if I’m wrong, but wasn’t the theory floated before that taiwan was a DS stronghold, Xi wasn’t necessarily good but not the bad guy in comparison and that the push to take taiwan was some sort of Chinese fight for its own freedom?
Wouldn't it be something if the whole rest of the world is playing along to wake America up from it's long sleep so we can go kick some real ass.
It's a shame we're all out of bubble gum
This stuff makes this board look stupid.
Idiot mods make this place stupid.