Trust the "Scientific" American Magazine, folks
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (25)
sorted by:
Does Scientific American follow actual FACTS?! Project 2025 is NOT Trump's agenda, and he has repudiated it. Trump's plan is contained in Agenda 47, which is appended to his webpage.
Fake news from a fake pseudo-scientific source.
Someone should correct them on X.
None of the left opperate on facts they solely opperate on lies and deciet.
What is a "federal scientist," and how would they be independent if working on behalf of the government? They are being paid to "find" specific outcomes.
This.. kinda
Scientific American went to hell decades ago.
It used to be an interesting magazine ----- then it got stuffed full of ads and crap.
They got sold to a German publisher. During the SDI years, Edward Teller made the quip that "Today, 'Scientific American' is neither scientific, nor American." They published critiques of the SDI effort that were just BS, manifesting no understanding of what really was going on.
Scientific American is the poster child of a magazine turning to shit.
Quite a pity. In the 50s and 60s, it was a leading publication. That's one of the real tragedies of a publication going left-wing: something really excellent is replaced with something really bogus. Popular Science was also quite decent in those years, with serious coverage of scientific topics.
Yeah, it more or less turned into an expensive version of Popular Science. But then Popular Science went to hell, too.
Are we talking actual science, or merely the machinations of the WEFists?
i thought covid did that?
Muh Science
Project 2025 is a DS psyop for the sheeple!
Federal scientists "find" or "discover" exactly what they are PAID to "find" or "discover"!
scientific American is a piece of shit.
they were partly behind the false 9/11 narrative
Federal scientist = gate keepers who withhold the truth from the public and suppress real scientist.
Their influence destroys truth. Screw them.
Federal propagandists
These idiots don't know the difference between "Project 2025" and "Agenda 47", among other things ...
such as the difference between their asses and a hole in the ground.
translation from cabalese:
"Trump would give scientists freedom and independence, getting rid of our strict control of the "facts" "
Is Scientific American pro Covid vaccine? That's the only qualifier you need.
Ohh, Democratic play book, blame what you are doing on your enemies. Look shiny.
Defund all federal scientists
Federal scientists, i.e. those working to support the government’s agenda deserve no independence. Project 25 is not a Trump agenda.
I gotta say, that one hurt a little when it came to my attention long ago. Bastards even steal love of science away from us. Oh well, I'm just as happy, maybe more so, just accepting the world around me for what it is, a remarkable place full of wonder. Hell, they even try to steal wonder from us. Just ask Google.