Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
So, that law will be anulled quicksmart, just which part of shall make no law ... do they not understand?. IF anyone bothers.
And the same folks that don't understand illegal searches and seizures.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
They should have included a provision that the judicial branch can tell the legislative branch RIGHT NOW that this is unconstitutional as fuck
Why wait for them to pass it for the review. Review it now, tell the legislature theyโre fucking retarded and this whole thing is repugnant to the constitution and completely void.
The Commies don't seem to care. They all belong in jail facing the most serious crimes that can be charged against them! Until they have some consequences for their horrible actions we will see this kind of "stunt" often.
That is why I love this country and its sacred constitution.
If this happened in the country I fled from, it would have been approved without delay, but of course it will never happen since religion is the most important thing for Latinos and Latin American countries, and the corrupt politicians of Latin America know it and that is why They will never make those types of laws because the people will rise up en masse.
In absolute numbers, the 2020 (USA) Jewish population estimate is approximately 7.5 million, including 5.8 million adults and 1.8 million children *******
To provide for the consideration of a definition of antisemitism set forth by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance for the enforcement of Federal antidiscrimination laws concerning education programs or activities, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the โAntisemitism Awareness Act of 2023โ.
SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS.
It is the sense of Congress thatโ
(1) title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.), prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, and national origin in programs and activities receiving Federal financial assistance;
(2) while such title does not cover discrimination based solely on religion, individuals who face discrimination based on actual or perceived shared ancestry or ethnic characteristics do not lose protection under such title for also being members of a group that share a common religion;
(3) discrimination against Jews may give rise to a violation of such title when the discrimination is based on race, color, or national origin, which can include discrimination based on actual or perceived shared ancestry or ethnic characteristics;
(4) it is the policy of the United States to enforce such title against prohibited forms of discrimination rooted in antisemitism as vigorously as against all other forms of discrimination prohibited by such title; and
(5) as noted in the U.S. National Strategy to Counter Antisemitism issued by the White House on May 25, 2023, it is critical toโ
(A) increase awareness and understanding of antisemitism, including its threat to America;
(B) improve safety and security for Jewish communities;
(C) reverse the normalization of antisemitism and counter antisemitic discrimination; and
(D) expand communication and collaboration between communities.
SEC. 3. FINDINGS.
Congress finds the following:
(1) Antisemitism is on the rise in the United States and is impacting Jewish students in Kโ12 schools, colleges, and universities.
(2) The International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (referred to in this Act as the โIHRAโ) Working Definition of Antisemitism is a vital tool which helps individuals understand and identify the various manifestations of antisemitism.
(3) On December 11, 2019, Executive Order 13899 extended protections against discrimination under the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to individuals subjected to antisemitism on college and university campuses and tasked Federal agencies to consider the IHRA Working Definition of Antisemitism when enforcing title VI of such Act.
(4) Since 2018, the Department of Education has used the IHRA Working Definition of Antisemitism when investigating violations of that title VI.
(5) The use of alternative definitions of antisemitism impairs enforcement efforts by adding multiple standards and may fail to identify many of the modern manifestations of antisemitism.
(6) The White House released the first-ever United States National Strategy to Counter Antisemitism on May 25, 2023, making clear that the fight against this hate is a national, bipartisan priority that must be successfully conducted through a whole-of-government-and-society approach.
SEC. 4. DEFINITIONS.
For purposes of this Act, the term โdefinition of antisemitismโโ
(1) means the definition of antisemitism adopted on May 26, 2016, by the IHRA, of which the United States is a member, which definition has been adopted by the Department of State; and
(2) includes the โ[c]ontemporary examples of antisemitismโ identified in the IHRA definition.
SEC. 5. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR TITLE VI OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964.
In reviewing, investigating, or deciding whether there has been a violation of title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.) on the basis of race, color, or national origin, based on an individualโs actual or perceived shared Jewish ancestry or Jewish ethnic characteristics, the Department of Education shall take into consideration the definition of antisemitism as part of the Departmentโs assessment of whether the practice was motivated by antisemitic intent.
SEC. 6. OTHER RULES OF CONSTRUCTION.
(a) General Rule Of Construction.โNothing in this Act shall be construedโ
(1) to expand the authority of the Secretary of Education;
(2) to alter the standards pursuant to which the Department of Education makes a determination that harassing conduct amounts to actionable discrimination; or
(3) to diminish or infringe upon the rights protected under any other provision of law that is in effect as of the date of enactment of this Act.
(b) Constitutional Protections.โNothing in this Act shall be construed to diminish or infringe upon any right protected under the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.
discrimination based on actual or perceived shared ancestry or ethnic characteristics
LOL.
Tell us the jews have control of Congress without telling us the jews have Control of Congress.
it is the policy of the United States
That means the federal government, not the States. Any State who upholds this unconstitutional garbage should be sued, and the individual government employees should be sued in their own personal names, because this would be coersion to prevent the right of free speech, which is a crime, and no government employee can have immunity from personal lawsuits if they engage in a crime as part of their "official duties."
Congress finds the following:
They list various things that are all based on fraud and lies.
The use of alternative definitions of antisemitism impairs enforcement efforts
They lie about the definitions, and then claim that nobody has a right of free speech to argue against their fake definition.
Of course, they do. Because ...
In reviewing, investigating, or deciding whether there has been a violation ... on the basis of ... an individualโs actual or perceived shared Jewish ancestry or Jewish ethnic characteristics, the Department of Education shall take into consideration the definition of antisemitism ...
Department of Education should be abolished to begin with. They will ONLY use this government's false definition of "antisemitism," which is ALL ABOUT passing laws in the USA like they have already done in other countries, making it illegal to call out the fake Holocaust, etc.
Constitutional Protections.โNothing in this Act shall be construed to diminish or infringe upon any right protected under the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.
Here, they explicitly admit they KNOW this is a clear violation of the First Amendment. But at least this clause provides all the argument needed that this "law" is void on its face, since the ONLY thing it does is violate the First Amendment.
Pure violation of free speech and jewish push for censorship.
Tell me again, these are "God's chosen people."
LOL!!!
They are Satan (which means "Adversary" in the original Hebrew language of the Old Testament).
And they prove it yet AGAIN.
THIS is why the jews have been kicked out of more than 100 countries over the past 1,000 years. They ALWAYS work to corrupt their host nations.
So Congress farmed out itโs money coining authority back in 1913.
This bill very literally farms out its legislative authority to IHRA by allowing them to define what is and is not illegal, dynamically, with no citizen oversight or protection.
Congress once again just voted against the constitution and American sovereignty, but that should be a shock to precisely nobody at this point.
The same criminals in Congress brought these groups in the universities just to have an excuse to pass their laws, the same is with the guns. These laws are not American laws in my opinion, law for thee and not for me.
The Senate isnโt doing anything so far with this bill. If they do, then I would worry. There is a great deal of hate speech in the Jewish & Islamic texts. Will the House vote on that? What pukes these people are. Not voting for my lousy Republican Rino in 2024.
Lmao fuck congress
First amendment
So, that law will be anulled quicksmart, just which part of shall make no law ... do they not understand?. IF anyone bothers.
The same folks that don't understand "shall not be infringed".
Yep, the money-grubbers are systematically demolishing all the Amendments.
I mean, those old things, scribbled with a pen on paper, are so outdated, and incovenient, for the oligarchs.
And the same folks that don't understand illegal searches and seizures.
Marburg vs Madison
They should have included a provision that the judicial branch can tell the legislative branch RIGHT NOW that this is unconstitutional as fuck
Why wait for them to pass it for the review. Review it now, tell the legislature theyโre fucking retarded and this whole thing is repugnant to the constitution and completely void.
I think you meant Marbury.....๐๐
The Commies don't seem to care. They all belong in jail facing the most serious crimes that can be charged against them! Until they have some consequences for their horrible actions we will see this kind of "stunt" often.
I was listening The hanging tree few days ago and I really like the idea.
Absolutely!
So now there is a list of name of who wants to make such law to the advantage of the semites and the disatvantage of WE THE PEOPLE? Nice.
That is why I love this country and its sacred constitution.
If this happened in the country I fled from, it would have been approved without delay, but of course it will never happen since religion is the most important thing for Latinos and Latin American countries, and the corrupt politicians of Latin America know it and that is why They will never make those types of laws because the people will rise up en masse.
Now we know why Soros funds anti Israel protests
This right here
In absolute numbers, the 2020 (USA) Jewish population estimate is approximately 7.5 million, including 5.8 million adults and 1.8 million children ******* To provide for the consideration of a definition of antisemitism set forth by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance for the enforcement of Federal antidiscrimination laws concerning education programs or activities, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the โAntisemitism Awareness Act of 2023โ.
SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS.
It is the sense of Congress thatโ
(1) title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.), prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, and national origin in programs and activities receiving Federal financial assistance;
(2) while such title does not cover discrimination based solely on religion, individuals who face discrimination based on actual or perceived shared ancestry or ethnic characteristics do not lose protection under such title for also being members of a group that share a common religion;
(3) discrimination against Jews may give rise to a violation of such title when the discrimination is based on race, color, or national origin, which can include discrimination based on actual or perceived shared ancestry or ethnic characteristics;
(4) it is the policy of the United States to enforce such title against prohibited forms of discrimination rooted in antisemitism as vigorously as against all other forms of discrimination prohibited by such title; and
(5) as noted in the U.S. National Strategy to Counter Antisemitism issued by the White House on May 25, 2023, it is critical toโ
(A) increase awareness and understanding of antisemitism, including its threat to America;
(B) improve safety and security for Jewish communities;
(C) reverse the normalization of antisemitism and counter antisemitic discrimination; and
(D) expand communication and collaboration between communities.
SEC. 3. FINDINGS.
Congress finds the following:
(1) Antisemitism is on the rise in the United States and is impacting Jewish students in Kโ12 schools, colleges, and universities.
(2) The International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (referred to in this Act as the โIHRAโ) Working Definition of Antisemitism is a vital tool which helps individuals understand and identify the various manifestations of antisemitism.
(3) On December 11, 2019, Executive Order 13899 extended protections against discrimination under the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to individuals subjected to antisemitism on college and university campuses and tasked Federal agencies to consider the IHRA Working Definition of Antisemitism when enforcing title VI of such Act.
(4) Since 2018, the Department of Education has used the IHRA Working Definition of Antisemitism when investigating violations of that title VI.
(5) The use of alternative definitions of antisemitism impairs enforcement efforts by adding multiple standards and may fail to identify many of the modern manifestations of antisemitism.
(6) The White House released the first-ever United States National Strategy to Counter Antisemitism on May 25, 2023, making clear that the fight against this hate is a national, bipartisan priority that must be successfully conducted through a whole-of-government-and-society approach.
SEC. 4. DEFINITIONS.
For purposes of this Act, the term โdefinition of antisemitismโโ
(1) means the definition of antisemitism adopted on May 26, 2016, by the IHRA, of which the United States is a member, which definition has been adopted by the Department of State; and
(2) includes the โ[c]ontemporary examples of antisemitismโ identified in the IHRA definition.
SEC. 5. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR TITLE VI OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964.
In reviewing, investigating, or deciding whether there has been a violation of title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.) on the basis of race, color, or national origin, based on an individualโs actual or perceived shared Jewish ancestry or Jewish ethnic characteristics, the Department of Education shall take into consideration the definition of antisemitism as part of the Departmentโs assessment of whether the practice was motivated by antisemitic intent.
SEC. 6. OTHER RULES OF CONSTRUCTION.
(a) General Rule Of Construction.โNothing in this Act shall be construedโ
(1) to expand the authority of the Secretary of Education;
(2) to alter the standards pursuant to which the Department of Education makes a determination that harassing conduct amounts to actionable discrimination; or
(3) to diminish or infringe upon the rights protected under any other provision of law that is in effect as of the date of enactment of this Act.
(b) Constitutional Protections.โNothing in this Act shall be construed to diminish or infringe upon any right protected under the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.
Passed the House of Representatives May 1, 2024.
LOL.
Tell us the jews have control of Congress without telling us the jews have Control of Congress.
That means the federal government, not the States. Any State who upholds this unconstitutional garbage should be sued, and the individual government employees should be sued in their own personal names, because this would be coersion to prevent the right of free speech, which is a crime, and no government employee can have immunity from personal lawsuits if they engage in a crime as part of their "official duties."
They list various things that are all based on fraud and lies.
They lie about the definitions, and then claim that nobody has a right of free speech to argue against their fake definition.
Of course, they do. Because ...
Department of Education should be abolished to begin with. They will ONLY use this government's false definition of "antisemitism," which is ALL ABOUT passing laws in the USA like they have already done in other countries, making it illegal to call out the fake Holocaust, etc.
Here, they explicitly admit they KNOW this is a clear violation of the First Amendment. But at least this clause provides all the argument needed that this "law" is void on its face, since the ONLY thing it does is violate the First Amendment.
Pure violation of free speech and jewish push for censorship.
Tell me again, these are "God's chosen people."
LOL!!!
They are Satan (which means "Adversary" in the original Hebrew language of the Old Testament).
And they prove it yet AGAIN.
THIS is why the jews have been kicked out of more than 100 countries over the past 1,000 years. They ALWAYS work to corrupt their host nations.
So Congress farmed out itโs money coining authority back in 1913.
This bill very literally farms out its legislative authority to IHRA by allowing them to define what is and is not illegal, dynamically, with no citizen oversight or protection.
Congress once again just voted against the constitution and American sovereignty, but that should be a shock to precisely nobody at this point.
The same criminals in Congress brought these groups in the universities just to have an excuse to pass their laws, the same is with the guns. These laws are not American laws in my opinion, law for thee and not for me.
Votes
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/118-2024/h172
More Republicans than Democrats voted yes. Mike Johnson among them LOL
Im starting to think Mike was the guy having sex with that boy in the congress building.
Shouldnโt be surprising. Half (or whatever the mix is) of the democrats are Muslims.
The Senate isnโt doing anything so far with this bill. If they do, then I would worry. There is a great deal of hate speech in the Jewish & Islamic texts. Will the House vote on that? What pukes these people are. Not voting for my lousy Republican Rino in 2024.