I know, right? Why do all these posts start with "Soon, I will be release...". Seriously, that just puts a target on their back for the Deep State. I mean, how many times have we had hard evidence just about to be released, and suddenly it disappears? Do you remember Mike Lindell's election fraud data that was hacked, and then he couldn't release it? Or when there was that guy who found CSAM on Hunter Biden's laptop and was going to send it all to law enforcement all over the country? They always announce this stuff and hype it up, just so that they can be stopped. Seriously, we the people need to say enough is enough. If you have the evidence, release now.
I think many of them do it quite simply for attention and web traffic to their site that might earn them money. They're usually just blowing hot air. I know that's a pretty cynical opinion, but I think it's true.
They know people will forget about it after a few days, but they'll still have the impression that something big happened. I think it gives people a distorted view of where things really stand in the country/world. We just keep bouncing from one "I'm about to..." to another without ever following up on them.
It would be interesting to see if anyone has ever bothered to keep track of all these "I'm going to release the biggest secret/scandal/whatever very soon!!!" promises just to see how many of them actually came through with what they claimed.
I'm trying to think of one that ever came through that might have an impact on what normies believe, and I honestly can't think of a single one.
The ones I can think of where they actually produced anything were all duds that didn't do anything other than convince people who already believed in Q's plans. Like Mike Lindell's cyber emporium or whatever that was, and those trumpet playing brothers who petitioned the Supreme Court (for what exactly, I can't remember) but the SC didn't review their case, or when Musk bought Twitter and was going to release their stored data of people involved in scandals, or the McAffee thing where info was supposed to be released after his death, or all the stuff related to the investigation into Epstein and Maxwell or those undercover Planned Parenthood videos.
I mean, really, can anyone think of one of these "I'm about to reveal something huge!!" claims where you showed it to normies and it actually changed their opinion on anything?
Not to refute your point that it's mostly hot air, which I agree with, but Elon Musk did at least release some info like he said he would. Names were named but obviously not much came of it - same story with Project Veritas / OMG: They release the receipts & names but nothing really happens other than the whistleblower being fired.
The McAfee thing was only ever a hoax that belongs in the same category as Ingersoll Lockwood, quantum grammar, flat earth: psyop / hoax.
I think a lot of the frustrations & cynicism on this forum come from false hope & false expectations resulting from a lack of discernment. We see it all the time, how extremely ludicrous ideas are promoted on here (mass arrests already finished etc) which we have no proof for, it's all wishful thinking and speculation.
If Harris is wearing fake earrings that are earbuds and persons unknown to the public is speaking to her, would that be election fraud or interference. Could a lawsuit or criminal charges be brought and that discovery request and tape confessions from her team be heard. Asking for my 10 year old parrot
After spending 15 minutes on this issue, I'll be seriously surprised if that whistle-blower or affidavit even makes the light of day.
Because I seriously doubt either the whistle-blower or the affidavit are real.
Even PJ Media author thinks so.
"That said, I'm skeptical. If such a whistleblower exists, the individual would likely speak with someone well-known with a reputation that people would trust or negotiate with a news network. Who is this X/Twitter user and why is he getting this scoop?"
I've seen the sauce X account before. Was not impressed.
If this turns out to be a scam, clickbait or disinfo from this account, it would serve us to really question why so many are so easily led astray.
There is a lot about the debate to be critical of, and its the bias was apparently so obvious, ultimately its all backfiring. But a sensationalist report of "whistleblower" and "a secret affidavit"... do these help the public absorb the reality and the bias, or is it just a disinfo bomb injected in order to a) exploit the moment or b) divert people's attention and further discredit ACTUAL information and ACTUAL critical thinking?
If I'm wrong, that's fine. Such a whistleblower and affidavit would be devastating.
But if I'm right, then all frogs should really think about HOW information warfare is played out. As always, there as scum willing to self-benefit from the conflict. And as always, there are bad actors seeking to undermine the truth, because actual critical thinking and discernment are the enemy of lies, and it is these that the enemy seeks to undermine. And one way is to inject fake and false narratives that play to one sides biases, but which ultimately undermine the aforementioned critical thinking and discernment.
David Muir and Don Lemon are sorority sisters. ~{°¡°}~
Trump's calling for all of them to be fired
This would be literal election interference. Would love to see their broadcast licence get revoked if they did this.
I thought you meant if a candidate called for the firing of reporters it would be election interference.
I'm with pjmedia. Healthy does of skepticism until proven true.
I know, right? Why do all these posts start with "Soon, I will be release...". Seriously, that just puts a target on their back for the Deep State. I mean, how many times have we had hard evidence just about to be released, and suddenly it disappears? Do you remember Mike Lindell's election fraud data that was hacked, and then he couldn't release it? Or when there was that guy who found CSAM on Hunter Biden's laptop and was going to send it all to law enforcement all over the country? They always announce this stuff and hype it up, just so that they can be stopped. Seriously, we the people need to say enough is enough. If you have the evidence, release now.
I think many of them do it quite simply for attention and web traffic to their site that might earn them money. They're usually just blowing hot air. I know that's a pretty cynical opinion, but I think it's true.
They know people will forget about it after a few days, but they'll still have the impression that something big happened. I think it gives people a distorted view of where things really stand in the country/world. We just keep bouncing from one "I'm about to..." to another without ever following up on them.
It would be interesting to see if anyone has ever bothered to keep track of all these "I'm going to release the biggest secret/scandal/whatever very soon!!!" promises just to see how many of them actually came through with what they claimed.
I'm trying to think of one that ever came through that might have an impact on what normies believe, and I honestly can't think of a single one.
The ones I can think of where they actually produced anything were all duds that didn't do anything other than convince people who already believed in Q's plans. Like Mike Lindell's cyber emporium or whatever that was, and those trumpet playing brothers who petitioned the Supreme Court (for what exactly, I can't remember) but the SC didn't review their case, or when Musk bought Twitter and was going to release their stored data of people involved in scandals, or the McAffee thing where info was supposed to be released after his death, or all the stuff related to the investigation into Epstein and Maxwell or those undercover Planned Parenthood videos.
I mean, really, can anyone think of one of these "I'm about to reveal something huge!!" claims where you showed it to normies and it actually changed their opinion on anything?
Not to refute your point that it's mostly hot air, which I agree with, but Elon Musk did at least release some info like he said he would. Names were named but obviously not much came of it - same story with Project Veritas / OMG: They release the receipts & names but nothing really happens other than the whistleblower being fired. The McAfee thing was only ever a hoax that belongs in the same category as Ingersoll Lockwood, quantum grammar, flat earth: psyop / hoax. I think a lot of the frustrations & cynicism on this forum come from false hope & false expectations resulting from a lack of discernment. We see it all the time, how extremely ludicrous ideas are promoted on here (mass arrests already finished etc) which we have no proof for, it's all wishful thinking and speculation.
James O Keefe is about the ONLY one who I've ever seen post (in a few days) actually come to light and bring 80% of the sauce he teased originally.
Me too but please Lord we sure could use your mercy! This would be so wonderful, right now I can’t think of a better gift !
So am I.
I mean, didn't Donna Brazile get caught in 2016 on behalf of Hillary.
Nobody gave a fuck. Why are they going to now?
Kamala Harris could probably walk in there and kill someone and the democrats would still blindly vote for that fucking moron.
And she's still an idiot.
.... is the correct answer
If Harris is wearing fake earrings that are earbuds and persons unknown to the public is speaking to her, would that be election fraud or interference. Could a lawsuit or criminal charges be brought and that discovery request and tape confessions from her team be heard. Asking for my 10 year old parrot
My mother- in law's cats would like the answer to that, as well.
And by "persons unknown to the public is speaking to her", you mean Obama. - speaking for Dave
THAT BITCH! 🤬
This is Watergate level cheating.
For which side?
Nixon did nothing wrong.
doubt
Bring it!!
Sitting at the doctor office with husband.
Couple next to us reading a newspaper said look Trump said what they are doing in Germany with oil is all wrong.
Snarky old wife grunts and said what else is new.
Loudly I said to my husband what is wrong with people they have no common sense anymore and can't think for themselves.
This is the way.
SHAME them for being sheep.
I try.
Any update on this?
Donna Brazille gave questions to Hillary
After spending 15 minutes on this issue, I'll be seriously surprised if that whistle-blower or affidavit even makes the light of day.
Because I seriously doubt either the whistle-blower or the affidavit are real.
Even PJ Media author thinks so.
"That said, I'm skeptical. If such a whistleblower exists, the individual would likely speak with someone well-known with a reputation that people would trust or negotiate with a news network. Who is this X/Twitter user and why is he getting this scoop?"
I've seen the sauce X account before. Was not impressed.
If this turns out to be a scam, clickbait or disinfo from this account, it would serve us to really question why so many are so easily led astray.
There is a lot about the debate to be critical of, and its the bias was apparently so obvious, ultimately its all backfiring. But a sensationalist report of "whistleblower" and "a secret affidavit"... do these help the public absorb the reality and the bias, or is it just a disinfo bomb injected in order to a) exploit the moment or b) divert people's attention and further discredit ACTUAL information and ACTUAL critical thinking?
If I'm wrong, that's fine. Such a whistleblower and affidavit would be devastating.
But if I'm right, then all frogs should really think about HOW information warfare is played out. As always, there as scum willing to self-benefit from the conflict. And as always, there are bad actors seeking to undermine the truth, because actual critical thinking and discernment are the enemy of lies, and it is these that the enemy seeks to undermine. And one way is to inject fake and false narratives that play to one sides biases, but which ultimately undermine the aforementioned critical thinking and discernment.