It was not so much a debate, as it was a "show trial" to expose the blatant bias and lies of the media... PLUS, it has been shining a spotlight on all of those lies. Instead of fooling people, the lies are backfiring on the perpetual liars ever more severely as more and more people wake up.
I know a few of those people. One the one hand, they are very smart, but on the other, so dumb. Pride can be devastating to one's understanding of the world and their need for salvation.
And those who use the media for mindf%ck pitch to PRIDE and EGO in their target audiences, with their psyops.
We saw that in spades with "covid." "Oh, here's the SCIENCY SCIENCE for you to repeat and inflict on others--and that makes you SMARTER THAN THEM! That makes you BETTER! Now take a selfie with your vax card and your donut!"
This is the most basic PR/advertising/campaigning/psyop tool in the kit. Literally the Adversary.
Exactly! Came here to say this. I missed that brilliant way in which he comes in for the kill but it was a different plan this time. He wasn't aimed at taking down Karmala but ABC
Exposing the media and Disney. Since Disney is involved, and they are perceived as family friendly, this is preparing people for when they get exposed as child traffickers - then people will understand why they treated Trump so unfairly - it will look like a coverup.
If he destroyed Harris like he did Biden, they could swap her out for someone else. Probably Hillary or Obama. Even if it’s “against the rules”, exceptions could be made. Especially if Republicans allow it. The corporate media would say it’s not fair not to have a Democrat ticket on the ballot because of some technicality of a candidate being swapped out, and Republicans would allow it, saying they don’t want to win by default.
^^^This exactly. ABC “moderators” were more aggressive than Kamala, and Trump beat them down. Debate was Trump v ABC, Kamala house-of-cards is propped up by ABC/Disney. Kick out the base and the rest collapses.
"Clandestine
@WarClandestine
We are witnessing a fascinating post-debate shift.
The ABC “fact-checks” were not true, which has inversely drawn MORE attention to these topics, aka the Streisand Effect.
-Springfield
-Late term abortion
-Gun confiscation
Public discourse on X has thoroughly debunked ABC’s “fact-checks” and brought video receipts for every single Kamala lie. As time goes on, public perception is falling more in favor of Trump, thanks to the reach and influence of citizen journalists on X, and other social media, circulating the video evidence that disproves Kamala/ABC’s lies from the debate.
This not only proves Kamala and ABC lied, but it’s further confirmation that the MSM are in bed with the DNC, and once again proves Trump was right about the media being corrupt and out to get him. The more the media attack him with such blatant bias, the more it validates Trump’s entire narrative, and discredits the Dems for weaponizing the media against Trump. They just proved a “Deep State” exists, while the entire world was watching.
Initially, I did not think this debate would have much impact on public perception or change the calculus in November, but as I observe the public’s response on social media, I think this performance from ABC woke up more people than I projected.
Normally the moderators are more subtle with their bias, but ABC made it so obvious, that some of the remaining normies are starting to notice. Glitches in the matrix."
This is so true. The whole war is a battle for people's minds. We must end the brainwashing, but it only ends when people figure things out for themselves. They saw the whole slick, lying package during the debate. They need to figure out themselves that it is a slick, lying package.
I agree...but to step away from the Father Of Lies, they need a higher place to stand. The media have ALWAYS courted people's sense of PRIDE and EGO, becoming for them their ultimate truth. Their idol. Their god.
Perhaps that's why he didn't crush her. If he would have crushed her it wouldn't have mattered that they cheated. But since he kept it close it had the appearance of mattering. He could have crushed her. He does rallies all the time. Those talking points roll out of his mouth with no effort. Took more effort to slow roll. IMHO
I contend that they were ready for Trump to come out aggressively and offensively. Instead he came out cool. He listened to the lady. He answered every concern, and even got fired up when she lied. He showed deference, care, and humanity. They had zero ammo to smear him afterward. We know how well this played for him, since we are hearing the WW3 drumbeat now (permission for Ukraine to strike Russia with our weapons). After Trump beat Biden in a debate, we had the assassination attempt. Telltale signs. Stable genius.
Where are the clips of her “baiting” him? They keep saying it, like a scripted talking point, but no clips? If it was true, the clips would be everywhere. But they can’t show the clips because they won’t match what they claim. It’s better for them to repeat it over and over and over again and try to reshape everyone’s memory of the debate. As soon as they show a clip, it will undermine that effort. The clip will make Trump look good. It will show him making a forceful point.
Compare that to the Biden debate. There were clips galore. And the clips made him look bad.
That’s how you know it’s gaslighting. They want to shape your perception, but without any backing evidence of what you are meant to perceive.
Where are the clips of her “baiting” him? They keep saying it, like a scripted talking point, but no clips? If it was true, the clips would be everywhere. But they can’t show the clips because they won’t match what they claim. It’s better for them to repeat it over and over and over again and try to reshape everyone’s memory of the debate. As soon as they show a clip, it will undermine that effort. The clip will make Trump look good. It will show him making a forceful point.
Compare that to the Biden debate. There were clips galore. And the clips made him look bad.
That’s how you know it’s gaslighting. They want to shape your perception, but without any backing evidence of what you are meant to perceive.
You cannot tell the people the truth, you must show them!
It was not so much a debate, as it was a "show trial" to expose the blatant bias and lies of the media... PLUS, it has been shining a spotlight on all of those lies. Instead of fooling people, the lies are backfiring on the perpetual liars ever more severely as more and more people wake up.
I know a few of those people. One the one hand, they are very smart, but on the other, so dumb. Pride can be devastating to one's understanding of the world and their need for salvation.
And those who use the media for mindf%ck pitch to PRIDE and EGO in their target audiences, with their psyops.
We saw that in spades with "covid." "Oh, here's the SCIENCY SCIENCE for you to repeat and inflict on others--and that makes you SMARTER THAN THEM! That makes you BETTER! Now take a selfie with your vax card and your donut!"
This is the most basic PR/advertising/campaigning/psyop tool in the kit. Literally the Adversary.
I quote this often. That and “It’s a movie!”
I guess this is why Trump didn't go in for the kill.
The purpose of this debate being to expose the media.
Exactly! Came here to say this. I missed that brilliant way in which he comes in for the kill but it was a different plan this time. He wasn't aimed at taking down Karmala but ABC
Why would you say that objective is more important? Genuine question.
Exposing the media and Disney. Since Disney is involved, and they are perceived as family friendly, this is preparing people for when they get exposed as child traffickers - then people will understand why they treated Trump so unfairly - it will look like a coverup.
Gotcha thank you
I think Disney has been revealed. Just check the clearance rack in the children sections. Everything disney hangs there.
I would argue this is one more nail in their coffin. But I know people who still think a trip to Disney world is worth the price of admission.
If what I suggested is indeed the case, then maybe it's because they have other (slam dunk) plans for Karmala.
If he destroyed Harris like he did Biden, they could swap her out for someone else. Probably Hillary or Obama. Even if it’s “against the rules”, exceptions could be made. Especially if Republicans allow it. The corporate media would say it’s not fair not to have a Democrat ticket on the ballot because of some technicality of a candidate being swapped out, and Republicans would allow it, saying they don’t want to win by default.
Oh both. Pretty much confirmed that kamala will lie about everything without a qualm. No moral compass whatsoever.
^^^This exactly. ABC “moderators” were more aggressive than Kamala, and Trump beat them down. Debate was Trump v ABC, Kamala house-of-cards is propped up by ABC/Disney. Kick out the base and the rest collapses.
Two birds, one stone.
Taking down the ABC = taking down Karamela.
DJT's situational awareness is a sight to behold. Give them the rope, and just watch her tighten the loop
It really is!
I guess it's the whole white hat team and their 5D chess.
Yep, its not about winning the election. Its about Great Awakening. The rest follows easily.
"Clandestine @WarClandestine We are witnessing a fascinating post-debate shift.
The ABC “fact-checks” were not true, which has inversely drawn MORE attention to these topics, aka the Streisand Effect.
-Springfield -Late term abortion -Gun confiscation
Public discourse on X has thoroughly debunked ABC’s “fact-checks” and brought video receipts for every single Kamala lie. As time goes on, public perception is falling more in favor of Trump, thanks to the reach and influence of citizen journalists on X, and other social media, circulating the video evidence that disproves Kamala/ABC’s lies from the debate.
This not only proves Kamala and ABC lied, but it’s further confirmation that the MSM are in bed with the DNC, and once again proves Trump was right about the media being corrupt and out to get him. The more the media attack him with such blatant bias, the more it validates Trump’s entire narrative, and discredits the Dems for weaponizing the media against Trump. They just proved a “Deep State” exists, while the entire world was watching.
Initially, I did not think this debate would have much impact on public perception or change the calculus in November, but as I observe the public’s response on social media, I think this performance from ABC woke up more people than I projected.
Normally the moderators are more subtle with their bias, but ABC made it so obvious, that some of the remaining normies are starting to notice. Glitches in the matrix."
Showing how corrupt the media is the win.
Just getting started
This is so true. The whole war is a battle for people's minds. We must end the brainwashing, but it only ends when people figure things out for themselves. They saw the whole slick, lying package during the debate. They need to figure out themselves that it is a slick, lying package.
I agree...but to step away from the Father Of Lies, they need a higher place to stand. The media have ALWAYS courted people's sense of PRIDE and EGO, becoming for them their ultimate truth. Their idol. Their god.
So it's also a battle for their souls.
So true.
Excellently stated.
I argued with two of my conservative friends all day yesterday who said Trump lost the debate and Obamala is going to win the election.
Most people dont know what the full goal of all this is.
Arrests? Winning election? Sure, but thats not the full goal. That by themselves does nothing. Great Awakening is the reward for all this patience.
Amen.
Perhaps that's why he didn't crush her. If he would have crushed her it wouldn't have mattered that they cheated. But since he kept it close it had the appearance of mattering. He could have crushed her. He does rallies all the time. Those talking points roll out of his mouth with no effort. Took more effort to slow roll. IMHO
I contend that they were ready for Trump to come out aggressively and offensively. Instead he came out cool. He listened to the lady. He answered every concern, and even got fired up when she lied. He showed deference, care, and humanity. They had zero ammo to smear him afterward. We know how well this played for him, since we are hearing the WW3 drumbeat now (permission for Ukraine to strike Russia with our weapons). After Trump beat Biden in a debate, we had the assassination attempt. Telltale signs. Stable genius.
Where are the clips of her “baiting” him? They keep saying it, like a scripted talking point, but no clips? If it was true, the clips would be everywhere. But they can’t show the clips because they won’t match what they claim. It’s better for them to repeat it over and over and over again and try to reshape everyone’s memory of the debate. As soon as they show a clip, it will undermine that effort. The clip will make Trump look good. It will show him making a forceful point.
Compare that to the Biden debate. There were clips galore. And the clips made him look bad.
That’s how you know it’s gaslighting. They want to shape your perception, but without any backing evidence of what you are meant to perceive.
Where are the clips of her “baiting” him? They keep saying it, like a scripted talking point, but no clips? If it was true, the clips would be everywhere. But they can’t show the clips because they won’t match what they claim. It’s better for them to repeat it over and over and over again and try to reshape everyone’s memory of the debate. As soon as they show a clip, it will undermine that effort. The clip will make Trump look good. It will show him making a forceful point.
Compare that to the Biden debate. There were clips galore. And the clips made him look bad.
That’s how you know it’s gaslighting. They want to shape your perception, but without any backing evidence of what you are meant to perceive.
I think it was a set up to expose and reveal them!
The art of war.
In case you missed it, this is a good source for this conversation: https://rumble.com/v5eqwai-will-ferrell-john-c.-reilly-boats-and-hoes.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp